Tag Archives: Human Giant’s

Did U.S. Special Forces kill a giant in Kandahar (Kandahar Giant)?

I have tried to find every little grain of info about this insident called Kandahar giant. It’s absolutely fascinating. Story is simple that back in 2002 or 2003, depends on the source, U.S. special forces killed a giant. There is a lots of evidence of giants for example in the bible and everywhere in the World so that is why I find this very interesting story. Here is the story and then I add another article, which is related, because the guy who tells this story on this video says that the giants’s nails were gnarly and like claws.  On this another article they have found the finger of the giant and it kind of fits this whole thing. So it’s up to you to decide is it true or a hoax…

In the summer of 2016, several personalities and web sites dedicated to discussing supernatural myths and conspiracy theories began claiming that an American Special Forces soldier serving in Kandahar, Afghanistan, was killed in 2002 by a 1,100-pound, blade-wielding, 12-foot-tall giant from Old Testament times before the giant himself was taken down by the military.

A Department of Defense spokesman told us they have no record of such an incident:

We do not have any record or information about a special forces member killed by a giant in Kandahar.

Current interest in the story appears to have been generated from a video created by L.A. Marzulli, an author, blogger and filmmaker determined to link modern times with biblical creatures and prophecies. On 13 August 2016, he posted an episode on YouTube of his series, Watchers, in which he claims to interview a military contractor or soldier who witnessed the blade-wielding “Giant of Kandahar” kill another soldier before being downed by troops, whisked away by a transport aircraft and hidden away from public view.

Marzulli makes the case that the giant was a Nephilimwhich were described in the Book of Genesis as offspring of gods and human women who inhabited Canaan at the time of Israelite conquest. But when it comes down to details, he’s vague, saying he interviewed the unnamed man at an “undisclosed location” on an unknown date. The interviewee who he claims shot and killed the giant, doesn’t give any details on the location of the alleged incident, other than to say it was a “remote” location in Afghanistan in 2002. He claims he and others were sent in to look for a missing patrol when they saw a scarlet-haired giant emerge from a cave and skewer his friend, who he called “Dan,” with a large blade.

If the Army’s statement isn’t sufficient, the only service member with the first name Dan or Daniel who died in Kandahar in 2002 was killed — along with three others — in an accident involving the clearing and disposal of explosives. There are no incidents on the Department of Defense press release page, in which all military casualties were listed, involving a giant. Likewise, there are no reports of an entire patrol disappearing in Afghanistan.

Marzulli’s video about the alleged giant incident, replete with a growling animation, can be seen here:


A 38-centimeter long finger found in Egypt: Evidence of the Nephilim?

Genesis 6:1–6
Now it came about, when men began to multiply on the face of the land, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of God (bene Elohim) saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose.

The images of a giant finger, 38 centimeter long has researchers clueless as they state that something like this is impossible. According to science, it is impossible, yet, the finger found in Egypt seems to be the real deal, as the finger even has a certificate of authenticity and X-Ray images.

The images displayed were taken in 1988 and were published by one of Europe’s leading newspaper, BILD.de


Could this be evidence that points towards the existence of giant beings that walked on Earth in the distant past?

“The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God (bene Elohim) came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown. Then the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”

The remains of this finger are impressive, it is a huge mummified humanoid finger that hast 38 centimeters in length. Researchers from Egypt believe it had to belong to a creäture that was over 5 meters height. Only a few people got to take images of this incredible artifact in 1988.

The owner of the giant finger was, according to Gregor Spörri, a grave robber that acquired the piece while searching through an undisclosed thumb” in Egypt. When Gregor Spörri, a 56-year-old entrepreneur offered to by the finger, the owner responded: NEVER.


“Number 13:30–33
Then Caleb quieted the people before Moses and said, “We should by all means go up and take possession of it, for we will surely overcome it.” But the men who had gone up with him said, “We are not able to go up against the people, for they are too strong for us.” So they gave out to the sons of Israel a bad report of the land which they had spied out, saying, “The land through which we have gone, in spying it out, is a land that devours its inhabitants; and all the people whom we saw in it are men of great size. There also we saw the Nephilim (the sons of Anak are part of the Nephilim); and we became like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.”

In an interview with BILD.de, Spörri stated: “It was an oblong package, smelled musty,” Spörri said when he told his story to the public in 2012. “I was totally flabbergasted when I saw the dark brown giant finger. I was allowed to take it in hand and also to take pictures. A bill was put next to it to get a size comparison. The bent finger was split open and covered with dried mold.”

According to Gregor Spörri, the grave robber who found the finger also had a certificate of Authenticity and an X-ray image, both of which are from the 1960’s.

Certificate of authenticity and X-Ray images of the giant finger
Certificate of authenticity and X-Ray images of the giant finger

After Spörri left Egypt he wanted to know more about this incredible relic, he wanted to find out where the rest of this giant creäture was located. He returned to Egypt in 2009 compelled to learn more about it. Unfortunately, by then, the old man who allowed Spörri to take pictures of the giant finger had vanished, and with him all traces of the mysterious finger that has scientists and researchers scratching their heads. Now, all that is left are these few images that are mind-blowing and stories and myth of creatures that once, in the distant past, walked among human beings.


Researchers have had mixed feelings when it comes to this mysterious ancient relic. The biggest problem is that, the finger does not fit into any conventional theories presented by archaeologists or historians, it simply put, impossible.

Is this enough evidence to finally conclude that giants did in fact walk on Earth in the distant past? And that the mysterious gigantic footprints found in different places on Earth are real?
(Source and images)


Sons of God, Daughters of Men

Sons of God, Daughters of Men

“The craving of demons for a body, evident in the Gospels, offers at least some parallel to this hunger for sexual experience.” -Derek Kidner

In 1947 an Arab boy tending his sheep accidentally discovered an ancient cave near the Dead Sea. In it were found a priceless collection of ancient scrolls which soon became known as the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Qumran Texts. Among these writings was one known as the Genesis Apocryphon. At first it was thought to be the long lost Book of Lamech. Although the scroll consisted of a speech by Lamech and a story about some of the patriarchs from Enoch to Abraham; it was not that book.

According to the Bible, Lamech was the son of Methuselah and the father of Noah. He was the ninth of the ten patriarchs of the antedeluvian world.

It is significant, however, that the Genesis Apocryphon mentions the Nephilim, and makes reference to the “sons of God” and the “daughters of men” introduced in Genesis 6. The Apocryphon also elaborates considerably on the succinct statements found in the Bible, and provides valuable insights into the way these ancient stories were interpreted by the ancient Jews.

