Tag Archives: Synthetic people

THE CLONING OF HUMAN BEINGS SHOWS ITS TRUE UGLY, SATANIC FACE

This is just horrible future if we don’t stop the mindset of our scientist brothers. Not everything that can be done should be done. Here’s an article about how we, in the future, make clone factories, which contain headless clones for harvesting body parts. Are these headless humans alive? Do their have a soul? If they do, then this is just a killing factory. Here’s the article:

clones

NEWS BRIEF: “Fetuses will be grown to harvest, say experts: Ethicist sees development in 10 years,” The Sun Chronicle, Monday, October 20, 1997, p. 5.

“LONDON (AP) — Partial human fetuses will be grown to harvest organs for transplants in the next decade, and government oversight is urgently needed to prevent abuses, an ethics expert said Sunday. Dr. Patrick Dixon predicted that it is only a matter of time before cloning technology is used to create partial fetuses with missing heads, arms or legs ‘as organ factories for tomorrow’s people’. Dixon, author of The Genetic Revolution, made his prediction following a report in The Sunday Times over the weekend that British scientists have created a frog embryo without a head.”

“Scientists believe the technique used to create a headless frog can be adapted to grow human organs such as hearts, kidneys and livers in an artificial womb … it is only a matter of time — five to 10 years — before scientists grow partial fetuses to obtain human organs.”

Absolutely nothing demonstrates the Satanic Morality of this coming New World Order than this article. When the first story of the cloning of Dolly the sheep broke into the news, we predicted that the next, inevitable step was the cloning of humans. Certainly, that prospect is sufficiently frightening to force us down on our knees to pray to Almighty God that He either prevent such a horrible development, or that He take us out in Rapture before this scenario can occur. When man gets new capabilities, he injects murder, violence, and evil into it.

Certainly, we could see the development of a “superior” race in this new technology; and, if you are going to bring a new ‘superior’ race into this world, you must first ‘cleanse the earth’ of the old ‘inferior’ races. Hitler reached this conclusion years before he achieved power. He believed that all of Eastern Europe must be ‘cleansed’ of people, so that his Germanic Master race could realize their full potential, in both population numbers and in ‘Quality of Life’. Thus, Hitler created the huge killing chambers and crematoriums to kill many millions more than the Jews and the assorted ‘unfits’ he did kill. This was the ‘morality’ of Hitler’s New World Order.

This cloning issue is the ‘new morality’ of the coming Satanic, Antichrist, Neo-Hitlerian New World Order. It is no less than sheer terror to contemplate. Now, man does have the scientific capability to create exactly the Master Race envisioned by occultists for centuries. Now, man has the excuse to ‘cleanse’ the earth of the unfits before this Master Race is created. At this point, you might reread the Book of Revelation, because much of the killing that Antichrist is prophesied to do in the 7-year Tribulation period might be tied in to this Satanic vision of a Master Race brought about by cloning.

Now, let us spend a few moments examining this article; then, once we have accomplished this task, we can examine the startling fact that this scenario of deliberately growing human beings for human body parts was publicly printed 10 years ago!!

In this article, above, the first absurdity contained is that the “Government” can inject a measure of morality into this situation!! Who ever would think that the Federal Government, either ours or anyone else’s, could be “moral” enough to control this cloning situation? The most heinous crimes in history, responsible for the most numbers of people killed, have been initiated and waged by governments! In fact, you can get a great book on this subject, by R.J. Rummel, called “ Death By Government“. The fact of history, especially Twentieth Century history, is that governments are responsible for planning, and carrying out, of the most terrible crimes against humanity. The Russian Communist Government is responsible for killing tens of millions of its own people, and throwing tens of millions more into Gulag concentration camps. The Chinese Communist Government is responsible for killing over 100 million of its own people. The Japanese Imperial Government, acting in concert with Hitler’s Nazi Government, is responsible for planning World War II, and initiating the war; they are also responsible for some of the most heinous medical experiments of this century.

Our own American Government planned and carried out the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and for deliberately exposing some of her own citizens to atomic radiation in experiments following World War II, so scientists could discover what radiation could do to a human being. The President also apologized, not too long ago, for the American Government deliberately not treating blacks for certain diseases so they could discover human responses to them.

Our American Founding Fathers so distrusted governments of unlimited powers that they created our form of government, where the powers of the government are split into three branches, each of which is separate from the other. They further limited our government with the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, which severely limits the government in what they can do to its citizens. This is why we are seeing the deliberate destruction of our government, to get the American people discouraged about this wonderful system, so they will accept another form of government, believing that “things cannot get any worse”. This is why we are hearing calls for a Constitutional Convention, to rewrite our Constitution according to the Globalist concepts embodied in the United Nations Charter, and in the Plans of the New World Order. This is the reason we are seeing Impeachment talk of President Clinton. The Plan apparently calls for such incompetence and crimes committed by our government officials that, once the Antichrist arises to establish his own form of government, people will welcome this change, being so sick and tired of the crimes and misbehaviors of their elected officials. We detail this part of the New World Order Plan in NEWS1114, “Clinton Dealing With China”. We encourage you to read it, as it will help you understand why so many of our officials are acting the way they are today.

So, for this “ethicist” to suggest that the government ought to get involved in this plan of cloning of humans without heads, to inject some “morality” into the situation is ludicrous. I find it hard to believe that any thinking adult would actually propose such a thing. Of course, if this good Doctor Patrick Dixon is a Liberal, he would naturally want the Federal Government involved, because Liberals always think that the government can do things better and make things better for everyone, the abundant examples to the contrary notwithstanding.

Secondly, the idea that scientists could even contemplate, much less carry out, cloning of humans so that the babies [fetuses to the secular crowd] thus conceived would be without heads is so Satanic it defies the imagination!! But, why should we be too surprised? These doctors of today can contemplate this kind of ghoulish scenario because they no longer believe that God Almighty created human beings as a unique creation, created in “His own image”. They no longer have the Christian concept of the sanctity of human life. Can you imagine a “factory” with rows upon rows of specially designed machines that act like artificial wombs? Inside these machines are human beings that have been born without heads because their genetic makeup has been changed so that heads will not form! Can you imagine a “factory” with tens of thousands of such “artificial wombs”?

Certainly, this new industry would immediately eliminate the shortage of available human parts for transplantation. Indeed, this type of industry would be so very, very profitable that Wall Street would invest billions and billions of dollars into it. But, we are getting a little bit ahead of “the rest of the story”.

The final implication of this technology is that scientists, working for the Satanic New World Order Government, can change the genetic structure so that the PERFECT SUPERMAN race can finally be created. Today’s New World Order occult leaders want this perfect race as much as Adolf Hitler wanted it! As we stated above, if the forces of Antichrist have this technology, they will first go about “cleansing” the earth of the “inferior” races. Ruth Montgomery, in her book, “Herald of a New Age”, speaks repeatedly of a “cleansing” of the earth that must occur as the world is going from the Old, to the New, World Order. Other New Age authors, such as David Spangler, also discuss this cleansing repeatedly.

Now, we want to tell you the rest of the story.

The New Age magazine, Omni, is one of the most influential “agents of change” within the New Age community. Controversial issues divulged first in Omni, are then debated throughout society, becoming reality later. Omni Magazine is so influential that it can really be thought of as the Flagship of the New Age.

In the September, 1987, issue, Omni ran a front cover story entitled, “Redefining Death”. This article was so shocking to me when I read it that it took my breath away. I felt that I could hardly believe it; yet, since I knew the Satanic nature of the New Age and its planned New World Order, I knew that this scenario laid out in this article was entirely possible. Later, when I included this story in Seminar 1, “ American Leadership of the New World Order“, certain people within every audience were highly offended by this story, feeling that I should not have exposed them to it, since no one in their right minds could ever conceive of this ever actually happening. My point at the time was that the Tribulation Period is a global moment in history where neither the leaders of government, nor the people, are in their “right minds”. People during this time period will be more influenced by demonic forces than at any other time in history. Since we are so close to the beginning of the Tribulation Period, we can assume that a vigorous campaign should be underway to subtly change people’s attitudes and values now. Remember the New Age premise that The Christ cannot appear until and unless a significant proportion of the peoples of the world have been preconditioned to accept him.

