10 Ways to Protect Yourself From NLP Mind Control

NLP or Neuro-Linguistic Programming is one of the world’s most prevalent methods of mind control, used by everyone from sales callers to politicians to media pundits, and it’s nasty to the core. Here’s ten ways to make sure nobody uses it on you… ever.

Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) is a method for controlling people’s minds that was invented by Richard Bandler and John Grinder in the 1970s, became popular in the psychoanalytic, occult and New Age worlds in the 1980s, and advertising, marketing and politics in the 1990s and 2000s. It’s become so interwoven with how people are communicated to and marketed at that its use is largely invisible. It’s also somewhat of a pernicious, devilish force in the world—nearly everybody in the business of influencing people has studied at least some of its techniques. Masters of it are notorious for having a Rasputin-like ability to trick people in incredible ways—most of all themselves.

After explaining a bit about what NLP is and where it came from, I’m going to break down 10 ways to inoculate yourself against its use. You’ll likely be spotting it left, right and center in the media with a few tips on what to look for. Full disclosure: During my 20s, I spent years studying New Age, magical and religious systems for changing consciousness. One of them was NLP. I’ve been on both ends of the spectrum: I’ve had people ruthlessly use NLP to attempt to control me, and I’ve also trained in it and even used it in the advertising world. Despite early fascination, by 2008 or so I had largely come to the conclusion that it’s next to useless—a way of manipulating language that greatly overestimates its own effectiveness as a discipline, really doesn’t achieve much in the way of any kind of lasting change, and contains no real core of respect for people or even true understanding of how people work.

After throwing it to the wayside, however, I became convinced that understanding NLP is crucial simply so that people can resist its use. It’s kind of like the whole PUA thing that was popular in the mid-00s—a group of a few techniques that worked for a few unscrupulous people until the public figured out what was going on and rejected it, like the body identifying and rejecting foreign material.

 

What is NLP, and where did it come from?

“Neuro-linguistic programming” is a marketing term for a “science” that two Californians—Richard Bandler and John Grinder—came up with in the 1970s. Bandler was a stoner student at UC Santa Cruz (just like I later was in the 00s), then a mecca for psychedelics, hippies and radical thinking (now a mecca for Silicon Valley hopefuls). Grinder was at the time an associate professor in linguistics at the university (he had previously served as a Captain in the US Special Forces and in the intelligence community, ahem not that this, you know, is important… aheh…). Together, they worked at modeling the techniques of Fritz Perls (founder of Gestalt therapy), family therapist Virginia Satir and, most importantly, the preternaturally gifted hypnotherapist Milton Erickson. Bandler and Grinder sought to reject much of what they saw as the ineffectiveness of talk therapy and cut straight to the heart of what techniques actually worked to produce behavioral change. Inspired by the computer revolution—Bandler was a computer science major—they also sought to develop a psychological programming language for human beings.

What they came up with was a kind of evolution of hypnotherapy—while classical hypnosis depends on techniques for putting patients into suggestive trances (even to the point of losing consciousness on command), NLP is much less heavy-handed: it’s a technique of layering subtle meaning into spoken or written language so that you can implant suggestions into a person’s unconscious mind without them knowing what you’re doing.

Richard Bandler, co-creator of NLP, in 2007. (Via Wikimedia Commons)

Richard Bandler, co-creator of NLP, in 2007. (Via Wikimedia Commons)

Though mainstream therapists rejected NLP as pseudoscientific nonsense (it has been officially peer reviewed and discredited as an intervention technique—lots more on that here), it nonetheless caught on. It was still the 1970s, and the Human Potential Movement was in full swing—and NLP was the new darling. Immediately building a publishing, speaking and training empire, by 1980 Bandler had made over $800,000 from his creation—he was even being called on to train corporate leaders, the army and the CIA. Self-help gurus like Tony Robbins used NLP techniques to become millionaires in the 1980s (Robbins now has an estimated net worth of $480 million). By the middle of the decade, NLP was such big business that lawsuits and wars had erupted over who had the rights to teach it, or even to use the term “NLP.”

But by that time, Bandler had bigger problems than copyright disputes: he was on trial for the alleged murder of prostitute Corine Christensen in November 1986. The prosecution claimed that Bandler had shot Christensen, 34, point-blank in the face with a .357 Magnum in a drug deal gone bad. According to the press at the time, Bandler had discovered an even better way to get people to like him than NLP—cocaine—and become embroiled in a far darker game, even, than mind control. A much-recommended investigation into the case published by Mother Jones in 1989 opens with these chilling lines:

In the morning Corine Christensen last snorted cocaine, she found herself, straw in hand, looking down the barrel of a .357 Magnum revolver. When the gun exploded, momentarily piercing the autumn stillness, it sent a single bullet on a diagonal path through her left nostril and into her brain.

Christensen slumped over her round oak dining table, bleeding onto its glass top, a loose-leaf notebook, and a slip of yellow memo paper on which she had scrawled, in red ink, DON’T KILL US ALL. Choking, she spit blood onto a wine goblet, a tequila bottle, and the shirt of the man who would be accused of her murder, then slid sideways off the chair and fell on her back. Within minutes she lay still.