The copy of the Genesis Apocryphon discovered at Qumran dates back to the 2nd century B.C., but it was obviously based on much older sources. When discovered in 1947, it had been much mutilated from the ravages of time and humidity. The sheets had become so badly stuck together that years passed before the text was deciphered and made known. When scholars finally made public its content, the document confirmed that celestial beings from the skies had landed on planet Earth. More than that, it told how these beings had mated with Earth-women and had begat giants.

Is this story myth or history, fable or fact? Specialized research has revealed that many ancient legends have a basis in fact. But to answer the question, let us consult the most authoritative document known to man–the Bible.

In Genesis 6:1-4 the “sons of God” are captivated by the beauty of the “daughters of men.” They subsequently marry them and produce an offspring of giants known as the Nephilim. Genesis goes on to say that these Nephilim were “mighty men” and “men of renown.”

“Sons of God”? “Daughters of men”? What sort of beings were these? Were they human or did they belong to an alien species from outer space?


There is no problem in identifying the “daughters of men” for this is a familiar method of designating women in the Bible. The problem lies with the “sons of God.” Three major interpretations have been offered to shed light on this cryptic designation.

First, a group within orthodox Judaism theorized that “sons of God” meant “nobles” or “magnates.” Hardly anyone today accepts this view.

Second, some interpret the “sons of God” as fallen angels. These were enticed by the women of Earth and began lusting after them. Many reputable Bible commentators have rejected this theory on psycho-physiological grounds. How can one believe, they ask, that angels from Heaven could engage in sexual relations with women from Earth? Philastrius labeled such an interpretation a down-right heresy.

Third, many famed scholars contend that the “sons of God” are the male descendants of Seth, and that the “daughters of men” are the female descendants of Cain. According to this view, what actually happened in Genesis 6 was an early example of believers marrying unbelievers. The good sons of Seth married the bad daughters of Cain, and the result of these mixed marriages was a mongrel offspring. These later became known for their decadence and corruption; indeed, it reached such a degree that God was forced to intervene and destroy the human race. This comment of Matthew Henry could be taken as representative of those holding this view:

“The sons of Seth (that is the professors of religion) married the daughters of men, that is, those that were profane, and strangers to God and godliness. The posterity of Seth did not keep by themselves, as they ought to have done. They inter- mingled themselves with the excommunicated race of Cain.” (1)

However, in spite of the excellent pedigree of the proponents of this theory, their argument is not convincing. Their interpretation is pure eisegesis–they are guilty of reading into the text what is obviously not there.


Their interpretation fails on other grounds as well. At no time, before the Flood or after, has God destroyed or threatened to destroy the human race for the sin of “mixed marriages.” It is impossible to reconcile this extreme punishment with the mere verbal strictures found elsewhere in the Bible for the same practice. If God is going to be consistent, He should have destroyed the human race many times over!

The contrast made in Genesis 6:2 is not between the descendants of Seth and the descendants of Cain, but between the “sons of God” and the “daughters of men.” If by “sons of God” is meant “sons of Seth,” then only the sons of Seth engaged in mixed marriages, and not the daughters. And only the daughters of Cain were involved, and not the sons. And another strange assumption is implied: that only the sons of Seth were godly, and only the daughters of Cain were evil.

The strangeness is compounded when one seeks for evidence that the sons of Seth were godly. We know from Genesis that when the time came for God to destroy the human race, He found only one godly family left among them–that of Noah. Where were all the other supposedly godly sons of Seth? Even Seth’s own son could hardly be called righteous. His name was Enos, meaning “mortal” or “frail.” And he certainly lived up to it! Genesis 4:26 reads, “And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the Lord.” That statement seems harmless enough, but what does it mean when it says that it was only now that men began to call upon the name of the Lord? Upon whom did Adam call? And Abel? And Seth himself?

Some scholars give us a more literal and exact translation to this verse: “Then men began to call themselves by the name of Jehovah.” Other scholars translate the statement in this manner: “Then men began to call upon their gods (idols) by the name of Jehovah.” If either of these be the correct translation then the evidence for the so-called godly line of Seth is non- existent. The truth of the matter is that Enos and his line, with few noted exceptions, were as ungodly as the other line. The divine record could not be clearer: “all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth” (Genesis 6:12).

In the Old Testament, the designation “sons of God” (bene Elohim) is never used of humans, but always of supernatural beings that are higher than man but lower than God. To fit such a category only one species is known–angels. And the term “sons of God” applies to both good and bad angels. These are the beings of whom Augustine wrote:

“Like the gods they have corporeal immortality, and passions like human beings.” (2)

The designation “sons of God” is used four other times in the Old Testament, each time referring to angels. One example is Daniel 3:25, where king Nebuchadnezzar looks into the fiery furnace and sees four men, “and the form of the fourth is like the son of God.” The translation is different and clearer in our modern versions, “like a son of the gods.” Since Jesus had not yet become the “only begotten son” of God, this “son” would have had to be angelic.

Another example is Job 38:7 which says the sons of God shouted for joy when God laid the foundations of the Earth. Angels are the only entities that fit this designation since man had not been created at that time!

In Job 1:6 and Job 2:1 the “sons of God” came to present themselves before the Lord in Heaven. Among the sons of God is Satan–a further implication that the “sons of God” must have been angels.

Since the designation “sons of God” is consistently used in the Old Testament for angels, it is logical to conclude that the term in Genesis 6:2 also refers to angels.


In the New Testament, born-again believers in Christ are called the children of God or the sons of God (Luke 3:38, John 1:12, Romans 8:14, 1 John 3:1). Dr. Bullinger in the Companion Bible states: “It is only by the divine specific act of creation that any created being can be called ‘a son of God.'” This explains why every born-again believer is a son of God. It explains also why Adam was a son of God. Adam was specifically created by God, “in the likeness of God made He him” (Genesis 5:1). Adam’s descendants, however, were different; they were not made in God’s likeness but in Adam’s. Adam “begat a son in his own likeness, after his image” (Genesis 5:3). Adam was a “son of God,” but Adam’s descendants were “sons of men.”

Lewis Sperry Chafer expresses this in an interesting way when he states:

“In the Old Testament terminology angels are called sons of God while men are called servants of God. In the New Testament this is reversed. Angels are the servants and Christians are the sons of God.” (3)

It is thus clear that the term “sons of God” in the Bible is limited to three categories of beings: angels, Adam and believers. All three are special and specific creations of God. As for the use of the term in Genesis 6, since it cannot possibly refer to Adam nor believers in Christ, we conclude that it has to refer to the angels whom God had created.


