Category Archives: HAARP

Could this be the greatest mind control project ever?

I have some older postings about project Blue Beam, but now I found some new information, what ties it to the NWO and Illuminati cover-up.  It also is connected to fake rapture they are pushing to convince, that aliens or different kind of messiahs have arrived. Here are the articles made before:

>> https://www.auricmedia.net/project-blue-beamalien-technology-2014/

>> https://www.auricmedia.net/silenced-people-serge-monast-project-blue-beam-murdered/

And here is the new info:

Could this be the greatest mind control project ever?

The NASA Blue Beam Project is the prime directive for the new world order’s absolute control over the populations of the entire earth. I would suggest you investigate this information carefully before dismissing it as fanatic lunacy. If we go further in the different reports we have presented, we find that the mind-control operations and technology include a transmitter that broadcasts at the same frequency as the human nervous-system, which transmitter is manufactured by the Loral Electro-Optical System in Pasadena, California.

Loral, a major defense contractor, has previously conducted research on directed energy weapons for Lt. Gen. Leonard Perez of the U. S. Air Force who was searching for a weapon that could implant messages into the minds of the enemy while urging his own troops on to superhuman deeds of valor! The device employs electromagnetic radiation of gigahertz frequencies [microwaves] pulsed at extremely low frequencies (ELF). It is used to torture people both physically and mentally from a distance.

Weapons of this type are thought to have been used against a British woman protesting the presence of American Cruise Missiles at Greenham Common Airbase during the 1970s. This weapon can be used to induce total sensory deprivation by broadcasting signals into the auditory nerve at such high power that it blocks the ability of the individual to hear themselves think!

The process employed by such ELF technology are described in various U. S. Defense Department publications, including one entitled, ‘ The Electromagnetic Spectrum and Low Intensity Conflict,‘ by Captain Paul E. Tyler, Medical Commandant, U. S. Navy, which is included in a collection entitled, ‘Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology Edict,’ by Lt. Col David G. Dean, USAF.

The paper was delivered in 1984 and the collection published 1986 by Air University Press, Maxwell Airforce Base, Alabama. Another pulse microwave device can deliver audible signals directly to an individual while remaining undetectable to anyone else. The technology is very simple and can be built by using an ordinary police radar gun. The microwave beam generated by the device is modulated at audio frequencies and can broadcast messages directly into the brain. Now here we come to the NASA Blue Beam Project. The broadcasting of subliminal two-way communication and images from the depths of space correspond directly to that kind of technology.

In his book, ‘The Body Electric,’ Nobel Prize nominee Dr. Robert O. Becker describes a series of experiments conducted in the early 1960s by Allen Frie where this phenomena was demonstrated as well as later experiments conducted in 1973 at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research by Dr. Joseph C. Sharp who personally underwent tests in which he proved he could hear and understand messages delivered to him in an echo-free isolation chamber via a pulsed microwave audiogram which is an analog of the word’s sound vibration beamed into his brain.

Becker then goes on to state, ‘Such a device has obvious application for covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with unknown voices or deliver undetectable instructions to a programmed assassin.”

Now figure out when we hear that voice from the new world messiah who would be speaking from space to all of the sane (?) people of the earth who might give instructions to zealots and religious fanatics, we would see hysteria and social mayhem on a scale never witnessed before on this planet. No police forces in the world, even as a combined front, could deal with the disorder that will follow!

A 1978 book entitled, ‘Microwave Auditory Effect and Application,’ by James C. Lynn describes how audible voices can be broadcast directly into the brain. This technology could actually allow the blind to see and the deaf to hear. Instead, it has been turned into a weapon to enslave the world.

Allen Frie also reports that he could speed up, slow down or stop the hearts of isolated frogs by synchronizing the pulsed rate of a microwave beam with the heart itself. According to Dr. Robert Becker, similar results have been obtained using live frogs, which shows that it is technically feasible to produce heart attacks with rays designed to penetrate the human chest.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: Both the author of this report and his colleague died of ‘heart attacks’ only days apart. I should mention also that Dr. Becker does NOT participate in such research.]