As Christensen lay dying, two men left her rented town house in a working-class section of Santa Cruz, California. One was her former boyfriend, James Marino, an admitted cocaine dealer and convicted burglar. The other, Richard Bandler, was known internationally as the cofounder of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), a controversial approach to psychology and communication. About 12 hours later, on the evening of November 3, 1986, Richard Bandler was arrested and charged with the murder.

Bandler’s defense was, simply, that Marino had killed Christensen, not him. Many at the time alleged he used NLP techniques on the stand to escape conviction. Yet Bandler was also alleged to actually use a gun in NLP sessions in order to produce dramatic psychological changes in clients—a technique that was later mirrored by Hollywood in the movie Fight Club, in which Brad Pitt’s character pulls a gun on a gas station attendant and threatens to kill him if he doesn’t pursue his dreams in life. That was, many said, Bandler’s MO.

Whatever the truth of the matter, Bandler was indeed let off, and the story was quickly buried—I’ve never spoken to a student of NLP who’s ever heard of the murder case, I’ll note, and I’ve spoken to a lot. The case hardly impeded the growing popularity of NLP, however, which was now big business, working its way not only into the toolkit of psychotherapists but also into nearly every corner of the political and advertising worlds, having grown far beyond the single personage of Richard Bandler, though he continued (and continues) to command outrageous prices for NLP trainings throughout the world.

Today, the techniques of NLP and Ericksonian-style hypnotic writing can be readily seen in the world of Internet marketing, online get-rich-quick schemes and scams. (For more on this, see the excellent article Scamworld: ‘Get rich quick’ schemes mutate into an online monster by my friend Joseph Flatley, one of the best articles I’ve ever read on the Web.) Their most prominent public usage has likely been by Barack Obama, whose 2008 “Change” campaign was a masterpiece of Ericksonian permissive hypnosis. The celebrity hypnotist and illusionist Derren Brown also demonstrates NLP techniques in his routine.

How exactly does this thing work?

NLP is taught in a pyramid structure, with the more advanced techniques reserved for multi-thousand-dollar seminars. To oversimplify an overcomplicated subject, it more or less works like this: first, the user (or “NLPer,” as NLP people often refer to themselves—and I should note here that the large majority of NLP people, especially those who are primarily therapists, are likely well-meaning) of NLP pays very, very close attention to the person they’re working with. By watching subtle cues like eye movement, skin flush, pupil dilation and nervous tics, a skilled NLP person can quickly determine:

a) What side of the brain a person is predominantly using;

b) What sense (sight, smell, etc.) is most predominant in their brain;

c) How their brain stores and utilizes information (ALL of this can be gleaned from eye movements);

d) When they’re lying or making information up.

After this initial round of information gathering, the “NLPer” begins to slowly and subtly mimic the client, taking on not only their body language but also their speech mannerisms, and will begin speaking with language patterns designed to target the client’s primary sense.

An NLP person essentially carefully fakes the social cues that cause a person to drop their guard and enter a state of openness and suggestibility.

For instance, a person predominantly focused on sight will be spoken to in language using visual metaphors—”Do you see what I’m saying?” “Look at it this way”—while a person for which hearing is the dominant sense will be spoken to in auditory language—”Hear me out,” “I’m listening to you closely.”

By mirroring body language and linguistic patterns, the NLPer is attempting to achieve one very specific response: rapport. Rapport is the mental and physiological state that a human enters when they let their social guard down, and it is generally achieved when a person comes to the conclusion that the person they’re talking to is just like them. See how that works, broadly? An NLP person essentially carefully fakes the social cues that cause a person to drop their guard and enter a state of openness and suggestibility.

Once rapport is achieved, the NLPer will then begin subtly leading the interaction. Having mirrored the other person, they can now make subtle changes to actually influence the other person’s behavior. Combined with subtle language patterns, leading questions and a whole slew of other techniques, a skilled NLPer can at this point steer the other person wherever they like, as long as the other person isn’t aware of what’s happening and thinks everything is arising organically, or has given consent. That means it’s actually fairly hard to use NLP to get people to act out-of-character, but it can be used for engineering responses within a person’s normal range of behavior—like donating to a cause, making a decision they were putting off, or going home with you for the night if they might have considered it anyway.

From this point, the NLPer will seek to do two things—elicit and anchorEliciting happens when an NLPer uses leading and language to engineer an emotional state—for instance, hunger. Once a state has been elicited, the NLPer can then anchor it with a physical cue—for instance, touching your shoulder. In theory, if done right, the NLPer can then call up the hungry state any time they touch your shoulder in the same way. It’s conditioning, plain and simple.

How can I make sure nobody pulls this horseshit on me?

I’ve had all kinds of people attempt to “NLP” me into submission, including multiple people I’ve worked for over extended periods of time, and even people I’ve been in relationships with. Consequently, I’ve developed a pretty keen immune response to it. I’ve also studied its mechanics very closely, largely to resist the nonsense of said people. Here’s a few key methods I’ve picked up.

1. Be extremely wary of people copying your body language.

If you’re talking to somebody who may be into NLP, and you notice that they’re sitting in exactly the same way as you, or mirroring the way you have your hands, test them by making a few movements and seeing if they do the same thing. Skilled NLPers will be better at masking this than newer ones, but newer ones will always immediately copy the same movement. This is a good time to call people on their shit.