Two New Testament passages shed further light on Genesis 6. They are Jude 6-7 and 2 Peter 2:4. These verses indicate that at some point in time a number of angels fell from their pristine state and proceeded to commit a sexual sin that was both unusual and repugnant. Jude 6-7 states:

“And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh…”

These angels not only failed to keep their original dominion and authority, but they “left their own habitation.” Habitation is a significant word: it means “dwelling place” or “heaven.” And the addition of the Greek word “idion” (“their own”) means that they left their own private, personal, unique possession. (4) Heaven was the private, personal residence of the angels. It was not made for man but for the angels. This is why the ultimate destination of the saints will not be Heaven but the new and perfect Earth which God will create (Revelation 21:1-3). Heaven is reserved for the angels, but as for the beings referred to in Jude 6-7, they abandoned it.

Not only did these angels leave Heaven, they left it once-for- all. The Greek verb “apoleipo” is in the aorist tense, thus indicating a once-for-all act. By taking the action they did, these angels made a final and irretrievable decision. They crossed the Rubicon. Their action, says Kenneth Wuest, “was apostasy with a vengeance.” (5)

As to the specific sin of these angels, we are given the facts in Jude 7. As in the case of Sodom and Gomorrah it was the sin of “fornication” and it means “going after strange flesh.” “Strange” flesh means flesh of a different kind (Greek “heteros”). To commit this particularly repugnant sin, the angels had to abandon their own domain and invade a realm that was divinely forbidden to them. Says Wuest:

“These angels transgressed the limits of their own natures to invade a realm of created beings of a different nature.” (6)

Alford confirms:

“It was a departure from the appointed course of nature and seeking after that which is unnatural, to other flesh than that appointed by God for the fulfillment of natural desire.”

The mingling of these two orders of being, was contrary to what God had intended, and summarily led to God’s greatest act of judgment ever enacted upon the human race.


Another New Testament verse may have bearing on Genesis 6. In I Corinthians 11:10, Paul instructs that a woman should cover her head as a sign of subjection to her husband, and also “because of the angels.” This observation has intrigued commentators through the years. Why this sudden reference to angels? Could it be a reference to what happened in Genesis 6 where angels succumbed to the inducements and physical charm of the women of Earth? Obviously, Paul believed that an uncovered woman was a temptation even to angels. William Barclay mentions an old rabbinic tradition which alleges that it was the beauty of the women’s long hair that attracted and tempted the angels in Genesis. (6)


The off-spring of this union between the “sons of God” and the “daughters of men” were so extraordinary that it indicates an unusual parentage. In no way could the progenitors of such beings be ordinary humans. Their mothers possibly could be human, or their fathers, but certainly not both. Either the father or the mother had to be superhuman. Only in such a way can one account for the extraordinary character and prowess of the off-spring.

God’s law of reproduction, according to the biblical account of creation, is “everything after his kind.” God’s law makes it impossible for giants to be produced by normal parentage. To produce such monstrosities as the Nephilim presupposes super- natural parentage.


“Nephilim” is a Hebrew word translated in the Authorized King James version as “giants.” “There were giants in the earth in those days” (Genesis 6:4). It is true that they were giants in more senses than one. However, the word Nephilim does not mean “giants.” It comes from the root “naphal,” meaning “fallen ones,” and most modern versions of the Bible have left the word “Nephilim” untranslated.

When the Greek Septuagint was made, “Nephilim” was translated as “gegenes.” This word suggests “giants” but actually it has little reference to size or strength. “Gegenes” means “earth born.” The same term was used to describe the mythical “Titans” — being partly of celestial and partly of terrestrial origin. (7)

The Hebrew and the Greek words do not exclude the presence of great physical strength. Indeed, a combined supernatural and natural parentage would imply such a characteristic. Angels, according to Scripture, are known for their power. They are often referred to as “sons of the Mighty” (Psalm 103:20). Therefore, if the ones who sired them were strong and mighty, it could be assumed that their offspring were likewise.

No evidence exists in Scripture that the offspring of mixed marriages (believers and unbelievers) were giants, excelling in great strength and might. No evidence can be found anywhere in history for that matter. Such an interpretation poses impossible assumptions.

When the word “Nephilim” is used in Numbers 13:33, the question of size and strength is explicit. Here we are left in no doubt as to their superhuman prowess. When Joshua’s spies reported back from Canaan, they called certain of the inhabitants of Canaan “giants.” “And there we saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, which come of the Nephilim, and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.”

Some commentators have speculated that the Nephilim of Numbers 13 belonged to a second eruption of fallen angels, since the earlier Nephilim had been destroyed in the Flood. And they see an allusion to this in Genesis 6:4, where it states that “there were Nephilim in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men.” Could it be that the “after that” was a reference to the Nephilim found in Canaan during the Israelite entry into the land? If so, it could explain why the Lord commanded the total extermination of the Canaanites, as He had earlier ordered the near annihilation of the human race.


The Book of Isaiah says that the Nephilim and their descendants will not participate in a resurrection as is the portion of ordinary mortals. Isaiah 26:14 reads: “They are dead, they shall not live; they are deceased, they shall not rise.” The original Hebrew word translated “deceased” here is the word “Rephaim.” It would have saved a lot of misinterpretation if the translators had left the word as it was in the original. The verse actually reads: “Dead, they shall not live; Rephaim, they shall not rise.” The Rephaim are generally understood to be one of the branches of the Nephilim, and God’s Word makes it clear that they are to partake in no resurrection. But with humans it is different: all humans will be resurrected either to life or to damnation (John 5:28-29).

We have already seen that the Greek Version of the Old Testament (The Septuagint) translated “Nephilim” as “gegenes;” we shall now inquire how it translates “sons of God.” In some of the manuscripts it is left as “sons of God,” but in the others– including the Alexandrian text–it is rendered by the word “angelos.” This text was in existence in the time of Christ, but there is no indication that He ever corrected or queried it. Can we not assume from His silence that He agreed with the translation!


Having studied all the arguments in favor of “sons of Seth,” one concludes that the only argument that is valid among them is that of rationality. “Sons of Seth” is an interpretation that is more palatable to human reason. Reason can never subscribe to the incredible notion that fallen angels could have sex relations with women of Earth. Angels have no physical bodies! They do not marry! They belong to an entirely different species of being! The mind revolts against such absurdity. So, what does one do? Settle, of course, for an easy, rational interpretation–sons of Seth and daughters of Cain. But what if the meaning of Scripture is clearly otherwise? There is the rub! Scripture is clearly otherwise! To impose a human interpretation at the expense of the obvious meaning of the divine Word, is a rape of the biblical text. Furthermore, when one deals with the world of the supernatural, rationality is never an argument.


