Tag Archives: Conspiracies

The CIA’s Presidents

Some presidents backed up CIA pretty good and some of them tried to tell the Truth and got bullet to the head…

The CIA’s Presidents

Any unmasking of the shadow forces that pull the strings that often determine events requires a time frame context. Historical study can go back to antiquity for classic examples of surreptitious intrigue, but in an age of distorted and diachronic mind control, the creation of the CIA by President Truman was our modern day and literal water shed monument. Coming out of the Office of Strategic Services, the brainchild of Wild Bill Donovan developed into the playpen of Allen Dulles.

The OSS origins on their face are clandestine by nature. Spooks and spies might be a trendy name for a board game, but when the pieces on the squares are pushed in direction of liquidation and oblivion, the uninitiated are truly the uneducated, for not grasping their significance. Being one of those pieces requires the responsibility of every citizen to wake up out of their lethargy.

Research material is so extensive that penning another account on the hidden secrets behind the throne may just confuse the public even more. One needs to take off the blinders and face the consequences of the big picture. Presidents have seldom been autonomous leaders. Those who demonstrated independence, integrity and courage were either marginalized and banished from positions of influence or killed.

The CIA is not just a standalone organization. The “Agency” is more of a euphemism than a society of black bag hit squads. The underlying ethos that underpins the operations and missions of the “Intelligence Community” has a distinct purpose. Never let an administration, much less a President, gain the actual power to rule the country or the global empire.

Until people accept and admit that the “SYSTEM’ is the ultimate crime syndicate, no one can liberate their minds or their circumstances.

Few remember the black and white culture that existed in the United States forty years ago. John Chuckman writes in the Foreign Policy Journal, The CIA and America’s Presidents.

“The 1975 Church Senate Committee looking into earlier illegality came into being because a number of sources were suggesting the CIA had been engaged in assassination and other dark practices, matters which at that time quite upset the general public and some decent politicians.”

Two things are totally different all these years later. Only a grub living under a rock would be shocked by reports that the government continues a policy of “dark practices”. But they would be genuinely surprised if someone could find and prove there is a single descent politician.

Examine the record. George H. W. Bush, was a CIA director, his successor William Jefferson Clinton was a CIA asset during his years avoiding his Rhode Scholar classes, George W. Bush another Skull and Bones diabolist followed in the family’s footsteps and who could forget the current POTUS, Barack Hussein Obama II the son of a CIA recruit and a 3D printed prototype of a mystery man with a false identity. The manufactured indoctrination of these anointed commanders in chief is the true definition of “The Good Shepherd” movie account.

The Great Man theory of history has been relegated to the most efficient synthesis organization that is based upon the official version of elitism “Political Correctness”.

Presidents must surrender their contrary visions, objections and actions against the established order. However, that power embodied by the supra elites, requires a silhouette caricature of subversion as their instrument of coercion, while bearing the focal image of blame.

No balanced observance of sincere national interest would dispute that the function of gathering information and analysis of its significance is out of bounds in a civilized society. The bounds, extent and intrusive methods are fair game for debate; however, the need to know is valid.

Deciding who should have access to that information is a core concern. When Hillary Clinton is allowed to violate even the most rudimentary security practices, one has to wonder why she is so special to get away with her treason.

In the book, Compromised: Clinton, Bush and the CIA by Terry Reed, critic John Cummings looks at the definitive book on the Mena connection that bonds the Clinton’s and the Bush’s with their CIA overseers. A short video that interviews a Former C I A Agent Chip Tatum On George H W Bush Bill Clinton’s Cocaine Smuggling Connect, provides first hand testimony.

The point of going over a decades old record that was a bomb shell at the time, but never gaining the critical political mass support within the government is that nothing has really changed in all these passing years.

Looking at this experience from the vantage of a conspiracy perspective misses the very essence of how power is imposed on the planet. The question is not does the CIA control American Presidents, but the proper perspective is to embrace has the psychopathic globalist implement their sociopathic system of command and control on humanity, using organizations like the CIA to foster the sinister strategy of enslavement that every President promotes.

Taylor Caldwell’s master work in her book, Captains and the Kings, is not just the story of an American Dynasty; it is a template of the way the world actually operates.

The forbidden reality that is suppressed is that any President may order men and women to their deaths for trivial jingoistic reasons, but none of these fearless leaders can tame the hidden cabals that keep the Nefarious Warrior Organism growing and destroying humanity. The NWO is served by intelligence organizations, even when they jockey with their foreign counterparts for a perceived advantage.

The CIA conducts their cloak-and-dagger wars in plain sight. If U.S. Dollars cannot buy loyalty, a hellfire strike from a drone will kill you. Such a foreign interventionism is not a beneficial policy protecting our country.

Managing the poppy field in Afghanistan to keep the opium trade profitable is far more important to the boys from Yale, than defending our own borders from the mujahideen terrorists, who were trained and taught many tricks of the trade under the tutelage of Agency contract mercenaries.

Eating one’s own is not taboo when the political powers on high deem a sacrifice is needed. Former Director David Petraeus is no General George S. Patton, but he was thrown under the bus quicker than in a New York minute.

The irony that the former NY Senator, Hillary Clinton can get another pass to her much more grave violations of security and law, only goes to prove that being the CIA top spy does not provide enough protection, when the ‘Arkancide” mafia family is threatened.

Now you know the substantial value of all those J. Edgar Hoover secret files when it comes down to the blackmail game.

Avid history buffs always ask the question. Who are behind and actually controls the puppets that are selected to win elections? This is no connivance experiment to out the most unlikable villain that a Hollywood CIA script writer can pen. No, the film industry has always been an integral part of a dream machine to spoof the public with subtle reminders of who is really in control.

The flick, ‘Spectre’ Is The Worst 007 Movie In 30 Years, reveals an important lesson.

“Pretty much everything Spectre has to offer amounts to something that a previous Bond movie did better. And that’s the trap of doing a Bond movie in the “generational nostalgia” sandbox. You end up replaying the best parts of other films and reminding audiences that prior 007 adventures did it better. The notion of 007 doing generational nostalgia is interesting and timely, but the end result is merely an example of it rather than a dissection or deconstruction.”

The message about replaying the best parts from other operations should not go unnoticed. How else can an immortal demonic enterprise continue their dissection and deconstruction of civilization?

There is no hero coming, who will mix shaken elixirs that will stir the public to go cold turkey and jump on the wagon of political sobriety. The CIA is meant to distract the television addicts to become and remain junkies of false reality propaganda. The “so called” threats of the last sixty plus years were necessary to divert the public away from the consolidation of power under NWO governance that is totally visible for everyone to see.

Another Bay of Pigs looms. This time it will be nuclear, and there in no JFK in the oval office. Nor will it take place in Cuba. Obama awaits the development of condos on the shores of Guantanamo Bay. CIA agents reserved their slot and are on the waiting list.

The synergistic and comingling of mutual interests drives the interdependency among different factions within the family structure of government mob enterprise. Ideological deviations are mostly for populace amusement.

When the professional assassin bureau engages in plausible deniability, they are really contracting out the assignment to an expendable fall guy. Can anyone shout out Oswald?

The figure head position of the most powerful person in the free world is less mighty than the corpse of E. Howard Hunt. Those magic bullets always hit the wrong victims.

>> Video

Source

Read more from Auricmedia:

[carousel-horizontal-posts-content-slider]

The world’s real puppetmasters

It’s a monstrous agenda behind our reality, which everyone must solve out by themselves. I have been done it since 2001.

>> Video

The Illuminati are portrayed by conspiracy theorists and Christian and Muslim Fundamentalists as the puppetmasters of the world. The world’s real puppetmasters are self-evident: they are the 80 individuals who own more wealth than half the world’s population. The 80 are the Archons of free-market capitalism, and are propped up by the vast capitalist infrastructure that exists solely to serve their private, selfish interests. They are mired in privilege, cronyism and nepotism. The governments and nation states of the world are fully in their service and never under any circumstances do they take any action against them.

This is the most unequal period in human history. By next year, 1% of the world’s population will own more wealth than the other 99%. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, asked, “Do we really want to live in a world where the 1% own more than the rest of us combined? The scale of global inequality is quite simply staggering and despite the issues shooting up the global agenda, the gap between the richest and the rest is widening fast.”

The wealth of the richest 80 doubled in cash terms between 2009 and 2014. Increasingly, wealth is inherited and used to finance lobbyists who are paid to further their wealthy clients’ own interests, and not those of the people … of private wealth, not the Commonwealth. All elected politicians are puppets of the Old World Order of dynastic wealth and power.

The true Bible of the Power Elite is Ayn Rand’s toxic Atlas Shrugged, her sickenening hymn to selfishness. Nearly all conspiracy theorists are fanatical Randroids, and they are absolutely right that we are their Nemesis. Our mission is to bring to a permanent end the anti-democratic and anti-meritocratic rule of the privileged, dynastic elites that run the world and create a false consciousness in the sheeple that blindly support them.

Conspiracy theories are used by the Elite to promote the agenda of unrestrained free-market capitalist globalism. Conspiracy theories are all about calling into question the inherent legitimacy of governments and nation states, so that they can be replaced by capitalist markets, wholly controlled by the rich Elite … by the 80.

The 80 are unelected and unaccountable to the people, and that’s exactly what Elitism – supported by legions of right-wing anarcho-capitalist libertarians and anti-Jacobin conspiracy theorists – is all about. The right wingers of the world are all about promoting private interest over the public interest, self-service over public service, selfishness over altruism, irrationalism over Reason, greed over need, narcissism over respect for others. Right wingers are on the psychopathic spectrum. They invariably love themselves and rail against anyone or any group that seeks to stand up to them and stop the hawk predators from feeding on the innocent, harmless doves.

“If it were necessary to give the briefest possible definition of imperialism, we should have to say that imperialism is the monopoly stage of capitalism.”
– Lenin

Capitalist Globalism – making the whole world dance to the Old World Order’s economic rule in perpetuity – is the supreme expression of imperialism. Capitalist Globalism is the One World Government that the rich Elite are implementing to ensure that they rule every corner of the globe.

“Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.”
– John Maynard Keynes

“Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it’s just the opposite.”
– John Kenneth Galbraith

“Capitalism is an organized system to guarantee that greed becomes the primary force of our economic system and allows the few at the top to get very wealthy and has the rest of us riding around thinking we can be that way, too – if we just work hard enough, sell enough Tupperware and Amway products, we can get a pink Cadillac.”
– Michael Moore

“Capitalism is against the things that we say we believe in – democracy, freedom of choice, fairness. It’s not about any of those things now. It’s about protecting the wealthy and legalizing greed.”
– Michael Moore

“The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn’t deliver the goods.”
– John Maynard Keynes

“The great nations have always acted like gangsters, and the small nations like prostitutes.”
– Stanley Kubrick

The biggest “nation” of all … the One World system of Global Capitalism, which rules everything … is the ultimate gangster, and all the rest of us are the prostitutes, begging for money from the Elite while they fuck us up the ass.

Just as Judaism, Christianity and Islam have always been terrorist religions – terrorising people with the threat of the wrath of “God” and eternal pain and suffering in hell – so free-market capitalism has never been anything other than gangsterism, where those with capital point a gun at the head of those without. It’s time to stop being the slaves of the Elite. It’s time for the people to rule.

“For all men being originally equal, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others for ever, and though himself might deserve some decent degree of honour of his contemporaries, yet his descendants might be far too unworthy to inherit them. One of the strongest natural proofs of the folly of the hereditary right in kings, is, that nature disapproves it, otherwise she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an ass for a lion.”
– Thomas Paine

“The aristocracy are not the farmers who work the land, and raise the produce, but are the mere consumers of the rent; and when compared with the active world are the drones, a seraglio of males, who neither collect the honey nor form the hive, but exist only for lazy enjoyment.”
– Thomas Paine

“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself, in all cases, as the ages and generation which preceded it. The vanity and presumptions of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies.”
– Thomas Paine

Inheritance is the precise mechanism by which the dead tyrannically rule over the living. When you’re dead, you’re dead. Your wealth does not live on to be inherited by nepotistic scroungers who did nothing to earn it. Inheritance is welfare for rich folk, and no decent person would ever accept it. Inheritance is how the rich control the poor and keep them in their “place”. It’s how the dead rule from beyond the grave. The dead have no legal rights and no stake in the world of the living. Post mortem transfers of wealth, power and influence must be made illegal via Pro Life legislation, i.e. legislation designed to ensure that corpses cannot dictate the future of the human race via selectively handing on decisive financial advantage to the chosen few (the “Chosen People”).

The mission of the rich elites is to set up their families to rule over the rest of us in perpetuity. They call for zero percent inheritance tax, and inheritance is of course the means by which they transmit overwhelming advantage across the generations, how they rig the system, and how they establish the all-powerful cartel from which all the rest of us are excluded if we are fools and cowards enough to go along with it. What is the antidote to dynastic rule, and what is it that the rich elites hate and fear more than anything else? … it’s one hundred percent inheritance tax. Anyone who opposes this tax – the tax that ensures that no dynasty can rule the world via inherited wealth (parasitical wealth, unearned by the deadbeats and dead heads who pathetically grab it because they are incapable of standing on their own two feet and earning their own money by their own sweat and effort) – opposes human progress and freedom. Anyone who resists total inheritance tax supports anti-meritocracy and the dynastic rule of rich elites. We note that all the cretinous conspiracy theorists rage against inheritance tax, and call it “communism” – exactly as required by their rich puppetmasters. Here’s the simple truth of the world:

1) Thesis: Free-market Capitalism … unequal opportunities and unequal outcomes.

2) Antithesis: Communism … equal opportunities and equal outcomes.

3) Synthesis: Meritocracy … equal opportunities and unequal outcomes.

Meritocracy is about the smartest, most talented people … from any background, no matter how humble or disadvantaged … getting to the top so that the rest of us can benefit from their expertise, intelligence and merit. It’s not a question of a rising tide of money raising all boats, but of a rising tide of intelligence and talent.

The proper function of the State is to optimise itself through optimising each and every one of its citizens. It has to maximise the potential of everyone, from any background. The optimal State is the one governed by its smartest and most meritorious citizens – Plato’s Philosopher Kings, who are not allowed to accumulate any private wealth and must be devoted entirely to the public good, the opposite of today’s rulers of the world.

Every person must be allowed to go as far as their talents take them, and that means they must not be up against a rigged system of privilege, cronyism and nepotism, designed to favour the children of the Elite and to obstruct the progress of everyone else.

Free-market capitalism exists to free the capitalists and enslave everyone else. Aren’t you sick of being a slave? Then do something about it. Get off your fucking ass.

No Taxation Without Representation

The American rebels against British imperial tyranny rightly demanded representation in Parliament. Nowadays, you routinely find American “patriots” demanding the end of government, and its replacement by the market. So, here’s a question for all the “patriots” … given that the markets are run by and for global banks, global corporations, and the global super rich, in what way are the markets accountable to the people? Can we vote the “market” or its controllers out of office? Can we fire any of the big market makers and players? Are we represented on the boards of any of the big market makers and players? Do the ordinary people have any say at all over the market? And, if they don’t, isn’t that tyranny? The market is tyranny without a face, or the face of the rich carefully hidden behind a faceless abstraction so that we can’t see the tyrant stamping on our face

The Divine Conspiracy

What is the Armageddon Conspiracy? It’s the Plot to Kill “God” … the Abrahamic Torture God, the Abrahamic Terrorist God … The Devil God who orders fathers to murder their own children as a test of slavish, blind obedience.

Illuminati Coded Fiction

“The Armageddon Conspiracy” by Mike Hockney – the ancient Solomonic plot to kill the Abrahamic God, brought into the twenty-first century.

“The Millionaires’ Death Club” by Mike Hockney – no one is safe from the world’s smartest, most glamorous, most stylish elite who will go to any lengths, even murder, to have their “fun”.

“Prohibition A” by Mike Hockney – Dante’s nine circles of hell are transported to Manhattan for the ultimate game of life and death.

“The Last Bling King” by Mike Hockney – the plot of the elite to own the whole world in perpetuity, and the ingenious counterplot to overthrow them.

You are the change in the world. If you don’t change, the world won’t change.

It’s time to undergo your appointed metamorphosis … from grub to hero, from worm to God.
Change is the basis of everything, and the thing most in need of change isn’t the world but always yourself. When you change, you will see the world with brand new eyes, you will see that all things are possible, and you will see a thousand new beginnings.
Step up your game, motherfuckers. Bring your “A” game or don’t bother showing up. Who wants the second best, the second rate, the half-hearted, the mediocre?
The Movement wants only the achievers, the talented, those who can make things happen rather than just talking about it or moaning about it.

The Most Forsaken Place in the Universe

In Dante’s vision of hell, a vestibule stands between the gates of hell and the river Acheron (the river of woe) where Charon the Boatman ferries the damned across the fast-moving river of pitch-black water to the First Circle of Hell, Hell proper.

As they pass through the vestibule, the souls of the damned encounter a strange sight – the Lost Souls. While the damned don’t linger in the vestibule for long – they’re just passing through – the group of Lost Souls is trapped there … forever! These are the souls rejected by both heaven and hell. Heaven shut its gates to them, and hell doesn’t want them, so they have nowhere to go. They have no home. They are lost in No Man’s Land.

What did they do to suffer this fate? These were the souls that refused to support one side or the other in life – they were the neutrals, the uncommitted, those who lived for themselves, those who joined no cause except their own. They did not choose either good or evil but lived their lives without making any conscious moral choices whatsoever. They were cynical and skeptical, always calculating their personal advantage.

In Christian mythology, when Lucifer’s angels rebelled against God, and Michael the Archangel led the loyal angels against them, many angels remained neutral, standing on the sidelines, waiting to see who would win. When God cast down the rebel angels into hell, he made sure he cast down these neutrals too, but they were no more wanted by Satan than by God, so they remained permanently on the near side of hell’s river, banned from ever crossing, and equally banned from ever leaving.

Such is the destiny of those who refuse to choose a cause, who refuse to commit, refuse to follow a banner. They are called the Ignavi, and they are the most pathetic and ignoble of all creatures. They are the Last Men, the opposite of the Supermen. They are the feeble, laughable creatures that remain when heaven and hell have received all of the souls they are willing to take.

The Ignavi are the selfish, the self-obsessed, always looking for their own benefit, and never willing to choose a side, never willing to fight, to risk themselves, to make any sacrifices. Their calculation is always the same: let others fight it out and then see how the land lies at the end when the smoke clears. See what opportunities there are to gain profit for themselves … you know, like free-market capitalists. They are the cowardly “neutrals” who refuse to side with any cause until it’s obvious who’s winning (i.e. they have no ideological commitment and would support whoever won, thus maximizing their self-interest). Most of humanity belong to the Ignavi, not to the Damned or the Saved. Neither God nor the Devil has anything but contempt for them.

The fate of the Ignavi is a terrible one. They are condemned to run naked forever behind a blank banner (the flag of all those with no cause except themselves), fluttering one way and then another (i.e. never settling into a definite position reflecting a definite cause), and which they can never catch (just as they could never catch a cause in life).

As they chase the flag, they are ceaselessly stung by hornets and wasps. With each sting, blood and putrid matter leak from them, feeding the writhing mass of worms and maggots that they are forced to run across. In life, they refused to be stung by any cause, and now they are stung without end. The worms write bloody, insulting messages in the soil in an unknown script.

The Ignavi’s cries of woe are unremitting. The air is continually rent with their shrieks, shouts, screams, and lamentations. Their torment has no end.

“This miserable state [Dante is informed by his guide Virgil] is endured by the dreary souls of those who lived without blame and without praise. They are mixed with the cowardly choir of angels who were not rebellious, nor were loyal to God, but were for themselves. Heaven drove them forth to keep its splendour from being sullied; and the depths of hell receives them not, for the wicked would thus have some glory over them…The world allows no report of them to exist. Mercy and justice disdain them. Do not speak of them, but look and pass on.”

“I looked and saw a whirling banner that went by so quickly that it seemed it would never pause; and behind it came so long a train of people that I should never have believed death had undone so many … These wretches, who were never truly alive, were naked and viciously stung by wasps and hornets that made their faces stream with blood, which, mixed with their tears, dripped to their feet, and disgusting maggots collected in the pus.” – Dante

Well, will Heaven and Hell alike deny you entry? What is your sacred cause? What moral decisions have you taken? How have you ever served anyone or anything other than yourself? Are you fated to reside in the Ante-Inferno for all time? This barren, hopeless place is within the perimeter of hell, yet not truly part of it. It’s Neverland.

Being pious, Dante tells us, is more than a matter of simply not sinning. Unlike the non-committal souls, you must actively practise virtue and side with the righteous. You have to be on the right side, not the wrong one, and not in the neutral, agnostic middle. You must make a leap. You must choose and commit.

The Great Refusal

“I hate journalists. There is nothing in them but tittering jeering emptiness. They have all made what Dante calls the Great Refusal. The shallowest people on the ridge of the earth.” – W.B. Yeats

Are you one of the great refusers, one of the cynical, sneering trolls – the utterly empty, blank, pointless people who have nothing constructive to offer the world?

The Falsehood

“That which has always been accepted by everyone, everywhere, is almost certain to be false.” – Paul Valery

The Blank Banner

Are you a follower of the blank banner of the Ignavi, the most pathetic flag there can possibly be? The blank banner is for all empty, non-committal souls. It’s for those who backed no clear side, supported no clear leader, and simply ran back and forth with no direction, other than their own comfort and advantage. There is nothing worse and more dismal than to be a follower of this banner.
If you have chosen no sacred cause in life, if you haven’t chosen sides, the blank banner is YOUR banner.

Since they were neither good nor evil, the Ignavi have no place in the afterlife. They might as well never have existed. They were pointless people who made no impression. Is that you too?

Ante-hell, the vestibule of hell, is also called “Nowhere”. It’s the eternal home of the Ignavi, the most pathetic souls of all, the souls that ought never to have existed, those that made no choices in life, “who lived a life but lived it with no blame and no praise”. It includes those agnostics too self-absorbed to make choices, those who were neither hot nor cold on important matters. They neither believed nor disbelieved, neither knew nor didn’t know, neither blasphemed nor opposed the blasphemers, neither stood for free speech nor against it.

Now, they run about the hills of Ante-Hell forever, having no hope of dying to end their misery, doing nothing but chasing banners (causes) they will never catch.

You are not saved because you have done nothing wrong. You must do something right. You must choose. You must leap one way or another. You must commit.

The worst places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintained their neutrality, who sat on the face and refused to take part. Are you one of those who will dwell permanently on the edge of hell?

Life isn’t a spectator sport. You must be involved.