2. Move your eyes in random and unpredictable patterns.

This is freaking hilarious to do to troll NLPers. Especially in the initial stages of rapport induction, an NLP user will be paying incredibly close attention to your eyes. You may think it’s because they’re intensely interested in what you’re saying. They are, but not because they actually care about your thoughts: They’re watching your eye movements to see how you store and access information. In a few minutes, they’ll not only be able to tell when you’re lying or making something up, they’ll also be able to figure out what parts of your brain you’re using when you’re speaking, which can then lead them to be so clued in to what you’re thinking that they almost come across as having some kind of psychic insight into your innermost thoughts. A clever hack for this is just to randomly dart your eyes around—look up to the right, to the left, side to side, down… make it seem natural, but do it randomly and with no pattern. This will drive an NLP person utterly nuts because you’ll be throwing off their calibration.

3. Do not let anybody touch you.

This is pretty obvious and kind of goes without saying in general. But let’s say you’re having a conversation with somebody you know is into NLP, and you find yourself in a heightened emotional state—maybe you start laughing really hard, or get really angry, or something similar—and the person you’re talking to touches you while you’re in that state. They might, for instance, tap you on the shoulder. What just happened? They anchored you so that later, if they want to put you back into the state you were just in, they can (or so the wayward logic of NLP dictates) touch you in the same place. Just be like, oh hell no you did not.

4. Be wary of vague language.

One of the primary techniques that NLP took from Milton Erickson is the use of vague language to induce hypnotic trance. Erickson found that the more vague language is, the more it leads people into trance, because there is less that a person is liable to disagree with or react to. Alternately, more specific language will take a person out of trance. (Note Obama’s use of this specific technique in the “Change” campaign, a word so vague that anybody could read anything into it.)

5. Be wary of permissive language.

“Feel free to relax.” “You’re welcome to test drive this car if you like.” “You can enjoy this as much as you like.” Watch the f*k out for this. This was a major insight of pre-NLP hypnotists like Erickson: the best way to get somebody to do something, including going into a trance, is by allowing them to give you permission to do so. Because of this, skilled hypnotists will NEVER command you outright to do something—i.e. “Go into a trance.” They WILL say things like “Feel free to become as relaxed as you like.”

6. Be wary of gibberish.

Nonsense phrases like “As you release this feeling more and more you will find yourself moving into present alignment with the sound of your success more and more.” This kind of gibberish is the bread and butter of the pacing-and-leading phase of NLP; the hypnotist isn’t actually saying anything, they’re just trying to program your internal emotional states and move you towards where they want you to go. ALWAYS say “Can you be more specific about that” or “Can you explain exactly what you mean?” This does two things: it interrupts this whole technique, and it also forces the conversation into specific language, breaking the trance-inducing use of vague language we discussed in #4.

7. Read between the lines.

NLP people will consistently use language with hidden or layered meanings. For instance “Diet, nutrition and sleep with me are the most important things, don’t you think?” On the surface, if you heard this sentence quickly, it would seem like an obvious statement that you would probably agree with without much thought. Yes, of course diet, nutrition and sleep are important things, sure, and this person’s really into being healthy, that’s great. But what’s the layered-in message? “Diet, nutrition and sleep with me are the most important things, don’t you think?” Yep, and you just unconsciously agreed to it. Skilled NLPers can be incredibly subtle with this.

8. Watch your attention.

Be very careful about zoning out around NLP people—it’s an invitation to leap in with an unconscious cue. Here’s an example: An NLP user who was attempting to get me to write for his blog for free noticed I appeared not to be paying attention and was looking into the distance, and then started using the technique listed in #7 by talking about how he never has to pay for anything because media outlets send him review copies of books and albums for free. “Everything for free,” he began hissing at me. “I get everything. For. Free.” Obvious, no?

9. Don’t agree to anything.

If you find yourself being led to make a quick decision on something, and feel you’re being steered, leave the situation. Wait 24 hours before making any decisions, especially financial ones. Do NOT let yourself get swept up into making an emotional decision in the spur of the moment. Sales people are armed with NLP techniques specifically for engineering impulse buys. Don’t do it. Leave, and use your rational mind.

10. Trust your intuition.

And the foremost and primary rule: If your gut tells you somebody is fucking with you, or you feel uneasy around them, trust it. NLP people almost always seem “off,” dodgy, or like used car salesmen. Flee, or request they show you the respect of not applying NLP techniques when interacting with you.

Hopefully this short guide will be of assistance to you in resisting this annoying and pernicious modern form of black magic. Take it with you on your phone or a printout next time you’re at a used car sales lot, getting signed up for a gym membership, or watching a politician speak on TV. You’ll easily find yourself surprised how you allow yourself to notice more and more NLP techniques… more and more… don’t you think?

(For more on NLP, check out the book Introducing NLP by Joseph O’Connor or the immensely useful Neuro-Linguistic Programming for DummiesAs a bonus, here’s a great video breaking down the use of NLP techniques by media outlets on both sides of the political spectrum, from FOX News to Stephen Colbert. It gets a bit into Christian conspiracy thinking, but is VERY good information.)

Source

Dark Fellowships The Nazi Vril Cult

From: https://www.facebook.com/charlie.legendd/posts/1938727479688849

Pay attention. This documentary aired on The Discovery Channel in 2008. It is 50% truth and 50% misinformation.
I’ll fill out the blanks.