The Jewish Fathers, when interpreting this expression from Genesis 6:2, invariably interpreted it as “angels.” No less an authority than W.F. Allbright tells us that:

“The Israelites who heard this section (Genesis 6.2) recited unquestionably thought of intercourse between angels and women.” (8)

Philo of Alexandria, a deeply religious man, wrote a brief but beautiful treatise on this subject, called “Concerning The Giants.” Basing his exposition on the Greek version of the Bible, he renders it as “Angels of God.” Says Bamberger, “Had he found the phrase ‘sons of God’ in his text, he most certainly would have been inspired to comment on it.” (9)

Philo certainly took the Genesis passage as historical, explaining that just as the word “soul” applies both to good and evil beings, so does the word “angel.” The bad angels, who followed Lucifer, at a later point in time failed to resist the lure of physical desire, and succumbed to it. He goes on to say that the story of the giants is not a myth, but it is there to teach us that some men are earth-born, while others are heaven- born, and the highest are God-born. (10)

The Early Church Fathers believed the same way. Men like Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Athenagoras, Tertullian, Lactantius, Eusebius, Ambrose…all adopted this interpretation. In the words of the Ante-Nicene Fathers, the angels fell “into impure love of virgins, and were subjugated by the flesh…Of those lovers of virgins therefore, were begotten those who are called giants.” (11) And again, “…the angels transgressed, and were captivated by love of women and begat children.” (12)

Nowhere before the 5th century A.D. do we find any interpretation for “sons of God” other than that of angels. We cannot deny the Jewish Fathers knowledge of their own terminology! They invariably translated “sons of God” as “angels.” The testimony of Josephus, that colorful cosmopolitan and historian, is also of paramount importance. In his monumental volume, “Antiquities of the Jews,” he reveals his acquaintance with the tradition of the fallen angels consorting with women of Earth. He not only knew of the tradition but tells us how the children of such union possessed super human strength, and were known for their extreme wickedness. “For the tradition is that these men did what resembled the acts of those men the Grecians called giants.” Josephus goes on to add that Noah remonstrated with these offspring of the angels for their villainy. (13)

Perhaps the most conclusive argument for interpreting the expression as “angels” is the simplest one of all. If the writer of Genesis wanted to refer to the “sons of Seth” he would have just said so. If God had intended that meaning, then the verse would undoubtedly read, “the sons of Seth saw the daughters of Cain that they were fair…” But the Bible meant something far more sinister–the sexual union between angels from Hell and evil women from Earth. Because of the gravity of such a union, and its dire consequences for the human race, God moved to destroy the race before it could destroy itself–except for one family which had not been contaminated.


God made man in His own image, the highest of all His earthly creations. While God said that everything He made was good, He considered man very good. Man had been made for fellowship with God Himself, but he soon turned his back upon his Maker and worshipped the creature more than the Creator. Before many generations, the human race was being polluted by this abominable union with demons. It seemed that Hell and Earth were in league together against the God of Heaven. God’s righteous anger was such that He regretted having made man.

“And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the Lord that he had made man. …”(Genesis 6:5-6)

It was specifically because of this ultimate sin that God brought about a deluge of such magnitude that man and beast were drowned from the face of the Earth. In the words of old Joseph Hall:

“The world was so grown foul with sin, that God saw it was time to wash it with a flood: and so close did wickedness cleave to the authors of it, that when they were washed to nothing, yet it would not wash off, yea, so deep did it stick in the very grain of the earth, that God saw it meet to let it soak long under the waters.” (14)


Why Noah and his immediate family were the only ones immune from this great judgment is significant. Genesis 6:9 says, “Noah was a just man.” He stood out as an example of righteousness and godliness in a perverse age. Like Enoch before him, Noah also “walked with God.” But there was another reason why Noah was spared, one that seems to have escaped most commentators. Genesis 6:9 says that Noah was “perfect in his generation.” Does this mean moral and spiritual perfection? Hardly. Genesis 9:20-23 disproves any such perfection. What, then, does the Bible mean by calling him “perfect”? The Hebrew word is “tamiym” and comes from the root word “taman.” This means “without blemish” as in Exodus 12:5, 29:1, Leviticus 1:3. Just as the sacrificial lamb had to be without any physical blemish, so Noah’s perfection. In its primary meaning, it refers not to any moral or spiritual quality, but to physical purity. Noah was uncontaminated by the alien invaders.

He alone had preserved their pedigree and kept it pure, in spite of prevailing corruption brought about by the fallen angels. (15)

And again:

Noah’s bloodline had remained free of genetic contamination. (16)

This implies, of course, that all the other families on Earth had been contaminated by the Nephilim. It also proves that the assault of Satan on the human race had been far more extensive than realized. It is no wonder that God pronounced such a universal fiat of judgment.

As for the fallen angels who participated in the abomination, God put them in custody “in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day” (Jude 6). This is sometimes interpreted as Tartarus or the “nether realms” (2 Peter 2:4). This would also explain why some fallen angels are in custody and why others are free to roam the heavens and torment mankind.

Such a drastic punishment, both for men and angels, presupposed a drastic sin, something infinitely more evil and more sinister than mixed marriages. It was nothing less than the demonic realm attempting to pervert the human world. By genetic control and the production of hybrids, Satan was out to rob God of the people He had made for Himself.

If Satan had succeeded in corrupting the human race, he would have hindered the coming of the perfect Son of God, the promised “seed of the woman,” who would defeat Satan and restore man’s dominion (Genesis 3:15). If Satan had by any means prevented that birth, he would obviously have averted his own doom. Satan did succeed to a large extent. It was for this reason that God drowned mankind in the Deluge.


Interpreting the “sons of God” as fallen angels, the question immediately arises–do angels marry? In Matthew 22:30, Jesus said angels neither marry nor are given in marriage. This seems a clear and emphatic negative. However, it does not preclude the possibility of such a thing happening–obviously contrary to the will of God. And it does not preclude fallen angels, who had rebelled against God already, from cohabiting with women of Earth, as the Scriptures state.

Some interpret the words of Jesus as meaning that angels do not marry among themselves. Is it because they are all male? Or is it because celestial beings are deathless and thus need no offspring. Only terrestrial beings need to find immortality in their children. (17) But if they do not need to marry and procreate, is it still possible that they could engage in sexual acts? If not among themselves then with human spouses? Jude seems quite explicit on the matter: the angels left their own habitation, and gave themselves over to fornication, going after strange flesh. In other words, they were capable of performing human functions–eating, drinking, walking, talking, even sexual activity and fathering children.