Source

Read more from Auricmedia:

[carousel-horizontal-posts-content-slider]

Shut Up Conspiracy Theorist

It’s time to clear the facts…

Shut Up Conspiracy Theorist

>> Video

We exist within extraordinary times. The proliferation of technology has ushered in an age of information and never before has humanity had the ability to gather information so easily, at least in the technologically advanced nations. Essentially, the knowledge of mankind lies at the fingertips of people in much of the world and curiously, a high percentage of people, especially in the west, instead utilize the tools available, not for self education or expansion of ones knowledge base, but as a means of distraction. I mean, really, why educate oneself when you can watch video clips of monkeys hurling feces at tourists? Why expand your knowledge base when you can upload to social networking sites, pictures of your kitty-cat or what you ate for lunch?

The internet is a linking of billions of minds; this technology has moved us forward and has brought the world closer. It has revolutionized the way we communicate, conduct business, gather information and connect with the world. It has also created a global platform for alternative media, which has been the bane of corporate, mainstream controlled, bought-and-paid-for media.

It seems as though whenever information is presented that conflicts with the official, consensus, mainstream version of events, it is immediately attacked and discounted as “conspiracy theory.” It’s amazing to me the way that words get thrown around and often times, their true meaning is lost to the ones using them. Etymology or the derivation of words, can teach us an awful lot. The word “conspiracy,” derives from the Latin word, conspirationem, which simply means: “agreement, union, unanimity.”

The modern dictionary definitions of the word conspiracy are:

1. The act of conspiring.
2. An evil, unlawful, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3. A combination of persons for a secret, unlawful or evil purpose.
4. Law: an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud or other wrongful act.
5. Any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

To simplify, the word “conspiracy” simply means: “to breathe together.” I’ve actually heard those among the I believe everything I’m told crowd, with such certainty; claim that there is no such thing as conspiracies. Obviously, when the etymology and definition is understood, that statement is seen for the ill-informed and absurd nonsense that it is. Two or more people plotting to rob a bank would be “conspiring” to do so.

The first use of the phrase “conspiracy theorist” apparently occurred in 1909; in an article published by the American Historical review.Later, in 1967, the CIA adopted the term in a psychological operation to discredit researchers and actual journalists whose findings deviated from the official claims, particularly, with those who were investigating the JFK assassination, and the ridiculous assertions and conclusions of the whitewash known as the Warren Commission Report.

In 1976, the New York Times acquired a CIA dispatch thorough the Freedom of Information Act, which outlined the CIA’s tactics to discredit those whose research and investigations conflicted with official propaganda. The document spells out the CIA’s tactics of psychological manipulation and disinformation. The dispatch outlines certain tactics:

Claim that it would be impossible that so many people would keep quiet about such a big conspiracy.
Claim that eyewitness testimony is unreliable [unless it is in line with the official version of events].
Accuse theorists of being wedded to and infatuated with their theories.
Accuse theorists of having financial interests in promoting conspiracy theories.

In part, the document reads:

To discuss the publicity problem with and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors) , pointing out that the [official investigation] made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.
To employ propaganda assets to and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories.

I’ve been on the receiving end of the label “conspiracy theorist” more times than I can count, and I would estimate that 99.9% of the time, the person using the term has not even bothered to look at any of my work or even engage in intelligent discussion regarding the particular topic at hand; they simply repeat the label as if by rote, and so few of them would ever bother to look at information that just may challenge what they think they know, or their TV educated mindset. They never seem to engage in any investigation of their own, apart from glancing at a “news” snippet or simply adopting the consensus view as their own. In fact, if I had a dollar for every time that label, or other such nonsense was thrown at me, without even considering what I was saying, I’d be writing this right now from my private yacht, off the coast of Maui!

Critical thinking has become all but extinct; it seems to have been bred out of most people, and the ones that question are at once considered “crazy conspiracy theorists,” often on knee jerk reaction with outright rejection of any information that contradicts their consensus mindset. Author Jack trout summed it up perfectly when he stated:

“The sane person constantly analyzes the world of reality and then changes what’s inside his or her head to fit the facts. That’s an awful lot of trouble for most people. Besides, how many people want to constantly change their opinions to fit the facts? It’s a whole lot easier to change the facts to fit your opinions. Unsane people make up their minds and they find the facts to ‘verify’ their opinions. Or even more commonly, they accept the opinion of the nearest ‘expert’ and then they don’t have to bother about the facts at all.”

After the attacks of September 11, 2001, the media, in a lockstep with the corporate apparatus that funds and controls it, engaged in massive smear campaigns against anyone who dared to question the official story. Now, I cannot pretend to know exactly what happened on that tragic day, but I can say emphatically, after investigating the event for years, that the official story is a steaming pile of crap from start to finish, filled with more holes than a Swiss cheese factory.

The laws of physics were somehow suspended on that day. Kerosene fuel burned over 1,000 degrees hotter than its maximum temperature and was somehow able to melt steel. Small, contained fires brought down a 47-story skyscraper that was not even hit by aircraft (building 7). The 200-ton, metal aircraft that allegedly hit the pentagon somehow disappeared upon impact and the public was told that it vaporized. The public was told that a passport of one of the hijackers somehow miraculously survived an explosion of fuel and metal, only to be found neatly amidst the rubble, intact! There are so many anomalies to the official story that it boggles the mind. Even more mind boggling, is the fact that when these events occur, droves of people buy into the official story and immediately adopt it into their beLIEf systems without question.

Here’s a great example of what I’m talking about:

At the time that the Obama administration announced that troops had killed Bin Laden (the CIA asset) I was working in the food service industry. Newspapers were sold there, and of course, when the govt. announced that they killed their former ally, the story was blasted all over mainstream media, on every front page and every news network. No evidence, photographic or otherwise was presented to the public, but of course, this didn’t matter. The “news” was broadcast on every TV network and printed in every major newspaper so it must be true.

I watched a man walk over to the newspaper rack, pick up a copy of the propaganda rag, and claim with glee: “we got em! We got the son of a bitch!” No investigation, no critical thought, hell, he didn’t even read the article! The front page headline was enough to convince him and this is exactly what I’m talking about.

I know osama’s dead because tv tells me so

I wonder if those who simply believe what they are told ever even consider where the information comes from. Do they ever ask who benefits by them believing the official story? Do they ever ask who owns the media, and whether or not those owners have a vested interest in the public believing what is presented to them? Alternative researchers are attacked all of the time, even if their information is credible and true; it wasn’t on CNN or Faux news so therefore, it must not be true or credible. Interestingly, alternative journalists, or “conspiracy nuts” have been very accurate as the passage of time and unfolding of events has shown.

media consolidationWhen one challenges the system or steps out of line, they are at once considered a threat. Swinging the sword of truth at mainstream lies does not exactly win you many friends. When the consensus trance is challenged, people are naturally resistant because their very identity is often built around what they’ve been conditioned to believe. Besides, so many seem to have real trouble entertaining the notion that they may have been wrong about something. The ego doesn’t like that idea very much! Those who question their reality, and what is presented as truth, and report their findings, are viewed as a threat, even if their information is true and valid; if it flies in the face of the mainstream consensus, it must be false, crazy, unfounded, “conspiracy theory.” No investigation required! A talking head in a five-thousand-dollar business suit, with a thousand-dollar haircut has slavishly repeated the official line, so who am I to question? Not thinking is just so much more hassle-free!

Fortunately, due to the efforts of some very brave researchers/presenters, film makers, real journalists, authors and the like, the tide is turning. People actually are beginning to shake off the spell that has been woven around their very consciousness and wake up to the fact that they have been sold lie upon lie and have willingly bought into them. Unfortunately though, there still does appear to be a rather high percentage of those whose minds are guided by the corporate apparatus, the mainstream media and the gatekeeper voice pieces that serve the spin machine.

Taking into consideration the actual meaning of the word conspiracy, and the etymology, the statement that “conspiracies don’t exist,” is simply absurd and nonsensical. Have you noticed that when the word conspiracy is used, it is so often followed by the word “theory?” That immediately discredits the information as per the CIA’s very succesful psy-op.

Was it not a “conspiracy” that hatched the plot to kill Caesar? Do corporate CEOs not “conspire” to figure out how to maximize profits? Don’t war profiteers “conspire” to sell unjustified wars to the masses to gain public approval? Whatever truly happened on 9/11, wouldn’t the perpetrators have had to “conspire” to pull that off? Crazy talk, crazy talk, tin-foil-hat-wearer, shut that person up! It’s making my cognitive dissonance hurt!

I sum it up like this:

“The greatest threat to the establishment today is the person who can think independently and maintains the ability to continuously scrutinize what they think they know. The challenger of conventional thought, the critical thinker, the man or woman of ideas is the enemy, the one who walks alone. She will not join, she will not conform; she will not waver. She has detached from the herd. The free thinker is perceived as the dangerous one. His ideas are a danger to the system, to his peers and to the rigid confines of ego- centered consciousness. He is a rebel in the truest sense. He/she is the sane amongst the unsane, the one whose guidance comes only from within. Think for yourself and watch the lie become dust beneath your feet!”

I’m not sure who came up with this phrase, but it’s perfect:

“I’ll call myself a conspiracy theorist if you call yourself a coincidence theorist.”

Source

Read more from Auricmedia:

[carousel-horizontal-posts-content-slider]

UFOs, Conspiracies, Government Black Ops

Now something about UFO’s, conspiracies and government black ops.

UFOs, Conspiracies, Government Black Ops – Full Documentary

UFOs, government black ops, and the ongoing conspiracy of secrecy that drains the world of treasure and sucks vital energy from the planet is explored with Dr. Sean David Morton. The distinction between technocrats and autocrats is illuminated, as the shadow government is explored. Spooky examinations at Area 51, hidden financial motivations behind 9/11, the Pleiadians and how Earth is a magnet school for the universe is discussed in an uncensored Buzzsaw, hosted by Sean Stone.GUEST BIO:
Dr. Sean David Morton attended Stanford University and received a Bachelor of Fine Arts and a Political Science degree, with minors in Organic Chemistry and Astronomy from the University of Southern California. He received his PhD. in clinical psychology, specializing in therapeutic counseling, from the International Institute of Alternative Medicine. He has also studied Astrology at the famed Exeter College at Oxford University.
Sean’s adventures at Area 51, his pioneering work in REMOTE VIEWING and his stunning predictions of the future brought him international recognition as the #1 guest on Coast to Coast AM where host ART BELL called him “America’s Prophet” and “My all time favorite guest!”
Sean is a multi-award winning independent filmmaker and has been a reporter/writer/producer/director for HARD COPY, SIGHTINGS, STRANGE UNIVERSE, UNSOLVED MYSTERIES, ANCIENT ALIENS, PARANORMAL BORDERLINE and has appeared on countless radio and TV shows.
He is the author of BLACK SERAPH and THE DARK PROPHET, spy thrillers about the inner workings of the Vatican and the Jesuits. His latest books, SANDS OF TIME Vol. I and II, the true memoir of a MAN IN BLACK, describes 40 years of the adventures of a top level director of the Shadow Government. He has authored over a dozen screenplays and is currently working on the funding for a film and media distribution company.

 

Read more from Auricmedia:

[carousel-horizontal-posts-content-slider]

Conspiracy Theorists by Jolly Roger

Have you been called a “Conspiracy theorist”? It’s just a tool to ridicule people who think with their own brains instead of just believing every rubbish story, that mainstream media tries to stuff down with their throats. Here’s a nice little article about this situation:

 Conspiracy Theorists

by Jolly Roger  slicingthroats@yahoo.com
1/08/2005

Everyone has heard, and has probably used the term “conspiracy theorist,” and the fact of the term being in common use, also indicates that we generally agree on what it means. I saw a movie by that name, and the title character was a raving lunatic who kept his food in thermoses with combination locks to reduce his chances of being poisoned by imaginary enemies.

Regardless of how the stupid movie turned out, what’s important here is the common perception people have of someone to whom that label is applied, and just as important, is who it is that applies the label. The common perception is that someone who is labeled a “conspiracy theorist” is suffering from some type of psychological disorder, and that label is usually applied to people by our government, and our news media. The next thing to consider, is that the label is applied to anyone who questions our government’s version of events in any matter. Doesn’t it logically follow that the media are teaching us to assume that anyone who questions the government is insane? When that label is applied to a person, doesn’t it become easy to dismiss everything they say without even hearing it? How convenient for them.

I think the label first became widely used to slander people who questioned the details surrounding the JFK assassination, and forty years later, there aren’t too many thinking people who still believe the Warren Commission’s “lone gunman” explanation. That explanation is doubted by everyone who has taken the time to look into the details, and believed only by people who refuse to.

Which is “theory” and which is fact? In the absence of a full confession, this can only be decided by a preponderance of evidence, and it would be silly to come to a conclusion on any matter without looking at all the evidence available. This is only common sense, just as it is safe to assume some degree of guilt or complicity on the part of anyone who lies about an event, or tries to hide, plant, or destroy any type of evidence.

Conspiracy theories arise from evidence. After the government releases an explanation of a particular event, a conspiracy theory is only born because evidence exists to disprove their explanation, or at least call it into question. There’s nothing insane about it, unless you define sanity as believing whatever the government tells you. In light of the fact that our government lies to us regularly, I would define believing everything they tell you as utter stupidity.

In July of 1996, flight 800 exploded over Long Island. Shortly after their terrorist explanation failed scrutiny, our government then explained the event by claiming that a faulty electrical system caused a spark that ignited a fuel tank, and the people who doubted this explanation were quickly labeled “conspiracy theorists.” More than a hundred witnesses saw a missile travel from the ground up to the plane just prior to its explosion, but rather than being treated as eyewitnesses to an event, they were labeled “conspiracy theorists,” which label allowed all subsequent investigation to ignore the strongest evidence in the matter.

Our “investigative” news agencies decided to accept and disseminate the official story, and they helped us forget the U.S. naval station nearby, the fact that missiles were regularly test fired there, and naturally, they paid no heed to more than a hundred “conspiracy theorists” who saw the plane get blown out of the sky by a missile. I believe that the U.S. Navy accidentally shot down flight 800, and that’s my belief because it’s the most sensible explanation that can be drawn from the available evidence. I’m not theorizing about conspiracies, but there are conflicting explanations of the event, and if the Navy did accidentally blow a passenger plane out of the sky, who would have a motive to lie about it? The U.S. government, or a hundred witnesses?

Then of course, there were the “crazy conspiracy theories” arising from the bombing of the Alfred Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City. In that matter, audio tapes and witnesses agree that there were two explosions, the first of which occurred inside the building between eight and ten seconds before the truck bomb exploded. Explosive experts agree that Timothy McVeigh’s fertilizer bomb could not have destroyed the building, and the FBI’s counter terrorism chief, and members of BATF lied about their whereabouts during and prior to the catastrophe. The evening news decided not to tell you any of this, and they will label anyone who tries to a “paranoid conspiracy theorist.” In light of the evidence, we would be complete fools if a conspiracy theory didn’t exist.

There were no conspiracy theories arising from the explosion of flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, and there were no conspiracy theories arising from the work of the uni-bomber, so the newly invented psycho-babble that tries to explain the malady of conspiracy theorists, also needs to explain why millions of conspiracy theorists all decided not to theorize about those events. There is no psychological malady. There was simply no evidence to indicate a conspiracy.

The real question is not why people theorize about conspiracies, but why people choose to believe the government’s version of events when it’s obvious that they’re lying. One reason is that most people never see the evidence because our “news” industry hides it, and another reason is that the same news industry will quickly associate anyone who questions the government with the people who see Elvis, Bigfoot, and UFO’s.

But sadly, I think the main reason people choose to believe the government’s version of events despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, is because it’s easier, and safer. If you ignore most of the evidence, and accept as plausible whatever ridiculous explanation the T.V. provides, your life remains simple, and you get to sit on your ass and watch more T.V. If on the other hand, you pluck your head from that same ass and realize you’ve been lied to, as a citizen in a democratic society, you’re instantly burdened with being responsible for doing something about it. Every citizen of the United States has a civic duty to participate in their government, and keep themselves informed of its actions, or government “of the people, by the people, and for the people” isn’t possible. You were warned that “eternal vigilance is the price of freedom, ” but you chose to ignore your government, and believe whatever they told you, and because of this, Americans have lost their freedom. Although presidents and senators are public servants, unlike the dog catcher and mailman, they wield a lot of power over people’s lives, and that’s why they have to be watched, and scrutinized.

Statistical analysts from UCLA and Rutgers University believe that John Kerry won the 2004 presidential election by an estimated 1.3 million votes, and despite the fact that these learned scholars are probably the most qualified people alive to forward such an opinion, our news madia dismisses this as “conspiracy theory.” George W. Bush lost the 2000 election, and he lost the 2004 election, but he’s occupying the White House, shredding our constitution, and stealing our wealth and freedom in a “war on terror” that’s as fraudulent as his presidency because many Americans are too stupid to see it, too lazy to do anything about it, or both.

I’m sorry if I sound angry, but the fact of the matter is that I am angry. While you were staring into the television like an idiot, our freedom, wealth, and constitutional protections have been stolen from us, and because you’re stupid enough to believe the manure being shoveled by our government, you’ve allowed them to commit bigger and more heinous crimes. Because you were too lazy to research their nonsensical economic policies, and see them for the scams that they are, we’ll all soon be living in poverty. And because you’re so lazy, apathetic, and easily lied to, millions have died for the profits of a few. I have every right to be angry, and only a fool wouldn’t be.

Only a small portion of my anger is reserved for the government of the United States, because they only did what can be expected of any government. They grabbed money, power and control where it was easy to do so. Most of my anger is directed toward my fellow American citizens, because they allowed it to happen by believing whatever they’re told, and not doing what’s expected of them. Patriotism in America does not mean waving the flag in blind loyalty to the government. As an American citizen, you have a civic duty to question your government, and hold them accountable for their actions, not use the flag as a blindfold. The American people have been duped once again, and it doesn’t seem like it’s a difficult thing to accomplish.

America’s latest “conspiracy nuts” are better known as the 9-11 truth movement. The news media are doing their usual job of slandering them with their usual childish name calling, but for more than three years, they have refused to show you the documented fact, scientific data, expert testimony, photographic evidence, or the credible eyewitness accounts that prove U.S. government complicity in the events of September, 11, 2001. If this were just a “crazy conspiracy theory,” I don’t think people in our government would have worked so hard to destroy, hide, and lie about the evidence. The White House tried to derail every investigation into the matter. If we had an honest government, we wouldn’t have conspiracy theories. We would have honest investigations, and fair trials, but these things are disappearing from America.

There are disturbing facts regarding the events of September 11 that every American needs to be aware of , but naturally, none of it will be on T.V. I’ve met a lot of people in the 9-11 truth movement, and I can assure you that none of them are crazy, paranoid, or even “conspiracy theorists.” One generalization I can make about them is that they all seem to be very intelligent. Maybe the smartest thing you could do would be to start listening to them. The Arabs don’t “hate your freedom.” The White House hates your freedom, because it’s the only thing that stands between them, and unlimited power. – Jolly Roger

“Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Freedom” – Thomas Jefferson

911truth.org 911review.org 911review.com physics911.org wtc7.net

Anything written by “Jolly Roger” is the property of the American Resistance Movement, and the author hereby grants permission to anyone who so desires to post, print, copy, or distribute this letter as they see fit, and in fact, the author encourages you to do so.

Source

Read more from Auricmedia:

[carousel-horizontal-posts-content-slider]

The Titanic Sinking – Rothschild and Rockefeller Conspiracy

Some interesting info about Titanic and how it all could have been staged like 911:

In October 1910, a group of seven men, all senior players in the Rothschild and Rockefeller financial dynasties, met in strict secrecy on a private island off the coast of Georgia, USA. Their brief was to create an organisation to usurp the power to create and print money, until then solely a function of the US government. This organisation was to be named ‘The Federal Reserve Bank’. This plan however, had several extremely powerful, high-profile opponents who stood in the way of these banker’s goals.

In the meantime, John Pierpoint (JP) Morgan, another American high-financier, involved in the Federal Reserve scheme, who also happened to own the British-based White Star shipping line, had commissioned a series of ‘super-liners’, the Olympic class, in an attempt to gain the lion’s share of the highly lucrative Atlantic-crossing market. The speculative investment involved in this project was immense.

However, in September 1911, before the second one of the planned three ‘sisters’, RMS Titanic had been completed, Morgan’s plans were dealt a massive financial blow when RMS Olympic, the first of the ‘sister’ ships off the production line was involved in a disastrous collision with a Royal Navy cruiser, HMS Hawke.

And so, the scene was set for one of the greatest deceptions ever perpetrated… in the 100th anniversary year, John presents information and evidence that seriously questions the official account in the history books.

DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #24

Audio letter No. 24

mp3 part 01

mp3 part 02

Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net

"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording.  Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

This recording is a product of AUDIO BOOKS INC., Box 16428, Ft.
Worth, Texas 76133.

   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter.  Today is May 28, 1977
and this is my monthly Audioletter No. 24.  This issue concludes
the second year of the Audio-letter.  But only if we are blessed
by a true miracle, will the third year ever be completed, because
as I speak to you today a tragedy has already been set in motion
that is beyond human comprehension.  Not since last July and
August, 1976 when the Soviet Union began planting underwater
bombs and missiles in our own territorial waters has the
situation been so grave and urgent as it is now.  For that reason
I will dispense with any further introduction today in order to
discuss these three topics: Topic #1--The Fall of Babylon
Revisited; Topic #2--The Handwriting On The Wall For America; and
Topic #3--WATER, THE ULTIMATE WEAPON.