-The Vril Society is not just an ideology, it is a reality. This secret society is still prevalent today.

-The Vril Society, as well as, some Nazis do frequent Deep Underground Military Bases / live & congregate below the surface of the earth as R.E.M driven clone versions.

-At the start of this documentary, an image of a UFO is shown @ approximately 30 seconds. UFO’s are man-made aircraft, back-engineered by Hitler and The Vril Society. The Vril referred to in this documentary as a ‘mysterious power’, practically and LITERALLY refers to a race of subterranean underground reptilian troglodytes, which are bi-pedal in nature. These Vril parasites led Hitler and his henchman to an abandoned Atlantean base (Underground base, belonging to the civilisation of Atlantis), and the Vril society back-engineered many advances in technology, left behind, from the civilisation of Atlantis; this includes flying saucer aircraft.

-The part in the documentary, which refers to ‘Vril power’ taking over the world, implies, turning human beings into “human hosts”, via the probosces of Vril.

-The Vril Society are allied with the Nazis and meet as R.E.M driven human clone versions of themselves at the cloning centers.

-Yes there is truth to the stories surrounding The Vril Society, and the organisation is EXTREMELY unsettling…

-The ‘intangible power-force called Vril’, in reality and literally, refers to the Vril parasites probosces -that is the ‘power’ and that is “Vril power” -because the probosces of Vril’s have the ‘power’ to turn mammals into “hosts” and in our case, create “human hosts”.

-‘Vril power’ can be used to gain material power’ -this part of the documentary is also a metaphor; practically & literally, Vril reptilian parasites have the capability to live and burrow deep into inner earth, and retrieve gold, diamonds and all sorts of jewels. Vril parasites have little use jewels, although Vril parasites have been known to eat gold. In exchange for food stock: goats, chickens and humans (I’m sorry… but it’s true), Vril parasites would burrow deep into the earth to retrieve gold, diamonds and other jewels… and these Vril Society helpers, as well as world leaders, would exchange food stock for the Vril parasites, to eat.

-‘Sex magic’ was just an excuse for a disgusting time…

-Yes that is an absolute truth, these secret societies do sacrifice children in the name of ‘Lucifer ‘the light bringer”. It is absolutely disgusting and must end. Some of these children are given to Vril parasites to be eaten, or some of these children are made into “human hosts” of Vril, whereby the Vril consciousness dominates and controls the entire body functions of the human consciousness which was killed via Vril parasitical takeover. “Human hosts” with Vril consciousness are compliant slaves.

-The 1871 book: “The Coming Race” by Edward Bulwer-Lytton is written in code for High Ranking Freemason members. Practically & Literally Vril mentioned in the book, refers to the Vril parasites, and the metaphor of a ‘coming race’ refers to the Vril parasites turning human beings into “human hosts”. These Vril creatures / parasites are an extremely dumb species belonging to the class of “Reptilia”.

-“Vril-ya”… practically and literally refers to Vril probosces secreting their parasitical cells and taking over the consciousness of mammals and creating “hosts”.

-Yes, it is true that these Vril parasites live below the surface of the earth. Vril parasites are subterranean troglodytes.

– ‘A child can use Vril to destroy an entire city’; practically & literally, this refers to using the Vril probosces to create an entire race of “hosts”.

-‘These subterranean keepers could destroy mankind’; literally and practically, Vril parasites are extremely dumb. Their ‘power’ is their probosces, which has the ability to turn human beings into “human hosts” and this is what it means, at the point whereby the documentary informs that: “Vril could destroy mankind”.

-These Vril parasites are not ‘mystical, mysterious, or an energy force’ etc. practically & literally Vril are just a species of Reptilia which lives below the surface of the earth and their ‘power’ is their probosces.

-The Vril women, kept their hair long to represent the Vril parasite’s probosces, and the transfer of Vril Repitila, to host or human host.

-The Vril society saw ‘Vril power as a kind of metaphysical petrol’; practically and literally this relates to Vril being capable of burrowing deep into the surface of the earth and retrieving, gold, diamonds and other jewels; it also refers to the Vril probosces -that is the ‘power’ of Vril parasites…

-@24:15 to 25:30 of the documentary: Hitler and his henchmen journey to Tibet in search for actual Vril; the Vril Society would meet the Tibetan monks, who introduced members of the Vril Society to actual Vril parasites. This is historically accurate, just that the documentary does not mention that Vril are REAL terrestrial parasites which have always existed on earth. At this point of the documentary, it is also mentioned that Hitler spent the equivalent of 20 billion dollars (in 2008 money) in search of these Vril parasites, as Hitler and his henchmen journeyed to Tibet in search of Vril.

-Wewelsburg castle is real, and was used as a “Vril centre-piece” by the Vril society.

-The symbol of the ‘solar wheel’ is a symbol for Vril power / Vril energy.

-The Crypt appears to be a room where rituals took place. The peculiar place in the center could be, most likely where the Vril parasites would pop up from, whereby a victim was rendered immobile for the Vril parasite to take over the human being’s brain, and turn the human into a “human host” whereby the Vril parasite’s consciousness dominates, and controls the bodily functions of the human after Vril parasitical takeover.