The fact that angels do not marry does not in itself prove they are sexless. Throughout the Bible, angels are referred to only as men. Finis Drake writes: “It is logical to say…that the female was created specifically for the human race in order that it could be kept in existence; and that all angels were created males, in as much as their kind is kept in existence without the reproduction process. Angels were created innumerable to start with (Hebrews 12:22) whereas, the human multitudes began with one pair.” (18)

Even in the next world, when the saints will dwell in their resurrection body and live forever, it does not imply that they will be sexless. The Bible teaches that everyone will have his own body in the resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:35-38). No suggestion is made that they will be unsexed. Furthermore, Christ remained a man after His resurrection.


One other question has been raised. If the fallen angels who lusted after women of Earth in Genesis 6 have been interred in Tartarus with “everlasting chains,” how does one explain the demons who have been operating since then? They seemed to have been quite active during the ministry of Jesus, and are busy again in our day. Following this reasoning, some share the conclusion of Kent Philpott:

However one might wish to interpret Genesis 6: 1-4 to link this passage with the verses in 2 Peter and Jude seems to post far more problems than it would solve. But 2 Peter 2.4 and Jude 6 clearly assert that the rebellious angels are being kept prisoner in the “nether gloom.” If they are prisoners, they could not very well function as the demons are described as functioning in the New Testament. (19)

But Philpott failed to see that there are two categories of fallen angels: Those cast out of Heaven with Lucifer, and who are still free to torment mankind; and those who fell the second time by committing carnal acts with the daughters of men. The spirits in this second category are those chained in the nether regions.

It seems clear to me that the “sons of God” are none other than fallen angels, and, because of their further sin of lusting after the “daughters of men,” many were imprisoned by God. Both the near annihilation of the human race and the incarceration of the fallen angels in Tartarus indicate the magnitude of the sin they committed. By such drastic judgment, God saved the human race from a calamity worse than the physical death originally imposed upon them.


l. Matthew Henry’s Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1961).
2. Aurelius Augustine, The City of God (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1949), Transl. Marcus Dods.
3. Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology, Volume 2. (Dallas: Dallas Seminary Press, 1947), p. 23.
4. Kenneth S. Wuest, Word Studies in the Greek N.T (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1966), Vol. 4, p. 240.
5. Ibid., p. 240.
6. Ibid., p. 241.
7. Unger, Biblical Demonology (Wheaton: Van Kampen Press, 1957), p. 48.
8 W. F. Allbright, From the Stone Age to Christianity (Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1940), p. 226.
9. Bemard J. Bamberger, Fallen Angels (Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1952), p. 53.
10. Philo, DeGigantibus, pp. 58-60.
11. The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 8, pp. 85 and 273.
12. Ibid., p. 190.
13. Josephus, The Work of Flavius Josephus; Antiquities of the Jews (London: G. G. Rutledge), 1.3.1.
14. Joseph Hall, Contemplations (Otisville, Michigan: Baptist Book Trust, 1976), p. 10.
15. Companion Bible (Oxford University Press). Appendix 26.
16. The Gospel Truth Magazine, Vol. 18, (June 1978), No. 7.
17. Dr. Morgenstem, Hebrew Union College Annual, XIV, 29- 40,114ff.
18. Finis Dake, Annotated R,?ference Bible, p.63.
19. Kent Philpott, A Manual of Demonology and the Occult (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1973), pp. 77-78.


Read more from Auricmedia:


Human Giant’s

I have always known, that there have been human giants on the Earth. They are suppressing this info everywhere on the globe and researchers must choose to talk the Truth or keep along with the conspiracy. If they choose to speak they are ridiculed and their studies are not published and they are abandoned from science community.  So lots of them keep on telling lies…

For some years now we have had proof that human giants have existed; so why is it so hard to learn about this? Why do the encyclopaedias still tell us that giants are only mythological fantasies and that gigantism only is a disease? And why do archaeologists warn me that my research on giants can be dangerous?

Two of the world’s most renowned researchers on ancient human species, Abesalom Vekua and Lee Berger, are sure that we humans have been through a period of gigantism. But even if they can show the fossils of giant bones this is still not accepted by the majority of the mainstream scientists – and in encyclopaedias we will read that human giants are just myths or results of a disease. Why? Is this supposed to be a secret?

The mythology and legends of many different cultures include monsters of human appearance but prodigious size and strength.
Encyclopædia Britannica: giant, in folklore, huge mythical being, usually humanlike in form.
Gigantism (Wikipedia): Gigantism, also known as giantism, is a condition characterized by excessive growth and height significantly above average. In humans, this condition is caused by over-production of growth hormone in childhood resulting in persons between 7 feet (84 inches) (2.13 m) and 9 feet (108 inches) (2.72 m) in height. Read
Encyclopædia Britannica: gigantism, excessive growth in stature, well beyond the average for the individual’s heredity and environmental conditions. Tall stature may result from hereditary, dietary, or other factors. Gigantism is caused by disease or disorder in those parts of the endocrine system that regulate growth and development.

Give it a go – do as I did; Search Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica for “giants”, “human giants”, “ancient giants”, “giant human skeleton(s)”, and “giant human bones” . You will find nothing but references to mythology.
You will easily find Berger and Vekua and their findings of very ancient human species in South Africa and Georgia respectively, on simular searches. But not a word about them confirming human giants! Why?

Well, it was not so hard for me to find information on the internet when it comes to the fact that the two famous professors also have told the world about giant human bones. I have written articles about this on my other pages but let me give you a short recap here:

Professor Lee Berger is a renowned paleoanthropologist and archaeologist from the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. He has conducted numerous expeditions as an explorer for National Geographic and he is well known for his discovery of Australopithecus sediba, a human ancestor that lived almost 2 million years ago.

“The Naked Scientists” is an award winning BBC weekly radio programme. In an interview with Lee Berger in 2007 he shows the host Dr. Chris Smith a fossilized bone of an individual that should be over 7 feet tall and says that they have found a lot of them and everywhere they find then they are enormous: – These individuals are extraordinary, they are giants, he says.

And yes; Professor Berger has confirmed in an e-mail to me that the interview indeed is real.

When it comes to finding remains of one of the oldest human ancestors everybody applauds him but when he is telling that we have been through a period of gigantism it seem like nobody wants to listen or take a look at the proof. Why?

Professor Abesalom Vekua is a paleontologist and archeologist at the Academy of Sciences of Georgia and a leading scientific researcher of the Georgian National Museum. He is almost as famous as Lee Berger, and as Professor Berger he has found fossilized bones one of one of the oldest human ancestors: Homo erectus georgicus, 1.8 million years old.

Channel One, the major broadcasting company in Russia, had a long news-report showing how a team of researchers found the giants bones of Borjomi in Georgia.

In an newspaper article Vekuka is confirming that giant human remains were found: – They are mentioned as giants in the scientific literature, although this hypothesis was not confirmed, Vekua said.