Now, let us review this Omni Magazine article, in the September, 1997, issue. The title was, “Redefining Death: Last Rights”, by Kathleen Stein, pages 59-60, 66-67, 114-117.

The scene opens in a hospital operating room, with the “patient” laying on the table. Quotations from this article will be within quotation marks, while our comments will be within brackets and in bold italic.

The “patient” is never given a name; rather, he is referred to only as “R.H.”.

“On his back, eyes shut, breathing rhymically, R.H. — six-three, 170 pounds — is a handsome man. Yet even as one admires the strong lines of his body, surgeons with scalpels incise the skin and muscle of his chest and abdomen with long, sure strokes. Using a small electric saw, they cleave the sternum as easily as if it were made of balsa. There is surprisingly little blood, but there’s a certain amount of disarray in the operating room (O.R.) when as many as eight doctors have their hands and arms inside the cadaver, working quickly to disconnect the organs from their many vessels. [What is happening here is that this living, breathing human being is being “harvested” of his organs! Further, this author writes about this awful scenario as dispassionately as if she were writing about eight mechanics, with their hands inside an engine cavity, systematically disassembling an engine!]

“Rib cage and thoracic cavity are splayed open and viscera held back with metal retractors known as ‘iron interns’. The organs reveal a marvelous power, as when someone lifts the hood of a fine car and sees the friction less workings of a precision-tuned engine. This ‘engine’ is awesome — glistening, organic, wet. Aesthetically, the liver is most pleasing, resembling some lustrous sea creature, smooth and supple with sharply defined edges. But a surgical error contaminates it. As a result, the liver loses its silkiness and definition, turning from coral pink to meat-market purple. The surgeons push the organ aside, and, struggling with their disappointment, proceed. R.H.’s heart suddenly begins an agitated dance, speeding from 100 to 200 beats a minute. The surgeons, alarmed, quiet it with a jolt of electricity from defibrillating paddles. Two hours later, it, too, is removed and slipped into a stainless steel bowl full of saline solution.” [Do you realize that this ‘journalist’ is calmly reporting the death of a human being? She is actually reporting the medical murder of a human being! Yet, she is not moved by any emotions, or any that she reports. She is not moved to revulsion because God’s Commandment against murder is being callously disregarded. This person is being murdered by medically removing his organs, undoubtedly ‘for the benefit of mankind’.]

“As soon as each organ comes out [of the body], it is carefully packed in an Igloo Playmate full of dry ice and rushed to a waiting helicopter for delivery to a distant transplant team. Finally, after the major organs are removed, a blond-haired surgeon from New York’s Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, his eyes rimmed by dark circles, tells the anesthetist to disconnect the I.V.’s and turn off the respirator.” [It is unbelievable that this kind of ‘human harvesting’ is going on at all in America, but the thought of it occurring in one of our most prestigious hospitals is true cause for alarm! You might rationalize that this type of ‘harvesting’ might be going on sporadically in a very few, probably backwater, hospitals, but it is truly sobering to discover that it is occurring in this elite hospital! I also find it interesting that this journalist would choose to describe one of the attendants as a ‘blond-haired surgeon. Is she trying, not too subtly, to draw our attention that this scene is straight out of the Nazi past?]

The author then tells us that R.H. was 42 years of age, and that he was a victim of an aneurysm that had rendered him “brain dead”. Whew! We feel better, don’t we? Now that we know he is “brain dead”, it is all right to brazenly “harvest” his organs. Right?! Isn’t it better to harvest his organs so that they can save other lives through transplantation, rather than just letting them rot in a grave, of no use to anyone. Right?!

Wrong. Since man is inherently evil {Jeremiah 17:9}, there are certain doors prohibiting certain behaviors under any and all circumstances; because to open those doors just a crack, would invite evil to come rushing in later, destroying much. This is the entire premise of the conditioning program called the Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan [ CE1002 and 1007 Radio Transcripts, and NEWS1006 and 1005, Current Newsletter]. The purpose of this insidious, invisible attitudinal change plan is to just open the door a tiny, tiny crack. Once the door to the previously forbidden practice is opened just a tiny crack, then, over time, it can be expanded until the door is fully opened. We saw this occur in the battle over Abortion, which had been outlawed under any circumstance in most states prior to 1973. Advocates of Abortion argued that it should be allowed under any circumstances, while opponents argued that it should never, ever be allowed, no matter what circumstance might occur. A compromise was reached: Abortion could be allowed only under very narrow boundaries — only in the case of rape, incest, or to protect the life of the mother. Proponents of unlimited Abortion lamented publicly that they had to ‘settle’ for this compromise; however, privately they cheered greatly, because they had opened the door to Abortion just a tiny crack. Opponents of Abortion were happy because their compromise, they believed, had prevented a more horrible tragedy. Little did they realize they had just set the stage for their delayed defeat. Then, in 1973, the Supreme Court kicked the door wide open, in Roe vs Wade. Now, Abortion is legal under any and all circumstances, right up to the point of the baby’s head coming out. Now, we are relegated to fighting the battle against Partial Birth Abortions, where a baby that is mostly out of the womb is killed, and his brain emptied of brain matter! This battle would never have been necessary to fight, had we Christians refused to accept the ‘compromise’ that allowed Abortion under very “narrow” circumstances.

This is the battle being waged in this Omni Magazine article of September, 1987. This article seems to be trying to show that ‘harvesting’ of human organs is perfectly fine under certain narrow circumstances. The next few pages of this article explains this position. The journalist, Ms Stein offers several statements which support this premise.

* “He was obviously dead” [This was the day before R.H. was harvested]

* “There is no moment of death” [This is an unbiblical statement, since God stated clearly that “the life of the flesh is in the blood”. Thus, if a person’s heart is continuing to pump blood throughout the body, God considers that person to be alive. But, if New Age practitioners can “redefine” death by stating that no one can actually know when a person is dead, then they can proceed with all sorts of neo-pagan death activities, like this one]

* ” ‘Brain death’ is only about 20 years old, the offspring of the ICY and its advanced life-support technologies … Bioethicists and members of the medical profession think the definition of death should encompass not only those who have no brain functions (the brain dead) but also those who have lost consciousness (the cognitive dead), ‘lost souls’ who linger mindlessly in what are called, ‘persistent vegetative states’.” [When Ms Stein states that members of the medical profession want to EXPAND the definition of death, I can only assume she means those medical professionals which have an economic reason to want such a redefinition, since they would be allowed to ‘harvest’ more organs, thus reaping the wealth that this ‘harvest’ would bring on today’s transplant market]

* ‘Cardiovascular death’ — “The heart stops beating. The doctor listens to the chest. Was that the moment of death? With modern equipment, you can detect signs of electrical activity in the heart forty minutes after it has stopped beating. The moment of death is fiction.” [Ah, yes, dear doctor, but is the heart actually PUMPING BLOOD? That moment is not fiction, and that is the Biblical moment of death]

* ‘The soul leaving the body’ — “Let’s assume there is a soul. When does it exit? When the heart stops? When the brain stops? When the reticular formation, the brain’s arousal system, stops? Does it exit all at once … or gradually? If gradually, then there’s no moment of death.” [Do you get the concept that New Agers desperately want a confused situation, not a clearly defined moment of death? In a state of confusion, they can proceed with their plan, the harvesting of organs]

After Ms Stein had told us graphically about the “harvesting” of organs, and after she has explored the New Age ‘ethical’ considerations, she is ready to shock us some more. She turns to a discussion of a bold new future, where harvesting of human organs is no longer shocking to the American people, thus allowing it to become BIG business.