Topic #1--We live today in a world that grows more complex and
more confusing with each passing day, but in spite of that we
Americans are fond of praising ourselves for the great man-made
wonders of our age.  And whenever the obvious dangers to our
continued existence as a nation prey on our minds, we are always
reminded that we, the great United States, have already survived
fully two centuries since our Republic was founded.  And scarcely
a day goes by that we are not reassured by our rulers, elected
and otherwise, that we are the mightiest nation on earth.  Our
technology, we are told day in and day out, is so wonderful that
it is impossible that any other nation on earth, especially the
poor, backward Soviet Union, might surpass us in any important
way.  In other words, we are technologically impregnable.  And
lest we become prematurely concerned over the impact of the
recent radical changes in our weather, certain news reports
recently have told incredible lies to the effect that the United
States has a two-year surplus of grains in our storage bins.  In
all of this, the behavior of the United States today is like that
of countless civilizations before us--just before they perished. 
And in some respects the greatest similarity of all is with that
of ancient Babylon just before its abrupt fall from power.  The
origins of the United States, unlike Babylon, were strongly moral
and spiritual in content, and the system of government set forth
in the United States Constitution, which freed men in a way
unparalleled in human history, was conceived by men who
understood man's place within God's creation.  This heritage
still lives today in the hearts of many Americans, but it's
rapidly being snuffed out under the bondage of rulers who are
superimposing the pattern of ancient Babylon on our beloved land. 
The Babylonian pattern is totally evil, and those who choose to
bow down to such Satanic rule thereby make themselves part of it. 
The origins of ancient Babylon are lost in the midst of time,
perhaps 5,000 years ago, but it reached its peak around 600 B.C.,
at which time it was undisputed as the most powerful empire the
world had ever seen.  The City of Babylon was the Rome of its
day, the most important trading center, the most powerful
military force, the greatest cultural influence, and even a
center of tourism because of its remarkable hanging gardens and
other man-made wonders.  The huge city of Babylon was surrounded
by city walls so high and so thick that they were impregnable by
any military technology of that day; and inside the city there
was a two-year supply of food, making any attempted siege against
Babylon unattractive.  And there was no lack of water either,
because no less than the mighty river Euphrates ran through the
city.  Yes, Babylon was powerful, wealthy, and so secure in
material terms that potential adversaries were hardly even taken
seriously.  Even when it became clear that the increasingly
powerful joint empire of the Medes and the Persians had designs
on Babylon, there was no real concern.  With all their means of
protection against invasion and their unrivaled prosperity, the
Babylonian attitude was simply "It couldn't happen here."  And so
when the Medo-Persian army of Cyrus and Darius laid siege to
Babylon, the only response of the ruler of Babylon was
debauchery, feasting, drunkenness, and mocking any real power
greater than himself.  At this point, we're told, the Babylonian
feast was interrupted by the appearance of a hand in midair
writing words on the wall that said Babylon's rule was at an end,
that its ruler had been weighed in the balances and found
wanting, and that the kingdom would be divided and given to the
Medes and Persians.  The handwriting on the wall said the
impossible was about to happen--Babylon, the impregnable city,
was about to fall--How could this be?  No one in Babylon had ever
had experience with invasion and so could not imagine such a
thing; and yet, within a few short hours, before the drunken
feast even ended, the impossible happened.  First, the water
level in the mighty Euphrates river, flowing through the middle
of Babylon, started dropping rapidly.  It dwindled to a trickle,
and soon stopped altogether.  Cyrus, the Persian, had worked out
of sight of Babylon and had diverted the Euphrates out of its
normal channel.  Now the great impregnable walls of Babylon were
left with huge openings--namely, the river bed no longer filled
with water, and in marched the Medo-Persian army, conquering
Babylon without resistance.  And today, the United States is
under siege by the Soviet Union with the cooperation from within
of quislings.  We are threatened by the joint Rockefeller/ Soviet
empire just as Babylon was besieged by the joint Medo-Persian
empire.  And now, as then, we are told there is nothing to worry
about, "It just couldn't happen here."  But, my friends, just as
happened in ancient Babylon, the handwriting is now on the wall
for America.  The America we know today is a perversion of the
pattern originally laid down for our beloved land, and America as
we know it is about to come to an end.  And as with ancient
Babylon, WATER is our Achilles heel and the means by which we are
to be reduced to surrender without a fight.

Topic #2--Not long ago the Carter administration's Ambassador to
the United Nations, Andy Young, made the remarkable statement
that: "Communism has never been a threat to me."  He also has a
habit of patting Cuba on the back for the so-called 'stabilizing
influence' of Cuban troops in Africa, and otherwise has
repeatedly shown a very amiable attitude toward World Communism. 
Many Americans have wondered why Andy Young is allowed to go on
saying such things without being restrained in any way by Jimmy
Carter.  But Carter has now answered that, in a major foreign
policy speech given at the University of Notre Dame on May 22,
1977.  This speech is as important as the famous Iron Curtain
Speech of Sir Winston Churchill a generation ago at Fulton,
Missouri.  White House aides stated that the Carter speech at
Notre Dame was specifically intended to "send some messages to
foreign governments"--and it did.  The foreign press is filled
with headlines about the major turn that has just been taken in
American foreign policy.  Yet, here at home, many Americans have
not grasped what has happened.  The most basic theme of that
Carter speech is an elaborate echo of Andy Young's statement,
that is: "We are no longer afraid of Communism."  Is this because
Communism is withering and dying?  One need only look at a map to
see how fast Communism is eating up the world.  What Jimmy Carter
is telling us and the world, is 'We can get along with
Communism'; and just to prove it, one of America's most
important, efficient intelligence operations to keep an eye on
Soviet naval movements and other important matters is being
closed down.  This intelligence unit, known as Task Force 157 and
run by the United States Navy, has a budget of well under 1/10 of
1% of that of the CIA, and yet it is being shut down--supposedly
for budgetary reason.  Meanwhile the signs of war to come are all
around us.  So great are the dangers facing us that military men
are speaking up in increasing numbers in an effort to warn
America before disaster arrives.  Since they are subject to
military law and subordinate to civilians who do not want them to
speak up, it's no small thing to speak out in this way.  So,
consider what Major General John K. Singlaub said in an interview
on May 19, 1977.  General Singlaub, the third-ranking U.S. Army
General in Korea said: "If we withdraw our ground forces on the
schedule suggested, it will lead to war."  And why did General
Singlaub speak up?  His answer was: "The question asked after
United States setbacks in Korea and Vietnam was: 'Did the
military people in the know express themselves loudly and clearly
enough that the decision-makers understood?'  We want to make
sure."  In speaking this way, General Singlaub was doing no more
than expressing the consensus of practically every knowledgeable
military man about the Korean situation.  For example, the same
Washington Post article that quoted General Singlaub also quoted
another headquarters Army officer in Korea as saying about the
Carter plan to withdraw our troops: "I don't know anybody who is
not staggered by it.  There's no military or strategic logic for
withdrawal."  The plan to withdraw from South Korea, in other
words, is strictly political--in line with the newly-announced
American foreign policy that it is no longer afraid of Communism. 
The reason General Singlaub's words had such an impact in this
country is that his name was attached to his warnings.  The words
I just quoted from the other anonymous Army Officer are just as
startling as what General Singlaub said.  But people will just
read those words once, frown, and then forget about it.  But
everyone knows about General Singlaub's warnings because,
deliberately or otherwise, he allowed himself to be identified as
the source of the warnings; and, for daring to warn us, he was
promptly relieved of his Korean command by Jimmy Carter.  The
situation in Korea illustrates the direction in which events are
now moving, but other events are due to occur long before the
pullout of our troops from South Korea.  The real threat to our
security is no longer in Korea or in Europe but right here in our
own backyard.

   Another military man who is actively trying to warn America is
Major General George Keegan, who retired at the beginning of this
year as Chief of Air Force Intelligence.  General Keegan is one
of the West's greatest intelligence analysts, and the story he
has to tell should be continuous headline news throughout our
nation.  General Keegan has been speaking on radio and television
talk shows, giving speeches, accepting interviews--in short,
using every channel open to him in an effort to wake up America
before it is too late.  One of his most comprehensive and
important speeches was the one delivered on March 11, 1977, at a
press conference sponsored by the American Security Council here
in Washington, D.C.  To find out in more detail what General
Keegan had to say, I would urge every American to obtain a copy
of that speech.  Write to the American Security Council, Boston,
Va., 22713 for information.  It was published as the April 1977
Washington Report of the American Security Council.

   We're frequently told by syndicated columnists that the CIA is
our first line of defense, but General Keegan said in his speech:
"The ultimate function of a nation's intelligence is to render
carefully assessed judgments and forecasts regarding the threat. 
When I look back upon my experience with this nation's highest
estimating body, I have the impression of having taken part in a
Charles Dickens novel.  The sense of make-believe and unreality
has to be experienced to be believed."  Further on he says: "The
intelligence estimators, heavily dominated by the CIA and the
State Department, have been wrong about Soviet purposes in
pursuing detente.  They have been shockingly deficient in their
estimates of the risks and the advantages to the United States
and the free world of the so-called technology exchange with the
Soviet Union."  And he adds: "If there has been a Watergate in
this country, and there has been, but ignored, it has been in the
monumentally incompetent judgmental processes of this government
regarding the nature, character, and growth of the Soviet threat
as it has evolved from year to year."  General Keegan goes on to
make crystal clear that the deficiencies in our intelligence
estimates are not due to any lack of our ability to collect
information or to analyze it technically.  The problem, instead,
has to do with what is done with that information.  To begin
with, the intelligence estimation process at the highest levels
in America today is not objective, but is manipulated to fit
political purposes.  In General Keegan's words, and I quote: "The
United States intelligence estimative process cannot be
understood unless it is first appreciated that national
intelligence estimates must perform three functions.  First, they
must support the decisions of the President, both for the record
of history and for the avoidance of impeachment.  Second, they
must substantiate or help to justify the decisions of the White
House 'Office of Management and Budget.'  Finally, the
intelligence estimates must, whatever other purpose they may
serve, rationalize the foreign security policy initiatives of the
Secretary of State."  Continuing, General Keegan says: "I
appreciate that those are extremely important allegations to
make, but I submit to you today that it is not possible to
understand the workings of the United States intelligence
community unless one is willing to open his mind to the influence
of those three factors."  This situation is illustrated vividly
by General Keegan's discussion of the controversy over the Soviet
Back-Fire Bomber.  As I've told you for many months, the
Supersonic Back-Fire is an inter-continental strategic bomber,
capable of striking the United States with nuclear weapons. 
General Keegan says: "The central issue all along has been
whether this bomber posed a threat to the United States.  The
Soviets argued that it did not, and the CIA and State Department
rather consistently accepted the Soviet point of view."  General
Keegan proceeded to acquire analysis of the Back-Fire's
capability from "the most competent analysts in the free world." 
The available intelligence information was provided to three
American aircraft companies with experience building strategic
bombers--plus, for good measure, the Royal Air Force and the
Royal Aircraft establishment in England--and the results: "every
single one of these organizations independently agreed that the
Back-Fire had an intercontinental capability.  Yet my word was
not good enough, nor was that of the American and British
heavy-bomber designers and builders.  CIA and State chose to
believe the Soviets."  General Keegan is not in a position to
express it this way, my friends, but his description of the
Back-Fire controversy illustrates what I've been trying to tell
you over the months--that the Rockefeller cartel has more faith
in the Soviet Union than in our own United States.  Finally,
General Keegan explains, the sheer weight of analysis made it
more and more apparent that the Back-Fire was truly
intercontinental: "however, CIA and State now judged that the
Soviet Union had no intention of using the Back-Fire as an
intercontinental bomber"--this in spite of the fact that the
second model of the Back-Fire has been given even greater range. 
The history of the Back-Fire controversy up to this point is very
disgraceful, and still generally unknown to the American people. 
But listen now to the final chapter in General Keegan's words,
and I quote: "Seemingly undaunted by the most extensive analysis
of a foreign bomber ever performed in the United States, the CIA,
in one final, super-secret, uncoordinated effort, proceeded over
a period of 18 months to undertake an analysis designed to prove
that the Back-Fire Bomber could not reach the United States. 
This effort, in which small bits and pieces of controlled
information were provided to McDonnell-Douglas Aircraft, designer
and builder of fighters, represents one of the most artful
contrivances I have ever observed.  It is one which I suspect may
have been designed to salvage a SALT accord.  Finally, when the
CIA surprised everyone by surfacing its new analysis, months of
painful and extensive analysis were required to show that the
books had been rigged.  Artificially high G-loadings had been
assigned to the design of the Back-Fire along with excessive
engine-drag and other factors which were designed to reduce
range."  And this, my friends, is how our so-called first line of
defense, the CIA, looks after America's national security to the
tune of over twenty billion dollars a year.

   Elsewhere in his talk General Keegan also spells out the
dangerous manner in which our military intelligence capabilities
have been progressively over-centralized, compartmentalized, and
taken over by civilians "who understand little about the horrors
of war--and these are people who understand even less about
military doctrine, strategy, and weapons."  The product of all
these trends described by General Keegan is the very intelligence
gap that I discussed with General George S. Brown, Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, when I met with him last September
(1976).  For years General Keegan has tried in vain to obtain a
series of post-mortem audits on the predictive and estimative
record of the United States intelligence community.  The audit
would be performed by qualified but disinterested outsiders with
no links to the intelligence community so that their work would
be unbiased.  Quoting General Keegan again: "Such audits would
record scrupulously where we had been wrong, where we had been
right, where we had fallen short of the mark or where we had
exaggerated.  Yet, every such suggestion had been met with
disdain and has been resisted in the most resounding vocal and
emotional way."  He might as well have asked for an honest audit
of Fort Knox.

   General Keegan's speech contains many more things than there
is time to discuss in this tape, and they're all important.  He
reveals many things about the military capabilities of both the
Soviet Union and the United States that you will never hear
through the usual news channels, but they all boil down to just
two major conclusions, backed up by many, many facts.  One
conclusion is that Soviet military capabilities vastly exceed
what we are being led to believe, both in terms of quantity and
quality.  The other conclusion is that the Soviet Union is firmly
convinced that a nation can fight a nuclear war and continue
afterward as a functioning society; and based on that conclusion
from a Soviet study undertaken after World War II, the Soviet
Union has for more than 20 years been preparing militarily to
fight and win a nuclear war.  The American approach, on the other
hand, is only to deter such a war, even though General Keegan
says: "I am unaware of a single definitive effort ever conducted
by the United States to determine precisely and in great detail
what it would take to deter."

   General Keegan also explains another very important
principle--it has to do with official judgments of the strategic
balance and carries over into public pronouncements by the
Pentagon.  This is the tacit rule requiring the use of so-called
'agreed national intelligence.'  Says General Keegan: "Agreed
national intelligence is derived by committee, contains little
that is controversial except in some footnote or dissent; and it
rarely contains meaningful reference to the dynamics of strategic
competition in terms of the new weapons, new forces, and new
capabilities being evolved by the Soviet Union."  Thus, whatever
new threats are involved, whether it be the awesome particle beam
weapon warned about by General Keegan or the Soviet underwater
missiles I've been warning about for nearly a year, Pentagon
disclaimers dare not be accepted at face value today without
challenge.  Those who accept these denials are playing straight
into the hands of our nation's deadliest enemies.

   Meanwhile the build-up toward the start of Nuclear War One is
gaining momentum.  Two months ago Nelson Rockefeller visited
Israel to help speed up the preparations for a Middle East war. 
By mid April, Israeli troops had begun massive maneuvers in the
Sinai with live ammunition, Reserves had been called up, and
Egyptian maneuvers were soon underway as well in the western
Sinai.  These maneuvers, headline news in Europe and Britain,
have gone unmentioned in the United States except for the crash
in the Sinai of a huge helicopter killing 56 Israeli soldiers. 
Then just a few days ago the extremists came to power by way of
the recent Israeli elections.  The Middle East is now a powder
keg as a result, and the Carter administration is rapidly
disengaging and disassociating itself from Israel.  So, when the
nuclear strike from the Sinai against Arab oil wells takes place,
it will not be recognized by the world or by most Americans for
what it really is.  Perhaps General Keegan was also right about
one other thing he said in his speech: "We have reached a point
in America where I believe we are almost incapable, culturally,
of being warned."  If so, my friends, it is we, the United States
of America, who will have been weighed in the balances and found
wanting, like ancient Babylon.

Topic #3--When the sun came up on southeastern Idaho one day
almost a year ago, it looked like the start of just another
beautiful late spring day.  It was Saturday, and two fishermen
were looking forward to a relaxing day in the shadow of the new
Teton Dam.  The Dam, over 300 feet high, had been completed the
previous fall except for a few finishing touches that remained,
and had been gradually filling up with water during the winter. 
Now, due to the run-off of melting snow in the mountains, it was
almost full.  Further down stream from the dam, tens of thousands
of people were going about their business.  Some puttered around
their houses doing weekend chores, while others were at work at
businesses or on farms; but for the construction crew who arrived
for work on the Teton Dam site that morning of June 5, 1976, it
was a different story.  At about 7:30 A.M. it was discovered that
a sizeable leak had sprung, not through the dam itself but
through the section of mountain on one side where the dam was
anchored.  This was reported immediately to the proper
authorities, who directed that steps be taken immediately to
start lowering the water level behind the Dam.  Why the leak had
appeared so suddenly was a puzzle, since inspection of the Dam by
personnel around nine o'clock the previous evening had turned up
nothing wrong.  But there was no time to solve this puzzle,
because soon a second leak developed.  Like the first, this
second leak also appeared to break through the anchoring mountain
side rather than the Dam itself.  Now the situation began to
deteriorate at an alarming rate.  Soon a leak found its way
through the earthen dam itself, and a growing torrent of water
gushed from it.  Two bulldozers raced to that location to try to
stop the flow by moving more earth into position, but the leak
grew so fast that the bulldozers were lost, the operators leaping
and scrambling to safety barely in time to save themselves.  Like
a nightmare come true, the Teton Dam crumbled, collapsed, and
released tons of water into the valley below.  The day ended
abruptly in tragedy for the two fishermen, and others who lost
their lives as well.  For two days, flood waters from that ruined
dam continued to spread, ultimately covering an area of 300
square miles including several towns and 50,000 acres of farm
land.  One of the major purposes of the Teton Dam, like many
others around our country, had been flood control.  Now the
man-made flood unleashed by the collapsed dam had caused damage
estimated to be in the range of $350- to $500,000,000 in addition
to the loss of life.  The bursting of the Teton Dam provided
America with a preview, on a very small scale, of what the Soviet
Union plans to do to our entire country.

   Last month in Audioletter No. 23 I reported hard intelligence
I had received to the effect that 21 major lakes and dams in 10
western states have hydrogen Soviet bombs planted in them.  But
the information I gave you then, my friends, was only the
beginning.  Since recording Audioletter No. 23, I have been under
an avalanche of ongoing intelligence reports concerning the
ongoing Soviet program of planting nuclear weapons in our inland
lakes and reservoirs.  I can now reveal that this Soviet program
began at a relatively slow, careful pace as much as 18 months
ago.  For example, a Soviet nuclear device was planted over a
year ago at a dam known as the Dalles on the Columbia River east
of Portland, Oregon, and it is still there now.  The Teton Dam
disaster appeared to be just a great big accident, but it brought
to everyone's attention the fact that dams can be made to
collapse under certain conditions and that the consequences are
devastating.  Meanwhile the border of Idaho with Canada has
become an important entry point for Soviet agents who are
bringing nuclear bombs into this country.  On Monday May 16, I
received an alert from my intelligence sources that Soviet agents
were at that time in the process of transporting nuclear weapons
into the northern United States by truck through several entry
portals along the Canadian border.  The greatest focus of that
activity was at the Idaho entry points of Porthill and Eastport. 
For the next several days I was in frequent contact with my
intelligence contacts in Canada who were taking very definite
action to find and stop these Soviet intruders; but here in the
United States our attention is being focused on our border with
Mexico by the manufactured distraction of illegal immigrants.  At
the same time, we are undergoing a wholesale invasion along our
border with Canada by the Soviet Union and not one thing is being
done about it by the United States.  By late that first day, May
16, at least 16 Soviet vehicles carrying nuclear weapons were
known to have crossed into the United States from Canada through
entry portals into Idaho and Montana; meanwhile 7 more were on
Canadian Highway 3 from Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,
heading toward Porthill and Eastport, Idaho, to enter the United
States.  By that time the origination point in the Vancouver area
had been narrowed down to a barge in Horseshoe Bay.  The
Canadians took care of the situation on their side of the border
by stopping and inspecting trucks in the appropriate area, and by
early May 18 all seven trucks driven by Soviet agents had been
stopped and rounded up just short of the border.  At that point,
however, their next step was to wait for further instructions
from Ottawa, and I have not yet been informed as to what further
action was taken.  Meanwhile the only public hint of what was
going on was contained in a short item printed in Vancouver
newspapers on May 19.  It stated that trucks were being stopped
and searched along Route 3, but did not give the reason.  For my
Canadian friends, now you know!  But it was a different and sad
story here in the United States.

   The Federal government is taking no action whatsoever, proving
that there is a continuing collusion between the Rockefeller
empire and the Soviet empire.  At the State level, one would hope
that the chances of obtaining action would be a little better,
but so far that has not been the case.  Concerned citizens who
have tried to bring my warnings to the attention of their
Governors and other high State officials have encountered
basically two reactions--one is that "This is something for the
Federal government, so we'll refer it to them"; and of course
there it ends.  The other main response is to the effect:
"Naturally even if we did find a bomb in the lake next to the
dam, we would not make it public--after all, we don't want to
excite the people."  But, my friends, that is like an air raid
warden refusing to turn on the siren during an attack because it
might frighten people.  At the local level though, one would hope
that some action could still be expected, but No; during the
period of May 16 I tried in every possible way to get local and
state police in northern Idaho to simply check out some very
specific reports I had been given, but to no avail.  Several
Soviet trucks were known to be heading southward in northern
Idaho toward the town of Sandpoint, and I was informed of the
approximate positions where it should have been possible to
intercept them on the highway; but when I relayed these reports
to State and local police in the area, both directly and through
a brave local citizen in that area, it turned out to be
impossible to persuade them to take action.  As one police
sergeant told me, "We're wondering why the Federal government
hasn't stepped in on this."  And since they had not, even after
being notified, the assumption was that there must not be
anything to it, therefore it was not even going to be
investigated.  And so there, my friends, is a part of the
handwriting on the wall for America.

   Most all Americans have been tricked into accepting the idea
that only the Federal government counts or is able to do
anything, even though this idea is totally alien to our Republic
as originally founded.  All the Federal government has to do is
not act or to remain silent about a matter, such as Soviet
missiles in our waters, and people conveniently leap to the
conclusion that there must not be any missiles.  As General
Keegan says, we're becoming incapable of being warned; and, my
friends, if we don't snap out of it, we will suffer horribly. 
The fact that something was afoot in the area of our nation's
water supplies should have been realized four years ago when
Nelson Rockefeller started his "National Commission on Water
Quality."  This he started at the same time as his much better
known "Commission on Critical Choices for Americans."  And just
as the Commission on Critical Choices was absorbed into the
Federal government in everything but name, the same was done with
Rockefeller's Commission on Water Quality.  But even if it was
clear that water was to become a political tool in some way, I
doubt that anyone in his worst nightmares imagined what was
actually afoot.  Over the past several years, Federal and State
water quality control boards have built up a comprehensive and
up-to-date picture of our nation's water resources and
requirements--and all this data has been turned over to the
Soviet Union!  So now, the Soviets know exactly where and how to
strike at us through our Achilles' heel of water, just as the
Medes and Persians were able to calculate how to attack ancient
Babylon through its water source.