I have not been able to get in touch with Abesalom Vekua but Otar Baghaturia, a senior lecturer at the Georgian Technical University, was one of the members of the expedition and he has e-mailed me confirming that they found bones of giants 2,2-3 meters tall and that they were hoping to organize another expedition but that the situation in Georgia is making it difficult.

So again: When it comes to finding one of the oldest human ancestors Vekua is applauded but when he is telling about giants it seem like nobody wants to listen or take a look at the proof. Why?

It is believed today that Homo Heidelbergensis was the ancestor of Homo sapiens in Africa and the Neanderthals in Europe, and perhaps also the Denisovans in Asia – and that the species survived until 200,000 to 250,000 years ago. But most scientists believe that Homo heidelbergensis averaged about 170 cm (5ft 7in) in height and were slightly taller than Neanderthals. Well, Lee Berger is finding plenty fossilized bones of much taller individuals in South Africa and Abesalom Vekua can show us very large bones from the opposite side of the globe.

And why have their findings not created a stir in the media?

From 12th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1890-1891:
“Near the original surface, 10 or 12 feet from the center, on the lower side, lying at full length on its back, was one of the largest skeletons discovered by the Bureau agents, the length as proved by actual measurement being between 7 and 8 feet.” .
In one of my other articles I show some samples of old newspaper articles telling about giant bones, mostly from the USA. Well, two other private researchers, Jim Vieira and Micah Ewers, have now managed to find more than 1500 old newspaper articles and archaeological/historical reports about the findings of giant bones! In many of them you can read that the bones were sent to the Smithsonian institution. And you can in fact read in old Smithsonian reports about the bones but if you ask the people at the Smithsonian today then they will tell you that they cannot find anything; no bones – that nothing is registered. Is it like some independent researchers say: That the Smithsonian is covering up? Covering up for what or who – and why?

“To say something about the future you must know the past”,
Research that supports Heyerdahl’s theories:
Early Americans helped colonise Easter Island
DNA Study reveals connection between Brazil and Polynesia
Radiocarbon and DNA evidence for a pre-Columbian introduction of Polynesian chickens to Chile
DNA shows how the sweet potato crossed the sea
Mummy Forensics: The Screamer
Viking Noble Woman from Black Sea Immigrant Family
Can it be it was like it was with Thor Heyerdahl of the Kon-Tiki fame? All the mainstream scientists strongly refuted the Norwegian’s theory in 1941 that people from South America could have sailed to the Polynesian islands in pre-historical times.

Heyerdahl was very afraid of the sea as a young man but he found it necessary to prove to the scientists that primitive vessels could have crossed the Pacific; by sailing the balsa raft Kon-Tiki from Peru to the Tuamotu islands in 1947.

In 1952 Heyerdahl published a book: “American Indians in the Pacific; The Theory behind the Kon Tiki Expedition”. The book had over 800 pages of single-spaced print and over a thousand scholarly references, and it spelled out his ideas in detail. But most established scientists still laughed at Heyerdahl – without looking at the elaborate research he had done!

Even today it seems that very few want to accept that Thor Heyerdahl was right – but he was: DNA testing of people, chicken and sweet-potatoes has shown that there must have been early connection between South America and Polynesia!

Most people have heard about Thor Heyerdahl and his Kon-Tiki expedition but not many, not even in Norway, are aware that Heyerdahl first of all was a scientist and that he lead archaeological expeditions all over the world up til he died in 2002. His main goal was to research on our cultural origins and he always had a team of well-respected archaeologists with him on his expeditions.

Heyerdahl never mentioned giants, and I guess that was wise; it was a very complicated puzzle he was trying to put together and to bring in giants would have made people believe that he totally had lost his wits. Especially in a country where giants just were trolls of the fairytales! But we know that Thor Heyerdahl everywhere came across legends of white skinned and blond giants that often were called Gods – he followed them all the way from the Pacific islands to the Caucasus Mountains!

Heyerdahl said that to be able to say something about the future you must know the past, and he was very afraid that our future is threatened by our use of fossil fuels: He saw dangerous climate change all over the world. He worked non-stop to find answers but today hardly anybody but me, at least not in Norway, seems to follow up his important work to find the truth of our cultural origins.

It was when I did some research to write an article about the ancient statues on the Pacific islands that I discovered that many of them had six fingers. To my surprise I also found that so did many ancient statues all over the world! Most often they depicted local Gods that also were very tall – what we call giants. To learn more I made two websites under my Sydhav-domain: “Six Fingers” and “Giants”. It did not take long before I met the same attitude as Thor Heyerdahl: “We do not want to believe you no matter what you say or prove”. ‘

Yes, most people do not want to take me seriously when I tell them that my private research is about a race of tall humans. It does not help to mention the findings of Berger and Vekua: They just do not want to hear about it. “Giants belong to fairytales and mythology”, is what they say – and just shakes their heads when I tell them they can see the bones of the giants with their own eyes.

I can in one way understand that people do not want to believe that giants have existed and do not want to look at the proof – and I have accepted that I can be ridiculed but do I have to be afraid as well? I have received warnings that my research can be dangerous. From several people, all over the world; among them a well respected Norwegian archaeologist (that I cannot name) and artifact researcher Klaus Dona from Austria. But nobody wants to tell me why my research can be dangerous.

Well, it is not only Thor Heyerdahl and me who has been discredited for researching history that is not according to what the mainstream believes about our past. And it is not only me that learn that such research can be dangerous. Let me just take two samples: One from Mexico and one from Greece. They do not, as far as I know, involve giants but show the dangers of studying the human race:

Hueyatlaco is an archeological site in the Valsequillo Basin near the city of Puebla in Mexico. After excavations in the 1960s, the site became notorious due to geochronologists’ analyses that indicated human habitation at Hueyatlaco was dated to ca. 250,000 years before the present. The scientific consensus for habitation of the New World is 13,000 to 16,000 years before present. The site was discovered by Juan Armenta Camacho and Cynthia Irwin-Williams, and later further work was done by Virginia Steen-McIntyre.

When the findings were dated to be incredible old, the research teams were harassed and viewed as incompetent – and the researches saw their careers hampered. Steen-McIntyre was refused permission to further research and eventually the site was claimed prohibited for excavations by the authorities. Even today it seems that we are not supposed to hear about the Valsequillo artefacts (including an engraved “green” mastodon bone!) and the old date – even if peer-reviewed analyses has confirmed the earlier findings of ca. 250,000 – the latest in 2006.