How BIG? “But over the next 20 years, the overwhelming demand for organs may increase the pressure to simply declare the ‘brain absent’, dead. There is already something of a black market for buying and selling organs”. [No kidding. Remember in the first part of this story, when Ms Stein reported that other doctors were anxiously awaiting for the organs that the surgeons at Columbia were harvesting? This is the black market at work, now, today, in 1987]

Ms Stein continues. “If the cognitive-death definition were instituted, organ-merchandising corporations might establish enterprises beyond Wall street’s wildest insider fantasies. The world would find itself in a situation where death itself would be an industry — an economic incentive.” [We are already at that point, now. I heard on the radio several days ago a report that Dr. Kevorkian has offered to sell the usable organs from his suicide victims.]

Ms Steins graphically describes some various states in which we might see the emergence of a “Death Industry”, where human body parts could be grown until they are needed, and then harvested. She describes the following possible scenarios:

* “Vegetative Dead, someone who is in a “persistent vegetative state”, a state where the person is physically healthy but with little or no brain function or activity. “Many physicians foresee the massive proliferation of ‘Jefferson Institutes’ devoted to harvesting organs from the vegetative ‘dead’. [This term refers to the movie, “Coma”, where people who are declared ‘brain dead’ are shipped off to the Jefferson Institute, where their physical body is kept alive until their organs were needed. Then, when the need arose, their organs were ‘harvested’.]

Stein continues. “There is no end to possible scenarios. Female vegetatives, for example, might be employed as surrogate wombs … The vegetatives could even be mated to produce fertilized eggs or offspring … Society has a ways to go before we set up ‘human vegetable farms’.”

* Neo-Morts — the state where consciousness is gone. “Once consciousness is gone, the person is lost. What remains is a mindless organism. After the loss of person hood, the death of what remains is not the death of a human being but of a thing, the demise of a body that has outlived its owner.” [This redefinition of a human being to that of a THING is so essential to this new Death Industry. Just as the Nazis discovered that their most hardened soldier was troubled by killing people — which is why they starved them into skin and bones non-people before killing them — so will normal nurses and doctors will be troubled by killing people. People must be made non-people]

This brings us to a most interesting part of our story. Ms Stein speaks to this issue of creating non-people late in her article. “We also have the emotional stress of treating the legally dead … maintaining bodies for ‘harvesting’ often requires treating dead people as if they were alive, an upsetting experience for doctors and nurses. They must try to ignore the signs of vitality that bombard their senses …”

Did you fully understand what you have just been told in the last paragraph? Let us repeat it again for you:

1) “We also have the emotional stress of treating the legally dead … maintaining bodies for ‘harvesting’ often requires treating dead people as if they were alive, an upsetting experience for doctors and nurses.”

2) They must try to ignore the signs of vitality that bombard their senses …”

In other words, the doctors and nurses that would be called upon to perform the surgery to “harvest” the bodies of people would be very upset after a short while, because they would be killing people that looked healthy and normal. I have read enough material on the psychology behind the Nazi extermination campaign to know that the trauma felt by the German soldiers who were actually pulling the trigger in the early days of the campaign was extremely real and powerful. This emotional stress was strong enough to worry high Nazi officials, to make them contemplate having to stop the “cleansing” campaign. Therefore, Nazi officials concocted the plan whereby they would slowly starve their victims, at the same time they were forcing them to work extremely hard. This deadly combination would dramatically change the looks of their victims, so that they became just skin and bones. They almost appeared as apparitions of their former selves. But, the effect of these skin and bones people on the German executioners was salutary; they now looked upon these creatures as less than human. Therefore, they did not experience the great emotional stress and trauma when they killed them.

Now, stop to think for a moment: with what part of the body do most people associate when they consider a human being as a person — don’t most people think of the head when they think of someone? Of course, they do. Take a moment to look at the various family photos you have around your house; how many of them are taken so as to deliberately omit the head of the people in the photo? None, of course!

Take a look at a magazine, especially a beauty magazine; notice how many times the head is the dominant feature in the photo. Notice, also, the many, many products sold that are meant to be applied to the head.

The answer, of course, is that none of the photos was taken so as to omit the heads of the people. The attributes which we associate with personality and with a human actually being a person, are mostly affiliated with the head. The head smiles, laughs, cries with tears flowing down, and even shakes back and forth to express emotion. We hold the head of a loved one, we kiss the head, we caress the head, we run our fingers through the hair of the head. The eyes in the head express a great range of emotion, from fear to joy to deepest distress.

The head is THE KEY part of the body that expresses the human elements we all associate with personality and uniqueness. Therefore, if you want to set up human parts factories, you know from experience that the nurses and surgeons are going to be under severe distress because they are going to be deliberately killing virile, healthy, normal people; therefore, if you can eliminate the head of the victims, you eliminate the key part of the body with which people associate most of the attributes of being a human and of expressing personality. The eyes are probably the most important in this regard. In our romantic literature, the eyes are the most important expression of love, compassion, and concern. In horror literature, the eyes are most often used to convey feelings of fear, and of terror.

Therefore, the story behind the story is that there is a very REAL reason these scientists set out to produce frogs without heads. In this new Death Industry, where “factories” will hold human bodies in row after row of mechanical “wombs” and life sustainers, it will be essential that the victims look as non-human as possible, so that the nurses and doctors called upon to harvest them would not be so traumatized that they could not continue!! Therefore, the answer would be to genetically altar human embryos so that the body would grow without a head.

This is the real “rest of the story”. Isn’t it terribly interesting that human scientists have reached this capability of genetic engineering and cloning at precisely the same time as we see so many dozens of Bible Last Days’ prophecies occurring, and at the time when occult literature is so full of the Plans to produce their Antichrist? Believe me, this is no accident. The soon arrival of Antichrist and this development of headless humans is closely tied in together. You are looking at a key development in this coming “Brave New World” called the New World Order!

But, does the Bible speak to horrors such as these, occurring in the End of the Age? The Bible speaks of general changes in the attitudes of people that would allow for this type of horror to occur.

* 1 Timothy 4:1-2, “Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron.” While this prophecy is speaking directly to the apostasy from the Christian faith in the Last Days of time, it certainly applies to this situation. If society were still governed by Christian principles, no scientist would dare to attempt such genetic re-engineering. The only way any human scientists could carry out such a dastardly deed is if they had had their conscience seared with a hot iron.

* 2 Timothy 3:1-3a, “This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection”

Notice how exactly this prophecy applies to these scientists who will be producing these headless human victims for slaughter:

* “men shall be lovers of their own selves” — Certainly, these godless scientists are only thinking of themselves and their own pocketbooks. Otherwise, they would not even contemplate the deliberate conception, growing, and harvesting of human beings for body parts. I have never seen such an example of extreme greed! Even Hitler was motivated by religious conviction — Satanic conviction — as he plotted to destroy entire races and classes of people. But, these men are motivated only by incredible greed.

* “unthankful, unholy” — Again, these conditions of the human heart prophesied to exist in the Last Days are precisely the conditions which have given rise to this Human Harvesting issue. Instead of being thankful to God for the lives which they have been given, they are so unthankful to God that they deliberately set out to commit great, great sin, the murder of fellow human beings. Certainly, no one can argue that this development is one of the most unholy, un-Godlike developments in human history.

“Without natural affection” — Again, no one who possesses natural human affection could carry out, or support, or participate in, such heinous activity. These men, and the men who will follow them in this new industry, are without natural human emotion. I believe our great Abortion Industry is proof of this prophecy coming true. No woman could destroy her own baby, or participate in such slaughter, unless she lacked normal human affection. Certainly, no one could participate in this hideous Satanic activity unless they lacked normal human affection. We have just witnessed another example of Last Days’ Prophecy coming true, in front of your own eyes, in your daily news!!

There is also no Scriptural basis for assuming that the eternal soul of a person is contained within the head. If this were the case, then the argument could be made that headless human victims would be born without eternal souls. Nowhere in the Bible does God say that the soul is located in any specific part of the body. Therefore, each of these headless human victims would be conceived with an eternal soul; you could probably make the case that these victims would perpetually remain innocent, since they would be deprived of their Godlike quality of thinking, reasoning, and understanding. That means, whenever they are killed for their organs, their souls would go to Heaven, thus making the crimes against them all the more heinous, and worthy of judgment.

Before we close on this note of judgment, let us examine for just one more minute the issue that the head contains the seat of thinking, of reasoning, and of understanding. These characteristics are undoubtedly those characteristics of which God was speaking in Genesis 1:26, “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:” Therefore, in creating these headless humans, Satan would finally achieve that for which he has long been seeking, i.e., creating humans that were not in the exact image of God! He cannot stop the fact that they will have eternal souls, but they will not have the Godlike abilities of thinking, reasoning, and knowing right from wrong.

Of course, this increases the surety of God’s national judgment on this country and this world to the point of inevitability. Listen to God’s pronouncement, In His Own Words:

* Revelation 18:5, “For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.” In this passage, God is moved to judgment against this Economic Babylon because her sins have reached unto heaven. The picture here is of wood stacked up like cork wood, until the pile reaches from the surface of the earth, through the seemingly limitless reaches of Outer Space, and into Heaven itself. Those are a lot of sins!!!

* Revelation 18:6, “Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.” God is going to double His judgment of Economic Babylon because of her mighty sins.

* Revelation 18:8, “Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.” This Economic Babylon shall be utterly consumed with fire, in one day. Later in this passage, this time frame is shortened to one hour of one day. Certainly, one logical way in which this judgment could literally be fulfilled is with nuclear weapons. Now join this prophecy with Joel 2:30-31, “I will show wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke. The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the LORD come.” This is a Latter Days’ prophecy that accurately describes the physical effects of a nuclear explosion.

The End of the Age is truly upon us, with all its Satanic fury. Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.

If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually. If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.

We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order — Kingdom of Antichrist — in their daily news.

God bless you.

Source

2012 – And Man Shall Walk as Machine?

Do you think that it is normal, that we blend ourselves with machines? Do we lost the last drop of humanity? I think so…

Image of Man's head covered in electrodes

2012 – And Man Shall Walk as Machine?

Originally published: ufodigest.com, unexplained-mysteries.com
6th February 2011

‘Transhumanism’ is a term that has become a euphemism that has been assimilated into our vocabulary such that it shocks no longer. It would seem perfectly natural that we follow the next ‘evolutionary’ step towards the survival of the fittest and convert ourselves into an information field that never breaks down or decays. No need for physical bodies that break down and die, we can reconstruct our virtual self in electronic form and go on forever. Or can we?

Ray Kurzweil believes the exponential growth of artificial intelligence, biotechnology and nanotechnology means that before 2050 his consciousness and identity – can be copied and uploaded into a non-biological form transcending biology and achieve the dream of immortality.

All this flows from Kurzweil’s Law of Accelerating Returns, a generalization of Moore’s Law, which predicts ongoing exponential growth of key technologies. What this means, Kurzweil writes, is that “…we won’t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century – it will be more like 20,000 years of progress (at today’s rate).”

A body vastly enhanced through biotech and nanotech may suffice to extend life spans indefinitely, but the ultimate leap is to transcend biology entirely. Before 2050, Kurzweil predicts that AI and nanotech will have advanced so far that his brain, with its memories, capabilities and characteristics, can be reduced to pure information and rebooted in a non-biological format, be it a supercomputer, a real or virtual body, or a swarm of nanobots.

If he’s right, before 2050 all information-based technologies will be millions of times more advanced and AI will far outshine the power of all human brains combined, a development futurists describe as ‘The Singularity.’

There are a surprising number who will see morphing into a non- biologically centred virtual machine as an attractive and even exciting prospect for the future of our species. Many look at it as a palliative for all the ills that plague the human quantum both in terms of a social and a physical perspective. Many people will be familiar with how the elements that contrast man against machine play out.

The arguments settle within the aprons of two broad primary factions. There are those who are able to have a sense of what might lie beyond the scales of the purely physical and empiricist standpoint; people with a religious faith or belief in an eternal tray of continuity. Then there are those who hold a hard wired outlook and only believe in an existential tray that is strictly the manifestation of atoms alone and thus of a Universe of force and parts that decays to a complete negation of all things ending in a nothingness driven by the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The latter is a strictly temporal view that only believes in what is here and affirmable through the physical senses, a view that, finally exposes an end to all reason and meaning and more pertinently, an end to the delineation of the concept of free compunction within an individualization that allows for an assertion of the concept and realization of the Self. Whilst the former, the religious view, all too often points to an anthropomorphic entity as a God who out of his perfection creates us in our imperfection just to watch the fun. If he, she, or it is any God he, she, or it should know the outcome! So how perfect can such a God be?

I have written extensively about a third way, one that unites both factional views and points to the fallacy and terrifying consequences of each taken in isolation.

Let’s first take a deeper look at the kind of ‘Singularity’ Kurzweil outlines as a something that might well point to a kind of Valhalla.
If you trace back the pathway of the explosion into states of greater and greater separation with time, as we can trace what has happened with the Universe, you will inevitably arrive at a point of union, a singularity where there is no separation of points and therefore no time, space or matter, a non-physical quantum field that you might for want of a better word call God. If our consciousness is a manifestation of that quantum field set against what is incidentally opposite to it, then the singularity that Kurzweil is so looking forward to would be a reconstruction of that original natural state in an artificial, virtual format.

But what exactly is that original natural state? There seems to be a power that allows for ordered states to happen incidentally within a disorganizing inertia. This power I believe emanates from an ultimate singularity that is itself manifested through the existence of two absolute Poles. One a pole of ultimate Union and Harmony, the singularity before the Big Bang and the other a Pole of ultimate disunion and disharmony, the point of ultimate chaos, the end point of the second law of thermodynamics or ‘entropy’ that describes the fact that all states decay into greater and greater randomness, chaos, and separation with time. This primary existential backdrop is implicit and implicate. There is no creator God playing dice with his created beings. We are, as a combined manifestation of these primary existential opposed poles, here through our own choice made in the perfect freedom of the state in which all choices are possible. It is this pole of ultimate union that provides for the whole reference against which all partial states can be known. Without that reference these partial states cannot be known. Thus artificial intelligence cannot include self awareness or consciousness. It will always be a sum of parts working together, a working machine, but it will have no reference of the whole picture through which it may know its parts.

The Earth as a planetary concept for instance is claimed to be conscious as the manifestation of the Gaya principle. If consciousness is defined as the ability to have control over one’s environment, to be cognizant enough to break the chain of cause and effect, the Earth cannot be conscious because it cannot intervene in the basic laws of cause and effect of its own volition and intercept them. In the same way no purely atomic construction can break the chain of cause and effect. It is intrinsically part of that chain of action and reaction in an enforced universe. Only that which has no force can break the chain and as force is the product of the separation of points only that which is from state of perfect union has no force.

A wonderful illustration of this principle is the contrast between the Old Testament dictum of ‘an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth’ and the Christian prophet’s instruction to turn the other cheek. By this simple statement Christ illustrated the nature of consciousness set against that which is not conscious. A computer program or a non living static-dependent object (by that I mean – a robot) can only follow an eye for an eye, action and reaction. A conscious and thus self evaluating being can intercept that chain of events and change it regardless of implied trend. When Jesus said “If a man asks you for his coat give him your cloak also” he was illustrating the same principle. Conscious being can change the course of events, do that little bit more than simply respond to stimuli. In fact it could be said that every positive quality that has a unionizing momentum that might be termed ‘love’ is an expression of consciousness intercepting the entropic chain of cause and logically implied effect.

In his unbridled enthusiasm to recreate his identity does Kurzweil believe that his self awareness will be there to appreciate its own virtual eternity? Will he be there to view and appreciate his virtual self? “In the 2040s,” says Kurzweil, “the non-biological proportions of our beings will be powerful enough to completely model and simulate the biological part. It will be a continuum, a continuity of pattern.” But is self awareness recreated by repeating the pattern of a self aware being? Would you be there to know your own artificial re-creation? Or would it be accurate to say that Kurzweil’s singularity is actually a dead end, nothing but an empty go-nowhere image of the conscious, aware singularity that preceded the Big Bang?

It is almost as though he and those who advocate trans-humanism are re-enacting the age old metaphor in which the character Lucifer, the fallen angel, makes copies of the heavenly hierarchy. Artificial intelligence, cloning, virtual reality would all come under this umbrella. Would you want your children to look forward to a future in which they will be implanted with chips that can increase their intelligence or their musical ability, genetically engineer their offspring to be to follow a desired specification and eventually download their personalities, their likes their dislikes, their whole being into a virtual copy? Would you want to leave your kids the legacy trans-humanism has to offer? If the answer is no and Kurzweil is right in his predictions now is the time to slam on the brakes.

If you suspect that the Grey alien phenomenon is real and have deduced as I have from the evidence thus far that these visitors are the ultimate in artificial intelligence then you might also come to the conclusion that the civilization that produced them never applied the brakes. In them are we looking at our future? Perhaps a more pertinent question would be, are they sponsoring that future?

In the Book of Revelation, Chapter 13 there is a remarkable description of what may well be trans-human future.  HYPERLINK “http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Revelation-13-11/” \o “View more translations of Revelation 13:11″A beast comes up out ‘out of the earth’ that has ‘horns like a lamb’ but speaks ‘as a dragon.’ The implication is of something that is seemingly innocent and harmless but in reality quite different. This beast does ‘great wonders’ and deceives those ‘that dwell on the earth by the means of miracles.’ An entity is described that has a deadly wound but is somehow miraculously brought back to life, an image is then created out of that entity. Could this refer to cloning procedures involving imaging and copying, procedures that might one day be so commonplace that anyone who does not embrace the trans-human ideal that they bring about will be dispensed with, ‘as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed?’

Many have speculated that the ‘mark’ of the ‘beast’ that is received ‘in their right hand or in their foreheads’ may well be a form of bio-chip that will be essential for all ‘buying’ and ‘selling.’ Could the ‘beast’ that seems, in the Book of Revelation, to lead the creation of a kind of Sim-card man simply refer to the ultimate irony that trans-humanism makes us like beasts as it takes away from us the very freedom of rationally, based sophisticated choice, the very freedom to beat the chain of cause and effect that marks us out as human when set against the simple reactive mental modes of animals not far removed from the mechanical psycho-expletives one might expect from a robot or machine and its functioning paradigms.

I do not wish to send a chill through the spine of readers but the mere possibility that such as I am outlining might be true exposes a remarkable irony. Could it be that the ultimate in apparent sophistication and human evolutionary potential actually results in the ultimate in human devolutionary potential, the conversion of the human species into a state of an idle and restricted freedom no different in real terms to that of the lowest forms of life.

Even if one does not accept a reality beyond the physical that might be compromised by the abrogation of the human spirit to mechanized external features there is no doubt that trans-humanism mortgages our capabilities as human beings to a prosthetic technology that is quantum steps further than that brought about by the industrial revolution, which arguably made life easier for us through mechanization of basic tasks. Trans-humanism is the mechanization of our intrinsic faculties as human beings to think and know.

I believe this all is a startlingly real and will be a verifiable threat for those who are willing to do the research (with a mind-set that is objective and neutral), into the consequence of the world Kurzweil and his cohorts are laying out for us. The trouble is that many of us find this very hard to do. We slip on with the days own troubles leading us into boxes made by our restrictions and prejudices, the strongest of which are those we hitch up to our eyes. We creep along inexorably with views that blend into a backdrop of ready assembled comfort points. Comfort points designed to provide physical ease and convenience. It is simply the dope of the damned. A matrix we create for ourselves where we weave a spiders web of restrictions all around us. The trouble is we don’t trap any flies. We are the flies. We trap ourselves and our futures.

Will we pay the ultimate price for not being able to see that an eternal scope might exist for each and every one of us in a scale that lies beyond the hems of atoms? Are we going to compromise something as mightily significant as this simply because we in the empirical way cannot measure it, and see, hear, touch, smell or taste it? Man shall surely walk as machine if we do.

© Nigel Kerner 2011

Source

Cyber-hugs and robot babies – a brave new world

This is exactly what I hate… Artificial! Synthetic! Virtual!:

 

Image of a woman interacting a robot baby

Cyber-hugs and robot babies – a brave new world

Originally published: ufodigest.com, unexplained-mysteries.com & world-mysteries.com
29th June 2010

Artificial! Synthetic! Virtual! These are the buzz words of the new millennium, buzz words that describe the brave new world it seems we cannot wait to reach. Every week there are blazing new technological developments towards this end. It seems that even over the past year the momentum has gathered blistering speed. We are all too happy for the natural to be replaced by the artificial. ‘Sim card man’ is truly on the horizon.

This week there are reports that a Tokyo University team has developed a robot designed to simulate the development and behaviour of a nine-month-old baby in an effort to better understand how humans grow. Creating a robot which can develop cognition in a way that a human baby does during its growth process should also help in achieving a society where robots and humans can live side by side, says Professor Kuniyoshi. “Our purpose is to build a system that can learn various behaviours and acquire various functionalities as it explores around the environment and interacting with humans,” 1 he said.

Noby is a highly accurate model with the sensory and motor functions of a nine-month-old human baby. The body is covered in a soft “skin” with 600 tactile sensors. It is flexible and its joints can move like those of a human baby.

 

Noby also has two cameras for “seeing” and two microphones for “listening to” the external world. The project is also part of attempts to make more human-like robots. Professor Kuniyoshi’s team chose a nine-month-old human baby as Noby’s model as this is the time of rapid development of movement and cognition functions.

Image of a woman holding a robot baby

There are two remarkable assumptions behind this experiment. First it is assumed that human beings will interact with a robot as they would with another human being and provide the robot with the same inputs that would reach a human baby. Second it is assumed that the development, behaviour and cognition of a human baby can be replicated if the same external signals that are received by a human baby are programmed into a robot. Is there a certain something that is being missed here, an ingredient that is non-programmable? What do you think?

It all reminds me of the special jackets were designed some years ago in Japan for children who are away from their parents. The idea was that if the child wears the jacket the parent can give him or her remote ‘cyber-hugs’ through it. If this makes you squirm then ask yourself why? If you feel something is missing from a ‘cyber-hug’ what could that something be?

Image of Dr. Alex Schwarzkopf and his avatar

In a recent New Scientist article entitled “Immortal avatars: Back up your brain, never die” 2 Linda Geddes reports the first steps towards creating digital avatars that are to all intents and purposes clones of their human sponsors. Huge amounts of information are programmed by an individual into a ‘mind file’ that will form the avatar’s data, likes, dislikes and mannerisms. A representative from an organization funding research into such avatars says: “If you spent an hour a day answering questions, it would take five years to complete them all, but the further you go, the more accurate a representation of yourself the mind file will become.” She goes on to say that: “Ultimately, however, they aim to create a personalized, conscious avatar embodied in a robot – effectively enabling you, or some semblance of you, to achieve immortality.” “If you can upload yourself into this digital form, it could live forever,” says Nick Mayer of Lifenaut, a US company that is exploring ways to build lifelike avatars. “It really is a way of avoiding death.”

Would you be happy with that kind of eternal life? Would uploading who you are as a human being into a robotic avatar give you a sense of a future scope and existence after your body dies? Would that robot to all intents and purposes be you? If you feel comfortable and somewhat hopeful about living on in this way cyber-hugs and robot babies should be no problem for you also.

Screenshot from 'Second Life'

“Second Life,” an online game offering life in a virtual world has acquired five million subscribers in just five years. Michio Kaku envisages that “by 2020 there will be an entire 3D universe in cyberspace with virtual countries and governments, virtual schools and universities, virtual properties and stock markets and virtual families and friends. Virtual reality is going to be more and more like real reality. Already more than 20 million people worldwide spend an average of 20 hours a week in virtual worlds and some actually prefer virtual communication to socialising in the real world.” 3 Well if it makes them happy why not?

Why not indeed? Are you feeling a gathering sense of unease about all of this? Are the hairs on the back of your neck standing on end as mine are as I envisage the future that lies in wait for my children? If such is the case then somewhere inside you, you are sensing that there is something about natural humanity that cannot be digitally mastered and reproduced. If there is such a something then there must be an ingredient that is not formed of purely physical elements. Anything physical is potentially reproducible with the right technology.

In my books I suggest that the Grey aliens reported by so many reliable witnesses may well be the final product of a civilization that sought to avoid death with the same kind of technological developments I have just been describing. Could these entities be the epitome of artificial intelligence? Abductees have commented on their blank, emotionless faces as they carry out painful procedures on their human subjects many of which are centred on the reproductive system. The impression is that we are laboratory rats to them. They seem incapable of any emotion be it compassion and sympathy at one end of the scale or cruelty at the other. As such they cannot, it seems, be understood in anthropomorphic terms. From all accounts they are more like programmed machines, biological robots perhaps programmed to preserve the identity of their creators for eternity. This identity could be preserved in more than just a ‘mind file’ or avatar format. These entities could carry the DNA of their creators and clone it and re-clone it in an attempt to reconstruct the original genetic programme. They may have been designed with a view to space travel in order to find new fresh sources of DNA elsewhere in the universe to refresh their cloning process.

Scientists in the US have just succeeded in developing the first living cell to be controlled entirely by synthetic DNA. The researchers copied an existing bacterial genome. They sequenced its genetic code and then used ‘synthesis machines’ to chemically construct a copy. They copied this code and chemically constructed a new synthetic chromosome, piecing together blocks of DNA which they then transplanted it into a host cell. The resulting microbe then looked and behaved like the species ‘dictated’ by the synthetic DNA. The advance, published in Science, has been hailed as a scientific landmark, but critics say there are dangers posed by synthetic organisms.

Dr Venter (one of the researchers) told BBC News: ‘We’ve now been able to take our synthetic chromosome and transplant it into a recipient cell – a different organism. As soon as this new software goes into the cell, the cell reads [it] and converts into the species specified in that genetic code.’ 4

The new bacteria replicated over a billion times, producing copies that contained and were controlled by the constructed, synthetic DNA. Could the Greys themselves be created by an advanced technology using synthetic DNA. Could our hurtling progress towards technologies such as these mean that we are soon to produce our own type of Grey? Artificial DNA could be modelled on our own DNA pattern and modulated to cope more efficiently with the effects of a physical environment.

The implantation of chips in the human body is gaining acceptance, be it for the enhancement of intelligence or memory or as a type of medical alert bracelet implanted in the hand or wrist so that if you’re found unconscious you can be scanned and your medical history brought up.
Dr Mark Gasson from the University of Reading had a chip inserted in his hand which was then infected with a virus. The device, which enabled him to pass through security doors and activate his mobile phone was able to pass on the computer virus to external control systems. If other implanted chips had then connected to the system they too would have been corrupted, he said.

Professor Rafael Capurro of the Steinbeis-Transfer-Institute of Information Ethics in Germany warned that “if someone can get online access to your implant, it could be serious.” However, Dr Gasson believes that there will be a demand for these non-essential applications, much as people pay for cosmetic surgery.”If we can find a way of enhancing someone’s memory or their IQ then there’s a real possibility that people will choose to have this kind of invasive procedure.” 5

By all accounts the Grey aliens featured in thousands of abduction reports are obsessed with our reproductive capacity. That they are conducting a hybrid program with humanity has been extensively reported and according to Professor David Jacobs and Budd Hopkins, (the world’s leading researchers into the alien abduction premise), that the hybrid program has been stepped up many-fold over the last twenty years. To quote Professor Jacobs: “All of these accounts, to put it bluntly, point to a future in which human-looking hybrids will be here amongst us. The evidence is now so strong I can no longer look at alternative motivations for them. Everything I have learned about this subject in the past 20 years inexorably points to this conclusion. I cannot escape it.” 6 It is interesting to note that the past twenty years has also seen exponentially greater developments in bio-technology and artificial intelligence than any other time period. Could these developments and the hybrid programme be inextricably linked?

The DNA reference of the original creators of the Greys is long since likely to have broken down through the dispersive effect of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. So are they now seeking to refresh that reference through our DNA on our planet or the DNA of any sophisticated enough natural species they could find in the galaxy? Are they slowly and carefully melding their patterns into ours so that the two can be a viable match and their genetic programme can be reproduced? Just as our scientists copy the pattern of bacterial DNA are the Greys copying our pattern to create synthetic bio-mechanical entities like themselves. In doing so they would be simply following their programme to survive in as advantageous a form as possible in a physical universe. But what if we do have that extra something that is not of that physical universe, that same something that may have made you cringe when I spoke of robot babies and cyber-hugs, could they be interfering with that something? Could they be compromising a natural connection to a non-physical state beyond the physical universe? Could that connection which some might term a ‘soul’ be interrupted and delayed by artificial insertions that compromise its ability to translate the non-physical into the physical? Is this the price we pay for embracing the artificial, the synthetic and the virtual – the loss of the natural and the real?

I don’t wish to seem didactic or preach new meanings to anyone. But a mighty threshold is creeping up on us all. Particularly those of us in developed societies. A threshold that it seems we lose sight of all too often because it creeps up on us inexorably in our everydayness. That threshold is a sight of the importance of the distinction between the natural living aegis of our human condition and that of an artificially created one. The size, range, and potential of the human spirit in its natural harbour to soar to limitless horizons beyond the empirically definable is losing definition. The tendency to run with the impetus that science brings dominates our everyday lives and we deny ourselves those grand and inspiring perspectives that reach beyond the mundane and the ordinary. We only get rare glimpses of our true natural potential and these get rarer and rarer as we become more and more hitched up to the artificial reality that is thrown at us. How many cyber-hugs would add up to one real one? How many hours of virtual reality will add up to one moment of actual reality? Why is it that we are rarely if ever tempted to ask those questions these days?

© Nigel Kerner 2010

REFERENCES
1 news.uk.msn.com/world/articles
2 Immortal avatars: Back up your brain, never die (07 June 2010 by Linda Geddes, Magazine issue 2763)
3 ‘Visions of the Future’ – ‘The Intelligence Revolution’ (November 2007) BBC 4
4 news.bbc.co.uk
5 news.bbc.co.uk
6 David M. Jacobs, “A Picture We May Not Wish to Gaze Upon,” Journal of Abduction Encounters Research

Source

Uploading and Downloading Your Brain – Leads to synthetic people and the end of humanity

This is very interesting, because if Dr. Peter Beter’s audio tapes are correct, this technology has been around almost 50 years. An I think, that it has been available, but like Robert Duncan once said in “Project: Soul Catcher: Secrets of Cyber and Cybernetic Warfare Revealed“, the CIA and Military are 30 years ahead in technology.

And if this all is possible this could lead to scenario where you have a duplicate of yourself, like a clone, and then they just download your brain image to that clone. Then they get rid of “real” you so, that they can use and control the clone instead. This is quite scary, because this could create a slave society where all are clones or replicas, which obey everything… hey but that is like reality today… hehe just kidding, but seriously WAKE UP and keep on searching the Truth.

So here is a article about how we are capable of store our brain in the computer:

This Guy Wants to Help You Download Your Brain

Image via

Ever wanted to download a copy of your own brain? Say you went through a serious car crash, for example—wouldn’t it be nice to take out your damaged brain and replace it with a replica you’d downloaded and stashed away prior to the accident? Or perhaps over time you could even build a collection of brains, each storing different memories, thoughts, and dreams that would equate, in a sense, to different versions of you? Something like that might come in handy when you’re trying to throw off various neuroses, like a fear of asking out hot people or an anxiety about bungee ropes, or a reluctance to believe that scientists could one day pull something like this off.

There are people trying to make this a reality. Last month, a Japanese supercomputer managed to simulate one second of human brain activity; last summer, some German scientists unveiled a remarkably high-res 3D digital model of the human brain; and last April, the Obama administration announced the BRAIN Initiative, a research endeavour projected to cost hundreds of millions of dollars and take over a decade to complete. Its humble goal? To map every single one of the tens of billions of neurons in the human brain, creating a “connectome“—a comprehensive diagram of the brain’s neural connections.

Theoretically, a complete connectome of an individual’s brain would constitute a copy of the pathways between every memory, thought, and experience that person had ever had. The implications of this kind of precise knowledge of a brain are far-reaching, but at this point still largely speculative.

Current procedures for brain imaging on a micro level tend to be incredibly time-consuming, costly, and require the destruction (via slicing and/or dyeing) of the brain being studied. But with the freakish, robotic march of progress, the technology required is being built and improved upon, and some futurists suggest that humans will be able to download and store copies of their brains within the next two decades. Naturally, labs the world over want to get there first, but I couldn’t find many that are already trying to sell the tech to you.

One I did find is Brain Backups. Headed up by 32-year-old Russell Hanson, the neuroinformatics startup based out of Cambridge, Massachusetts, aims to map human brains without destroying them. While other research groups are being formed and funded through government grants, Brain Backups hopes to crowdsource a great deal of its research costs by offering the future storage of all your neurons and synapses. I gave Russell a call to find out his thoughts on the matter.

Russell Hanson.

VICE: Can you explain—in the simplest possible terms—what your company does or proposes to do?
Russell Hanson: Our team is developing the tools to image the brain non-destructively and non-invasively. The earlier methods in this field required slicing the brain very thin and imaging it on an electron microscope, which is both extremely slow and extremely expensive. We wanted to do this faster so researchers can learn how the brain changes over time, without destroying the brain every time they wanted to make a measurement.

OK, and how are you going to research this?
Obviously we’re talking about animal experiments here. We’re a small company with a big goal. We have some very talented engineers, scientists, and designers from MIT, Harvard, the Danish Technical University, UCLA, biotech, and pharma, and also the synthetic biology community in Boston. Our goal is to do this cheaply and non-destructively, so that anyone can image their brain, like they can map their genome affordably using a [personal genomics testing] service like 23andMe. I got into this a number of years ago when I asked how much space is needed to store the contents of the human brain in a class at MIT. It’s only become more interesting since then.

How much space is needed?
It depends a lot on how detailed the information you want to store is. The range is somewhere between 1,000 terabytes to 10,000 terabytes. With compression, this can be much smaller—this is an estimate of the uncompressed size.

Does the technology you want to use even exist yet?
The actual technology does exist, but it is cumbersomely slow and prohibitively expensive. Our equipment is quite real—we’re not working with hypothetical equipment. It’s incremental; we can do a certain set of things now, and we want to do a certain set of additional things tomorrow. And it’s just getting easier, just like building anything. Ford didn’t start out with their 2013 model, they started out with the 1908 Model T—the first car affordable to the middle class. And before that there were prototypes—19 of them, in fact, before they got to the Model T. The whole goal when I started this at MIT was to make the personal brain map affordable on a middle-class income.

A PET scan of a normal brain. Image via

At the moment, how much would it cost to back up your brain, and what exactly would that get a prospective buyer?
Please understand this is the current “research and development” price, not the price of the product, which will be much lower. The current estimate is in the range of $1.5 million to $3 million for a destructive, knife-edge scanning, optical microscope imaging of a human brain. It would give, essentially, a complete brain map, but of course would destroy the brain in the process. This would provide the set of images that can be used to do a whole brain circuit reconstruction.

There are other methods that use nanoparticles, synthetic biology, X-rays, or MRI that can reduce this cost significantly, and that do not require destroying the brain during imaging. The price for high-throughput genome sequencing has come down to $3,000 to $4,000 recently, and there are methods that are in development to use this inexpensive method to get high resolution brain connectivity information. Getting this cost down significantly, making the data more useful and easily understood, and building the interface and platform are the foci of our work.

Currently, you have to have a non-living brain for imaging, right? How far are you from being able to map a brain without destroying it?
It’s all about the resolution. Currently we can map the brain’s activity using fMRI non-destructively. Newer special purpose MRI machines with higher power and animal MRI machines have greater resolution than older medical MRI machines. Determining exactly what is needed for different types of brain maps apart from “everything” is an open research topic. What is the minimal amount of information needed to accurately characterize or model a brain, and in what way? Adapting these methods from animal experiments to safe methods that can be used with human subjects is where much of the new Obama BRAIN initiative and many research labs are heading.

So once a brain has been imaged, can you effectively play back that information, like a tape?
A single snapshot is a static image, so you can’t play something back that doesn’t have a time series associated with it. Conceivably, you could “rewind” just as you can peer back in time into your memories. The way different people access different pieces of their memories is hierarchical and everything is built upon prior experience, so you would have to build a special kind of “relative knowledge engine” that needs to construct the mechanism of accessing the memories for each person individually. Research has shown that the brain is very poor at telling wall-clock time, and is affected by all sorts of things, like whether we caused an event or not. So no—you can’t really “play back” the information in the kind of frame-by-frame or second-by-second manner we’re used to with audio or visual recordings.

The connectome, from my understanding, is simply the documentation of connections, but provides no information about what is being passed between neurons at these points. If you can’t play back or otherwise access the information in your brain, what’s the use to the average person of having a map of their brain’s pathways?
The goal of the work is to build the infrastructure to make this data usable and interesting. It is pretty clear that having the brain map is a necessary first component to “playing back” or “running” a meaningful dynamical simulation of a brain, whether it’s a mouse, fly, or human. We decided to tackle this engineering challenge first before the other one—that’s being worked on by other very capable groups. In its simplest form, this research will surely inform treatments for devastating diseases like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, autism, depression, and others—research that the governmental funding agencies have a long history of supporting.

A 16th century diagram of how to prepare the skull for brain surgery. This is the kind of thing Brain Backups would like to avoid. Image via.

Who do you think might be interested in “backing up” their brain, and what might be the benefits of having a copy?
“Backing up” the brain is really just a short way of saying “getting the relevant information on cellular structure, neuronal connectivity, etc, at a very high resolution and recording all that information to a computer or hard drive.” There are lots of compelling reasons why getting this brain backup is useful. I think one of the most compelling ones is that it’s like an insurance policy, a backup of something you value. You could get in a car accident tomorrow morning and really wish you could just rewind. The medical benefits of having this detailed personal information are also huge: a doctor could know exactly which treatment you should receive for depression or Alzheimer’s or epilepsy without having to guess or rely on crude measurements.

What do you make of the suggestion that the brain can’t possibly be uploaded or stored in its entirety because its important features are the result of unpredictable, nonlinear interactions among billions of cells? Are the brain and the human experience it processes too random to be computerized?
This is essentially a computability problem. All of the information in the brain is a finite set of finite-precision numbers. It is well known that any finite set of finite-precision numbers is computable. From a chemical or biochemical perspective, having enough data about the biochemical interactions—i.e. that these proteins, genes, RNA, etc, are used in this neuron and in this way—is all the data that is needed to determine the neuron’s function. Gathering the appropriate dynamical and time series data with the appropriate metadata and also gathering the chemical and biochemical data without destroying what is being imaged is a technology problem, not an intrinsically intractable system. There are already many neuron modeling computer programs that can model experimental neuronal firing data very accurately.

What are the implications of having someone’s brain content downloaded somewhere, in terms of identity theft or large-scale life tampering?
I think it is very unlikely. For example, anyone can steal your DNA by just getting a sample of your saliva. I can’t think of anyone who thinks twice about spitting because they fear someone is going to come along and harvest their DNA, which is all the information needed to make them. These days, people are uploading all kinds of information about themselves, including their genome, because they realize this data is important and can benefit society. Some people are uploading their genomic information in the hopes that, because it is available, someone will use it to fix the ailments that affect them personally, or that affect their families. This is happening at hospitals in controlled environments, but also on the open internet. Right now it is a purely hypothetical problem of online genomic identity theft. It is too expensive, and the skills required are very specialized.

Regarding protecting the data, encryption is the industry standard. If you steal someone’s data, decrypt it and that data is used to impersonate someone—and that data you are using to impersonate them is everything they know—the problem becomes a little bit more tricky.

Yeah, I can see that you might run into a few problems there. Finally, can you map the brain successfully without mapping the consciousness? A lot of the criticisms of brain backup research seem to rest on the idea that machines can’t possibly process phenomenal human experience.
Most of the work on this tends to be philosophical. It is a classic philosophy vs. science debate. I am not much of a philosopher. In my view, and in the view of many others, consciousness arises from biological, chemical, and physical interactions. This isn’t to say that there aren’t many interesting philosophical issues of mapping the consciousness; there are. Deciphering the neural codes that are used to communicate with the nervous system has shown that they are indeed very much like machine codes.

Source

And here Stephen Hawking talks about the topic:

Could your brain keep on living even after your body dies? Sounds like science fiction, but celebrated theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking recently suggested that technology could make it possible.

“I think the brain is like a program in the mind, which is like a computer,” Hawking said last week during an appearance at the Cambridge Film Festival, The Telegraph reported. “So it’s theoretically possible to copy the brain on to a computer and so provide a form of life after death.”

He acknowledged that such a feat lies “beyond our present capabilities,” adding that “the conventional afterlife is a fairy tale for people afraid of the dark.”

Hawking, 71, made the remarks in conjunction with the premiere of a new documentary about his life.

He has spoken previously about what he calls the “fairy story” of heaven and the afterlife. Likening the human brain to a computer whose components will fail, he said, “There is no heaven or afterlife for broken-down computers.”

Some people are actively working to develop technology that would permit the migration of brain functions into a computer. Russian multi-millionaire Dmitry Itskov, for one, hopes someday to upload the contents of a brain into a lifelike robot body as part of his 2045 Initiative, The New York Times reported recently.

A separate research group, called the Brain Preservation Foundation, is working to develop a process to preserve the brain along with its memories, emotions and consciousness. Called chemical fixation and plastic embedding, the process involves converting the brain into plastic, carving it up into tiny slices, and then reconstructing its three-dimensional structure in a computer

 

 

And Here’s Michio Kaku talks about this topic:

 

Everyone is always talking about the good sides of technology, but what about this clone idea and mass control? No it’s not fashionable and people just don’t need to know the bad sides, let’s just microchip them all and tell them it’s a good idea because then we can read your medical records… bullshit. Via microchips they can start synthetic telepathy and control every fucking one of us. Have a nice day to you all.

“Organic Robotoids are real” by Dr Peter Beter, clones and synthetic people

This is very a fascinating, but hard topic and if it’s true it explains many things in the world. I try to collect information from different sources, but the best source is Dr. Peter Beter’s audio letters. That is the reason I have posted them before, but now I leap to these letters, which include these organic robotoids. But if you want to learn the BIG PICTURE unfortunately you have to listen all Dr. Peter Beter’s audio letters:

Dr Beter Talks on how the Organic Robotoids are real, how the Russian Scientists stumbled upon the organic robotoids by pure accident, how they look like us and how they have now infiltrated the U.S..

 

 

 

There is a tons of information about these robotoids in Dr. Peter’s letters on this site: http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/

If I remember correctly the Robotoid stuff in Peter Beter’s audio letters begins on number 45 and then Dr. Beter tells about these almost every letter after that.

Then I list some information about these clones and synthetics:

What if you were to discover that certain individuals in government, corporations, military, academia, media, and the alternative research community are either reprogrammed versions of their former selves or artificial beings entirely? What if you learned these were under the complete control of covert forces possessing a vested interest in manipulating society?

>> Human Simulacra (Source)

>> Doubles, Robotoids and replicas

>> Doppelgängers/Doubles

>> Is Sylvester Stallone cloned?

>> “Synthetic people”, “bio-androids” and “robotoids” may be walking among us.

>> ARE US PRESIDENTS CLONED?

>> APPENDIX 3. CLONES, SYNTHETICS, ORGANIC ROBOTOIDS AND DOUBLES

>> Are Synthetic Humans walking amongst us? are they being used in public arena’s to control the population? is this youtube science fiction or reality?

 


Then some Videos about this topic:

 

And then some Nicki’s weird performances like the “double” is in malfunction or something. And if you search more about this topic, it is the main characteristic of a clone, that it doesn’t work properly and it may start to malfunction over time:

 

 

Here some robotoid collapses on live TV-Show:

 

And then we have a conspiracy, that Eminem is cloned and here the clone is malfunctioning on live TV-Show:

 

 


 

And then we have couple of videos about how celebrities have been cloned and some of them have lived before in our history:

DYSLEXIC !!!! … like it was in the beginning, it shall be in the end…VIDEOS —- former government insider George Green talks about cloning of presidents…that they started to clone humans around 1930 – http://youtu.be/cCD6dk2OtK8 …….. Obama Sees Self In Egyptian -Pyramid – http://youtu.be/a5-rRA-jV0k …… this is where i found the cloning stuff of obama – http://youtu.be/kQdfT3gKrD8 …The Government Are Cloning Humans and Themselves!- They’re All ZOMBIES – made by a woman that was ten years in the illuminati industry- http://youtu.be/SZhRaLhU6Zs ….Michael Jackson – Remember The Time music video — http://youtu.be/LeiFF0gvqcc ……Ancient Egyptian Michael Jackson statue– http://youtu.be/9ZJYqdLj3Bk … paul is dead documentary part 1 of 7 -. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5F-t8B… …. ONE OF THE MOST CRAZIEST ANCIENT TABLETS IN THE WORLD!! —- http://youtu.be/sxllptqVSYk

 

 

 

Then I post just some movies about cloning & robotoids, because Illuminati wants to hide things in the movies:

>> Futureworld (1976)

>> Body Snatchers (1993)

>> The 6th Day (2000) : This is actually pretty close to the process, that Dr. Peter Beter tells about. How they take “Hologram photography” of your brain and the plant it into the clone.

Hard topic to comprehend, but I think, that the technology is there so this could be possible.