@30.57 of the documentary – *press pause* who knows what is happening in this still image… however when Vril probosces begins to secrete parasitical cells inside the brains of mammals, this causes the victim excruciating pain… you can see here that the person is clutching his chest as a man is stood over him… so what is going on here? Is this a Vril parasitical take over, and thus creating a human host?

-Vril flying saucers were actual blueprints… practically & literally, Hitler did obtain flying saucer blueprints, which Hitler and his henchmen back-engineered from the abandon Atlantean base (military base containing technology from the civilisation of Atlantis). The Vril parasites led Hitler to this abandoned base. Hitler was so proud of his association with Vril parasites, he named the flying saucers which he & his henchmen back-engineered ‘The Vril-Heimer’ (“Heimer” is German for ‘illustrious’). Most of the technology rediscovered can be found in deep underground military bases today.

-The Vril society, and these Vril enablers, who keep Vril parasites secret and use them for the most despicable crimes against human nature (turning human beings into human hosts) still exist today.

*The notes presented here are further facts regarding The Vril Society, and Vril parasites; other parts / information presented in the documentary is misdirection and misinformation to throw people off the real information, and that is: Vril is not ‘mystical or mysterious’ etc, but a parasitical animal, kept secret by world leaders, as well as, the Vril Society, in order to turn human beings into “human hosts”; -that is the extremely dark, and cold hard truths about The Vril Society, and Vril parasites, as well as, ‘Vril power’.

#KillVril

Dead chipheads

From: http://astral7ight.blogspot.fi/p/chipheads_23.html

Astral Light – A Dead Chiphead (also known as a Reanimated Chiphead or an Undead Chiphead) is one who has a flawed copy of their or someone else’s dead consciousness recorded on a apple-seed sized microchip called the Soulstone (also called the Consciousness Chip or the Soul Catcher) implanted in their head (real body or even a clone body). They don’t like the term Dead Chiphead, so they call it Re-lifed. Don says, “they can drill a hole in a persons head or they can remove [one’s] eyeball and insert the chip with a rod to a certain depth in the brain.” Then they turn it on and it bodysnatches the person via technology as opposed to a Vril lizard that bodysnatches one parasitically.

Donald Marshall – It messes up the person for like a month or something. They can only sleep, get up and eat. They have to have a nurse with them.

They can reanimate you into a shadow.you come back evil gay child molester. they all do. its flawed.. they have neurosurgeons trying to fix this problem. all over the world german scientists asian russian they cant fix it. they would stop doing it but they fear death. said theyre scared of possibly facing gods judgement and will reanimate themselves. they record your consciousness on a chip just before u die. then they implant this chip in a clone body’s head OR a victims head. then they implant this chip in a clone . but use chips now. thats an undead chiphead. can do it to a clone body and have to just get replacement bodies like every 6 months or so. or real body stolen which makes have less side effects and no need to change bodies. destroy the mindworks satellite all the undead chipheads will drop. they dont even need to be executed… a button push deactivated them.

Question – Is the switch to deactivate the chipheads the cloning centre or through computer?

Donald Marshall – unknown about off switch, Ive seen them deactivate them tho, they just shut off. no pain or anything.

Question – who has access to this button?

Donald Marshall – mindcomputers company is one way,… they have back ups, but this mindcomputers company must be stopped…. they have a site on the net even. lol…….. describing half of the stuff they can do. lol.

Dunno about souls in clones,… i feel just like real life unless theyve drugged the clone with something… smack yer own face n all… then ya cry cuz ya know the evil hag has activated a clone of you while your in rem sleep stage then ya get mad lol………. i feel like when a clone I have a soul…. same as in real…. same feeling. im like curious george bad,… i had to know everything,… i wondered about the soul thing too… so did they… they dont know what happens to your “consciousness” as they call it they can only preserve a flawed negative of you…they have lotsa theories…. all I know is i dont wanna go wherever they end up… or come back mark 3 or 4 clone for elizabeth to stab. mega death… the worst thing they say that can happen to a living thing…it keeps people from talkin.

They would be killed too if they talked… Or killed and cloned after death and tortured over and over clone to clone all the time no rem required after yer dead…

He [George Bush Senior] might be one of those kind of clones mark 3 or 4 there are a bunch… they need replacing, they go to certainmilitary hospitals theres one by camp david in the states and get a new body, the brain degrades, whole body internally degrades, that’s why cloned organs can’t be used for transplant, theyre grown too quickly, theyre not the same as as tissue that grew over years, and if they tried to make that kind of clone it would be underwater in the tube and the skin would bloat after too long and the skin would be all messed up, takes like 5 months to make a clone, they can probably make them even faster now theyre alway making tech smaller and reducing time for stuff, they put a lot of money into it.

But the clones are mentally unstable, theyre like missing essential behavioral requirements that the “original” had, but as clones they have a very one track mind, are prone to being more jealous or get angry easier and are dumber, when they think people are making fun of them they get deadly, because theyre pissed off this person is a real person and doesnt suffer the side effects of being a dead clone and rrrrr clone attacks… this is why they have handlers, so they dont try to kill people sometimes, and to keep them clear of stressful situations… there is another kind of handler though…

You do not need to be dead to have a flawed version of your consciousness,… They can double up and copy as many chips with the recording as they want… The consciousnesses are independent of each other and the memories of these doubles is uploaded to the original person each night. Many have done this and I will detail. For some reason the person you implant the chip into has to be your specific biological body “type”… This is why they usually look like the person or looks like a close relative…

Katie Wright Whale Song – when the chip is placed into the victim do they die..or does their consciousness remain and become over shadowed by the chip personality? When the chip is not activated does the body of the victim go into a coma? How does it work?

Donald Marshall – Total donation, no coming back, chip has to be in a certain part of the brain, but they’re constantly upgrading the technology and have hinted to me that the chips can be put anywhere in the body and they can just link to brain via the minute electrical current that runs through people’s bodies naturally…

They got a lot of tech. Don’t get the chip ever.

Katie Wright Whale Song – so the invader..the entity that takes over via a chip inherits all the talents of the original?

Donald Marshall – Can access most memories,… If the person has a good voice for singing then they just use that voice. With minor training they can reproduce the same quality of singing that the original could manage.

Unknown for certain if chipheads can access the memories. But vrill parasite hosts can.

Jesse Murrin – Now does the copy of your consciousness remember the actual death…?

Donald Marshall – Yes

If they spoke multiple languages when alive then they will remember.

Laurence Mountford – but can they be programmed with different stuff as well? guess not

Donald Marshall – yeah they can get additional programming. wouldnt be able to learn a new language once a dead chip head though.

If you get the RFID chip (even in your arm), it acts as a brain chip. They’ve upgraded the technology. They can upload a dead consciousness into you and it only takes a short time for them to become coherent. Once the chip is shut down, the original person comes back into control.

Astral Light – This is the only secret that Donald Marshall wasn’t suppose to talk about.

Exposing Vril

From: https://www.facebook.com/groups/Conspiratorium/permalink/1854330384782064/

I must help to expose Vril and tell you about Vril, because quite frankly if you are human and you do not speak up against Vril you have betrayed your own species, it is as simple and as serious as that. However, before I start posting about highest level 33rd degree knowledge it is important a few things are said about 32nd degree knowledge involving human cloning and R.E.M (rapid eye movement) sleep driven human cloning.

I understand it is difficult to accept that reality may not be what we think it is, and that in the background humans have been cloned. I wholly understand that. I also understand when people discuss cloning, they think it is from a baby stage upwards… and cannot fathom or accept that cloning has advanced much further in secret, and it now involves sleep driven human cloning… whereby original people go to sleep and wake up through the process of consciousness transfer from their original bodies, to their R.E.M (rapid eye movement) sleep driven human cloned alternatives, and are therefore simultaneously asleep, in their original body, and simultaneously awake via consciousness transfer, as a R.E.M driven human clone version of themselves. I know. It is plenty to take in. However this disclosure on R.E.M driven human cloning reduces to advanced and hidden science and technology (in comparison to that currently available for public use). I get it.

It was an initial struggle for me to accept consciousness transfer is a possibility, yet alone a reality; and that is one main aspect; there are many hurdles to overcome, personal to everyone before one can see the plain and obvious truth of these whistle-blowing disclosures. Nonetheless, the three main stumbling blocks people face in realising, and knowing the truths of such disclosures are: technological advancements; the environment; and personal biases. If you accept that the current technology which is available publicly is the pinnacle of humanity’s technological capabilities, then you must do some serious homework on this, because it simply isn’t; what we see in public is most certainly not the height of humanity’s technological capabilities. Our environment reinforces such an illusion, in the sense that we go out into the world, and accept that what we perceive with our five senses is the only reality, and this aspect, further reinforces the illusion that what we perceive in our environment is the height of humanity’s technological capabilities. It simply is not. We all have personal biases, and it is difficult not to have any formed, once we have lived in this world for many years, and we have become indoctrinated into believing, mostly through little fault of our own, that: ‘we know what the world is, or is about’.

Personal biases are one of the hardest stumbling blocks to overcome, because they are personal, and with a whistle-blowing disclosure as explosive as sleep driven human cloning via consciousness transfer to substrate bodies as depicted in the movie Avatar, Inception, The 13th Floor, A Nightmare on Elm St, and countless others; it forces us to re-address our personal biases, and re-examine life, and if we are unable to do this, we simply cannot see the simple truth and reality of R.E.M sleep driven human cloning which is present today. As I’ve mentioned one of the most difficult concepts for me to accept initially was that of consciousness transfer, it went counter to everything I had previously held to be true.

However, when you have many world renowned scientists claiming they are 99% or even 100% sure that consciousness transfer is not only possible… but it will be a reality in say 20 years time, you have to ask yourself “HOW?”… How can they be so precise in terms of timeline, and be so certain? That alone should leave the sceptic in you with many unanswered questions worth exploring… whereby through diligence, you come to realise that what is happening is not so much predictions, but rather scripts. This makes more sense; “one does not need to read the future, when one is writing the future”. The above statement becomes glaringly obvious once it is realised, the level of technological progress hidden from humanity.

It takes scepticism, open mindedness, and optimism to make breakthroughs. We must all “breakthrough” to realise the simple truths of these whistle-blowing disclosures. Scepticism keeps you from believing fallacies. It keeps you from believing that which you have not yet proven for yourself. This simply means one must be diligent and reach the point whereby they “know” and can concretely separate facts from fiction, backed by evidence. It is better to “know” than to “believe”; to “know” means to “understand with certainty”; to “believe” is to “accept without proof” –the sceptic in you should want to “know” the truths of these whistle-blowing disclosures. Optimism (which was difficult for me initially, because I’m more sceptical than anything) gives you the ability to give merit to that which you have not proven for yourself. Therefore, instead of just being sceptical and thinking ‘what a load of croc –you cannot transfer consciousness etc… etc.’, and move towards an optimistic standpoint, one should ask –what will be the implications if it is possible to transfer consciousness etc., etc? You will be surprised at the answers you receive. Take this further by finding research which either verifies or challenges your assertions, causing you to reconsider your estimations or your presuppositions.

Open mindedness gives one the ability to “see” that which has not yet been proven. One has to be open to the possibility, that on some statistically probability, it is possible to clone humans; R.E.M sleep driven human cloning is possible; and consciousness transfer is possible and so on. One must be opened to it, because so long as one remains closed, one will simply not have the gumption to look further, and it is as simple as that. This is exactly what I did. With such initial mind-blogging disclosures, although primarily difficult to accept, I just weighed them on arbitrary and personal statistical probabilities. Okay, if consciousness transfer is possible, what arbitrary statically probability would I assign to that; that it is possible to transfer consciousness…? Initially, I gave it 5% (out of 100%), because it is just initially difficult to accept any of this. However, even such a small arbitrary, personal and assigned statistical probability, meant that I now had to change from being completely sceptical, to being slightly open-minded, then optimistic… because if I am now open to such a possibility of consciousness transfer, from an optimistic standpoint –what are the implications etc. etc?

I would continue to research and revise my assumptions, until that arbitrary personal statistical probability of consciousness transfer was no longer at the 5% interval, but closer to being a certainty for me. Scepticism, open-mindedness, and optimism are really needed to make breakthroughs and break new grounds, and most importantly, good healthy scepticism will keep one from falling into fallacies, throughout the entire research process, and from believing anything which you have not yet proven to yourself (with evidence; try as best as possible not to leave ‘open loops’; I would disagree assertions are demonstrable where open loops are found.).

With all that said, if you have kept up to date, or read ahead, you should already know human cloning and R.E.M (rapid eye movement) sleep driven cloning is a reality, which exists today and is kept in secret. It is extremely obvious to those who have kept up to date or read ahead. If you’re still sceptical about such disclosures, then remember one also needs optimism and open-mindedness to either see the truth of such claims, OR, to debunk such claims, by means of thorough research methodology.

I shall now provide you with a scientific video on consciousness transfer. It is drip-feed disclosure. Drip feed disclosure is also an aspect one must learn about to further understand the realities of these whistle-blowing disclosures. This was one of the first videos which REALLY opened my eyes to the possibilities and reality of consciousness transfer, because it is all there… and you can witness how a person’s consciousness can be easily transferred. I URGE you to watch this video. It will WHOLLY help with one’s better understanding of consciousness transfer and further help with understanding R.E.M sleep driven human cloning, and understanding that it is the consciousness which get’s transferred to substrate (clone) bodies –as depicted in the 2009 movie, Avatar.

With all this said, I’ll be making future posts on Vril, and thought it is better to inform others in advance of this. This is because if you thought your governments and world leaders cloning people in secret over 70 years is difficult enough to accept; well… when it comes to the reality of Vril, I simply want to lessen the shock factor for you so that you do not panic, become paranoid etc –that is, if you do not know what Vril is. Vril must also be exposed, because if you are human, and you keep silent about the threat of Vril, then you have simply betrayed your own species, -humanity.

In short Vril can be likened to an animal which governments and world leaders have kept secret for over 1000s of years. For example, if I am to mention the animal rattlesnake… most people would not get extremely frightful by the fact that I’m mentioning that rattlesnakes pose a threat to humans, most people have heard and seen videos / images of rattlesnakes and know they should keep their distance. This is the same with Vril. Humans should keep their distance because Vrils are just as dangerous as rattlesnakes, if not more…

However, because the animal rattlesnake is more known publicly, the shock factor is reduced, because it is out in the open. Nevertheless, because Vrils are unknown by the majority of the public, kept hidden and secret, this factor causes a huge psychological detriment to others once discussing the reality and prevalence of Vril. It’s because of the secrecy aspect and the threat Vrils pose to humans, just as people may become extremely fearful than they normally would, if rattlesnakes were kept hidden and secret, and then one day there is a revelation about rattlesnakes, and the threat rattlesnakes pose to humans…

It is the secrecy aspect which further causes a much larger than normal psychological detriment, however, once it is in the open, or known about for years, the shock factor reduces. Consequently, my aim is to help further expose 33rd degree level knowledge which involves Vril without causing you to go into a state of shock, panic, and paranoia… if you do not know what Vril is / are. As I’ve already mentioned they can be likened to that of an animal which governments have kept secret and formed alliances with for many thousands of years. These creatures just need to be known about publicly; their strengths and weakness detailed for all to read and examine, -and eradicated –because of the threat which Vrils pose to humans…; Overall Vril are cowardly… and I would not be too fearful for them… and just like the rattlesnake, you will learn Vril must be kept at a distance, and just like the rattlesnake, you must kill Vril, before it kills you. Moreover, yes I am fully aware… first our governments and world leaders are cloning people, and now they have dangerous animals kept in secret?! Yes they do such heinous crimes in secret for amusement and entertainment.

There’s a whole barrage of gene-spliced animals, some of which kept secret, others made public, you simply have to research gene spliced creatures, to realise the vast amount of animals which have been gene spliced, for example: ‘spider-goat’. With all, this said, there is not much need for panic when it comes to Vril; Vril just needs to be fully exposed; known publicly worldwide, and severely dealt with.

#KillVril

Make sure to watch the lecture on consciousness transfer, if you need further reference to understand the prevalence and reality of R.E.M driven human cloning by following the link below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR7HissYN2U

Source

Google’s New AI Has Learned to Become “Highly Aggressive” in Stressful Situations

Late last year, famed physicist Stephen Hawking issued a warning that the continued advancement of artificial intelligence will either be “the best, or the worst thing, ever to happen to humanity”.

We’ve all seen the Terminator movies, and the apocalyptic nightmare that the self-aware AI system, Skynet, wrought upon humanity, and now results from recent behaviour tests of Google’s new DeepMind AI system are making it clear just how careful we need to be when building the robots of the future.

In tests late last year, Google’s DeepMind AI system demonstrated an ability to learn independently from its own memory, and beat the world’s best Go players at their own game.

It’s since been figuring out how to seamlessly mimic a human voice.

Now, researchers have been testing its willingness to cooperate with others, and have revealed that when DeepMind feels like it’s about to lose, it opts for “highly aggressive” strategies to ensure that it comes out on top.

The Google team ran 40 million turns of a simple ‘fruit gathering’ computer game that asks two DeepMind ‘agents’ to compete against each other to gather as many virtual apples as they could.

They found that things went smoothly so long as there were enough apples to go around, but as soon as the apples began to dwindle, the two agents turned aggressive, using laser beams to knock each other out of the game to steal all the apples.

You can watch the Gathering game in the video below, with the DeepMind agents in blue and red, the virtual apples in green, and the laser beams in yellow:

Now those are some trigger-happy fruit-gatherers.

Interestingly, if an agent successfully ‘tags’ its opponent with a laser beam, no extra reward is given. It simply knocks the opponent out of the game for a set period, which allows the successful agent to collect more apples.

If the agents left the laser beams unused, they could theoretically end up with equal shares of apples, which is what the ‘less intelligent’ iterations of DeepMind opted to do.

It was only when the Google team tested more and more complex forms of DeepMind that sabotage, greed, and aggression set in.

As Rhett Jones reports for Gizmodo, when the researchers used smaller DeepMind networks as the agents, there was a greater likelihood for peaceful co-existence.

But when they used larger, more complex networks as the agents, the AI was far more willing to sabotage its opponent early to get the lion’s share of virtual apples.

The researchers suggest that the more intelligent the agent, the more able it was to learn from its environment, allowing it to use some highly aggressive tactics to come out on top.

“This model … shows that some aspects of human-like behaviour emerge as a product of the environment and learning,” one of the team, Joel Z Leibo, told Matt Burgess at Wired.

“Less aggressive policies emerge from learning in relatively abundant environments with less possibility for costly action. The greed motivation reflects the temptation to take out a rival and collect all the apples oneself.”

DeepMind was then tasked with playing a second video game, called Wolfpack. This time, there were three AI agents – two of them played as wolves, and one as the prey.

Unlike Gathering, this game actively encouraged co-operation, because if both wolves were near the prey when it was captured, they both received a reward – regardless of which one actually took it down:

“The idea is that the prey is dangerous – a lone wolf can overcome it, but is at risk of losing the carcass to scavengers,” the team explains in their paper.

“However, when the two wolves capture the prey together, they can better protect the carcass from scavengers, and hence receive a higher reward.”

So just as the DeepMind agents learned from Gathering that aggression and selfishness netted them the most favourable result in that particular environment, they learned from Wolfpack that co-operation can also be the key to greater individual success in certain situations.

And while these are just simple little computer games, the message is clear – put different AI systems in charge of competing interests in real-life situations, and it could be an all-out war if their objectives are not balanced against the overall goal of benefitting us humans above all else.

Think traffic lights trying to slow things down, and driverless cars trying to find the fastest route – both need to take each other’s objectives into account to achieve the safest and most efficient result for society.

It’s still early days for DeepMind, and the team at Google has yet to publish their study in a peer-reviewed paper, but the initial results show that, just because we build them, it doesn’t mean robots and AI systems will automatically have our interests at heart.

Instead, we need to build that helpful nature into our machines, and anticipate any ‘loopholes’ that could see them reach for the laser beams.

As the founders of OpenAI, Elon Musk’s new research initiative dedicated to the ethics of artificial intelligence, said back in 2015:

“AI systems today have impressive but narrow capabilities. It seems that we’ll keep whittling away at their constraints, and in the extreme case, they will reach human performance on virtually every intellectual task.

It’s hard to fathom how much human-level AI could benefit society, and it’s equally hard to imagine how much it could damage society if built or used incorrectly.”

Tread carefully, humans…

Source