The Petralona cave is located in about 35 km southeast of Thessaloniki and on the west side of Mount Katsika in Greece. In 1959 a shepherd came across a small opening to a cave and a human skull embedded in the wall was found (later research also uncovered a huge number of fossils including pre-human species, animal hair, fossilized wood, and stone and bone tools).

Dr Aris Poulianos, an expert anthropologist, found the “Petralona man” to be 700,000 years old, making it the oldest human europeoid (presenting European traits) discovered in Europe. His research showed that the Petralona man evolved separately in Europe and was not an ancestor of a species that came out of Africa. This created problems.

German researchers tried to dismiss Dr Poulianos’ findings, arguing that the skull was only 50,000 years old and was indeed an ancestor that came from Africa. However, research published in the US in 1971 in the prestigious Archaeology magazine, backed up the findings that the skull was indeed 700,000 years old. Dr Poulianos was stopped from further work in the cave without any explanation and he and his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home. He was also verbally abused when attempting to give an invited presentation to teachers and school children.

So there seems to be some uncertainty about our distant past – and that this seems to cause some problems for the people researching our origins.

“Forbidden Archaeology” is a 1993-book by Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson. Cremo is claiming that the book has “over 900 pages of well-documented evidence suggesting that modern man did not evolve from ape man, but instead has co-existed with apes for millions of years!”. He also writes that the scientific establishment has suppressed the fossil evidence of extreme human antiquity.

I guess that the mainstream archaeologists are having a good sarcastically laugh of Cremo’s claims, most probably without reading the book and take a look at the evidence he is presenting, but should they behave like this? Is not science about of pursuing knowledge, not only the knowledge itself?

The so called “Ica stones” is a collection of andesite stones with depictions of dinosaurs and what supposedly is illustrating advanced technology. The mainstream scientists claim that the Ica-stones are fake and the main argument is of course that humans did not co-exist with dinosaurs. A doctor named Javier Cabrera Darquea collected the stones from the 1960s and he obtained many of them from a farmer named Basilio Uschuya. Uschuya admitted at one stage to creating the carvings he had sold but later recanted this, saying that he had claimed they were a hoax to avoid imprisonment for selling archaeological artifacts.

In July of 1944 a man named Waldemar Julsrud (said to be a German, but the family-name is Norwegian) came upon some artefacts near Acambaro, Guanajuato in Mexico: the so-called “Acambaro Figurines”. These small figurines depicted all types of creatures but many of them were dinosaurs. A local farmer helped him to find more and they found 32.000 of them! Among the figurines were also images of Egyptians and Sumerians.

Most scientists believe that the Acambaro figurines are not genuine, and one of the reasons are the huge number of figurines found. Another argument is, of course, that no humans have ever seen a dinosaur; they died out long before homo sapiens came to existence. Well, thermoluminescence testing has shown that the figurines are about 4500 years old. The question is then: How could somebody make a figurine depicting a dinosaur, when fossil records of dinosaurs did not exist?

On the walls of the Ta Prohm temple near Angkor Wat in Cambodia there are hundreds of carvings of familiar animals like deer, parrots, monkeys and water buffaloes. But one of the carvings seems to be of a Stegosaurus dinosaur! Again; the main stream scientists say that this is a hoax or that the depiction does not show a dinosaur. But research has shown that the carved figure is old – and it definitely looks like a Stegosaurus!

What if the Ica-stones, Acambaro figurines and the Cambodian temple dinosaurs in fact are real artefacts and not hoaxes? What if the Hueyatlaco and Petralona findings are dated correct? What if we homo sapiens sapiens are much older than 200.000 years, when it is believed that the first modern man evolved in Africa? Or what if we have had other and much older homo species on Earth able of making depictions of dinosaurs?

Can it be that what we have learned about our origins is very wrong?

DNA-testing has started to change a lot – so has new findings. New theories about the first human species are presented all the time. We learn about new species of homo that seems to have lived together with, and interbred with, our own strain. One of them were the Denisova hominins. Even if we still do not know how they looked and how tall they were; it is a fact that the tooth found in the Denisova cave is the largest homo molar ever found. It was in fact so big that the archaeologists first believed it was a tooth of an extinct cave bear!

How long we humans have existed on earth as homo sapiens sapiens is of course an interesting question but I believe that might be even more interesting to figure out what happened to the other homo species. The Denisovans had a very advanced technology for the time and it now also seems that Neanderthals had much more knowledge than us homo sapiens sapiens. It might very well be that we were the dumbest in the class!

Did the interbreeding with us make the other species extinct?

Lee Berger says that there has been found a lot of fossilized bones of giants in South Africa but that we are talking about 300.000 years ago. What if they did not slowly die out as is believed (might be because of the lust of our own species); what if they lived on Earth for thousands and thousands of years?

There are lot of samples of advanced technology from a distant past all over the globe: Ancient buildings, wall, structures and smaller objects that should have been impossible to make with the tool and knowledge that the humans were supposed to have at the time: Pyramids and temples with huge blocks of stone positioned so finely together that you can not push a piece of paper in between them. Statues, and obelisks, even menhirs, so large and heavy that it should have been impossible to move and raise them. Dolmen with enormous boulders placed on top of standing stones.

But craftsmen of today might be even more in awe over some of the smaller objects, like the jars in the museum in Cairo: Made of basalt or granite they are fully hollowed with narrow openings, and some even have long necks. To produce such a jar in clay would be very impressive – in granite or basalt it is incredible. Yes, it is safe to say that the techniques used to produce these jars has yet to be replicated!

There are holes drilled in pyramids and temples at Giza, and not only are the holes drilled to perfection in granite and basalt but some of the holes have even been enlarged in ancient times using a core drill! A core drill bit is usually made of a hollow steel tube, and for drilling in basalt or granite the end of the steel ring is studded with industry diamonds. To try to drill in such hard rock without such a modern tool would be an exercise in futility! And the ancient Egyptians were supposed to have used soft copper tools, stone and sand! You will find the same incredible drilling in very hard stone done in ancient times other places – like in the ruins of Puma Punka in South America.

So who were behind the advanced technology all over the world in ancient times? Who managed to move gigantic stones from far away and placed with incredible precision in megalithic structures, who made delicate jars of granite and drilled tiny holes in basalt; feats that it would be hard to replicate today? The mainstream archaeologists say it was the forefathers of the people living on these places today. Well, when the first explorers asked the natives, they just shrugged their shoulders and said that they did not know. It was done in a very distant past – of a race of giants that lived before them.

Myth and legends all over the world tell that giants have lived on our planet. Yes this was also the common belief among the scientists before Charles Darwin in 1859 presented his theory saying that natural selection was the cause of evolution: Humans had evolved from apes. The giants of the Bible were suddenly nothing but theology, and the legends all over world just fiction. Well; there is still a fierce debate between the creationists and evolutionists – and archaeological findings and DNA-testing is bringing questions to the accepted theory of human evolution.