It has been demonstrated that focused ultra high frequency UHF electromagnetic energy beams can be used to induce considerable agitation and muscular activity or induce muscular weakness and lethargy. Microwaves can also be used to burn human skin and aid the effect of drugs, bacteria and poisons or affect the function of the entire brain. These effects were all revealed at length by the CIA on September 21, 1977 in testimony before the Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research.

Dr. Sidney Gottlieb who directed the MK-Ultra program at that time was forced to discuss the scope of the CIA’s research to find techniques of activation of the human organism by remote electronic means. So this is something that exists right now, that has been pursued to its highest degree, that can be used from space to reach any person, anyplace on the face of the earth.

If we go deeper in that process of mind control over the people we find that the equipment and technology has been used to influence politics in a much more direct fashion. Michael Dukakis, the Democrat candidate running against George Bush in the 1988 election was targeted with microwave technology in order to impede his public speaking performance once the public opinion polls showed he posed a serious threat to Bush’s election prospects.

He also claims that the equipment was used against Kitty Dukakis and drove her to the brink of suicide. In the Disneyland world of U. S. politics, a presidential candidate with problems such as these, would obviously lose their race to the White House. In the December 1980 edition of the U. S. Army Journal, called the Military Review, a column by Lt. Col John B. Alexander, entitled, ‘The New Mental Battlefield: Beam Me Up, Spock,’ provides further insight into the technical capabilities at the disposal of the comptroller. He writes:

“Several examples will demonstrate areas in which progress have been made. The transference of energy from one organism to another; the ability to heal or cause disease to be transmitted over a distance, thus inducing illness or death from no apparent cause; telepathic behavior modification which includes the ability to induce hypnotic states up to a distance of 1,000 kilometers have been reported.

The use of telepathic hypnosis also holds great potential. This capability could allow agents to be deeply planted with no conscious knowledge of their programming. In movie terms, the Manchurian Candidate lives, and does not even require a telephone call. ‘Other mind-to-mind induction techniques are being considered.

If perfected this capability could allow the direct transference of thought via telepathy from one mind or group of minds to a select target audience. The unique factor is that the recipient will not be aware that thought has been implanted from an external source. He or she will believe the thoughts are original.”

This is exactly what we were talking about.

The third step in the NASA Blue Beam Project is called the Telepathic Electronic Two-Way Communication. Lt. Col John Alexander’s article continues:

“If it is possible to feed artificial thought into the multigenic field via satellite, the mind control of the entire planet is now possible. An individual’s only resistance would be to constantly question the motivation behind their thoughts and not act upon thoughts which they consider to be outside their own ideological, religious and moral boundaries.'”

Once again, it is wise to consider how television, advertising, modern education and various types of social pressure are used to manipulate those boundaries. It has been reported by Lt. Col Alexander who said, in the summary of his Military Review article,

‘The information on those kinds of technologies presented here would be considered by some to be ridiculous since it does not conform to their view of reality. But some people still believe the world is flat.’

Now, this means a lot, because if people do not believe this kind of technology is possible, or that it is science fiction, those people put themselves in great jeopardy, because on the night when those thousand stars will shine from space, during the night when the new messiah will be presented to the world, they will not be prepared and will have no time to prepare to save themselves against that kind of technology. They don’t believe and they won’t take time to prepare.

(This is exactly what happens to people who are convinced by Satan into believing that he doesn’t exist, so they have no defense against him. – JAH.)

Source

Read more from Auricmedia:

[carousel-horizontal-posts-content-slider]

Chemtrails – Total Control Part 3

This is the last part of the miniseries:

The HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapons system, aerosol-spraying (chemtrails) and mind control

There is prima facie evidence that the HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapons system and aerosol spraying (chemtrails) are carrying out mind control against the human population on a global (as well as national, regional and individual) scale.

These mind control operations include:

  • Biological operations, including the use of apparent bio-warfare mind control agents, in the covert global aerosol spraying program (chemtrails), and through
  • Electromagnetic Operations, including HAARP mind control weapons applications constituting war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Geneva conventions.

 

Mind control – Biological operations and covert global aerosol spraying (chemtrails)

According to one source,

“The term [Mind Control] has been applied to any tactic, psychological or otherwise, which can be seen as subverting an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making.”

By this definition, a powerful global covert mind control program is being carried out against global, national, and regional populations as well as individuals through the biological operations of covert global aerosol spraying (chemtrails).

Specifically, as demonstrated in “Part 1” far above of this Examiner series, the sprayed aerosols (chemtrails) contain the following amounts of toxic chemicals.

The effect of these toxic chemicals on the mental, psychological and emotional functioning of the target human population is to,

“subvert the individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making.”


2010 Air Particulates – Antimony, arsenic, iron, and manganese

These figures indicate how many times they are over the “allowable” toxic limit:

  • Aluminum: 15.8
  • Antimony: 63.3 [This is not a typo]
  • Arsenic: 418 [This is not a typo]
  • Barium: 5.3
  • Cadmium: 6
  • Chromium: 6.4
  • Copper: 9
  • Iron: 43.5 [This is not a typo]
  • Lead: 15.7
  • Manganese: 513.8 [This is not a typo]
  • Nickel: 10.7
  • Zinc: 7.5

Global aerosol spraying has transformed the atmosphere that our human population breathes into a plasma.

Breathing this plasma with the above toxic concentrations of chemicals has been shown to lead to the following behavioral abnormalities that “subvert the individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making,” and hence can be considered a mind control program.

The following mind control impacts of aerosol spraying (chemtrails) are drawn from Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri’s Carnicom Institute Board of Advisors Feb. 3, 2011 preliminary report of the impacts of the covert aerosol-spraying program as a bio-warfare program.


Mind control impacts of manganese (aerosol spraying – chemtrails)

  1. “Hallucinations, forgetfulness, schizophrenia, dullness, headaches, and insomnia; languor; sleepiness; weakness; emotional disturbances;”
  2. “How many people who have caused ‘public’ disturbances and/or have ‘behavioral outbursts’ are actually suffering from environmental chemical brain injury, due to poisoning from heavy metals or other toxic chemicals, but are being treated like criminals?”Cognitive impairment and brain damage
  3. “It is well know that Aluminum causes cognitive impairment and brain damage. It takes years for this damage to become evident. During this time, it works its slow, but insidious, destruction on the brain. But, even in the beginning, muddle thinking is noticeable. Why are so many people acting odd? Many more people appear to have a very short fuse.”
  4. “Why do our children have an epidemic of autism, ADD, ADHD? Why are so many of our young children on long-term prescription drugs for behavioral/cognitive troubles? Why are millions of adults on years of anti-depressant drugs? “

  5. “Four impacts:
    1. Attention
    2. Forgetfulness
    3. Short-term memory
    4. Impatience

    Four things are very obvious:

    1. Human attention span has dropped dramatically
    2. People are very forgetful
    3. Short-term memory has been affected
    4. Far too many people are impatient, and have very ‘short fuses’”

  6. “For many people, thinking and thought processes are very difficult issues to contemplate or even discuss. No one wants to be told that s/he is not thinking clearly. Even if there are scientific data to support this, it is a concept that goes right to the very heart of who we think we are! It is not you. It is the result of what is being done to all of us! However, it is easier to attack the messenger, than comprehend the enormity of military/government involvement – especially since nothing is reported by mainstream controlled news. It is easier to dismiss valid information, or be on the defensive, rather than take personal responsibility for critical issues that already are detrimentally affecting our lives.”

    Electromagnetic Operations, including HAARP-atmospheric aerosol weapons system mind control weapons applications

    There exists prima facie evidence of HAARP-atmospheric aerosol weapons system mind control weapons operations against the global, national, regional populations and against individuals.

Dr. Nick Begich, Mind Control & HAARP


European Parliament Report against mind control capabilities of HAARP

There are multiple reports that exist of the mind control capabilities of HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapons system.

The following is from an official report of the European Parliament:

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WARNS OF DANGERS
“Awareness of the existence of mind-control technology, and hence its dangers and possibility for misuse, seems to be more prevalent than in Europe than in other areas. The European Parliament recently passed a “Resolution on environment, security, and foreign policy”. [18] This document includes these articles:

“’23. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new ‘non-lethal’ weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions…

“’27. Calls for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings.”

The United States will ignore these resolutions, of course, as it has other EP requests; for example, as mentioned in the same document:

“’24. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for it’s legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting to be held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the HAARP program currently being funded in Alaska…”

“One of HAARP’s potential uses is a communications system. The military officially acknowledges two communications-related applications:

(1) to replace the existing Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communications system now operating in Michigan and Wisconsin

(2) to provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the military’s own communications system working.

“As we have seen, the mind-control subliminal messages are carried on radio-frequency broadcasts.

“The HAARP facility could be used to broadcast global mind-control messages, or such messages could simply be inserted into existing systems.

“Dr. Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-correction in Moscow, says in regard to this technology:

“It is easily conceivable that some Russian ‘Satan’, or let’s say Iranian [or any other ‘Satan’], as long as he owns the appropriate means and finances, can inject himself [intrude] into every conceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio or television broadcast, with relative technological ease, even without disconnecting cables.

You can intercept the [radio] waves in the aether and then [subliminally] modulate every conceivable suggestion into it. If this transpires over a long enough time period, it accumulates in the heads of people. And eventually they can be artificially manipulated with other additional measurements, to do that which this perpetrator wants [them to do].

This is why [such technology] is rightfully feared.”


Detection of exotic propulsion systems, including detection of off-planet or interdimensional UFOs

In his above ExopoliticsTV interview, Mr. Carnicom indicated that HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapons system created by the transformed atmosphere due to the covert global aerosol-spraying (chemtrails) program has as one of its seven applications the detection of exotic propulsion systems, including detection of off-planet or interdimensional UFOs.

There is prima facie evidence of the use of the HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapons system for the detection of exotic propulsion systems, including detection of off-planet or interdimensional UFOs.


Videos of HAARP and UFOs

NASA UFO FOOTAGE OF HAARP SHOOTING AT UFO


Why individuals and entities designing, ordering and carrying out

…the covert global aerosol spraying operation (chemtrails) are not prosecuted for war crimes

As this 3-part Examiner article has demonstrated, there is prima facie evidence that the global covert spraying of aerosols into the atmosphere operation (also known as “Chemtrails”) that are directed against the human population constitute war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Geneva conventions.

There are several layers of reasons why individuals and entities designing, ordering and carrying out the covert global aerosol spraying operation (chemtrails) are not prosecuted for war crimes.

These include and are not limited to the members of the executive branch of the U.S. and Canadian governments (and other governments), U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. Air Force, the Canadian Air Force, and unknown parties members of an international war crimes racketeering organization, both inside and outside government.


Chemtrails & the international war crimes racketeering organization
The principal reason is that the constitutional governments in the major spraying nations of the United States of America, Canada and other nations are controlled by an international war crime racketeering organization that has infiltrated constitutional government and overtaken the aims of constitutional government with an “invisible” HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapons system deployed to carry out a depopulation program that constitutes constitute war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Geneva conventions.


How the HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapon system (including chemtrails)

…constitutes war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity

The prima facie evidence set out in Parts 1, 2, and 3 of this Examiner article as to the use against the human population of the HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapons system, including the covert global aerosol spraying operation (chemtrails) demonstrates prima facie violations of Article 5(1) of the statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), to wit:

1. (a) The crime of genocide;
(b) Crimes against humanity;
(c) War crimes;

Under Article 6 of the ICC statute, the crime of Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

The evidence set out in Parts 1, 2, and 3 of this Examiner article demonstrates prima facie commission of the crime of Genocide by those responsible for the planning, development, implementation and operation of the HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapon system including aerosol spraying (chemtrails).

Under Article 7 of the ICC, the crime of Crimes against Humanity means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

1.
(a) Murder;
(b) Extermination;
(f) Torture;
(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

2. For the purpose of paragraph
1:
(a) “Attack directed against any civilian population” means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

(b) “Extermination” includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population;

(e) “Torture” means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions

The evidence set out in Parts 1, 2, and 3 of this Examiner article demonstrates prima facie commission of the crime of Crimes against Humanity by those responsible for the planning, development, implementation and operation of the HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapon system including aerosol spraying (chemtrails).

Under Article 8 of the ICC, the crime of War crimes shall mean war crimes when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.

“War crimes” means:

2. (a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention:

(i) Willful killing;
(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
(iii) Willfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health;
(iv) Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;

(b) Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts:

(i) Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;

(ii) Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives;

(iii) Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict;

(iv) Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated;

(v) Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which j6-5F4G4l6gmilitary objectives;

(vi) Killing or wounding a combatant who, having laid down his arms or having no longer means of defense, has surrendered at discretion;

(ix) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives;

(x) Subjecting persons who are in the power of an adverse party to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are neither justified by the medical, dental or hospital treatment of the person concerned nor carried out in his or her interest, and which cause death to or seriously endanger the health of such person or persons;

(xiv) Declaring abolished, suspended or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile party;

(xvii) Employing poison or poisoned weapons;

(xviii) Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices;

Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition and are included in an annex to this Statute, by an amendment in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth in articles 121 and 123;

(xi) Committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;

Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law;

(xxv) Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including willfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions;

(e) Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in armed conflicts not of an international character, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts:

(i) Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;

(ii) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law;

(iii) Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict;

(iv) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives;

(xi) Subjecting persons who are in the power of another party to the conflict to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are neither justified by the medical, dental or hospital treatment of the person concerned nor carried out in his or her interest, and which cause death to or seriously endanger the health of such person or persons;

The evidence set out in Parts 1, 2, and 3 of this Examiner article demonstrates prima facie commission of the crime of War Crimes by those responsible for the planning, development, implementation and operation of the HAARP-atmospheric plasma weapon system including aerosol spraying (chemtrails).

Convening of an international citizen’s war crimes tribunal on the covert global aerosol spraying operation (chemtrails) and the HAARP-atmosphere plasma weapons system

During their ExopoliticsTV interview, Clifford E. Carnicom and Alfred Lambremont Webre discuss the feasibility of convening of an international citizen’s war crimes tribunal on the covert global aerosol spraying operation (chemtrails) and the HAARP-atmosphere plasma weapons system.

This citizen’s war crimes tribunal, and an international treaty to ban the covert global aerosol spraying operation (chemtrails) and the HAARP-atmosphere plasma weapons system will be discussed in future Examiner articles.

Source

Climate Change: Washington’s New World Order Weapons

Could chemtrails be part of this agenda?:

HAARP-QSL

Climate Change: Washington’s New World Order Weapons
by Michel Chossudovsky
Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa,
Author of The Globalization of Poverty, second edition,
Common Courage Press, 2000

November 26, 2000

The Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the World’s climate.
Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that “US military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon.”

IT’S NOT ONLY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: WASHINGTON’S NEW WORLD ORDER WEAPONS HAVE THE ABILITY TO TRIGGER CLIMATE CHANGE

The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides but a partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World’s climate can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated “non-lethal weapons.” Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the World’s climate.

In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the (“Star Wars”) Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.

While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been used, surely the United Nations should be addressing the issue of “environmental warfare” alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases.

Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of deliberate climatic manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of the UN agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations nor the environmental action groups participating in the Hague Conference on Climate Change (CO6) (November 2000) have raised the broad issue of “weather warfare” or “environmental modification techniques (ENMOD)” as relevant to an understanding of climate change.

The clash between official negotiators, environmentalists and American business lobbies has centered on Washington’s outright refusal to abide by commitments on carbon dioxide reduction targets under the 1997 Kyoto protocol.1 The impacts of military technologies on the World’s climate are not an object of discussion or concern. Narrowly confined to greenhouse gases, the ongoing debate on climate change serves Washington’s strategic and defense objectives.

“WEATHER WARFARE”

World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that “US military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth’s atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods.”2 Already in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen in his book “Between Two Ages” that:

“Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised… Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.”

Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several types of “unconventional weapons” using radio frequencies. He refers to “weather war,” indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already “mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s.”3 These technologies make it “possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar [waves].” 4

A simulation study of future defense “scenarios” commissioned for the US Air Force calls for:

“US aerospace forces to ’own the weather’ by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary… In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. 5

THE HIGH-FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (HAARP)

The High-Frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) based in Gokoma Alaska –jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy– is part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating “controlled local modifications of the ionosphere”. Scientist Dr. Nicholas Begich –actively involved in the public campaign against HAARP– describes HAARP as:

“A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere [upper layer of the atmosphere] by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything — living and dead.” 6

Dr. Rosalie Bertell depicts HAARP as “a gigantic heater that can cause major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet.” 7

MISLEADING PUBLIC OPINION

HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific and academic research. US military documents seem to suggest, however, that HAARP’s main objective is to “exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes.” 8 Without explicitly referring to the HAARP program, a US Air Force study points to the use of “induced ionospheric modifications” as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy communications and radar.9

According to Dr. Rosalie Bertell, HAARP is part of an integrated weapons’ system, which has potentially devastating environmental consequences:

“It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature. The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be “sold” to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer. 10

In addition to weather manipulation, HAARP has a number of related uses:

“HAARP could contribute to climate change by intensively bombarding the atmosphere with high-frequency rays… Returning low-frequency waves at high intensity could also affect people’s brains, and effects on tectonic movements cannot be ruled out. 11.

More generally, HAARP has the ability of modifying the World’s electro-magnetic field. It is part of an arsenal of “electronic weapons” which US military researchers consider a “gentler and kinder warfare”.12

WEAPONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

HAARP is part of the weapons arsenal of the New World Order under the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). From military command points in the US, entire national economies could potentially be destabilized through climatic manipulations. More importantly, the latter can be implemented without the knowledge of the enemy, at minimal cost and without engaging military personnel and equipment as in a conventional war.

The use of HAARP — if it were to be applied– could have potentially devastating impacts on the World’s climate. Responding to US economic and strategic interests, it could be used to selectively modify climate in different parts of the World resulting in the destabilization of agricultural and ecological systems.

It is also worth noting that the US Department of Defense has allocated substantial resources to the development of intelligence and monitoring systems on weather changes. NASA and the Department of Defense’s National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) are working on “imagery for studies of flooding, erosion, land-slide hazards, earthquakes, ecological zones, weather forecasts, and climate change” with data relayed from satellites. 13

POLICY INERTIA OF THE UNITED NATIONS

According to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro: “States have in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.” 14

It is also worth recalling that an international Convention ratified by the UN General Assembly in 1997 bans “military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects.”15 Both the US and the Soviet Union were signatories to the Convention. The Convention defines “’environmental modification techniques’ as referring to any technique for changing–through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes–the dynamics, composition or structure of the earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere or of outer space.” 16

Why then did the UN –disregarding the 1977 ENMOD Convention, as well as its own charter, decide to exclude from its agenda climatic changes resulting from military programs?

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ACKNOWLEDGES IMPACTS OF HAARP

In February 1998, responding to a report of Mrs. Maj Britt Theorin –Swedish MEP and longtime peace advocate–, the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy held public hearings in Brussels on the HAARP program.17 The Committee’s “Motion for Resolution” submitted to the European Parliament:

“Considers HAARP by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body…; [the Committee] regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration… to give evidence to the public hearing into the environmental and public risks [of] the HAARP program.” 18.

The Committee’s request to draw up a “Green Paper” on “the environmental impacts of military activities”, however, was casually dismissed on the grounds that the European Commission lacks the required jurisdiction to delve into “the links between environment and defense”. 19 Brussels was anxious to avoid a showdown with Washington.

FULLY OPERATIONAL

While there is no concrete evidence of HAARP having been used, scientific findings suggest that it is at present fully operational. What this means is that HAARP could potentially be applied by the US military to selectively modify the climate of an “unfriendly nation” or “rogue state” with a view to destabilizing its national economy.

Agricultural systems in both developed and developing countries are already in crisis as a result of New World Order policies including market deregulation, commodity dumping, etc. Amply documented, IMF and World Bank “economic medicine” imposed on the Third World and the countries of the former Soviet block has largely contributed to the destabilization of domestic agriculture. In turn, the provisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) have supported the interests of a handful of Western agri-biotech conglomerates in their quest to impose genetically modified (GMO) seeds on farmers throughout the World.

It is important to understand the linkage between the economic, strategic and military processes of the New World Order. In the above context, climatic manipulations under the HAARP program (whether accidental or deliberate) would inevitably exacerbate these changes by weakening national economies, destroying infrastructure and potentially triggering the bankruptcy of farmers over vast areas. Surely national governments and the United Nations should address the possible consequences of HAARP and other “non-lethal weapons” on climate change.

NOTES

1. The latter calls for nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an average of 5.2 percent to become effective between 2008 and 2012. See Background of Kyoto Protocol at http://www.globalwarming.net/gw11.html

2. The Times, London, 23 November 2000.

3. Intelligence Newsletter, December 16, 1999.

4. Ibid.

5. Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report, http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/ (emphasis added).

6. Nicholas Begich and Jeane Manning, The Military’s Pandora’s Box, Earthpulse Press, http://www.xyz.net/~nohaarp/earthlight.html See also the HAARP home page at http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/

7. See Briarpatch, January, 2000. (emphasis added).

8. Quoted in Begich and Manning, op cit.

9. Air University, op cit.

10. Rosalie Bertell, Background of the HAARP Program, 5 November, 1996, http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/envronmt/weapons.htm

11. Begich and Manning, op cit.

12. Don Herskovitz, Killing Them Softly, Journal of Electronic Defense, August 1993. (emphasis added). According to Herskovitz, “electronic warfare” is defined by the US Department of Defense as “military action involving the use of electromagnetic energy…” The Journal of Electronic Defense at http://www.jedefense.com/ has published a range of articles on the application of electronic and electromagnetic military technologies.

13. Military Space, 6 December, 1999.

14. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York, 1992. See complete text at http://www.unfccc.de/resource/conv/conv_002.html (emphasis added).

15. See Associated Press, 18 May 1977.

16. Environmental Modification Ban Faithfully Observed, States Parties Declare, UN Chronicle, July, 1984, Vol. 21, p. 27.

17. European Report, 7 February 1998.

18. European Parliament, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy, Brussels, doc. no. A4-0005/99, 14 January 1999.

19. EU Lacks Jurisdiction to Trace Links Between Environment and Defense, European Report, 3 February 1999.

Copyright by Michel Chossudovsky, Ottawa, November, 2000.

All rights reserved. Permission is granted to post this text on non-commercial community internet sites, provided the essay remains intact and the copyright note is displayed. To publish this text in printed and/or other forms contact the author at:

Michel Chossudovsky
Department of Economics,
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N6N5

chossudovsky@videotron.ca,
(Altern. E-mail: chossudovsky@sprint.ca)
fax: 1-514-425-6224
voice mail: 1-613-562-5800, ext. 1415

Source

Video about HAARP:

Senator Murkowski asks questions about the impending dismantling of the HAARP facility in Alaska. Basically the defense related research has been done, they are moving on to other ways of managing the problems the ionosphere poses for radio communication, and nobody wants to pay the $5 Million a year to keep it running for academic research.