   In the alliance between the Rockefeller and the Soviet Union
empires, the Rockefeller brothers still want to rule the American
continent under complete dictatorship; and the Soviets still want
America to become their complete satellite--a nation of slaves. 
But the Rockefellers realized long ago that this country could
not be brought under the total control they desire without the
benefit of crushing disasters to force us into that mold.  And
the Soviets for their part realize that to extract the benefit
from America that they seek, it is not enough simply to conquer
us in war.  Afterward there must be a core of turncoat managers,
quislings, to run America for them.  Soon, the Rockefellers
expect to obtain the "Declaration of National Emergency" that
they want in response to events which can be triggered by the
Soviets.  The Declaration of National Emergency, they believe,
will make their dictatorship all but complete.  At the present
time the Soviet Union has at least 158 underwater missiles in our
territorial waters along our coastlines.  In addition, the Great
Lakes now bristle with smaller, single warhead Soviet underwater
missiles--a total of 53 as of my latest information.  The fact
that the Soviet Union has been able to invade the Great Lakes and
place missiles there is shocking; and it is even more shocking to
know that Soviet agents are fanning out all over the United
States, unhampered, to sow seeds of nuclear disaster throughout
our land.  It's hard for most people to imagine how such things
are possible; but as I know from my own sources, they are being
facilitated from within our country.  For example, one of the key
steps which has been taken by the Carter administration to permit
these things recently was publicly confirmed by former
Congressman John Rarick of Louisiana.  Congressman Rarick
publishes a very informative monthly newsletter entitled "You've
a Right to Know", about which you might write to him at: Drawer
E, Saint Francisville, La.  70775.  Quoting from his March 1977
issue, "The Soviets are hauling United States cargo in
intra-coastal shipping illegally against the provisions of the
Jones Act.  Russian vessels can be seen in the river loading from
barges, and also unloading on two barges, as if they constitute
an integral arm of the United States Maritime Service.  Barges
loaded by Soviets have been followed up the river through inland
waterways and small canals to where their cargoes have even
reached the Chicago market."  Congressman Rarick further reports
that the Soviets are able to get away with this because Secretary
of the Treasury Blumenthal waived the provisions of the Jones Act
as applied to Soviet vessels.  Thanks to such generous help from
within the United States has been thrown wide open to offensive
Soviet actions.  As a result the planting of nuclear devices in
our inland waters--rivers as well as lakes and reservoirs--is
mushrooming at a tremendous pace.  To begin with, additional
bombs have been planted in some of the huge dammed-up lakes that
I named last month.  For example, Hoover Dam had one bomb when I
recorded Audioletter No. 23, but now it has 3--one next to each
end of the Dam itself, the third upstream some distance from the
Dam.  Another example is Oroville Reservoir in California.  Last
month it had one bomb, now it has 4.  But more serious than this
overkill of a few dams is the vast number of targets throughout
America where Soviet bombs have been and are being planted.  City
water reservoirs of any significance throughout America are
targeted.  Many already contain bombs, while others are scheduled
to receive bombs from the many trucks fanning out across America
with Soviet agents at the wheel.  Flood control, irrigation, and
hydroelectric dams of all kinds are targets as well; and major
rivers are also being seeded with bombs at strategic points.

   To indicate the magnitude of the Soviet attack plan, I will
report the current status of just one state--Texas, which is a
major target.  As of my latest intelligence, over 100 bombs have
already been planted in Texas; and I have been provided so far
with a partial list that specifies 33 of the lakes involved. 
These are: Toledo Bend Reservoir, Sam Rayburn Reservoir,
Steinhillyers Reservoir, Lake Vernon, two lakes northeast of
Houston which provide water for the city, Conroe Lake, Somerville
Reservoir, Lake Waco, Lake Whitney, Malakoff Lake, Frankston
Lake, Lake Livingston, Millwood Reservoir, Lake Texarkana, Lake
O' the Pines, Cedar Lake, Lake Tawakoni, four water reservoirs
for Dallas and Fort Worth, Lake Texoma, Arbuckle Reservoir, Lake
Bridgeport, Hubbard Creek Reservoir, Lake Kemp, Lake Arrowhead,
O'Folla Reservoir, San Angelo Reservoir, Twin Buttes Reservoir,
Lake Thomas, and White River Reservoir.

   A number of rivers around the country are also known to be
involved already.  These include the Mississippi, the Missouri,
the Illinois, the Ohio, the Columbia, the Potomac, and the
Susquehanna.  In the Mississippi alone there are already 31 bombs
located near dams, and locks, and other strategic points.  The
farthest to the north is a bomb about 5 miles downstream of
Little Falls, Minnesota.  From there, they have all been planted
all the way down to New Orleans of Louisiana, where 2 bombs are
in the river.  There are also two other bombs near New Orleans at
the east end of Lake Pontchartrain.

   My friends, the Soviet Union is striving to be in a position
to suddenly, decisively rob America of our water resources. 
While we are distracted with arguments over weapons delivery
systems, such as bombers and missiles, the Soviet Union is
striving for the reliability of weapons that are already on site
at the target.  When war comes, the Soviet Union plans to be able
to just push a button, detonate nuclear weapons all over America,
devastate our country with floods and the pestilence that they
bring, and still have all their missiles and bombers still in
reserve.  But before war comes, the Rockefeller/ Soviet alliance
plan to lay the groundwork for a Declaration of National
Emergency in the United States.

   One option still available to them is war in the Middle East
causing a cutoff of Arab OPEC oil supplies.  But a horrendous new
capability is now in place as an alternate means for creating our
national emergency; and, my friends, there are ominous signs that
this capability is going to be used, very soon.  Lurking deep in
the waters around the Philippine Islands there are now 7
fission-fusion-fission bombs planted there by the Soviet Union. 
Such a bomb is essentially a hydrogen bomb with a jacket of
uranium 238.  When it's set off, the nuclear reaction converts
much of the jacket material to plutonium 239, which in turn
explodes as well.  The Soviet Union is the only nation that has
ever set off such a bomb--16 years ago on October 30, 1961.  In
doing so, they set an ugly record that still stands--the biggest
nuclear weapon ever fired in the atmosphere.  Its yield was
something over 50 megatons--that is 50 million tons of TNT, 2500
times as large as the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. 
Theoretically, there's no limit to the yield of such a bomb, but
for 16 years it has been thought of in the West as unusable
because it produces such vast quantities of fall-out that it
would endanger the country that used it.  But the Soviet Union
has found a way to use it--deep under the ocean for geophysical
warfare in an environment where the radio-active products are
relatively confined, producing little fall-out.  The Philippines
sit like a keystone among a long arch of sub-sea trenches and
faults that comprise the most earthquake-prone areas on earth. 
Starting just north of New Zealand, a band of geological
instability runs northwestward toward the Philippines, then
northeastward past Japan to the Kamchatka Peninsula, eastward
along the Aleutians to Alaska, and then southward along the west
coast of the United States, Mexico, Central America, and onward
all the way to Chile.  This long, irregular zone around the
Pacific rim is often called the "Ring of Fire."  The 7 Soviet
bombs planted in Philippine waters are there for the purpose of
triggering major earthquakes, which, thanks to the peculiar
convergence of faults and trenches in that area, are intended to
work their way by chain reaction all around the Pacific rim,
devastating Washington State, Oregon, and California in the
process.  The 7 bombs in the Philippines are in the so-called
gigaton range--that is, each one is equivalent to a billion tons
of TNT--50,000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb and
therefore big enough to trigger massive earthquakes.  And the
Soviets believe they can safely use such warfare, treaties or no
treaties, because most of the Soviet Union has no history of
earthquakes.  The Soviet gigaton bombs in the Philippines are
located at navigational coordinates which I will now reveal.  No.
1 is at 17-23-23 north, 117-7-23 east; No. 2 is at 14-48-48
north, 119-2-18 east; No. 3 is at 14-0-40 north, 118-23-53 east;
No. 4 is at 13-0-0 north, 117-42-8 east; No. 5 is at 12-0-54
north, 126-4-55 east; No. 6 is at 13-50-36 north, 125-21-45 east;
No. 7 is at 19-48-3 north, 123-51-57 east.  But to make sure that
our west coast is devastated by the effects of a seeming natural
disaster erupting in the Philippines, a series of 7 conventional
but large hydrogen bombs have been planted off our west coast by
the Soviet Union.  These can be set off in conjunction with those
in the Philippines, and at the right moment to produce tidal
waves which would sweep in from the Pacific with devastating
effect along our west coast.  Bomb No. 1 west of Seattle is at
48-0-0 north, 127-50-0 west; No. 2 west of Eugene, Oregon is at
43-29-18 north, 127-55-5 west; No. 3 west of San Francisco is at
37-8-45 north, 125-42-30 west; No. 4 west of Monterey is at
36-31-0 north, 125-26-30 west; No. 5, also west of Monterey, is
at 36-26-30 north, 124-56-0 west; No. 6 west of Los Angeles is at
33-25-15 north, 122-23-50 west; and No. 7 southwest of San Diego
is at 31-45-35 north, 120-36-0 west.  In my Audioletter No. 20
for January 1977, I referred to a warning document issued in
December 1975 by Mr. Tony Hodges of Hawaii.  In that document Mr.
Hodges presented evidence of the feasibility of underwater
missiles.  He also warned of the dangers of bombs on or in the
seabed designed to generate earthquakes or tidal waves. 
Unfortunately, it turns out that Mr. Hodges warnings were all
valid.

   The dictatorship and war plans are being speeded up now; the
world will be stunned by what will look like a massive, natural
disaster in the Philippines that also spreads around the Ring of
Fire to decimate our west coast.  And when it happens, Jimmy
Carter will have the excuse David Rockefeller wants him to have
to declare a National Emergency and in effect suspend the United
States Constitution.  The President's dictatorial emergency
powers spelled out in Executive Orders 11490 and 11921 will be
activated, and the complete bureaucracy of dictatorship set in
motion under circumstances designed to stifle all dissent; and
the elaborate prescriptions for complete governmental control of
all of our water resources spelled out in Executive Order 11921
will be activated under conditions which enable this to be sold
to the people as necessary for our best interest.  Soon
thereafter, with the Rockefeller dictatorship in place, Nuclear
War One itself is planned to come.  Dams and reservoirs all over
America are to be destroyed at one blow by the Soviet Union; and
the quislings from the Trilateral Commission, who now control the
Federal government, will use their control over what little
remains of our water supplies to make their domination of us
total.  The saddest thing about all of this is that only when it
happens will people believe.  By total exposure there is a chance
to prevent the West Coast disaster; but without exposure, there
is no chance whatsoever.

   My friends, it's only by the grace and power of our Lord Jesus
Christ that I've received the information I revealed over the
recent past; and it's my solemn duty to pass on this information
to you--it's not meant for me alone.  And in the same way, it's
not meant for you alone--it needs to be known by every one.  And
so, my friends, this completes two years of my monthly
Audioletters.  I want to thank you for all your words of
encouragement, your support, and especially your prayers.  Again,
thank you; and may God bless each and every one of you.

Source

DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #23

Audio letter No. 23

mp3 part 01

mp3 part 02

Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net

"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording.  Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

(This recording is a product of Audio Books, Inc., Box 16428,
Fort Worth, Texas  76133)

    Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter.  Today is April 24,
1977, and this is my monthly Audioletter No. 23.

    Two months ago in Audioletter No. 21 for February 1977, I
explained how America had been turned into a nation-wide energy
addict over the course of two generations and more, and how this
energy addiction is to be used against us by the four Rockefeller
brothers in turning off our national security; and just four days
ago, on April 20, 1977, this process got under way in earnest by
way of David Rockefeller's revolutionary energy program announced
to the world by his employee, Jimmy Carter.  To the casual
observer it must seem incredible--a new administration under a
new President, with no previous experience in Washington, has in
only three short months done what no previous administration has
ever succeeded in doing: developed a comprehensive, detailed
energy program for the most complex economy on earth. 
Furthermore, Mr. Carter tells us that we must do as he tells us
in order to avoid "a national catastrophe"; and he says we must
act now.  Why the rush?  Why this sudden urgency?  And why does
he go out of his way to call his energy program "the moral
equivalent of war"?  The answer lies in what I warned you about
at the end of monthly Audioletter No. 22 just last month.

    The CIA is hard at work arranging what is to be the CIA's
crowning achievement--the staging of a horrendous act of
terrorism that is intended to cause war to erupt in the whole of
the Middle East.  This is to set in motion a modified, up-dated
version of the detailed war plan I revealed in monthly
Audioletter No. 6 for November 1975.  This plan includes a
limited nuclear strike from the Sinai to cap off Arab OPEC oil
wells except those in Libya, which is controlled by the CIA. 
This will lead immediately to very harsh energy rationing in the
United States, and the Federal government will at last get to
issue those precious gas rationing coupons that have been
awaiting use now for over three years.  So the Carter energy plan
with its underlying warlike atmosphere is actually the first step
in a gradual shift unto a war footing for the United States.  It
has the same purpose as the declaration of national emergency
which President Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaimed in May 1941, six
months before Pearl Harbor, to start getting America ready for
war he was helping to bring about.  The second major step in our
progressive shift onto war footing is intended to occur the time
of the cut-off of Middle East oil, by war.  This will provide a
perfect excuse for an actual Declaration of National Emergency,
and that in turn will activate all the dictatorial presidential
powers spelled out in Executive Order 11921 signed by President
Ford very quietly in June 1976, and described in my Audioletter
No. 14 for July 1976.

    Audioletter No. 14, of course, is also the issue in which I
first revealed the presence of Soviet underwater missiles and
bombs in our own territorial waters.  The terrible Middle East
incident now brewing, which I fervently hope and pray will
somehow be sidetracked by its advanced exposure, is to cause a
limited nuclear war in the Middle East.  That in turn is supposed
to initiate a chain of events, culminating in Nuclear War One
between the Soviet Union and the United States of America. 
Originally this was to have been a carefully programmed war for
the mutual benefit of the Rockefeller cartel and their Soviet
allies, with the Rockefellers and their intimates riding out the
war safely in the nuclear-safe zone across the northern United
States; but ever since the Soviet Union began its double cross of
the Rockefellers last summer 1976, the plans for war have been
undergoing frantic revisions.  Even the insane Rockefeller
concessions to the Soviets, embodied in the Red Friday agreement
of October 1, 1976 (which I revealed that month in Audioletter
No. 17) have failed to fully reinstate the Rockefeller/Soviet
alliance--so now anything can happen.  The Rockefeller brothers,
who for so long have tried to play God with their immense power,
are now finding out that they too are fallible and human, even if
they still refuse to consciously admit it.  Today, my friends,
the power of the Rockefeller empire is in the process of
destroying itself; but just as Samson pulled down the temple
around him, the Rockefeller brothers threaten to pull down modern
civilization around their heads as their power runs out of
control and collapses into the inferno of nuclear war.

    Earlier this month, on April 7, 1977, Prime Minister Rabin of
Israel resigned.  The press has played up his resignation as if
it were another Watergate, but actually it was only a
technicality having to do with a modest bank account held here in
Washington, D.C. by Rabin against government regulations. 
Overnight Rabin was out of office, and his public career has been
described as ruined; but the real reason for Rabin's lightning
exit from Israeli politics was that he learned of the CIA plot to
ignite war in the Middle East, and he wanted no part of it.  It's
almost a replay of Sir Harold Wilson's sudden unexplained
resignation as Prime Minister of Great Britain on March 16, 1976,
just over a year ago; and as I explained then in monthly
Audioletter No. 10, Wilson resigned because he had learned of the
coming war plan and wanted nothing to do with it.  And so the
build-up toward war continues, and our rulers know it.  But what
of the American public in general?  How many know what danger we
are in?  And especially, how many believe it enough to do
something about it?  My friends, most Americans today are on
vacation from reality, but reality will have to be faced one day
in the not too distant future.

    My three special topics for today are: Topic #1--THE PRE-WAR
SABOTAGE OF AMERICA, Topic #2--THE COMING NAVAL BATTLE FOR THE
UNITED STATES AND THE WORLD, and Topic #3--THE UNTOLD PERSONAL
SACRIFICE OF GENERAL GEORGE S. BROWN.

Topic #1--In the early days of the 20th century the
Rockefeller/Standard Oil monopoly had already become supreme in
the United States, but abroad it faced two powerful competitors
in oil.  One was the British Empire, whose destruction by means
of two World Wars I've discussed in a number of my past talking
tapes.  The other foreign competitor was even bigger than the
British Empire in oil, and it was attacked and destroyed first. 
That competitor was Czarist Russia.  After the Bolshevik
Revolution took place in 1917, property owners and businessmen of
all kinds were dispossessed and liquidated in great numbers.  And
included in this, by design, was the utter destruction of the oil
fields, refineries, oil tankers, everything having to do with
oil.  The small band of revolutionaries under Lenin and Trotsky
who had been sent into Russia with the help of Rockefeller
financing had done their job well; and within a few years the new
Communist regime of the Soviet Union welcomed the
Rockefeller/Standard Oil interests with open arms to re-develop
the huge Russian oil reserves.  Ever since that day, right down
to the present, practically all of the oil leaving the Soviet
Union has been carried in oil tankers of the Rockefeller/Standard
Oil empire under various names, nominees, and national flags. 
For a thorough and most unusual expose of the oil competition
presented to the Rockefellers by Czarist Russia, I highly
recommend a new book by Robert V. Tolf, entitled THE RUSSIAN
ROCKEFELLERS--THE SAGA OF THE NOBEL FAMILY AND THE RUSSIAN OIL
INDUSTRY published by the Hoover Institution Press, Stanford
University, Stanford, Calif.  94305--the price is $15.95
postpaid.

    For decades following the Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet
rulers were absolutely dependent upon an uninterrupted flow of
transfusions from the West of money, technical know-how, food,
and arms.  The Kremlin ruled a huge nation with an iron fist, and
the Rockefellers shared this rule with the Kremlin.  The Soviet
Union, therefore, appeared to be the perfect vehicle for bringing
the entire world under the control of the super-rich Rockefellers
and their intimates.  All that was necessary, or so they thought,
was to gradually build up the Soviet system while bleeding to
death the harder to control United States and the western world. 
This was the situation the four Rockefeller brothers inherited
long ago-they literally grew up with it, and could hardly imagine
things being any different.  But now things are different.  The
Soviet Union can now survive without continued outside help, and
now they have been double-crossing the Rockefellers and we the
people will have to suffer for it.  Now, both the Rockefellers
and the Soviets are maneuvering, playing a tricky game, and all
the while trying to emerge supreme from the conflict to come. 
But, just as it was planned before the Rockefeller/Soviet
alliance began coming apart, the main and prime battleground is
to be the United States of America.  The Soviet Union is busy at
work trying to weaken America here and abroad so that we can be
defeated in Nuclear War One; and the Rockefellers are trying to
turn our nation into a complete dictatorship under their
domination.  Both are trying to bend the weakening of America's
freedom to their own special advantage.

    The centerpiece of the Rockefeller program to completely take
over America right now is the so-called CARTER ENERGY PROGRAM. 
Recently the CIA s-u-d-d-e-n-l-y upgraded its estimates of Soviet
spending for new military equipment and installations to four
times the previous figure so as to alarm us.  In a similar vein,
the CIA has also provided Jimmy Carter with grist for his energy
mill to grind us into submission by issuing a report saying world
oil reserves are much lower than previously thought.  Both CIA
reports are rubbish, issued purely for propaganda purposes; so
the CIA under Admiral Turner, who is a Rockefeller man, is
continuing with the preparations for the limited nuclear strike
from the Sinai in order to get the war started.  American F-15
fighter bombers are now available in the Sinai and would hit all
of the five or more Arab target areas with ease; and the special
low-yield nuclear weapons for the job are already on the scene,
currently stored underground at the so-called American Monitoring
Station in the Sinai.  The bombs themselves are atomic, not
hydrogen, very clean, with primary blast effects confined to a
radius of only 300 to 400 yards--just right for a so-called
surgical attack to wipe out the oil wells in the target areas.

    As for America, even though the Alaskan oil is supposed to
start flowing through the pipeline this summer, it will not come
into the lower United States.  It happens to be high sulphur oil
of a type which west-coast refineries cannot handle even though
there have been ten years to get ready for Alaskan oil.  Instead,
the Rockefeller plan is to ship this oil to Japan at a handsome
profit, of course, and make up the difference with more imports
of, guess what--Arab oil.  When the Arab oil is cut off, there
will be some attempts to ship some of the otherwise useless
Alaskan oil to the Gulf Coast by small, inefficient tankers
through the Panama Canal, which is targeted both by underwater
missiles and by missiles in Guyana.  The sharp drop in our oil
supplies will also help to intensify the reduction in food
supplies, which is already resulting from drought here in
America.  Many factors are contributing to the drought situation,
including not only the Soviet weather modification activities
I've mentioned in the past, but also activities under Rockefeller
control.  For example, I mentioned in Audioletter No. 9 for
February 1976 that for years the Rockefeller oil companies have
been knowingly lowering the underground water table in many areas
of the Midwest and Great Plains by means of excessive pumping
from their oil wells; and now, in many of these very areas, the
problem of low ground water is adding to the drought crisis.

    Meanwhile, the Rockefellers never lose sight of their
objectives, no matter how much they are forced to change their
tactics along the way.  Their objective for America is
DICTATORSHIP, according to the pattern spelled out in their
secret New Constitution, which I revealed in my Audio Book
Talking Tape No. 4 released in July 1975.  Under the guise of
"governmental reorganization", the provisions of their
dictatorial new constitution are being imposed on the United
States piecemeal, gradually, while our real Constitution is
increasingly "interpreted" out of existence.

    But of all the things that determine whether a nation will
survive or succumb in time of crisis, the human spirit is still
the most important.  A strong spirit and deep resolve can
overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles, and it can make a
people impossible to conquer; but a weak spirit, without
convictions or values, leaves a people defenseless--defenseless
no matter how much armor they may wear or what weapons they may
command.  This is why the human spirit has been the most
consistent target of all, both of the Rockefeller "One World"
group and of the rulers of the Soviet Union.

    Last month in Audioletter No. 22 I pointed out one of the
extremes in church philosophy that has been promoted wherever
possible for generations by the Rockefellers and their
collaborators.  This extreme is to divorce the moral and
spiritual lessons of religions from daily decisions and actions,
as if the two had no relationship to one another except for lip
service.  For whatever reasons, this extreme is personified today
by one Jimmy Carter.  The opposite extreme is equally deadly, if
not more so.  This is to dilute the spiritual teaching for which
churches originally existed and replace it with preaching about
economic, political, and social issues.  To do this is to play
with fire; but this is exactly what the National Council of
Churches and its sister organization the World Council of
Churches have been doing for decades.  Prior to November 28,
1950, the National Council was known as the Federal Council of
Churches.  For many years the Federal Council had been dominated
at the national level by the Rockefellers and their agent John
Foster Dulles, and was the recipient of several grants from the
Rockefeller Foundation.  But the Federal Council became so
totally identified with political activism in support of
socialist causes that it became an object of increasing distrust. 
Accordingly, the name was changed to the National Council of
Churches, and its tarnished halo was polished up with public
assurances that this was a new organization which would devote
itself to the real business of the church.  There were many
influential laymen in the churches under the umbrella of the
National Council who wanted to help insure that the supposedly
new organization would truly devote itself to proper areas of
church concern.  As a result, a National Lay Committee was
brought into being under the chairmanship of the late J. Howard
Pugh, a truly great American, who was the director and president
of the Sun Oil Co. when it was still free of the grasping
clutches of the Rockefellers.  The National Lay Committee existed
from March 28, 1951, until June 30, 1955.

    The whole story of what happened to the National Lay
Committee of the National Council of Churches is told in the
"Chairman's Final Report" by J. Howard Pugh.  Unfortunately this
important report has long been suppressed and buried.  I have in
my possession one of the very few copies still known to be in
existence; therefore I will read a few brief passages from the
Chairman's Explanatory Letter, which serves as a Foreword to the
Report as a whole.  These quotations are taken in sequence; and
although they do not do justice to Mr. Pugh's complete
explanatory letter, much less the entire 316-page Report, I
believe you will find them revealing:

   "In the failure of this most important effort to bring about
an enduring partnership between the clergy and laity, I feel a
very real responsibility to provide a comprehensive and factual
account of those steps which led to the Board's
action--discontinuing lay participation."

   "We lay people found ourselves not only deeply in the minority
but often poles apart from the clergy who invariably out-voted us
10 to 1 in these sessions."

   "The members of the Lay Committee were often misunderstood in
their urgency to keep the churches out of politics and their
insistence on the promisee evangelism.  Our premise was that
instead of appealing to government, the church should devote its
energies to the work of promoting the attributes of
Christianity--truth, honesty, fairness, generosity, justice, and
charity in the hearts and minds of men.  We attempted to
emphasize that Christ stressed not the expanded State, but the
dignity and responsibility of the individual."

   "Their philosophy, it seemed to the Lay Committee, looked to
an ever-expanding government."

   "With few exceptions, the members of the Lay Committee had
agreed to serve only because they had been assured that the new
National Council would avoid the political involvements and
controversies of the old Federal Council of Churches, which was
now superseded."

   "Most of the members of the Lay Committee came finally to the
realization that a wide chasm existed between the thinking of the
laity and the clergy and executives of the denominational bodies
which comprise the National Council."

   "Thus, on June 30, 1955, the Lay Committee ceased to exist as
a committee of the General Board."

   "The members of the Lay Committee believed, and so stated,
that the political adventures of the National Council in the
fields of economic and political controversy would seriously
hinder and not further Christian leadership in the pressing
fields of evangelism, fellowship, and education."

   "It appears from the record that the National Council could
find no room for opposition to the philosophies and practices
carried over from the old Federal Council.  Lacking the patience
to resolve the basic problem, it has sought to bury it."

Thus ended, my friends, more than 20 years ago the last major
effort to deflect the Rockefeller-dominated National Council of
Churches away from its political programs and toward concern for
spiritual matters.  After more than four years of frustrating
effort, the National Lay Committee was dissolved.  This signaled
the end of any influence of the general church population of
America on the policies of the National Council of Churches.  The
National Council proceeded on its way, proclaiming to the public
that it represented 34,000,000 Protestants, while using this
power base to help undermine our free Republic.  The National
Council has done much to help dull and weaken the spirit of
millions of Americans, softening our approach in opposition to
Communism.  Let us hope and pray that in these dangerous days
they will at last see the light and begin to work at last to
build up the American spirit, instead of destroying it.

Topic #2--In monthly Audioletter No. 15 for August 1976, I
explained that the planting of short-range underwater-launch
nuclear missiles in our territorial waters was part of the Soviet
naval strategy for the United States and world conquest.  The
same continues to be the case now.  Admiral Gorshkoff, who has
commanded the Soviet navy for more than 20 years, has built it
into a fighting force that is radically different from any other
navy the world has ever seen; and as we near the very threshold
of war, it is no accident that the Rockefeller insider who now
heads the CIA is also an Admiral--4-star Admiral Stansfield
Turner.  The CIA has become the most powerful military
organization in the United States, and Nuclear War One will
revolve around naval strategy.  Both the importance of the Soviet
Navy and its great difference from our own United States Navy can
be illustrated by just one fact: When the supersonic Backfire
long-range bomber entered operational service in the Soviet Union
late in 1974, it did so simultaneously with the Soviet Navy as
well as with the Soviet Air Force.  This is like giving our own
new supersonic bomber, the B-1, to our Navy to fly--or, since we
still do not have the B-1 to counter the Soviet Backfire, having
our navy fly B-52s.  Of course our own navy does not fly
strategic bombers.  The United States Navy, like the British Navy
and most of the other great navies of history, has as one of its
primary missions the protection of our sea lanes of commerce--a
war which is basically defensive in nature.  Since World War II
our navy has also acquired offensive missions which have
gradually assumed greater importance, including the ability to
attack an enemy from the sea with the submarine-launched
ballistic missiles.  But the traditional defensive mission of
protecting our sea lanes can never be neglected.  Admiral
Gorshkoff, however, has been able to concentrate on building a
navy which is almost totally offensive in character.  Soviet
fishing trawlers, some of them genuine, roam the world; but the
Soviet Union does not depend for its survival on the sea nearly
as much as the United States.  So the Soviet Navy is designed
first and foremost for offensive operations; and this not only
includes the ability to interdict enemy sea lanes and attack
enemy naval forces at sea, it also includes an unprecedented
emphasis on projecting naval power ashore.  This in turn means
not only the ability to carry out amphibious assaults and
tactical bombardment, but strategic attack--a role we usually
tend to think of only in terms of the Soviet Air Force with its
ICBMs and bombers.

    The new Soviet Navy of Admiral Gorshkoff also differs from
ours in another way.  Aside from missile submarines, the American
Navy is structured around the aircraft carrier; whereas the
Soviet Navy is built around the submarine.  American task forces
include all kinds of ships designed to coordinate with the needs
and capabilities of the aircraft carrier.  By the same token,
Soviet surface ships of all kinds are intended to support the
huge submarine force in various ways.  This applies even to the
new Soviet aircraft carriers which are now beginning to appear on
the scene since Soviet naval aviation is heavily oriented toward
anti-submarine warfare, although it has other capabilities as
well.  The relative naval capabilities of the Soviet Union and
the United States have never been considered in the Strategic
Arms Limitations Talks, the SALT talks, except with regard to
sea-launch ballistic missiles; and yet it is the coming naval
confrontation that could all by itself determine the outcome of
Nuclear War One.  It is often forgotten, for example, that the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is primarily a naval
alliance.  We hear frequently about NATO in the controlled major
media of the United States as though the only problems were Army
problems--such as rusty tanks and lack of spare parts; and when
the Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, who is presently General
Alexander Haig, is mentioned in the news, he is often called the
head of NATO, or some such, but actually he's only one of three
co-equal Commanders in NATO.  The other two are Naval
Commanders--they are the Commander-in-Chief, Channel Command; and
the Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantic, the latter based at
Norfolk, Va.  NATO depends for its very life on its naval
strength, including the ability to keep open the vital North
Atlantic sea lanes.  But now, Soviet naval Backfire bombers with
air-to-surface, anti-ship missiles threaten to cut those North
Atlantic sea lanes in time of war; and the Mediterranean, which
was once dominated by the United States Navy, is now heavily
populated by the Soviet Navy as well.  While the Soviet Navy has
undergone explosive growth over the past decade to the formidable
armed force that it is today, the United States Navy has been
allowed to shrink to half its former size with more and more
ships aging and obsolescent.  When the Arab oil is cut off by war
soon, Europe will have to fall back on its meager reserves, which
will run out within 60 to 90 days.  Interdiction of NATO sea
lanes at that point by the Soviet Union could cause all of Europe
to fall like a plum into Soviet hands.  This is especially true
in light of the short-range Soviet underwater missiles in
European territorial waters, which I mentioned in Audioletter No.
22 last month.  So far only Great Britain shows signs of being
able to withstand such a course of events.  As I mentioned last
month, the British government had requested the latest missile
coordinates from me, and I had supplied them.  Of the 29 Soviet
missiles around the British Isles at that time, all but one had
been removed by the Royal Navy as of April 18--6 days ago. 
However, I have been informed of 3 newly planted missiles there,
and I have relayed these to the British for action.  Great
Britain also may have the benefit of her new North Sea oil fields
which, barring sabotage or the like, should make Britain
independent of foreign oil producers in the near future.

    Since I spoke to you last, action has been taken in another
area also.  Acting on information which I relayed, of the 8
missiles around southern Africa, seven have now been taken up. 
At last report, however, the missile lying off Mozambique
targeted on Rhodesia was still in place.  Such removals of
missiles are better than no action at all, but they are still no
more than holding actions.  What is needed, if war is to be
prevented, is for this deadly cat-and-mouse game to be stopped
altogether by revealing to the whole world what the Soviet Navy
is up to.  Late last September, as I revealed in monthly
Audioletter No. 16, the United States had a golden opportunity to
do just that, and to do so while the Soviet underwater missile
threat was only a small fraction of what it is now.  At that
time, a Soviet missile-laying mini-sub equipped with
sonar-defeating design features entered Chesapeake Bay and became
trapped there, due to a malfunction that ultimately killed the
crew.  It was a perfect opportunity for the United States to pick
up the sub, display it on television world-wide by satellite, and
tell the Soviet Union that the jig was up; but instead, as I
revealed in Audioletter No. 17 the following month, the Red
Friday agreement on October 1, 1976 reinstated a strained
alliance between the Rockefellers and the Soviets, and the Soviet
Navy was allowed to enter Chesapeake Bay under cover of darkness
and recover the mini-sub.  But now, a similar opportunity exists
once again--not in American waters but in those of Norway.  In
March 1977 a Soviet submarine entered the fjord of Folda on the
north coast of Norway.  The Norwegians detected its presence and
sealed off the exit to wait for the sub to surface.  On April 4,
1977, the story was broken in European press, although the
location was not mentioned.  To my knowledge, however, it has
received no mention anywhere in the United States.  I strongly
suggest to the Norwegian government that before the Soviet
submarine be allowed to escape, a search be made at the
navigational coordinates 64 35' 23" north, 10 23' 14" east.  This
location is not far from where the Soviet submarine is trapped
and is the site of one of the seven Soviet underwater missiles
that have been planted recently in Norwegian waters.  Should the
government of Norway so request, I will naturally provide the
other locations as well, through proper channels.

    As for the United States, there continues to be no effort at
all to clear our waters of the Soviet nuclear weapons which
threaten our country.  As of my latest report a few days ago, not
one of the 158 Soviet missiles and hydrogen bombs lurking in our
territorial waters has been removed, and I have not been
approached in any way by the United States government with
requests for their locations.  Meanwhile the Soviet plutonium
cloud attacks on the United States are still continuing by means
of the new canisters which are being deployed close to shore
along the West Coast, which I mentioned last month.  Of the 16
canisters which were deployed at the time I recorded Audioletter
No. 22 last month, 11 had been discharged as of April 15, but by
then there were 17 new ones.  At last report, these canisters are
being deployed along the entire West Coast from San Diego to
Seattle.  These are extremely easy and simple to deploy--for
example, they are dropped from aircraft flying under our radar
like the Soviet Bear bombers that we were told about by news
reports the other day.  They are also planted by Soviet trawlers,
since they are allowed to enter our new 200-mile fishing zone to
catch certain fish there.  The fact that this is being done was
proven by the arrested Soviet trawler Taras Shevchenko which was
carrying plutonium canisters in a compartment near the stern of
the ship.

    Thus the maneuvering in preparation for Nuclear War One
continues with a strong naval emphasis.  At one level,
Rockefeller agents in America appear to continue to cooperate in
the joint plan of conquest with the Soviets; but on the real
level the Soviets and the Rockefellers are both jockeying for a
decisive knock-out blow.  In this, time is on the side of the
Soviet Union, so they're trying to delay war slightly while the
Rockefeller brothers are trying to hurry it up; and to condition
us all for it, the Carter Administration is flexing its muscles
to show us how strong it is when it comes to the Soviets.  In
short order it has forcefully espoused Human Rights, handed the
Soviets an ultimatum on SALT talks, seized Soviet fishing
trawlers, chased Soviet Bear long-range turbo-prop bombers away
from the southeast coast of our country--and what's next?  A
photo of a Soviet submarine in our waters?  Already the
Rockefeller position has decayed further in the past several
months because of the further deterioration of their CIA undersea
super-missiles in the Atlantic and Pacific.  Of the fleet of 14
such missiles which I described in Audioletter No. 20, January
1977, all 5 in the Pacific have now sprung leaks and are no
longer usable.  Of the 9 in the Atlantic, 4 have now
failed--missiles #4, 6, 7, and 8.  That leaves only 5 of the
original fleet of 14 CIA missiles still available for Rockefeller
threats against their Soviet partners.  Meanwhile the Soviet
short-range missiles in our waters in the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico are now being used by the Soviets
to further weaken our position as a nation.

    But, my friends, that's not all.  For the very first time
Soviet missiles have now been planted in the Great Lakes.  From
there they now threaten Chicago, Racine, Milwaukee, Cleveland,
Bay City, Erie, Buffalo, Rochester, and other cities of our
industrial heartland.  At present there are exactly 50 such
missiles in the Great Lakes.  These, however, are single warhead,
short-range missiles, and are even smaller in size than the
multiple warhead missiles that have been planted along our East,
West, and Gulf Coasts.  As if this were not enough, I have just
been alerted that Soviet agents are now fanning out across
America planting small hydrogen bombs in selected inland lakes. 
The primary targets here are major dams, but some other targets
are also involved.  Since the Federal government refuses to take
action, it's imperative that State governments--especially those
in the West--take action now to protect their citizens.  Security
patrols around major dams and lakes should be beefed up
immediately and placed on full alert.  In addition, search
operations must be performed to locate those bombs that have
already been planted so that they can be removed.  Already,
Soviet underwater nuclear devices have been planted in 21 places
within the United States, and more are being planted.  Nineteen
(19) of the targets are dams, the other 2 are cities.  CALIFORNIA
has 4--Oroville Dam north of Sacramento, Castaic Dam north of Los
Angeles, Shasta Dam in north California, and Otay Reservoir Dam
near San Diego.  ARIZONA also has 4 bombs--Glen Canyon Dam,
Coolidge Dam, Theodore Roosevelt Dam, and Lake Pleasant Dam near
Phoenix.  NEW MEXICO has 3--the Navajo Dam, Blue Mesa Dam, and
Alfa Butte Dam.  MONTANA has 3--Fort Peck Dam, Yellow Tail Dam,
and Hungry Horse Dam.  NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA,
NEVADA, and WASHINGTON STATE so far have 1 bomb each, threatening
dams which are among the world's largest--these are respectively
Garrison Dam, Oahe Dam, Fort Randall Dam, Hoover Dam, and Grand
Coulee Dam.  IDAHO has 2 bombs, both threatening towns--one is in
the north end of Cour d'Alene Lake, threatening the town of that
name; the other is in the north end of Lake Pend Oreille near the
town of Sandpoint.  My friends, this would not have been possible
had it not been for the destruction of the FBI beginning with the
murder of J. Edgar Hoover.  God help us all.

Topic #3--With our military situation so serious, one would
naturally expect someone to come forward to take action against
the Soviet underwater missiles.  For example, General George S.
Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, brought about the
removal of many of these ocean and gulf missiles during August
and September 1976.  But where is he now?!!  My friends, here is
what has happened to General Brown.  No matter how much the
tactics of public manipulation change and shift, some things
never change.  I mentioned several months ago in connection with
the disgraceful Sputnik One episode that nowadays accolades and
awards go to the spoilers and traitors in our midst, while the
true heroes who dare to raise their heads are beaten down,
suppressed, and forgotten.  Today there is no more grim testimony
to this fact than the current predicament of General George S.
Brown.

    As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Brown is
the top military officer in the United States, and therefore in
some respects in the entire free world.  As I revealed in detail
in monthly Audioletter No. 16 for September 1976, it was he,
General Brown, who more than any other person in the United
States government, prevented a surprise Soviet nuclear attack on
America during August and September 1976.  Under extremely
adverse conditions, he obtained the go-ahead to remove Soviet
underwater missiles and hydrogen bombs then planted in our own
territorial waters and then ordered the United States Navy to do
the job, which it did quickly.  And on September 16, 1976, I met
for over an hour with General Brown in his office at the Pentagon
to discuss the continuing Soviet underwater missile crisis and to
relay new information to him which had been prevented from
reaching him through normal channels.  In meeting with me,
General Brown was accepting terrible personal risks, and he knew
it.  He had overruled his entire staff in order to meet with me,
and the meeting itself was completely free of interruptions of
any kind.  Nor was there any cut-off due to time; the meeting
simply continued without pressure until we finished the business
at hand.  Then I left, along with an associate who had
accompanied me to the meeting as a witness.  We drove away from
the Pentagon that day in a driving rainstorm; but the brave
patriot whose office we had just left now faced a far worse
personal storm--thanks to his efforts on our nation's behalf.  I
warned my listeners about this in monthly Audioletter No. 16 last
September, and asked that everyone strengthen his hand by
expressing their support for him.

    General Brown, alone among the top echelons of the United
States government, had stood by us and had saved millions of our
lives in the process.  Now he was depending on us to stand by him
in his continuing efforts to carry out his Constitutional duties
to the letter.  Some of us did so, my friends, but far too many
of us did not.  During August and early September 1976, the Joint
Chiefs of Staff were flooded with demands for action against the
Soviet underwater missiles; but after that action was taken,
there was no such massive outpouring of thanks for General
Brown's crucial leadership or support for the continued positive
efforts needed to save our country.  Far too many of us forget
that it is not enough just to complain about what is wrong; we
must also actively support that which is right, or it will wither
and die.  After the crucial actions taken under General Brown's
leadership late last summer, far too many of us just relaxed and
went back to sleep, leaving General Brown to fend for himself.

    Now I must tell you what has happened to General Brown as a
result.  For many months now I have been cut off from direct
contact with General Brown; and in recent months General Brown
has seemed like a completely different person than in the past
whenever he appears in public.  In place of the outgoing
personality which has been General Brown's trademark in the past,
there is nothing but resignation and acceptance of the dictates
of his civilian superiors.  The change has been so dramatic that
it has even been commented upon by syndicated columnists, who are
mystified.  What has happened to General Brown, my friends, is
known to very few.  I myself have been able to confirm it only
within the past few days.  General George S. Brown, the nation's
top military officer, is now virtually under house arrest.  This
is exactly the same kind of confinement that was meted out, for
example, to Army Lieutenant William Calley during his court
martial for the My Lai massacre in Vietnam.  But there are two
differences in General Brown's case.  First, there has been no
court martial.  Instead, he is living under the threat of a court
martial, for its twisted evidence and perjuring witnesses have
already been assembled.  Second, General Brown's isolation at the
Pentagon and confinement to his Fort Myer residence are not
absolute.  Instead, they are interspersed with very carefully
controlled appearances at official functions, since his absence
from these would quickly arouse suspicions that something was
terribly wrong.  Now, should General Brown attempt again to step
out of line and defy those in high places by giving orders to
remove the missiles, doing his Constitutional duty, the suspended
threat of court martial would instantly come crashing down upon
him.  By means of the elaborately doctored and falsified evidence
I've already mentioned, General Brown would be railroaded into
certain conviction for treason for doing his duty.  Already
alleged statements by General Brown have been published recently
to make him appear to be a dangerous man.  Were General Brown to
be courtmartialed with falsified evidence, it would destroy him
personally.  It would also prevent his efforts from producing any
benefits to America--such as a resumption of the removal of
Soviet nuclear missiles from our waters.  Any such orders of his
would be rescinded; and his courtmartial would be used to make
any attempts by him to warn America useless, by destroying his
credibility.

    As long ago as October, 1976, just a month after my meeting
with him, General Brown was given a powerful demonstration of the
ability of his enemies to crucify him publicly.  As I discussed
that month in Audioletter No. 17, a six-month old interview of
General Brown was dredged up and used to subject him to intense
public embarrassment and criticism.  A few alleged statements of
his from the interview were made public and played up by the
controlled major media to such an extent that he was forced to
make a public apology on nationwide television.  Can you imagine? 
All of that for a few relatively insignificant comments which, if
he really made them at all, had attracted no attention six months
earlier.  This episode had just one purpose--to prove to General
Brown that if the falsified charges of treason should ever be
leveled at him, he would have no chance at all either to defend
himself or to do a service to America.  His only recourse now
would be to himself publicly demand a court-martial, but even
that would not be successful without a massive outpouring of
public support for him ahead of time--and that, my friends, has
so far been denied him to the everlasting shame of our entire
nation.  Should General Brown come to any physical harm, the
responsibility for it will rest squarely on the shoulders of
David, Nelson, Laurance, and John D. Rockefeller III; but
meanwhile, he's a secret captive, keeping millions of Americans
reassured that all is well merely by his presence on the scene. 
Whenever a public or official appearance or statement by General
Brown is called for, it's arranged and carried out under the
watchful eyes of a heavy escort, although this is not always
apparent.  Otherwise the openness, the accessibility, and warmth
that has always distinguished General Brown among newspaper
reporters is now gone.  He's a virtual prisoner at the Pentagon,
held practically incommunicado except for the carefully
controlled communications and appearances I have already
mentioned.  As soon as this Audioletter is released, you can
expect to see things happen that may seem to disprove what I am
telling you--for example, General Brown may become more visible
publicly for a while.  It is even conceivable, though highly
unlikely, that this might even be carried to the point of having
General Brown publicly deny that he has come under any new
restrictions in recent months as the result, say, of the
unfavorable publicity he received some months ago.  Should that
happen, keep in mind that General Brown is now a prisoner of war,
imprisoned by the enemies within our own midst; and we've already
seen many examples of the kinds of things American prisoners of
war are forced to say for propaganda purposes.

    Yes, my friends, General Brown stood up for all of us only to
have too many of us let him down by failing to follow through
with our thanks and our overwhelming support; but there is one
way that we can still keep General Brown's great personal
sacrifice on our behalf from being in vain, and that is for us,
each and every one of us as individuals, to begin right now to do
whatever we can to save our beloved country.  My friends, there's
no vacation from reality.  It's up to you to do what you
can--there's no one else; and even though you may not be able to
do more than write a letter or two, do it.  You never know how
far your few words may spread.  They may pass from one person to
another, finally reaching the ear of someone you don't even know,
someone with far more resources than you have who may play a
vital role in saving our nation, yet who may never hear and never
act if you fail to do your part.  If all you have to offer is 5
loaves and 2 fishes, offer it; you just might be amazed at the
results.

    Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter.  Thank you,
and may God bless each and every one of you.

Source

DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #22

Audio letter No. 22

mp3 part 01

mp3 part 02

Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net

"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording.  Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

This recording is a product of AUDIO BOOKS INC.  (1980 current
address: 1629 K St., NW, Washington, D.C.  20006.)

Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter.  Today is March 27, 1977,
and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 22.

   Few things are certain in life, but one thing we can depend
upon is that things are always changing.  Today a flower blooms
in all its glory; tomorrow it will be withered and forgotten,
leaving behind only a beautiful memory.  Today a child at play
scrapes a knee, and the whole world revolves around a mother's
tender care.  Tomorrow the knee will be healed, leaving behind
only a lesson of caution and comfort.  Today you and I pass
through this world for a little while; tomorrow we will not be
seen, leaving behind only the legacy of our choices for good or
evil.

   Last month in AUDIO LETTER No. 21 I alerted you to the
possibility that we may have already failed in our efforts to
prevent NUCLEAR WAR ONE, which is drawing closer by the day.  My
question is not "Can the war be stopped?" but "Will it be
stopped?"  There is nothing in this whole world that would please
me so much as to be able to tell you: "Good news.  We have
prevented the war.  We have won."  And when I recorded monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 16 on September 25, 1976, it seemed as though I
might soon be able to give you such good news.  Public reaction
to my AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 14 and 15 for July and August 1976 had
thwarted an attempted Soviet double-cross of the Rockefellers by
means of underwater missiles along our coast lines, and it had
produced a direct meeting between General George S. Brown,
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and myself.  But then came
the terrible reversals for America that I revealed the following
month in AUDIO LETTER No. 17; and far too many of those who had
pressed the government for action during August 1976 failed to
follow through and support General Brown in his efforts to
continue to protect our beloved country.  Now, as a result, we
have lost General Brown as an effective force for good.

   Now the job of stopping NUCLEAR WAR I is even harder.  It can
still be done, but WILL WE DO IT?  My deep hope is still that the
answer is YES, otherwise I would not be speaking these words.  I
am doing all in my power to bring the truth to you.  So long as I
continue to have access to vital information that bears on your
life and your well-being, I will feel a deep responsibility to
communicate it to you, but then it becomes your responsibility to
choose what you will do about it.

   I have made many suggestions of things you might do to help
save our country.  ln December 1975 I even recorded an entire
tape devoted to nothing else, entitled "WHAT WE CAN DO TO SAVE
AMERICA"; but all I can hope to do is open your mind as to what
you, as an individual, can do.  In this great nation of some
215,000,000 individuals, every person is different.  No two of us
have the same set of abilities, the same opportunities, or the
same avenues for possible action.  There is no way that I, just
one person, even with the help of my associates and information
sources, can provide a simple, cut-and-dried prescription for
what to do; but I am convinced that scattered throughout America
is all of the knowledge, all of the ability to organize, and all
the resources necessary to save our beloved land IF WE WILL BUT
DO IT.

   My three topics for today are:

Topic #1--HOW CIRCUMSTANCES ARE PROVING THE ROCKEFELLER-SOVIET
PLANS TO DESTROY AMERICA

Topic #2--PRESIDENT CARTER'S EFFORTS TO HURRY UP NUCLEAR WAR ONE

Topic #3--HOW THE CHURCH IS BEING USED.

Topic #1--For over four years now I have been trying by every
means at my disposal to alert the American people to the progress
of far-advanced plans to destroy our beloved country as we know
it.  We are seeing the final stages of a plan to create a
world-wide dictatorship acted out before our very eyes with
ourselves ensnared as the victims.  This commitment for a
ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT under the control of a super wealthy elite
was set in motion in the early years of the 20th Century, using a
small group of powerful tax-exempt Foundations to coordinate and
direct the program.  This program of conquest long ago became so
massive, so powerful, and so complex that the average citizen had
no hope of grasping what was really going on.  And the ONE WORLD
plans were and are so evil that the normal person simply cannot
believe they are real without overwhelming proof.

   But how are things like this proven?  Such a long-range
commitment is a sophisticated form of conspiracy; so, how are
conspiracies exposed and proven?  Well known in legal circles,
and especially in the United States Department of Justice, are
the words of Special Judge Advocate John A. Bingham during the
trial of the conspirators involved in Abraham Lincoln's
assassination.  This trial took place in Washington, D.C. in
1865.  Listen to Judge Bingham's words, and I quote:

  "A conspiracy is rarely if ever proven by positive testimony. 
When a crime of high magnitude is about to be perpetrated by a
combination of individuals, they do not act openly, but covertly
and secretly.  The purpose formed is known only to those who
enter into it.  Unless one of the conspirators betrays his
companions and gives evidence against them, their guilt can be
proved only by circumstantial evidence.  It is said by some
writers on evidence that circumstances are stronger than positive
proof.  A witness swearing positively, it is said, may
misapprehend the facts or swear falsely, but that circumstances
cannot lie."

Judge Bingham's words may come as a surprise to you if you're not
a lawyer.  Contrary to the impression you may have received from
fictional detective stories, circumstantial evidence can be very
powerful indeed and has decided the outcome of vast numbers of
court cases.

   Furthermore, it is the incriminating power of circumstances
that makes any conspiracy most vulnerable to just one
thing--exposure.  If the plans of even the most powerful of
conspirators are made public and put on record before the plans
are executed, often the plans have to be abandoned; because even
if the conspirators succeed in carrying out their plans without
being caught in the act, the circumstances that result from their
criminal actions cannot be hidden, and the advance exposure of
their plan then causes the finger of guilt to point straight at
the conspirators.

   This is the principle I invoke every time I publicly reveal
anything about the plans or actions of those who are conspiring
to destroy America.  As I have always tried to make clear, my
purpose in exposing these criminal plans is to prevent them from
being carried out.  In this way I share a common goal with my
associates and the many sources who provide me with vital
confidential information.  The best achievements of Intelligence
gathering, like diplomacy, often lie in what did not happen--the
crisis quietly deflected.  And our efforts up to now have been
partially successful in that regard.

   But the commitment for world domination that was forged over
two generations ago has grown into an incredible monster with
countless tentacles and tremendous momentum.  As a result, the
four Rockefeller Brothers and their co-conspirators have found it
impossible to completely cover their tracks even though many
modifications in their detailed plans have been made.  So a brief
review of the circumstances that have been developing around us
over the past years is very, very revealing.

   First: Consider Nelson Rockefeller's unsuccessful attempt so
far to become our unelected President and Dictator by way of his
25th Amendment to the United States Constitution.  On October 11,
1974, I recorded my first AUDIO BOOK talking tape entitled: "HOW
TO PROTECT YOURSELF DURING THE COMING DEPRESSION AND THIRD WORLD
WAR."  At that time Rockefeller still had two months to go being
confirmed as Vice-President; but I revealed that if confirmed,
Rockefeller intended to become President by June 1975.  In June
1975 during a trip to Europe, President Ford suddenly began
taking serious falls--once down an aircraft ramp, and persons
close to him said he also looked pale and unsteady.  The public
was quickly fed stories about the trouble being an old knee
injury from football, even though Ford's doctor stated flatly
that his falls had nothing to do with his knees.

   The following month in AUDIO LETTER No. 2 I relayed
information that I had been given to the effect that Ford's
troubles had been caused by a powerful virus of unknown origin
which had been arrested successfully.

   The next month I revealed in lectures and also in AUDIO BOOK
Special Tape No. 1 that by September or thereabouts we should
know whether Nelson Rockefeller was to be stopped in his drive to
seize the presidency.  And on September 5, 1975, an alleged
attempt on Ford's life was made by Lynette Fromme; but as I
warned in AUDIO LETTER No. 4 that month, this was only a dress
rehearsal intended to frighten Ford into resigning.  But Ford
refused to resign, and on September 22, 1975, a real attempt on
Ford's life took place.  During a visit to San Francisco, Ford
became the target of Sara Jane Moore, and it truly was only by
the grace of God that he escaped injury.  It had been planned for
Ford when he came out of the St. Francis Hotel to cross the
street and shake hands with people in the crowd.  And there
waited Sara Jane Moore, standing exactly where Ford was supposed
to enter the crowd, armed with a pistol she had bought with a
Treasury agent by her side the previous day, and with her mind
programmed for assassination by electronic programming
techniques!  But at the last moment the assassination plan fell
apart.  A Secret Service agent told the President not to cross
the street, so he headed straight for his limousine.  At that,
Sara Jane Moore raised her gun to fire across the street at Ford,
but her shot was deflected by another onlooker--a Vietnam veteran
in a wheel chair.

   As it turned out, this was indeed the real turning point in
Nelson Rockefeller's hopes for succeeding Jerry Ford as
President.  He ran through a series of additional back-up plans,
all of which my sources enabled me to reveal in advance in my
monthly AUDIO LETTERS--and he failed for the time being.  But he
recently whispered to reporters as he left a White House Award
ceremony, "I'll be back."

   And then there is Fort Knox.  I recorded my first AUDIO BOOK
tape in October 1974 less than three weeks after the so-called
Gold Inspection Visit to Fort Knox by 6 Congressmen, a Senator,
and about a hundred newsmen.  Here was a perfect example of a
case in which the true circumstances alone--namely, the absence
of the huge hoard of gold shown on Treasury and Federal Reserve
books--would have been sufficient all by themselves to prove the
existence of a tremendous financial conspiracy.  Therefore great
care was taken by the Treasury Department to prevent these
circumstances from being detected.  Instead of an objective,
honest inspection of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox by
independent gold experts, the Treasury substituted a public
relations peep show involving people who had no way of knowing
what they should look for.  And while the public was loudly
promised an independent audit by the General Accounting Office of
Congress, the actual so-called Audit Committee consisted almost
entirely of Treasury personnel; and the tiny Audit Report that
was finally issued several months late presented no findings of
fact, concluding only, quote: "We believe" the gold is there!

   My associates and I have amassed mountains of evidence in
connection with the FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL.  This twin scandal
involves not only the theft of America's monetary gold supply but
also the storage of leaking canisters of CIA super poison
processed from radioactive Plutonium 239.  From time to time I
have made portions of this evidence public, such as in monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for July 1975.  In that tape I was able to
reveal the sworn statement of former Congressman Frank Chelf
attesting to the constant flow of gold out of Fort Knox during
the mid 60's and the unsatisfactory answers he received from the
Treasury and the White House about what was going on.  I also
revealed that the official listing of gold shipments from Fort
Knox omits major shipments.  One example of which we had
photographs took place on January 20, 1965; and in response to
such a specific challenge, the Mint admitted the shipment had
taken place.

   But the most important item about Fort Knox that was revealed
in AUDIO LETTER No. 2 was the secret "Central Core Vault"--a huge
central gold storage vault whose existence was not revealed to
the September 1974 visitors and was later denied in writing by
then Treasury Secretary William Simon--another interesting
circumstance because the Central Core Vault was described and
confirmed for us and for Congressman Otis Pike by a former
Commanding Officer of Fort Knox, General John L. Ryan, Jr.  Both
Simon's lie and General Ryan's confirmation are quoted in monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 8, January 1976.  The Central Core Vault is the
key to the whole Fort Knox Scandal.

   The joint Rockefeller-Soviet program to conquer the world is
so all-encompassing that many other aspects of it have been
discussed too in the monthly AUDIO LETTER.  But the most
overriding issue of all now is the rapid approach of NUCLEAR WAR
ONE on American soil.  In my very first tape recorded in October
1974 I explained the basic purposes for which the Rockefeller
Brothers were betraying America into nuclear war.  I also
revealed the target schedule for the war to begin--mid 1977 to
mid 1978.  Today some of the details of the war plan have
changed, and the economic and political scenarios being planned
by the Rockefellers at that time, while still on track, are
behind schedule.  But of all Rockefeller plans, the one for
nuclear war on America is most crucial and, as of now, the time
schedule for war is still practically unchanged.  For reasons I
will explain in Topic #2, the Rockefeller Brothers are straining
all their resources to prevent a slippage in the timing of the
war.

   In July 1975, Indira Gandhi clamped down on her own India in a
manner that stunned the world.  She was condemned most bitterly
of all by the Government of the United States!!  The following
month in AUDIO LETTER No. 3 I told you what had actually happened
in India.  Despite all appearances, Indira Gandhi was trying to
save India's freedom--not destroy it.  What she had done was to
smash a CIA project that had been under way for five years to
take over India.  In the same tape I went on to reveal that the
joint Rockefeller plans for war were being revised on India's
account.  The plan for nuclear war on American soil was put back
on a back burner until India could be taken over by war in Asia. 
The target date for India to be attacked under the revised war
plan was March 1977, this month.

   I also told you, quote:

  "The new plans do not involve hostilities on American soil as
they stand right now.  Keep in mind though that further changes
can and probably will occur.  In particular, should Indira Gandhi
be toppled from power any time soon, it may well enable the CIA
to put the original takeover plans back on track, and that would
restore the original plan for war on the United States."

   When I revealed these things 19 months ago, they probably
seemed remote and improbable to you; but by relaxing the
Emergency control she had imposed and holding election on March
21, six days ago, she lost--tragically for not only India but
America as well.  Once again things are not what they seem to be. 
The CIA succeeded in toppling Indira Gandhi by subverting the
free election she wanted for her people--and did so this very
month, March 1977.  This was the original target date for war on
India in the plans I revealed 19 months ago.

   With India taken care of, neutralized for the moment, NUCLEAR
WAR ONE on American soil no longer faces any delay on India's
account.  In monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 for November 1975, I
revealed the grand strategy for the huge Asian war that was to
precede nuclear war on America.  It called for hostilities to
begin in the Middle East with a severe provocation arranged to
justify a limited nuclear strike from the Sinai Desert at
Arab-OPEC oil wells.  This cut-off of oil supplies would cripple
the heart of Europe and Africa, disable Japan, and force
dictatorial measures such as gas rationing and other measures on
the American people by Executive Orders with all of these being
brought about more completely under the domination of the
Rockefeller-Soviet alliance.

   But now, India has been rendered easy prey for a complete
takeover and has therefore dropped in priority.  The war in the
Middle East has been delayed several times.  The most decisive
failure in this regard occurred late in December 1975 when OPEC
oil ministers were kidnapped in Vienna by terrorists in the pay
of the CIA.  Several were supposed to be killed, inflaming
passions and leading to war, but the job was botched and they all
escaped with their lives.  This caused a tremendous slippage in
the plans for war and conquest; and for bungling this top
priority assignment, the CIA station Chief in Athens, Richard
Welch, was executed by the CIA itself, as I revealed in monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 8 for January 1976.

   In that same tape I publicly revealed the super secret White
House Merge Directive.  This Directive requires that life in the
United States be so altered that it can be comfortably merged
with life in the Soviet Union, and it has been in existence since
the days of Stalin!  Such a way of life is totally alien to
America; but today, under the puppetized administration of Jimmy
Carter, the federal government is now openly run by aliens with
alien philosophies.  Our life is being merged with that of the
Soviet Union.  Even so, the greed and lust for power that
motivates both the Rulers of the Soviet Union and the real Rulers
of America today knows no bounds.  And as early as November 1975
in AUDIO LETTER No. 6, I began warning of the threat of a Soviet
double-cross of the Rockefellers and their Corporate Socialist
intimates here in America.  By the spring of 1976 I reported that
certain Trustees of the Rockefeller-controlled major Foundations
were increasingly concerned that such a double-cross was brewing. 
But not so the Rockefeller Brothers and their closest
collaborators, because they have more faith in the Soviet Union
than they do in America.

   Last summer, of course, the Soviet double-cross actually
began.  First, as I reported in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 13 for
June 1976, I received Intelligence information that a nuclear
weapon had been planted at Seal Harbor, Maine, between the summer
homes of David and Nelson Rockefeller.  Soon afterwards I was
notified that the Soviet Union was planting short-range nuclear
missiles within our own territorial waters ready for launch from
undersea resting places upon remote control.  We were in danger
of an immediate Soviet nuclear surprise attack, not only here but
world-wide, that would destroy all effective naval opposition to
the Soviet Union and thereby guarantee Soviet victory.  Thanks to
the Intelligence gap created by Henry Kissinger as Secretary of
State, the information reaching me about the missiles was not
reaching the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  Intelligence sources
informed me that the only way action could be brought about to
save the situation was by making it a public issue, so that is
what I did by means of AUDIO LETTERS 14 and 15 last summer--and
it worked as I recounted for you in AUDIO LETTER No. 16 for
September 1976.

   But the four Rockefeller Brothers long ago passed the point of
No Return.  In spite of what has happened last summer, they are
continuing with the joint program of conquest with the Soviet
Union, trying to convince themselves that their long-time
alliance is back on track.  But at the same time they are trying
to hurry up NUCLEAR WAR ONE because in the Soviet-Rockefeller
rivalry, time is now on the side of the Soviets.

   My friends, we are now surrounded by circumstances that prove
the existence of a grand conspiracy to rob us of our freedom and
even our very lives.  It is up to each one of us to open our eyes
and see these circumstances for what they really are before it is
too late.

Topic #2--Last month in AUDIO LETTER No. 21 I explained what the
words "NATIONAL SECURITY" really mean to those who control
America's government today.  To them National Security begins and
ends with the protection and the advancement of our unelected
Rulers themselves--not you and me.  Nowhere is this more vividly
proven than in the realm of war.  We are taxed to the breaking
point in order to support so-called National Security.  But when
in this Century has all of this prevented a war?  And for all our
vaunted Intelligence gathering and Early Warning Systems, when
have you and I ever benefitted by being warned in advance of an
imminent conflict by the Government?

   It has been proven beyond question, not only by circumstantial
evidence but by documentary evidence as well, that every single
major conflict in the 20th Century involving America has been
known about, in advance, by our Rulers.  But this advance
knowledge has never been communicated to us, the nation at large,
except once.  In 1962 President John F. Kennedy did notify
America of the warnings he had obtained of the imminent Cuban
missile threat.  It was a frightening experience for us all, but
the result was that a successful Soviet surprise attack was
rendered impossible.  Barely a year later, Jack Kennedy died at
the hands of the CIA for ruining this Rockefeller-Soviet gamble
by acting in the interest of true national security--our
security.  But in the cases of two World Wars, Korea, and
Vietnam, a different pattern has consistently applied.

   In 1916 Woodrow Wilson, the first American president to be a
total puppet of the Rockefeller empire, narrowly achieved
re-election with the peace-oriented slogan, "He kept us out of
war."  Meanwhile he was rapidly maneuvering America into war. 
Five months after his re-election on April 6, 1917, America
declared war on Germany, and soon American doughboys were off to
fight "The War to End All Wars."  There thousands died in
trenches while Trustees of the "Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace" encouraged Wilson to extend the war because
of the desirable changes it was producing in American lives!

   In 1940 with Europe once again aflame with war, President
Franklin D. Roosevelt, like Wilson before him, appealed to peace
sentiment in order to be re-elected.  Even now, my friends, I can
still hear those campaign words of F.D.R. ringing in my ears, and
I quote:

  "And while I am talking to you mothers and fathers, I give you
one more assurance.  I have said this before but I shall say it
again, and again, and again: 'Your boys are not going to be sent
into any foreign wars.'"

But even as he won an unprecedented third term in this way,
F.D.R. was moving the United States rapidly toward war.  On May
27, 1941, only six months after his re-election and with Pearl
Harbor still six months in the future, F.D.R. proclaimed an
"UNLIMITED NATIONAL EMERGENCY" to get ready for war!  In the
ensuing months everything possible was done to provoke a Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor; and when this attack was known to be
imminent, most of the United States Pacific fleet was
conveniently bottled up in Pearl Harbor as a tempting target. 
Only our Aircraft Carriers were kept far away from danger, since
they would be indispensable for retaliation against Japan.

   Certain officials in the American government knew well in
advance that war with Japan was coming.  Proof of this can be
found in many places today, some of them quite unexpected.  One
example is the autobiography of the Rt. Reverend Edward Randolph
Welles II published by Learning, Inc., Manset, Maine  04656.  The
book entitled "THE HAPPY DISCIPLE" is not basically about
politics or economics at all but about the career and life of an
Episcopal minister.  But it so happens that in the fall of 1941,
Bishop Welles was the rector of Christ Church in Alexandria,
Virginia, the church of George Washington.  And on page 62 one
reads the following, and I quote:

  "Another of my friends was Norman H. Davis, President of the
American Red Cross, who was elected to our parish vestry.  He was
very close to President Franklin D. Roosevelt and saw him
frequently.  On November 6, 1941, I had lunch with Mr. Davis in
Washington and learned of the approaching war with Japan which
would begin within five weeks.  I was shaken, and asked Mr. Davis
to urge the President to appoint a national day of prayer, and
handed Mr. Davis a letter I had written to President Roosevelt on
the subject.  Mr. Davis did hand my letter to the President, who
did appoint the following New Year's Day as a 'National Day of
Prayer.'

   I was so moved by the luncheon revelations that later that
very day I sent our mimeographed postal cards to the congregation
stating:

    'The rector is preaching a sermon at 11:00 A.M. service on
Sunday, November 9, which he feels is sufficiently important to
call to your attention.  The sermon will assess the desperate
situation that confronts America this Armistice Day, and suggests
basic Christian attitudes and actions.'

   On Sunday in the course of that sermon I said:

    'Few people realize how great is the possibility that we
shall actually be at war with Japan within thirty days.'

   The congregation was deeply shocked; and in response to many
requests, my booklet of sermons was reprinted with this sermon
added.  Twenty-eight days after that sermon came, December 7, the
Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and the war was on."

(End of quotation from Bishop Welles' autobiography.)

   Bishop Welles, of course, had no way of knowing that President
Roosevelt's advance knowledge of the impending Japanese attack
was due to conspiracy to bring about that attack, but he did know
that people should be warned about it--and he did just that.  The
federal government, of course, could have warned all of America
of the impending Japanese attack, but then the attack would never
have taken place.  And F.D.R., doing the bidding of the
Rockefellers and their allies, wanted the attack to take place so
that America would go to war!

   In the two-volume AUDIO BOOK talking tape I recorded a year
ago with Colonel Curtis B. Dall, the detailed story of Pearl
Harbor is told by Colonel Dall--and Colonel Dall, who was the
son-in-law and close friend of F.D.R., knows what he is talking
about.

   Next came Korea.  On June 21, 1950, Assistant Secretary of
State Dean Rusk testified before Congress to the effect that
there was no indication of any impending North Korean attack on
South Korea.  Several days later John Foster Dulles went to
Seoul, South Korea, to give reassurances that there was no danger
of invasion from the north.  Then he left quickly because the
North Korean invasion was already being launched!

   As for us, the American people, another nasty surprise. 
Vietnam, too, followed the old pattern.  The last thing the
American people wanted was yet another bloody war.  And during
the election campaign of 1964, Lyndon Johnson knocked down straw
man Barry Goldwater by playing on the Peace theme.  Goldwater was
portrayed as the dangerous man who would get America into a big
war; Johnson, as the 'great compromiser' who would keep us away
from any such danger.  But Johnson had already obtained the
Tonkin Gulf Resolution as the tool he needed, and within 3 months
after his landslide election, Johnson started turning Vietnam
into another big disastrous war.  By June 1965, the commitment of
American combat troops to the nightmare of Vietnam had begun
under the orders of one more president who had promised America
Peace and Prosperity.

   Today it is all happening again.  Jimmy Carter, the puppetized
president who works for David Rockefeller, is raising many
Americans' hope that this time it will be different.  This time
we have a president who wears sweaters and blue jeans and must
therefore be a man of the people.  He must be determined to have
peace since he is so aggressively seeking disarmament; and he has
promised us all that he will never lie.  Yet in a short space of
only two months, President Carter has succeeded in alienating and
angering governments the world over.  Under the guise of
folksiness, he is systematically insulting visiting ambassadors
with undignified receptions and by refusing to attend luncheons
given by the ambassadors.  He is preaching to the world about
"human rights", while doing nothing whatever about the violation
of our own human right to breathe clean air free of contamination
by Soviet plutonium attacks, among other things.

   In the case of the Soviet Union with whom he says he wants to
negotiate arms reduction to prevent war, he is breaching an
agreement not to interfere in one another's internal affairs that
was signed by President Nixon back in 1972.  He says he wants
peace; but the circumstances he is bringing about with great
speed are exactly those that could well lead to war.

   The fact is, my friends, that Jimmy Carter is sweeping us
along swiftly toward NUCLEAR WAR ONE--and the sooner the better,
according to his Rockefeller bosses.  Does he himself know where
he is taking America by following orders?  Bear in mind that he
is conspicuously trying to emulate F.D.R. in every respect right
down to launching his campaign last summer where F.D.R. did in
1932--Warm Springs, Georgia, and reviving the Fireside Chat as
president.  And listen to Carter's own words from a recent
Fireside Chat, and I quote:

  "I remember another difficult time in our nation's history when
we felt a different spirit.  During World War II we faced a
terrible crisis, but the challenge of fighting against Fascism
drew us together.  I believe we are ready for that same spirit
again."

   The Rockefeller Brothers want very badly to have NUCLEAR WAR
ONE begin as soon as possible, for several reasons.  The military
balance is shifting ever more rapidly in favor of the Soviet
Union and away from the Rockefellers even in the realm of secret
super weapons.  As of now, according to all the information I
have been able to obtain, the CIA undersea super missiles in the
Atlantic and Pacific, which I revealed two months ago in AUDIO
LETTER No. 20, are still the most awesome nuclear missiles in the
world.  But as I revealed then, these CIA missiles which are to
protect the Rockefellers--not you and me--have become inoperative
in several cases, and there is no way to predict how long those
that remain will last before they, too, fail and start leaking.

   But there is another even more basic worry the Rockefellers
must think about.  As of now, the United States has no
anti-missile weapons at all, and the Soviet Union has only the
Galosh ABM, whose effectiveness against ICBMs is questionable;
but that situation is on the verge of changing drastically very
soon.  Major General George Keegan Jr.,  who retired on January
1, 1977 as head of Air Force Intelligence, is a man who has
repeatedly been first to detect major new developments bearing on
the military balance.  He has said recently, quote: "A global
conflict is in gestation."  And, my friends, he is right. 
Furthermore, he has been sounding the warning that the Soviet
Union is already testing a death ray type weapon called a
"Particle Beam."  Once this weapon is operationally deployed in
the very near future, it could destroy incoming missiles and
render the Soviet Union invulnerable to any ICBM attack,
including an attack by means of the Rockefeller CIA undersea
super missiles.

   Meanwhile the Soviet Union is continuing right now in a
relentless program of planting underwater missiles along the
coastlines of the United States and other countries around the
world.  And in spite of the "Red Friday Agreement" of October 1,
1976, which I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 17, the Soviet
Union is not honoring the "Nuclear Safe Zone" in planting these
missiles.  The Rockefellers believe that the threat of their CIA
undersea missiles will prevent the Soviet missiles inside the
Nuclear Safe Zone from actually being launched in NUCLEAR WAR
ONE, but that is strictly a gamble on their part because the
threat is there.

   During the latter part of this month, I have been receiving
reports from my own Intelligence sources about the current status
of the world-wide Soviet program of planting short-range
underwater nuclear missiles.  When I recorded monthly AUDIO
LETTER No. 15 last August, I gave the coordinates for 64 missiles
and bombs around the world, including 16 in American and Canadian
waters.  That was sufficient to give the Soviet Union the
capability of a surprise knockout punch against all the naval
power in the world opposing the Soviet Union; but now, thanks to
the insane Red Friday policy of the Rockefellers, the situation
has been allowed to become far worse.  Now redundant targeting
insures that any such Soviet attack has a very high probability
of success.  And in addition to naval and other military targets
close to the sea, Soviet underwater missiles are now being aimed
as well at increasing numbers of non-military strategic targets.

   As of my latest tally, the Soviet Union has so far planted a
total of 372 nuclear weapons, mostly missiles but a few bombs, in
coastal waters of the world.  Of these nearly half, 158, are
planted in American waters.  This includes 130 around the
mainland 48 States, 9 more around Alaska, 15 in Hawaiian waters,
and 1 each at Midway Island, Guam, Christmas Island, and the
north approach to the Panama Canal.  The Soviet Union is also
preparing to be able to strike with additional plutonium cloud
attacks against America.  On March 1 America extended its
territorial limits to 200 miles, and Soviet submarines have moved
out beyond this new limit; but now remote control canisters are
being planted along our west coast within 3 to 5 miles of the
coastline.  So far 16 of these have been planted, and more are on
the way.

   There are 29 missiles around the British Isles and 11 in
Canadian waters.  Europe and the Mediterranean are currently
surrounded by 46 Soviet underwater missiles.  Ten of these are in
the Mediterranean.  Along the Atlantic and North Sea coasts,
Spain is targeted by one, France by 3, the Netherlands by 5, and
West Germany by 6.  Three Soviet missiles have been planted in
Danish waters, 7 near Norway, 6 near Sweden, and 5 near Finland. 
In addition, 7 Soviet underwater missiles surround Iceland. 
These are ready to decimate NATO Air Bases there, enabling the
new Soviet supersonic long-range Backfire Bomber in its naval
version to interdict all our vital sea lanes across the North
Atlantic.

   The rest of the pattern world-wide is: First on the Pacific
and Indian Oceans--Australia 7, New Zealand 6, New Guinea 4,
Philippines 6, Indonesia 6, Malay Peninsula 2, Thailand 1, Burma
1, India 1, Taiwan 3, Red China 7, border between Red China and
Vietnam 1, Japan heavily targeted 19, South Korea 8.

   Around southwest Asia, Africa, and the Middle East--Caspian
Sea coast of Iran 3, Persian Gulf coast of Iran and Saudi Arabia
5, in the Oman Gulf 1 (target Iran), Red Sea coast of Saudi
Arabia 2, Black Sea coast of Turkey 1, southern Africa 8.

   And along the coast of Latin America--Mexico 11, Guatemala 1,
British Honduras 1, Honduras 1, Nicaragua 1 even though Nicaragua
itself is being used for certain naval purposes by the Soviet
Union, Costa Rica 3, Venezuela 4 including one in the Orinoco
River, Chile 5, Argentina 1.  The British possession of West
Falkland near southern Argentina is also targeted by 1 Soviet
missile as is the Island of Bermuda.

   The government of any country I have named may obtain the
navigational coordinates of the threatening Soviet underwater
missiles from me upon official request.  Up to now only one
government, that of Great Britain, has requested these latest
coordinates and I have gladly supplied them.  Great Britain is
quietly living up to her majestic name, because alone of all the
nations on earth, the British Government is fending off the
Soviet naval threat with grim determination.  I do not think it
would be in the best interest of the British people for me to
tell you all of the measures being taken in this regard beyond
the fact that the Soviet missiles are being removed from British
waters.  But I will tell you that the British are proving one
very important fact up to now.  Given the will to do so, the
Soviet war threat can be staved off.  For all their modern
weaponry, the Soviets are not supermen except in comparison to
the treasonous jellyfish who control America's government today. 
What is necessary is to recognize circumstances for what they
really are, and then to summon the spirit and determination to do
what must be done; and that, my friends, is exactly what the
British are doing right now.

Topic #3--A few days ago the Reverend Billy Graham was quoted in
newspapers as saying he likes, quote: "symbolic gestures made to
the American people" by President Carter.  He expressed
particular pleasure at the fact that Carter not only plans to go
to Sunday School but even to teach there.  But as for the
substance of the new administration, Dr. Graham said it is just
too early to assess that.

   Millions of Americans are placing their trust in Jimmy Carter,
an untried newcomer to national politics, mainly because of his
Sunday School teacher image.  In the rush, rush world of today,
Jimmy Carter's highly visible piety almost seems like something
out of the past.  A hundred years ago the following words might
have been written about him, and I quote:

  "He became a regular attendant at the Erie Street Baptist
Church, and vigorously did Jimmy give himself to his work.  Jimmy
was publicly baptized in the fall of 1854.  Not long after, Jimmy
was made Clerk of the church, an unusual responsibility for a
mere youth, and indicative of the impression of maturity and
responsibility that he gave to others.  Before many years passed,
he was teaching one of the largest classes in the Sunday School.
As a bright High School graduate, a faithful attendant, a most
staid and responsible young man, Jimmy soon took a prominent part
in all church activities.  He threw himself into them with
characteristic single-mindedness.  As we have said, the church
offered this unemotional youth an outlet; but it also offered his
mother, brothers and sisters the best part of what social life
they enjoyed."

   My friends, I did not just make up these words to fit Jimmy
Carter.  I have simply substituted the name "Jimmy" for the name
"John" in excerpts from the biography of John D. Rockefeller, Sr.
by Allan Nevins.  The striking thing about John D. Rockefeller
was that his vigorous church activities never throughout his
entire career translated into fair, honest, or ethical dealings
in business!  And in a similar vein today, Jimmy Carter, whether
he realizes it or not, is preaching good but doing evil.  How far
might some dictators, past and present, have gotten if they had
eliminated church opposition by themselves going to church?  It
may be that Jimmy Carter is being misled and is not knowingly
doing that which is evil; but either way, my friends, that is no
excuse for the rest of us to blindly follow along like sheep to
the slaughter.  If we do so, history shows clearly what will
happen.

   The end of the world came for the organized church in Russia
after the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.  Within a few short years
more than 20,000,000 Russians met death at the hands of the
Soviet government.  And while a struggling underground of
believers has persisted to the present day, the church as an
organization that can influence events directly no longer exists. 
And it will not exist so long as Communism remains the official
religion of the Soviet Union.

   In mainland China, too, the same thing happened when Mao
Tse-tung took over.  The church in China was much smaller as a
percentage of the population than it had been in Russia, but its
fate was the same--the end of the world aside from a struggling
remnant of believers forced under ground.  After killing more
than 60,000,000 of his own people, Mao succeeded in turning
Communist China into perhaps the most rigidly regimented society
on earth.  And David Rockefeller, who made Jimmy Carter president
and calls the shots now, has expressed strong approval of this
state of affairs.  For example, several years ago he said, and I
quote:

  "The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership
is one of the most important and successful in human history."

   Now, my friends, if we allow it to happen, we are
next--America and the whole western world.  The elaborate plan
which I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 for November 1975,
is being revised and updated for application in the present
circumstances.  Certain of my sources have expressed great
concern to me recently that a provocation for war in the Middle
East is now being established that will be unlike anything we
have ever seen before.  I repeat, the Rockefellers are
increasingly desperate to get NUCLEAR WAR ONE under way before
they lose what control they still have over events.  To achieve
that purpose, plans are being seriously considered which, if
carried out, could instantly throw all three major religions of
the western world into turmoil in the course of igniting a Middle
East conflict.  My hope is that by warning you of the existence
of such plans, I am making them too dangerous for the
conspirators to carry out.  But in case they are carried out, I
hope that you will now be able to recognize it immediately when
it happens.  We must not allow ourselves to be tricked,
stampeded, or neutralized, my friends.  We have important work to
do.

   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter.  Thank you,
and may God bless each and every one of you.

Source

 

DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #21

Audio letter No. 21

mp3 part 01

mp3 part 02

Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net

"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording.  Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter.  Today is February 27,
1977, and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 21.

   For some time now I have been warning you of the dangers
facing America.  Now, time is fast running out.  When Jimmy
Carter was inaugurated President on January 20, 1977, a
contingency plan concocted in 1963 was set in motion, and it is
progressing very rapidly.  The key to this particular plan was to
be the placement of a completely puppetized president in office
at a time of rapidly-mounting war threats.  Under this plan,
inadequate performance by the puppet presidents in the face of
these dire threats is intended to enable a take-over of the
country by Rockefeller-controlled military and CIA inner circles. 
In this manner the total dictatorship sought by the four
Rockefeller Brothers is to be brought into being.

   We are now faced with the planned threat of NUCLEAR WAR ONE
with the puppet president now on the scene in the person of Jimmy
Carter.  Carter continually spouts the Rockefeller line as he
learned it from his participation in their TRILATERAL COMMISSION,
but he has no real grasp at all of what he is involved in.

   Meanwhile, the CIA is also being readied for its appointed
role.  Nelson Rockefeller has been busy packing key positions in
the CIA with his "new men"; and to facilitate the enlistment of
required military support for the coming Dictatorship, a military
man who is a member of the Rockefeller inner circle, Admiral
Stansfield Turner, has been selected to head the CIA.  That's why
the earlier nomination of Ted Sorenson ran into a brick wall--he
ran afoul of a game plan he didn't even know about.

   The plan calls for pre-war crisis measures to be used to
condition Americans to accept the elaborate transformation of
America into a total dictatorship, and this pre-war build-up is
going on right now.  Ultimately many millions of Americans are to
be annihilated in a Soviet nuclear attack, which is to be carried
out according to rules laid down in secret agreements negotiated
by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.

   As I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 12 for May 1976,
this joint Rockefeller-Soviet war plan includes a super-secret
"NUCLEAR SAFE ZONE" across the upper portion of the continental
United States within which the Rockefellers and their intimates
plan to ride out the war on Mount Desert and Bartlett Islands off
the coast of Maine, right in the heart of the Nuclear Safe Zone. 
This Nuclear Safe Zone is merely the nuclear-age equivalent of
the orders which were given to Allied Bombing Commands during
World War II not to damage Rockefeller-owned strategic targets in
Germany.  These orders caused such huge important installations
as the I. G. Farben Chemical plants to survive unscathed all the
way through World War II, while other targets and even whole
cities nearby were completely leveled.

   Last month in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 20 I was able to reveal
the club the Rockefeller Brothers believe they hold over the
heads of the Soviets to make sure the Soviet nuclear attack on
America goes as planned.  In this way the Rockefellers will have
used the Soviets to do their dirty work for them.  In any event,
this club consists of an undersea fleet of 14 super-missiles
targeted on the Soviet Union--five in the Pacific, 9 in the
Atlantic.  These missiles are not under the control of our
Defense Department, and have nothing whatever to do with the
defense of our country as a whole.  They're under the direct
control of the Rockefeller Brothers through their controlled CIA,
and their only purpose is to make sure that the Rockefeller inner
circles in America are not included in the holocaust that is
being arranged for the rest of us.  If all goes as planned, the
CIA super-missiles deep in the ocean will never be fired at all. 
Only if there should be a Soviet double-cross would there be an
attempt to fire them, and under those circumstances they would
act only as vengeance weapons.

   Yet as awesome as these CIA super-missiles are, they cannot
prevent a Soviet double-cross.  In fact, they have already
provoked one double-cross.  Last summer the Soviet Union sneaked
in under the CIA missile umbrella and began planting short-range
underwater-launch nuclear missiles in our own territorial waters,
hoping to achieve such total surprise that the CIA undersea
super-missiles would never be fired.  The limited exposure of
this threat, which I was able to achieve by means of AUDIO
LETTERS Nos. 14 and 15 for July and August 1976, was sufficient
to ruin the Soviet surprise, so an attack at that time was
averted.  The joint Rockefeller-Soviet war plan is back on track
for the time being, but now both sides are watching for a chance
to double-cross each other.  Meanwhile, as I reported last month,
the presence of the Soviet missiles in our waters are now being
incorporated into the joint war plan.

   For the first time in many years, Civil Defense, of which we
have none, has again become the subject of wide concern.  We are
again hearing radio test alerts on the Emergency Broadcasting
System which will be used in the event of war.  It has even been
hinted that we may soon experience unannounced air-raid drills, a
practice that could be especially effective in conditioning us
all to the idea that war is imminent.

   Only a few days ago, on February 11, 1977, President Carter
became the first president to fly with great publicity in a
special airplane now fitted as a flying Command Post to be used
in nuclear war.  The article above this in the New York Daily
News carried the headline, quote: "CARTER GETS A PREVIEW OF WORLD
WAR III."  Just a year ago such headlines would have been
unthinkable.  Now they are all around us.

   Because the plan now under way requires that military support
be arranged for the new Dictatorship, it was essential that
General George S. Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
be neutralized as I said he would be in monthly AUDIO LETTER No.
17.  General Brown played a pivotal role in preventing a Soviet
nuclear surprise attack on the United States during August and
September 1976; but that will not happen again, my friends.  The
campaign which began in October 1976 to render General Brown
ineffective in his efforts to protect America has now succeeded. 
He is no longer able to influence events to any significant
extent.  That is why when Carter demanded on January 12, 1977,
that studies be performed toward eliminating 75% to 80% of our
Intercontinental Missiles, General Brown simply agreed to have
the studies done.  Can you imagine?

   My friends, now that we have lost General Brown, there is no
one left in the entire United States Government to help us. 
There are still many patriotic individuals in the Government, of
course, but they are not the ones in positions of power.  Only
massive public pressure--informed, angry, and determined--now has
any chance of stopping the carefully-planned war to kill millions
of us and enslave the rest.  Every one of us must work to bring
about public awareness and pressure in whatever time we have
left.  But suppose we do not succeed--then what?!  I believe the
time has come to face that question squarely and honestly.

   It may well be that we have already failed in our efforts to
help prevent NUCLEAR WAR ONE.  Only God can know, but we dare not
give up because the victory may yet be ours.  But the fact is
that many Americans do not want to listen.  They are not ready,
and some will not be ready to listen until catastrophe comes upon
their heads.

   If NUCLEAR WAR ONE does come here, my friends, millions will
die, but there will also be some survivors.  You owe it to
yourself, to your family, and to our whole society to do whatever
you can to be among the survivors.  The godless dictatorship
being fashioned by our unelected Rulers will collapse in the end;
and when it does, there must be people left who know what America
was all about, and what went wrong.  Because you are willing to
hear the truth now before disaster arrives, YOU are that people. 
And if we are all forced to pass through the dark tunnel of war
and bungling dictatorship, it will fall your lot to help lead our
people out of darkness and into the sunlight once again on the
other side.

   My three special topics for today are:

Topic #1--HOW OUR NATIONAL SECURITY WAS REALLY LOST
Topic #2--PRE-WAR AMERICA, 1977
Topic #3--THE END OF AN ERA.

Topic #1--For more than a generation, since the outbreak of World
War II in fact, Americans have been preoccupied with the idea of
national security.  But what is National Security?  One concept
of national security is the familiar one promoted day in and day
out by the federal government.  According to the Government,
national security is a matter that is just too complex for most
of us to understand and must always be wrapped in secrecy,
intrigue, and more secrecy.  When we see diplomatic maneuvers
which seem to help our enemies while harming our friends or even
ourselves, we're always told we simply don't understand the
so-called National Security considerations that are involved. 
The map of the free world shrinks ever smaller, our country grows
visibly weaker and weaker, yet the federal bureaucracy knows
best, we are assured, and will take care of it all for us.  But
while you and I are both forced to pay the bill for it all, we
are never, never let in on what it is really all about.

   What is called "National Security" today by the Government
would be better described as security for our Secret Rulers. 
They see themselves as the embodiment of our nation, just as
royalty did in times past.  Thus to them, so-called National
Security is nothing more than a king's "X" to prevent the public,
you and me, from learning things about governmental doings that
could endanger our Rulers' security.  Vital secrets that are
routinely betrayed to our deadliest enemies are kept hidden from
our view.

   The Government's version of National Security involves ever
greater centralization of all power and all decision-making into
just a few hands.  Increasingly it involves spying on the
citizens of our own nation, and now it even includes diplomatic
manipulations that have betrayed us straight down the road to
NUCLEAR WAR ONE.  This is what the words National Security really
mean to those who secretly control the United States
Government--a government that used to be ours, but is no more. 
What is called National Security obviously is not what most of us
naturally think of when we hear these words.  The Government's
version of National Security, in other words, is an illusion and
a fraud.  Real national security has to be rooted in the people,
who are the nation.

   When we think of national security we usually think of the
ability of the nation as a whole to protect itself from damage by
other nations--politically, economically, and if need be
militarily.  But there's another side to national security that
is actually more basic, yet we in America have been led to
gradually neglect it and finally lose it altogether over the past
100 years or so.  I refer to the internal stability that has been
destroyed by over-centralization.

   Gone are the days when America consisted of thousands of
communities which could, if need be, survive for indefinite
periods without supplies from distant sources.  And gone are the
days when consumers could choose from among a wide variety of
products produced by true competitors.  Instead, most of the
things we now have to have for life come from somewhere else,
often we know not where; and there is little competition or real
choice left.  The flow of essential commodities can now be turned
off at will by the corporate socialists and a few central spigots
in order to bring America to a grinding halt.  Most Americans
today never give this state of affairs a second thought.  The
young cannot imagine things being any different; and most of
those who are old enough to remember a different way of life are
willing to settle for what we have today with the comforts and
luxuries that have become commonplace.

   What has happened, my friends, is that we have all become
addicts.  There is an addiction that underlies our entire way of
life today, and this same addiction has made it possible for us
to be brought to the threshold of Totalitarian World Government
and nuclear holocaust.  My friends, we are addicts--addicts to
energy.  There's no precedent in history for the magnitude of the
suffering man can now bring about, because there is no precedent
in history for the energy addiction that now grips America and
the world.

   For thousands of years mankind got by on the ancient and
renewable forms of energy such as animal power, water power, wind
power, and the burning of wood.  Then came coal, and the
industrial revolution was spawned.  But it was petroleum, thanks
to its great convenience and high energy output, that was
destined to make true energy addicts of us all.

   It is typical of addictions that they take time to develop,
and that is true of our energy addiction of today.  It began very
gradually over 100 years ago, and has built up over several
generations.  During the early years after petroleum first made
its appearance, we were still in the take-it-or-leave-it stage;
but gradually it found more and more uses, and then whole
technologies were spawned which depend specifically on petroleum
energy, such as the automobile and the airplane.  These
technologies gradually took on the character of necessities,
rather than optional luxuries, and from that point onward we were
true addicts.

   The same way, our energy addiction expanded to include
dependence on natural gas and electricity.  Even our food
production became increasingly dependent upon uninterrupted
supplies of non-renewable energy.  The American farmer, blessed
already with a rich land, began to retire his ox-drawn plow in
favor of a gasoline-powered tractor, and soon expanded his
productivity still further with other farm machinery--all of it
run by petroleum energy.  It became possible for fewer farmers to
feed us all; and farmers who failed to keep up with these new
trends, whether for financial reasons or otherwise, gradually
disappeared from the scene.

   Then came high-yield hybrid crops, petroleum-derivative
insecticides and fungicides to protect these delicate hybrids
from damage, and fertilizers made with natural gas as a raw
material in order to make them grow better.  Farms became bigger,
fewer, and more expensive; huge agribusinesses, energy-intensive
and geared for high productivity, began to dominate American
agriculture, making it still harder for the small family farm to
compete.

   Meanwhile, petroleum energy made possible fast freight
transportation over long distances.  High-volume food
distributors have exploited this in such a way that nearby small
suppliers of many foods are by-passed in favor of a few
centralized huge supply sources far away.  This, of course, has
caused many of the nearby supplies that used to exist in many
areas to dry up and disappear.  For example, every town of any
size used to have access to one or more local dairies which
processed the milk produced by cows in that area.  But today many
of the familiar, dependable local dairies of the past are gone;
and if you can find anyone who can tell you where the milk you
buy comes from, you may well discover that it comes from a
central processing plant in another state.

   We have now reached the point where practically all the
necessities of life, including food and water, reach us only by
means of non-renewable, centrally-controlled energy.  The energy
pushers have done their job well, making it appear that nothing
more than natural trends were at work.  They have fed our
addiction beyond the point of no return, taking care not to allow
competing sources of energy to develop that could get out of
their control and ruin their grip on us.

   Our energy addiction is now to be used against us for their
own purposes.  When we're told now that we must conserve, it
means that we must knuckle under to sacrifices as we are
gradually ground under the heel of artificial shortages and
rising costs.

   My friends, the role of energy in our society is so
all-pervasive today that it is hard to describe, and it is the
Rockefellers who first realized how powerful a tool it could be
for their own ends.  John D. Rockefeller, Sr. built the giant
Standard Oil monopoly with ruthless determination to corner the
market on petroleum.  The trust-busting era merely caused him to
devise better ways to hide his control while his program
proceeded without letup, and soon the Rockefeller Standard Oil
empire became involved in international intrigue and wars to
overcome foreign competitors as well.  The process has continued
down to the present with wars, skirmishes, coups, and so forth,
enabling the Rockefeller empire to maintain a strangle hold on
most of the world's oil.  In recent years this has been made
virtually airtight through control of most of the free world's
refining capacity.  So today it is the four Rockefeller Brothers
who are in a position to turn off the vital energy supplies to
which we have become addicted for our very lives.  We have all
become so accustomed to the steady supply of electricity, natural
gas, and petroleum products that the illusion of reliability has
been created.

   Alternative means of surviving by means of local resources
have gradually fallen into the disuse and have disappeared, while
we all have been lulled into a life or death dependence on
centralized energy sources controlled by the Rockefeller
Brothers.  And they're not interested in your security or mine. 
Their horizon is the world and how to control it--not the mere
survival of America.  Therefore when they turn the energy spigots
off, as they are beginning to do now, they will be turning off
our national security with it--in other words, we have NO
national security.  So long as the necessities of life remain
under the centralized control of men who are determined to murder
our beloved country, we will never again have true national
security.  Only if we, the people, will rise up and take back the
government that has been stolen from us, will the many things be
done that are necessary to restore true national security to our
land.

Topic #2--When I recorded my AUDIO BOOK tape on the coming
depression and war in October, 1974, I explained the real purpose
that caused World Wars I and II.  In both cases, Germany was
nothing more than a huge pawn in an ever bigger game of
international conquest.  Instead, as I said then, through two
World Wars America's Secret Rulers brought Great Britain to her
knees.

   The American people as a whole feel strong kinship to the
British, so it seems incredible that our Secret Rulers would have
deliberately smashed Britain through war.  But listen to what
former Prime Minister Sir Harold Wilson said last month on
January 22, 1977 on a television talk show.  When he was asked to
explain the economic crisis Britain is in, he said, quote:

  "Two world wars took all our investments; and the Lend-Lease
Agreement with the Americans not only took all our markets, which
was justified as we didn't want shipping going to Latin America,
but we had to give them all our inventions."

Thus the three decades from the beginning of World War I to the
end of World War II were used to concentrate the bulk of the
world's economic might into the hands of those who ruled America
secretly, behind the scenes--namely the ROCKEFELLERS.

   The technologies and markets of friend and foe alike were
stolen and poured into the coffers of the Corporate Socialist
empire controlled by the four Rockefeller Brothers.  But this
emergence of America into sudden world dominance was never
intended to be more than a temporary phenomenon by those who had
secretly caused it to happen.

   A dominant share of the economic and technological might of
the world had been centralized under American control so that we
could then serve as an immense reservoir for transfusions to the
Soviet Union!  The godless dictatorship set up by the Bolsheviks
in Russia in 1917 with the help of Rockefeller financing was to
be the real wave of the future.  It represented the ultimate in
monopoly--total control over every aspect of peoples' lives.  But
the Soviet System which is intended as the pattern for TOTAL
WORLD DOMINATION is artificial and unnatural, and that is why the
Soviet Union had to be built up by massive transfusions from
outside--transfusions of money, food, economic and technological
know-how, everything.  Now the transfusions are virtually
complete.

   It took three decades to drain Britain and Europe to build up
America as a reservoir for the Soviet Union, and it has taken
three more decades to drain the American reservoir and make the
Soviet Union the world's most powerful nation in material terms. 
The United States is now following Great Britain down the road to
ruin, and for the same reasons.  The Rockefeller Brothers and
their intimates now arrogantly believe they can no longer be
stopped in their plan of world conquest.  They are convinced
there is no power greater than themselves, and they are becoming
more brazen by the day.

   Jimmy Carter has been programmed to proceed with all possible
speed in dismembering what remains of our nation's defenses while
at the same time promoting public awareness of war tensions here
and abroad.  He is making the terrible mistake of thinking he is
actually President.

   Meanwhile long-time Rockefeller agent, Walter Mondale, stands
ready and waiting for the moment IF and WHEN Jimmy Carter is
erased from the scene.  Mondale is by far the most powerful
Vice-President in history next to Nelson Rockefeller, and he's in
a position to pick up the reins of presidential power at a
moment's notice.

   As for Nelson Rockefeller, he hasn't given up either.  After a
recent White House ceremony at which he was given an award,
Rockefeller whispered to reporters as he left: "I'll be back."

   Jimmy Carter is functioning with a skeleton government at the
present time here in Washington.  Huge gaps remain deliberately
unfilled in the Carter Administration--such as the Chairmanship
of the United States Export-Import Bank.  Normally positions at
Eximbank are among the most coveted plums in all of Washington,
and yet up to now they remain unfilled.  Why?  Because, my
friends, the Export-Import Bank is a peacetime operation, and it
will be shut down when war comes as it is planned to do.

   The Carter Cabinet is a war cabinet, and the unprecedented
measure was taken of rushing their confirmation hearings through
Congress even before Carter took office.  On hand to preside over
America's final destruction in NUCLEAR WAR ONE are men of
unchallenged qualifications for that task--such as Secretary of
State Vance, Secretary of Defense Brown, and National Security
Advisor Brzezinski, among others.  These men were in the
forefront of those who argued in favor of America's involvement
in the disaster called Vietnam, and helped guide the conduct of
the war in such a way as to guarantee our defeat!  Now all they
have to say about Vietnam is, quote: "We made a mistake."  And
with that, our country has been placed in their hands once again.

   We hear continually about "government reorganization", but
what does this really mean?  For one hint, consider the fact that
Brzezinski is on record as saying, quote:

  "The reality of our times is such that a modern society, such
as the United States, needs a central, coordinating, and
renovating organ which cannot be made up of 600 people."

In other words, the United States Congress in its present form is
obsolete and should be replaced by something else!!  Brzezinski,
by the way, is a close neighbor and associate of David and Nelson
Rockefeller's at Seal Harbor, Maine.

   And then there are the words of Andrew Young, appointed United
States Ambassador to the U.N. by Carter.  In that position, Young
is charged with speaking for everyone in the United States, yet
he has said, quote: "Communism has never been a threat to me." 
Do words like that speak for you, my friends?  Or for your
neighbors?  Or for any real American?  But those words have been
allowed to stand, and the man who said them is still the United
Nations Ambassador.

   We are moving rapidly toward the introduction of the secret
new Rockefeller Constitution for America which I revealed and
described in AUDIO BOOK tape released in July 1975.  The plan is
now to accomplish this as part of the scenario now under way to
take over the country under threat of war.  Even Carter's new CIA
Director, Admiral Turner, has been in contact with Carter for
over five years--not about military matters but governmental
reorganization.

   And so our unelected Rulers continue to plan and scheme to
take full advantage of the threat of war and even NUCLEAR WAR ONE
itself to destroy our way of life for their own purposes.  The
orchestrated pre-war build-up of tensions continues.  In recent
weeks, western Europe has suddenly been highlighted as our
nuclear-age Dunkirk because doubts are now being expressed that
NATO forces there could withstand a surprise attack by the Warsaw
Pact forces.

   And here at home it is now officially acknowledged that the
Soviet Union is shooting for military superiority over the West. 
Unofficially, some say they already have it.  Worse yet, the
Rockefeller-controlled CIA just 'happens' to have been grossly
underestimating the Soviet military build-up for a decade or
more.  Can you imagine?  Suddenly now we are told that the Soviet
Union has been spending four times the previous CIA estimates for
new weapons and military installations.  The deliberate
underestimates, which were arranged for years by Rockefeller
insiders in the CIA, had just one purpose: To undermine any
arguments about a serious Soviet threat and thereby to insure a
decline in American military might.

   But now that NUCLEAR WAR ONE is imminent, the CIA estimates
can no longer make any difference in our preparedness, so now the
estimates have suddenly been raised in order to demoralize us and
convince us that defeat at Soviet hands is all but inevitable. 
Having arranged for our Constitutional military forces to be
weakened as much as possible, the CIA itself has become the most
powerful military organization in the United States--a fact
symbolized by the fact that the CIA will now be headed by Four
Star Admiral Turner, a Rockefeller insider who will retain his
military rank.

   The CIA has been transformed into a combined super-Military
and Secret Police controlled by persons loyal only to the
Rockefeller Brothers instead of the country as a whole.  This is
in complete violation of the original charter of the CIA and of
the CONSTITUTION of the United States.

   Sixteen years after the establishment of the CIA at the
instigation of David Rockefeller, former President Harry S.
Truman expressed public regrets over having done so.  On December
21, 1963, he wrote for the Washington Post, quote:

  "For some time I've been disturbed by the way the CIA has been
diverted from its original assignment.  It has become an
operational and at times a policy-making arm of the government."

Saying that he had never visualized, quote, "peacetime cloak and
dagger operations" for the CIA, he added, and I quote:

  "This quiet Intelligence arm of the President has been so
removed from its intended role that it is being interpreted as a
symbol of sinister and mysterious foreign intrigue, and a subject
for cold war enemy propaganda."

   These words of President Truman were published just a month
after an American president, John F. Kennedy, had been brutally
removed from office by a successful CIA operation, as I revealed
in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 3 for August 1975.  Already the CIA
had broken free of presidential control, and a decade later a CIA
operation called "WATERGATE" replaced an elected President and
Vice-President with appointees for the very first time in
American history!

   Today the United States is surrounded by 90 short-range
underwater-launch nuclear missiles planted by the Soviet Union
within our own territorial waters.  Our Constitutional military
services have been under presidential orders since October 1,
1976 NOT to remove them; and now that General Brown has been
neutralized, no effort whatever is being made to do so.  And the
only real counter-threat to these Soviet underwater missiles is
the fleet of 14 awesome super-missiles targeted on the Soviet
Union from resting places deep in the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans.  These undersea super-missiles, as I revealed last month
in AUDIO LETTER No. 20, are not under normal military control but
are under direct Rockefeller command through their controlled
CIA.  Their purpose, as I have already explained, is not to
prevent NUCLEAR WAR ONE or even to retaliate when it comes. 
Their purpose is only to insure that the Soviet Union abides by
the joint Rockefeller-Soviet war plan to spare the Rockefeller
Brothers and their intimates while incinerating the rest of us.

   But as I revealed last month, the super-secret CIA missiles
have begun deteriorating and leaking.  One missile in the Pacific
is totally disabled, and several others are leaking plutonium
from their warheads into the surrounding waters, and probably are
useless also.

   One of the leaking missiles which I mentioned last month is
Atlantic Missile No. 8, which is located in the ocean about 290
miles east-southeast of Jacksonville, Florida.  On February 7,
1977, just two weeks after I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No.
20, the beach near Jacksonville, Florida became the scene of a
mystifying phenomenon.  For no apparent reason, whales suddenly
began beaching themselves in large numbers.  Within a short time
over 120 whales beached themselves only to die there.  That
evening NBC News reported that no autopsies were being performed
on the whales, that this was to be left to the Smithsonian here
in Washington.  The next day that story was retracted, but
meanwhile I know from my own sources that a high-ranking
Smithsonian official who is a covert CIA agent went to Florida
immediately to investigate and to make sure that the real cause
of the whales beaching themselves did not become publicly known.

   One story the Smithsonian circulated as a possible explanation
for the strange behavior of the whales was that some sort of
parasites, caused perhaps by pollution, had caused the whales to
lose their senses of depth and direction.  But that, of course,
does not explain why they would all have come ashore out of their
natural habitat, rather than wandering aimlessly at sea.  And it
explains even less what happened when some of the whales were
towed off the beach and into the sea.  In most cases they
unerringly headed straight for shore and beached themselves
again.  Even though death awaited them on the beach, they
preferred that to their natural habitat of the sea.

   What you have not been told, my friends, is that a number of
the whales were dissected, and in practically every case their
stomachs were completely empty--they were sick.  But the real
problem was not in their stomachs but in their lungs, which were
heavily contaminated with plutonium.  A few days after the whales
began beaching themselves, I was informed by my Intelligence
sources that the plutonium leakage from Atlantic Missile No. 8
had accelerated so rapidly that plutonium was now contaminating
the Atlantic in a fan that touches the east coast all the way
from about half way between Savannah and Brunswick, Georgia,
southward almost to Daytona Beach, Florida.  It was strongest in
the middle, right where the whales came ashore near Jacksonville.

   My friends, I am not a marine biologist, and I don't know
exactly how the whales got water-borne plutonium into their
lungs, but the facts speak for themselves, somehow it happened;
and once there, the plutonium produced a fungus-like infection
that interfered with their breathing.  Finally in desperation,
the whales (which are mammals like you and me) began casting
themselves onto the beach, gasping for air.

   By now the whales have been collected and buried in the Gerwin
Road landfill in Jacksonville, Florida, and forgotten by most as
yesterday's news.  But we would do well not to ignore the lesson
of the beached whales; because now, like the whales, our drinking
water in the United States now contains plutonium too.  The
Soviet injections of plutonium into our atmosphere which began
last October 1976 have continued and, in fact, are now
accelerating; and now fallout of this material has contaminated
our own drinking water nationwide.  It is invisible, it is
tasteless, but it is there.

   As I reported last month, a dramatic increase in flu-like
illness was to be expected all across America, thanks to the
Soviet plutonium attack No. 3 which took place in late December
and early January; and now it's happening.  Outbreaks of (quote)
"flu and flu-like illnesses" have been reported this month in at
least 23 states.  Perhaps you yourself have had a round of
something lately that seems like the flu, yet may have seemed
somehow different from flu you have had in the past, or perhaps
you have just noticed that something is "going around."  Even
this recording was delayed one week by flu-like illnesses which
hit myself and some of my associates very hard.

   I wish I could tell you that the flu-like illness season were
about over, but unfortunately the opposite is true.  A fourth
Soviet plutonium attack began this month on February 3 involving
25 Soviet submarines.  This time they were deployed along the
entire West coast from Seattle to San Diego, and they injected
plutonium into our atmosphere over a period of approximately two
weeks.  And now just three days ago on February 24 a fifth Soviet
plutonium attack on the United States has begun.  This time there
are 30 Soviet submarines, again deployed all the way from Seattle
to San Diego.  Furthermore, I am now able to confirm that there
is a weather-modification aspect to the Soviet plutonium attacks.

   In the past year or so the United States Environmental
Protection Agency, the EPA, has issued warnings, so-called, that
fluorocarbon propellants from household aerosol cans are damaging
the ozone layer far up into the atmosphere.  We have been warned
that this could have very dangerous effects on our environment;
and as a result, a trend away from aerosol spray cans is now
under way.  There may be some merit to that argument, but as
usual the EPA is merely seizing on a minor danger in order to
cover up a far more real immediate and major threat.

   The means by which the plutonium is being dispersed into our
atmosphere by the Soviet submarines is none other than by
fluorocarbon propellants discharging upward into the air at a
steep angle.  Each submarine in each attack exhausts huge
quantities of fluorocarbon propellant in such a way that it is
far more effective in damaging our ozone layer than millions of
ordinary household aerosol cans in normal use.  Even before the
plutonium attacks began last October, my Intelligence sources
believe that fluorocarbon injections like this into our
atmosphere were under way for some time.  The introduction of the
plutonium to these attacks last October was therefore an easy
matter.

   But by other means, also, weather-modification activities by
both the CIA and the Soviet KGB have been in progress for some
time now for use in warfare.  Because of these facts, I believe I
should warn you about one thing which, at this time, I must label
as conjecture.  Normally, as you know, my policy is to tell you
only those things which I have been able to confirm as
established fact; but this time I believe an exception is
warranted.  The timing, severity, and pattern of the huge winter
storm that struck the north and east portions of the United
States may well have been a massive pre-war weather-modification
experiment as a rehearsal for similar measures in NUCLEAR WAR
ONE.  Had war broken out while those weather patterns persisted,
large portions of the upper United States within the "Nuclear
Safe Zone" would have been immobilized by weather and therefore
could have been spared from attack--seemingly for natural
reasons.

   It may be that weather control is the key to the riddle of the
"Nuclear Safe Zone", enabling it to escape attack while the
southern two-thirds of the United States along with Alaska and
Hawaii endure a nuclear holocaust.  If this is the case, then a
future storm pattern that immobilizes the part of the United
States above the 40th Parallel could be the signal that a Soviet
nuclear attack is imminent.  I emphasize again that, as of now,
this is conjecture on my part.  I have not been able to confirm
it, but there are so many facts that point in this direction that
I believe you should be warned of this possibility.  The
Rockefeller Brothers, in any case, are doing everything in their
power to hurry up NUCLEAR WAR ONE, so anything can happen.  They
are in a hurry because they want to make sure that the war takes
place while enough of their super CIA missiles are still
operational to provide an effective blackmail threat against the
Soviets.  But as for America's officially acknowledged fleet of
Intercontinental Missiles, that is another matter.

   I have never revealed what went on when I saw General George
S. Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his Pentagon
offices last September 16, 1976, but I think I should now mention
just one item which has now acquired urgent new significance.

   One of the things I discussed with General Brown was the
horrendous Intelligence gap created by then Secretary of State
Henry Kissinger.  Because of this deliberate Intelligence gap,
General Brown and the Joint Chiefs have been denied crucial
information needed to protect our country.  In this connection,
General Brown did not know about the super-secret "Nuclear Safe
Zone" negotiated for the private benefit of the Rockefeller
Brothers and their intimates by Kissinger.  In fact, it seemed
unbelievable because he pointed out the presence of several prime
targets--namely, ICBM installations inside the "Nuclear Safe
Zone."  But now Jimmy Carter is pushing for those very ICBM sites
to be shut down.  That is the meaning of Carter's incredible
order to General Brown at the Blair House meeting of January 12,
1977, and by that means the Rockefellers plan to make the
"Nuclear Safe Zone" off limits to NUCLEAR WAR ONE attack.

Topic #3--Whatever the future holds for us, my friends, one thing
is for sure.  We are witnessing the end of an era.  Politically,
economically, socially, and spiritually we are entering a time of
tumultuous change, but the question still remains: Change in what
direction?

   Will this be the end of the era of destructive Rockefeller
control over our lives?  Or will we just sit back wringing our
hands and let them succeed in their plans to snuff out the era of
human freedom?  Might we look forward to the new era of renewed
respect for nature as God in His wisdom created it?  Or will we
condemn ourselves by inaction to a suicidal era of ever
increasing destruction of our beautiful world under the greedy
exploitation of the Rockefeller cartel and their Soviet allies? 
Will the struggle that is being forced upon us lead us at last to
a new dawning of the day of the individual?  Or will we submit
without struggle to the perfect equality of slaves in the
Rockefeller-Soviet world empire?

   My friends, it will take organized, dedicated, selfless action
to sound the alarm and bring pressure to bear in time to turn
away from total disaster for our land.  But the hour is now so
late; where can we hope for this action to come from?  If history
is any guide, my friends, there is only one institution left.

   I have pointed out on previous occasions that what is
happening in America today is a ghastly replay of what happened
to Germany before World War II--with one difference.  Those who
brought Hitler to power as a pawn are themselves coming to power
here in America.

   With this in mind, I will now read a very rare letter to you. 
For reasons which will become apparent, it will be safely stored
away again under lock and key by the time you hear this
recording.  The letter, written by a distinguished churchman, is
dated October 16, 1945, and is addressed to Dr. Albert Einstein. 
I will now read directly from the letter:

  "My dear Dr. Einstein:

   I have seen you reported as having said, quote: 'Being a lover
of freedom, when the revolution came in Germany I looked to the
Universities to defend it, knowing that they had always boasted
of their devotion to the cause of truth; but NO, the Universities
immediately were silenced.  Then I looked to the great editors of
the newspapers whose flaming editorials in days gone by had
proclaimed their love of freedom; but they, like the
Universities, were silenced in a few short weeks.  Only the
Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler's campaign for
suppressing the truth.  I never had any special interest in the
church before, but now I feel a great affection and admiration,
because the church alone has had the courage and persistence to
stand for intellectual truth and moral freedom.  I am forced thus
to confess that what I once despised, I now praise
unreservedly.'"

Still continuing with the letter:

  "Would you be kind enough to let me know whether this
represents your feeling now that hostilities have ceased?  I
should be very grateful to know how you feel about this now.

   With great admiration and every good wish, I am
                                          Yours faithfully,"

and there follows the signature of the writer.  Below there is a
postscript as follows, and I quote:

  "P.S. - The statement is reported to have been made by you
before the United States entered the war, and I thought possibly
you might have had some occasion to change your opinion in the
light of later developments.  I naturally hope that you haven't."

The writer of this letter received it back with the following
answer in longhand along the right-hand margin, and I quote:

  "The reproduction of my verbally given statement is essentially
correct, and I have not changed my opinion concerning this
point."

There follows the signature:

"A. Einstein."

   My friends, the churches in Nazi Germany recognized the
onslaught of evil and stood up against it.  Today America faces
the same evil, multiplied a thousand times over.  But where?  oh
where are the churches today?

   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter.  Thank you,
and may God bless each and every one of you.

Source