Let us take a brief look at the ancient people of Mexico, like the Aztec; they believed that the present world was preceded of four cycles of creation and destruction. In the first cycle, first “Sun”, the people were giants. They were also gods, and rivalry made one of them knock the sun out of the sky so the world became totally black, and all the people were eaten by jaguars. At the start of the second period the gods created a new group of people, this time they were of normal size. But they grew less and less civilized and stopped honouring the gods.

One god then turned the people into monkeys, and sent a mighty hurricane that blew them from the face of the Earth. New people was created but in this period a great drought swept the world. The people’s prayers for rain annoyed the god that had created them and in a fit of rage he sent a great downpour of fire, and it continued to rain fire until the entire Earth had burned away. The gods had to make a new Earth from the ashes but it did not go better this time either; the wife of one of the gods sent a horrific flood that drowned everyone on Earth. One of the gods who would not accept the destruction of the people went to the underworld where he stole their bones from another god and he then dipped these bones in his own blood to resurrect the people to the current period.

You will find simular legends telling about different periods for the human race many places in the world and often the people are eradicated to almost the last man. Very common is that one of the periods was ended by a world wide flood because the people made the gods angry; most famous is of course the story of Noah from the Christian bible.

So what are the chances that the people of the Earth have gone under to almost the last man one or several times? Well, several researchers and scientists now seem to agree that we have had gigantic catastrophes in the past. And that comets hitting the our planet being the culprits. There is physical evidence for an impact around 10,900 BC, and also 7600, 4400, 3150, 2345, 1628, 1159 and 207 BC – and also 536 and 11768 CE. Several of these dates correspond well with the legends about catastrophes.

But there also might be other explanations to the catastrophes. Robert M Schoch, famous for dating the Great Sphinx to a much older date than previously believed, is now researching if solar activity could have played an important part; If extra strong solar activity, like under a solar maximum where the sun’s magnetic fields/poles are changing positions, might have sent gigantic solar storms our way in a distant past. Yes, he asks if solar outburst could have created powerful plasma phenomena that caused strong electrical discharges that hit Earth, burning and incinerating materials on our planet’s surface, melting glaciers and cause water to evaporate and then precipitate as torrential rain. That the melting of ice sheets kilometres thick would release pressure on the crust and cause catastrophic earthquakes and volcanic activity around the globe.

Schoch says that the best way to escape the massive solar busts would be to go underground – and he asks if the ancient underground cites around the world (like Cappadicia in Turkey), many of them little researched, were shelters from solar storm.

Well, then we also can ask if many of the ancient megalithic wall and buildings were built of the same reason; to protect against major catastrophes. Like tsunamis, earthquakes – and even solar storms! Is this the reason that the walls like those in Peru were built with interlocking stones to be earthquake proof? And are gigantic stones made in a kind of “pillow” shape to have groves where to place waterproofing material (like a kind of putty)?

Did the surviving “gods” with the help of the people rebuilt the megalithic walls and buildings after the catastrophe, and tried to make new ones with varying results, to be prepared for the next time?

We can read, as earlier explained, in archaeological documents that bones of very large humans were found in many of the so called Indian mounds of North America. In what obviously were the oldest mounds the skeletons crumbled to dust but in some of the “crypts” inside the mounds they found skeletons sitting upright on benches around a fireplace. With food on the table.

It is hard to believe that this was an old, Indian ritual. Is it not more natural to ask if they were trying to survive a catastrophe? That they were buried alive in a desperate hope of surviving? We find the same believe many places in the world; that people were buried with food, servants, horses and other goods to have a good time in afterlife. But is this the correct explanation?

Why did the pharaoh Djoser, by the hjelp of the long-skulled vizier Imhotep, in addition to the Step Pyramid at Saqqara also make several large stone-buildings to store massive amounts of seeds like wheat, barley, grape, tomato and figs? 40.000 storage vessels have been found so far. Would he need such a large amount of seeds in a theological heaven? And the “boat pits” at the Giza complex, would a pharaoh need a fully working boat to row to heaven – or did he prepare for another devasting flood?

Is it not strange that civilisation on Earth developed so fast – according to the books? It is almost like fantastic buildings appeared almost out of nowhere. How and why did people that were gatherers and hunters suddenly start to build in massive stone? Did they not have more than enough to learn how to do their agriculture? If building in stone was an important part of civilisation – why is nobody doing it today? The logical answer is that it was not the local people that built the pyramids, temples and walls: They explained to the explorers that it was the gods that have built the fantastic structures – gods that also were giants. Often they were survivors after a gigantic catastrophe.

Yes, another interesting factor that the scientific world seems to “forget” is that many ancient buildings of stone were built on top of even older structures – or remade with elements from older structures!

All over the world it lookes like what we call civilization started around 3000 BC, with impressive buildings made of stone. Well, that is what the scientist said a few years ago. Now the ruins of Göbekli Tepe in Turkey have forced the scientists to accept an earlier date of about 10.000 – or even 12.000 BC. But why was Göbekli Tepe buried after completion – and why did statues found there look like ancient statues on Easter Island, with no legs and hands on the stomac? What’s next – what other mysteries will we not hear about?

Why do we not learn about the fact that giants have existed? Why are there so many unanswered questions about our distant past? Why are private researchers like me been told that the research can be dangerous?
“The eyes of that extinct species of giant, whose bones fill the mounds of America, have gazed on Niagara as our eyes do now.”
– Abraham Lincoln
Are we not supposed to know the truth?

Yes, it is a big job to change the history books all over the world – to rewrite and reprint them. But we need get it correct, we cannot just accept that what we have learned is wrong? Is it just a practical problem that stops us from learning the truth about our earliest history?

Or shall we not hear about giants because of Darwin’s theory of evolution? Why not? Might be we just need to upgrade it? Let creationists and evolutionists do the job, make them work together with open minds and study the latest research. Our past might be different to what both parties have believed but so what? Well, it might be hard to accept and understand that the gods that walked together with people on Earth might have been tall, blond giants but somebody or something must have created them as well – or?

Some say that the gods came from outer space to create us but I believe that we do not need to leave Earth to find the answers. To look for aliens will only create more problems – for who created them, if they are out there?

Or is the major problem that it might not have been us humans, homo sapiens sapiens, that built all the impressive megalithic structures that we find all around the world. Might be it was another race of humans, the giants?

That might be hard to swallow for some.

But we need to know the truth about past to say something about our future – and we need the answers more than ever! Agree?


Read more from Auricmedia: