Remote viewer Edward Riordan views comet ISON

I have watched and searched many remote viewers, but absolutely the best one is a man called Edward Riordan. Here he’s viewing the comet ISON.

Target cue: Describe the most important aspects of the target.

Target coordinates: 3062 9557

Remote viewer: Edward Riordan

Monitor: Jerry Harthcock

This target was selected for several reasons. First, not much is known about the object(s) commonly referred to in astronomical circles as ISON (C/2012 S1), which might be improperly designated a “comet”. Second, there is much controversy circulated on the Internet not only from “official” sources such as NASA, etc, but also in the form of YouTube videos and articles written about it by various “authorities”. Third, due to the foregoing reasons, the target seemed to be an excellent candidate for an “operational” session, wherein the ultimate objective is to obtain information/data in the form of descriptions when no other source of obtaining such information is available, which is what operational remote viewing (as opposed to mere scientific experiments, demos, or practice sessions) is all about and why CRV was developed in the first place.

This is an approx. 5.5 hrs-long session, comprising 4 videos. In this session, Edward actually names the target–twice! The first time he named it, monitor Jerry Harthcock prompts him to Stage-5 the AOL/S “comet ISON”. The main reason for this is to try and understand the data behind the AOL/S. In other words, it is not enough for the viewer to articulate the target name. What is more important is to articulate “why” Edward AOL’d it. We want to know what are the descriptors behind that noun. In other words, what data was stored in those cognitrons at the time of the AOL.

Here are the links to the sites from where the video clips, simulations, and images used in the leader to Part 1 of the session:

(Hubble image used in the tasking and session feedback photo)
http://hla.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/display?…

(Track simulation clip)
http://www.solarsystemscope.com/ison/

(Alleged “Chinese Space Radar” clip 1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZZ9i…

(Alleged “Chinese Space Radar” clip 2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44HF-…

Here is an interesting article posted at the Exopolitics website:
http://exopolitics.org/is-comet-ison-…

 

 

 

 

 


Here you can find more info about Edward and his viewings:

>> Edward Riordan website

>> Edward Riordan Youtube-Channel

Here’s some info about remote viewing:

https://www.auricmedia.net/remote-viewing-baltic-anomaly/

Last month’s Poll Of The Month winner: Were moonlandings a hoax?

Last month’s “Poll Of The Month” winner topic was, that moon landings could be a hoax. I have studied this little bit and I could not tell, that they were hoax, but something odd there is. I don’t understand why NASA won’t just explain these “mistakes” properly. They could do a documentary or discussion panel where people could ask these questions and get some real answers.

An Apollo Hoax analysis by Eric Dubay of AtlanteanConspiracy.com

Photo Evidence: (All this photo evidence is well-documented at www.aulis.com and all available from NASA photo directories)

-There are dozens of photos showing shadows of astronauts, flags, rocks and other objects falling in different directions up to 90 degrees apart; this is impossible without secondary lighting which was not brought to the moon, the only light is the sun coming from one direction which casts all shadows in one direction, not two

-In consecutive Apollo 17 photos (AS17-135-20588 and 89) the rock’s shadows change almost 180 degrees as if they switched studio-lights between shots

-In one shot (AS14-64-9089) studio-lighting representing the sun is seen reflecting off a black background, a photographic effect that couldn’t happen in the blackness of space, and could only reflect off a background

-In one Apollo 17 shot (AS17-140-21370) the moon rover is shown still packed up, not yet unloaded, but there are clear wheel tracks going across the foreground of the entire photo

-There is one Apollo 12 shot that shows the reflection of what can only be an overhead studio light, and another (AS12-49-7278) which shows two lens flares from overhead lighting

-There is one shot (15-86-11670) which clearly shows a sneaker-print partially covered by an astronaut boot-print (there were no sneakers on the moon, the astronaut’s boot-prints are otherwise all uniform)

-Many consecutive photos supposedly from astronaut’s hand-held cameras are exactly the same, completely unmoved, to a degree only achieved by a tripod

-Consecutive photos AS11-40-5862 and 63 show the lunar lander with different colored windows, different lettering on the United States sign, and a mysterious disappearing component

-Buzz Aldrin in consecutive Apollo 11 photos changes from white gloves, to dark gray gloves, back to white gloves, and back to dark gray gloves

-There is never a burn print under the lunar lander, nor is there any dust/dirt on the landing pod feet, as if it was just set down gently onto a stage

-There are many pictures which show moon rovers with no wheel tracks in front or behind them (as though they were set down into place) even though there are many footprints all around

-There are pictures of astronauts shown with footprints all around them, but no prints leading to or from where they are, as if they were lowered into place by wire

-There are shots that appear out of sequence in the timetable given

-There are shots which show camera cross-hairs being overlayed onto the original

-Photo AS11-40-5922 close-up of the Apollo 11 Eagle is classic, looks uncannily like cardboard, construction paper, scotch tape and wires

-The video from the Data Acquisition Camera mounted on the Apollo 11 starboard window and the Tripod Mounted TV Camera mounted outside both pan, tilt, reframe, and zoom supposedly while unmanned

-In the 6 moon missions the total time on the moon amounted to 4834 minutes and the total number of photographs taken was 5771; this means they were taking an average of one photo every 50 seconds, covering vast distances, all while supposedly doing many other tasks, collecting rocks, planting flags, making repairs, driving moon rovers etc. Is this even feasible?


General Evidence:

-NASA made all networks record their feed for TV broadcast, so that’s why we only ever see the grainy recording of a recording on TV, and now NASA says they lost the original high-definition video and data telemetry tapes so they can never be verified

-Blueprints and designs of certain machines are missing from both NASA and the companies which supposedly constructed them such as the Apollo Lunar Module and rover

-Van Allen Belt, Russians could never get beyond because of intense radiation that recquires 4 feet of lead shielding too heavy to rocket into orbit; and in 1969-70 the Van Allen Belt was at it’s 11 year cycle peak radiation yet somehow American astronauts and their film was able to survive this without shielding

-There are no stars in any of the moon pictures/video, just complete darkness; they couldn’t make a perfect model in a studio, even a planetarium layout can only be seen in absolute darkness, spotlighting from the “sun” would block out the “star” lighting; so they cover this by saying the sun is SO bright on the moon that the astronauts couldn’t remember seeing stars either

-The moon walk is in half-speed slow-mo; if you speed it up x2 the astronauts are clearly in Earth gravity walking normally with long strides

-The flag in many photos and videos is shown flapping in the wind on the supposedly atmosphere-less moon

-Werner Von Braun took a NASA team to Antarctica in 1967 and was purported to be collecting “moon rocks.” Later Bill Kaysing (author of “We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle”) hired his private investigator friend Paul Jacobs to check with the head of the US Department of Geology in Washington and ask, “did you examine the Moon rocks, and did they come from the Moon?” The geologist simply laughed and insinuated that people high in the US government knew all about the cover-up.

-11 Apollo astronauts were mysteriously killed before making their missions, 3 had oxygen pumped into their test capsule until it exploded, 7 died in 6 separate plane crashes, and 1 died in a car crash, highly unlikely coincidence, points towards a cover-up

-The astronauts rarely give public interviews or take questions at speaking events and were very unconvincing on their first interview back from the moon

-Buzz Aldrin punched Bart Sibrel who called him out on the hoax after he wouldn’t place his hand on the Bible and say he went to the moon

-Buzz Aldrin Jr. (Apollo 11), Gordon Cooper Jr., (Mercury 9, Gemini 5), Donn Eisele (Apollo 7), John Glenn Jr., (Mercury 6), Virgil Grissom (Apollo 1&15, Mercury 5, Gemini 3), James Irwin (Apollo 15), Edgar Mitchell (Apollo 14), Walter Schirra Jr. (Apollo 7, Sigma 7, Gemini 6, Mercury 8), Thomas Stafford (Apollo 10&18, Gemini 7&9), and Paul Weitz (Skylab 2, Challenger), all these astronauts are Masons

-The first director of NASA was Werner Von Braun one of hundreds of NAZI rocket scientists brought into America through the OSS Project Paperclip

-Nazis and Masons are not the most historically trustworthy folks

-Why didn’t NASA make some sort of light/flare display from the moon that people could see without their TVs to prove they were there?

-Why no color video on Apollo 11 when we know the astronauts had a color camera with them?

Peace,
~Eric

Source

Then we have a nice list where they are asking some tough questions:

>> 10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax

And then we have couple of videos made by Bart Sibrel:

Award winning filmmaker Bart Sibrel presents his highly acclaimed (and much hated) controversial documentary showcasing newly discovered behind-the-scenes out-takes from the first mission
to the moon, proving that the crew never left earth orbit.

Never before in all of recorded aviation has a flying machine worked on its first attempt, much less the most complicated one ever imagined, landing on another heavenly body on its maiden voyage, and returning roundtrip with a crew that lived to tell,
all with 1960’s technology. (More computing power is found today in a $10 watch.)

According to William Kaysing, a NASA contractor for Apollo,
a classified interdepartmental memo rated the odds of a successful and survivable manned lunar landing on its first attempt at one in ten thousand. That is why the returning men of the mission looked so dejected rather than triumphant at their press conference,
as they were blackmailed into lying about the alleged greatest accomplishment of mankind, to the detriment of their own souls.

Sibrel has been interviewed, and his documentary about
the moon landings have been featured on, The Tonight Show,
The Daily Show, Geraldo at Large, The Abrams Report,
Coast to Coast, NBC, CNN, FOX, Time Magazine,
The New York Times, The L.A. Times, The Washington Post
and USA Today.

 

 

And another one:

Astronauts Gone Wild is a 2004 film made by Bart Sibrel, a filmmaker from Nashville, Tennessee, United States who charges that the six Apollo moon landings in the 1960s and 1970s were elaborate hoaxes. Sibrel made this film, 53 minutes in length, as a follow-up to his 2001 video A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, which accuses NASA of falsifying the Apollo 11 mission photography. He also appeared in the TV special aired on the FOX network in 2001, called “Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?”. More recently he has made appearances on radio programs, expounding on his theory and explaining why he believes that the Apollo Moon landings were a hoax.

Encounters with astronauts

Buzz Aldrin
In Astronauts Gone Wild, Sibrel confronts nine Apollo astronauts and asks them to swear an oath on a Bible that they did, in fact, voyage to the Moon and back. His first encounter is with the Apollo 11 crewmember Buzz Aldrin. Inside an office room, he shows Dr. Aldrin his “secret” footage, which Sibrel says was sent to him by mistake from NASA.[1] According to Sibrel, this footage shows the crew rigging a shot inside their spacecraft to appear halfway to the Moon, when they were really in Earth orbit and trying to deceive the world.

Aldrin dismisses Sibrel’s arguments, stating “We went to the Moon; we’re not misleading anybody.” Later in the film, Sibrel confronts Aldrin on another occasion, this time in September 2002 in Beverly Hills, California. The filmmaker makes his Bible demand. When the ex-astronaut refuses and tries his best to get away from the man, Sibrel follows Aldrin and calls him “a coward, and a liar, and a thief.”[1] Aldrin then punches (visually described as a right overhand) the man on camera. This incident, which made international headlines at the time, is the best-known response he received from one of the Apollo astronauts about his conspiracy belief.[3] In a recent radio interview, Sibrel stated that he blames himself for provoking Aldrin to punch him. He claims to have sent Aldrin a letter of apology.

Other astronauts
As shown in the video, Sibrel also was able to interview astronauts Alan Bean, Eugene Cernan and Edgar Mitchell about the Apollo project. Bean, for instance, states that the “all-up” testing[5] of the Saturn V rocket cut months off the schedule and was an impetus in reaching the Moon before decade’s end. Cernan describes an experiment on his Moon mission, Apollo 17, that was specifically designed to study the radiation of the Van Allen radiation belts. The interviews end with the request to swear an oath on Sibrel’s Bible. He asks them to “swear and affirm, under penalty of eternal damnation, perjury and treason” that the astronauts really went to the Moon. Cernan and Mitchell testify that they did indeed walk on the Moon, taking the whole oath as Sibrel states it to them. Alan Bean is also willing to swear on Sibrel’s Bible, though Sibrel shows him as unwilling to swear under penalty of treason.

Later, Mitchell had the following to say about his encounter: “Sibrel faked his way into my home with false History Channel credentials for an interview. After about 3-4 minutes, he popped the bible question. Realizing who he was, I maintained my cool enough to swear on his bible, then ended the interview and tossed him out of the house, with a boot in his rear.”

The other astronauts Sibrel confronts are Michael Collins, Alfred Worden, Bill Anders, John Young and Neil Armstrong. Sibrel did not arrange formal interviews with any of these men, instead accosting them at public events to make his Bible request. For the most part, these astronauts do the best they can to avoid him as soon as they find out that he supports the conspiracy theory.[1] He confronted Armstrong at a meeting of stockholders in New York City.[7] During interviews for the biography, regarding the hoax claims, Armstrong said, “It doesn’t bother me. It will all pass in time.”[8] The Apollo 11 commander refused to go along with his demands and states, “Mr. Sibrel, you do not deserve answers.” Meanwhile, Worden tells Sibrel that his claims of a falsified mission are “totally nonsense.” He says that he has no problem swearing on the Bible of his trip to the Moon, but that he doesn’t feel he needs to do so.

 

 

So were moonlandings a hoax? I don’t know, but most of this blog’s readers think so…

Fairy ring

I came across with this phenomenon and I had to check it out and it is called “Fairy Ring”. Is it a portal to another dimension and time?

Fairy ring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
“Fairy circle” redirects here. For the barren or desert grassland phenomenon, see Fairy circle (Africa). For the Neolithic monument in Scotland, see Hjaltadans.
A fairy ring, also known as fairy circle, elf circle, elf ring[1] or pixie ring, is a naturally occurring ring or arc of mushrooms. The rings may grow to over 10 metres (33 ft) in diameter, and they become stable over time as the fungus grows and seeks food underground. They are found mainly in forested areas, but also appear in grasslands or rangelands. Fairy rings are detectable by sporocarps in rings or arcs, as well as by a necrotic zone (dead grass), or a ring of dark green grass. A fungus, mycelium, is likely to be present in the ring or arc underneath.

Genesis

There are two theories regarding the process involved in creating fairy rings. One states that the fairy ring is begun by a spore from the sporocarpus. The underground presence of the fungus can also cause withering or varying colour or growth of the grass above. Mushrooms, the fruiting bodies of fungi that poke their heads up out of the soil after rainstorms, tell only part of the fungi’s story. Hidden in the soil is a huge network of thread-like mycelia. Mushrooms are not individual organisms. Rather, they are just one part of the mycelia lurking beneath the ground.[2]

The second theory, which is presented in the investigations of Japanese scientists on the Tricholoma matsutake species, shows that fairy rings could be established by connecting neighbouring oval genets of these mushrooms. If they make an arc or a ring, they continuously grow about the centre of this object.

Necrotic or rapid growth zones

One of the manifestations of fairy ring growth is a necrotic zone—an area in which grass or other plant life has withered or died. These zones are caused by the mycelia which, during a very dry year, coat the roots of grasses and other herbs in meadows. After some time they are removed by biotic factors from the ground, at which stage a zone on the surface soil becomes visible. Patterns other than the basic ring or arc are also possible: circles, doubled arcs, sickle-shaped arcs, and other complicated formations are also formed by this process. Fungi can deplete the soil of readily available nutrients such as nitrogen, causing plants growing within the circle to be stressed which leads to plant discoloration. Some fungi also produce chemicals which act like hormones called gibberellins, which affect plant growth, causing rapid luxuriant growth.

Long-term observations of fairy rings on Shillingstone Hill, England, further suggested that the cycle depended on the continuous presence of rabbits. Chalky soils on higher elevations in the counties of Wiltshire and Dorset (U.K.) used to support many meadow-type fairy rings. Rabbits crop grass very short in open areas and produce nitrogen-rich droppings. Mushrooms need more soil nitrogen than grass does. A ring can start from a single spore from which the mycelium develops; the fruiting bodies of the mushrooms only appearing later, when sufficient mycelial mass has been generated to support them. Subsequent generations of fungi grow only outwards, because the parent generations have depleted their local nitrogen levels. Meanwhile, rabbits keep cropping the grass, but do not eat the fungi, allowing them to grow through their competition to tower, relatively, above the grass. By the time a circle of mushrooms reaches about 6 metres (20 ft) in diameter, rabbit droppings have replenished the nitrogen levels near the centre of the circle, and a secondary ring may start to grow inside the first.[citation needed]

Soil analysis of soil containing mycelium from a wood blewit (Clitocybe nuda) fairy ring under Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in southeast Sweden yielded fourteen halogenated low molecular weight organic compounds, three of which were brominated and the others chlorinated. It is unclear whether these were metabolites or polluntants. Brominated compounds are unknown as metabolites from terrestrial fungi.[3]

Types

There are two generally recognised types of fairy ring fungus. Those found in the woods are called tethered, because they are formed by mycorrhizal fungi living in commensalism with trees. Meadow fairy rings are called free, because they are not connected with other organisms. These mushrooms are saprotrophic. The effects on the grass depend on the type of fungus that is growing; when Calvatia cyathiformis is growing in the area grass will grow more abundantly; however, Leucopaxillus giganteus will cause the grass to wither.[4]

Species involved

There are about 60 mushroom species which can grow in the fairy ring pattern.[5] The best known is the edible Scotch bonnet (Marasmius oreades), commonly known as the fairy ring champignon.

One of the largest rings ever found is near Belfort in France. Formed by Infundibulicybe geotropa, it is thought to be about 600 metres (2,000 ft) in diameter and over 700 years old.[6] On the South Downs in southern England, Calocybe gambosa has formed huge fairy rings that also appear to be several hundred years old.[7]

List of species

Cultural references

Oral tradition and folklore

“Plucked from the Fairy Circle”
A man saves his friend from the grip of a fairy ring

A great deal of folklore surrounds fairy rings.[23] Their names in European languages often allude to supernatural origins; they are known as ronds de sorciers (“sorcerers’ rings”) in France, and Hexenringe (“witches’ rings”) in German.[24] In German tradition, fairy rings were thought to mark the site of witches’ dancing on Walpurgis Night,[23] and Dutch superstition claimed that the circles show where the Devil set his milk churn. In Tyrol, folklore attributed fairy rings to the fiery tails of flying dragons; once a dragon had created such a circle, nothing but toadstools could grow there for seven years. European superstitions routinely warned against entering a fairy ring. French tradition reported that fairy rings were guarded by giant bug-eyed toads that cursed those who violated the circles. In other parts of Europe, entering a fairy ring would result in the loss of an eye.[24] Fairy rings are associated with diminutive spirits in the Philippines.[25]

Western European, including English, Scandinavian and Celtic, traditions claimed that fairy rings are the result of elves or fairies dancing. Such ideas dated to at least the mediæval period; The Middle English term elferingewort (“elf-ring”), meaning “a ring of daisies caused by elves’ dancing” dates to the 12th century.[26] In his History of the Goths (1628), Olaus Magnus makes this connection, saying that fairy rings are burned into the ground by the dancing of elves.[23] British folklorist Thomas Keightley noted that in Scandinavia in the early 20th century, beliefs persisted that fairy rings (elfdans) arose from the dancing of elves. Keightley warned that while entering an elfdans might allow the interloper to see the elves—although this was not guaranteed—it would also put the intruder in thrall to their illusions.[27][28]

Fairy rings in moss on Iceland

The folklores of the British Isles contain a wealth of fairy lore, including the idea from which fairy rings take their name: the phenomena result from the dancing of fairies.[29] In 19th-century Wales, where the rings are known as cylch y Tylwyth Teg, fairies were almost invariably described as dancing in a group when encountered,[30] and in Scotland and Wales in the late 20th century, stories about fairy rings were still common;[31][32] some Welsh even claimed to have joined a fairy dance.[33] Victorian folklorists regarded fairies and witches as related, based in part on the idea that both were believed to dance in circles.[34] These revels are particularly associated with moonlit nights, the rings only becoming visible to mortals the following morning.[35][36] Local variants add other details. An early 20th-century Irish tradition says that fairies enjoy dancing around the hawthorn tree so that fairy rings often centre on one.[37] One resident of Balquhidder, Scotland, said that the fairies sit on the mushrooms and use them as dinnertables,[32] and a Welsh woman claimed that fairies used the mushrooms as parasols and umbrellas.[33]Olaus Magnus in Historia de Gentibus Septentrionalibus wrote that the brightness of the fairy ring comes not from the dancing of the fairies, who harm it with their feet, but from Puck, who refreshes the grass.[38] A Devon legend says that a black hen and chickens sometimes appear at dusk in a large fairy ring on the edge of Dartmoor.[39] A Welsh and Manx variant current in the 1960s removes dancing from the picture and claims that fairy rings spring up over an underground fairy village.[40] These associations have become linked to specific sites. For example, “The Pixies’ Church” was a rock formation in Dartmoor surrounded by a fairy ring,[41] and a stone circle tops Cader Idris in northern Wales, believed to be a popular spot for fairy dances.[42]

Many folk beliefs generally paint fairy rings as dangerous places, best avoided.[40][43] Sikes traces these stories of people trespassing into forbidden territory and being punished for it to the tale of Psyche and Eros. In it, Psyche is forbidden to view her lover, and when she does so, her palace disappears and she is left alone.[44] Superstition calls fairy circles sacred and warns against violating them lest the interloper (such as a farmer with a plough) anger the fairies and be cursed.[33][45][46] In an Irish legend recorded by Wilde, a farmer builds a barn on a fairy ring despite the protests of his neighbours. He is struck senseless one night, and a local “fairy doctor” breaks the curse. The farmer says that he dreamed that he must destroy the barn.[47] Even collecting dew from the grass or flowers of a fairy ring can bring bad luck. Destroying a fairy ring is unlucky and fruitless; superstition says it will just grow back.[40]

A traditional Scottish rhyme sums up the danger of such places:

He wha tills the fairies’ green
Nae luck again shall hae :
And he wha spills the fairies’ ring
Betide him want and wae.
For weirdless days and weary nights
Are his till his deein’ day.
But he wha gaes by the fairy ring,
Nae dule nor pine shall see,
And he wha cleans the fairy ring
An easy death shall dee.[48]

Numerous legends focus on mortals entering a fairy ring—and the consequences. One superstition is that anyone who steps into an empty fairy ring will die at a young age.[49] A 20th-century tradition from Somerset calls the fairy ring a “galley-trap” and says that a murderer or thief who walks in the ring will be hanged.[50] Most often, someone who violates a fairy perimeter becomes invisible to mortals outside and may find it impossible to leave the circle. Often, the fairies force the mortal to dance to the point of exhaustion, death, or madness.[49][51] In Welsh tales, fairies actively try to lure mortals into their circles to dance with them.[30] A tale from the Cambrian Mountains of Wales, current in the 19th century, describes a mortal’s encounter with a fairy ring:

… he saw the Tylwyth Teg, in appearance like tiny soldiers, dancing in a ring. He set out for the scene of revelry, and soon drew near the ring where, in a gay company of males and females, they were footing it to the music of the harp. Never had he seen such handsome people, nor any so enchantingly cheerful. They beckoned him with laughing faces to join them as they leaned backward almost falling, whirling round and round with joined hands. Those who were dancing never swerved from the perfect circle; but some were clambering over the old cromlech, and others chasing each other with surprising swiftness and the greatest glee. Still others rode about on small white horses of the most beautiful form … All this was in silence, for the shepherd could not hear the harps, though he saw them. But now he drew nearer to the circle, and finally ventured to put his foot in the magic ring. The instant he did this, his ears were charmed with strains of the most melodious music he had ever heard.[52]

Entering the ring on May Eve or Halloween night was especially dangerous.[40] One source near Afon fach Blaen y Cae, a tributary of the Dwyfach, tells of a shepherd accidentally disturbing a ring of rushes where fairies are preparing to dance; they capture him and hold him captive, and he even marries one of them.[53] In variants from Scotland recorded by Edwin Sidney Hartland in 1891, the ring is replaced by a cavern or an old mill.[54]

Freedom from a fairy ring often requires outside intervention. A tactic from early 20th-century Wales is to cast wild marjoram and thyme into the circle and befuddle the fairies;[55] another asks the rescuer to touch the victim with iron.[56] Other stories require that the enchanted victim simply be plucked out by someone on the outside,[57] although even this can be difficult: A farmer in a tale from the Langollen region has to tie a rope around himself and enlist four men to pull him from the circle as he goes in to save his daughter.[58] Other folk methods rely on Christian faith to break the enchantment: a stick from a rowan tree (thought to be the wood from which the cross of Jesus Christ was built) can break the curse,[33] as can a simple phrase such as “what, in Heaven’s name”, as in a 19th-century tale from Carmarthenshire.[59] A common element to these recoveries is that the rescuer must wait a year and a day from the point where the victim entered the ring.[56]

Mortals who have danced with the fairies are rarely safe after being saved from their enthrallment. Often, they find that what seemed to be but a brief foray into fairyland was indeed much longer in the mortal realm, possibly weeks or years.[49][60] The person rescued from the fairy ring may have no memory of their encounter with the sprites, as in a story from Anglesea recorded in 1891.[61] In most tales, the saved interlopers face a grim fate. For example, in a legend from Carmarthenshire, recorded by Sikes, a man is rescued from a fairy ring only to crumble to dust.[59] In a tale from Mathavarn, Llanwrin Parish, a fairy-ring survivor moulders away when he eats his first bite of food.[57] Another vulnerability seems to be iron; in a tale from the Aberystwyth region, a touch from the metal causes a rescued woman to disappear.[61]

Some legends assert that the only safe way to investigate a fairy ring is to run around it nine times. This affords the ability to hear the fairies dancing and frolicking underground.[43] According to a 20th-century tradition of Northumberland, this must be done under a full moon, and the runner must travel in the direction of the sun; to go widdershins allows the fairies to place the runner under their sway. To circle the ring a tenth time is foolhardy and dangerous.[40]Thomas Keightley recorded a similar tradition from Northumberland in 1905: “The children constantly run this number [nine times], but nothing will induce them to venture a tenth run.”[62] A story from early 20th century England says that a mortal can see the sprites without fear if a friend places a foot on that of the person stepping beyond the circle’s perimeter.[63] Another superstition says that wearing a hat backwards can confuse the fairies and prevent them from pulling the wearer into their ring.[64]

Although they have strong associations with doom, some legends paint fairy circles as places of fertility and fortune. Welsh folk belief is that mountain sheep that eat the grass of a fairy ring flourish, and that crops sown from such a place will prove more bountiful that those from normal land.[23] A folk belief recorded in the Athenian Oracle claims that a house built on a fairy circle will bring prosperity to its inhabitants.[65] Likewise, a legend from Pont y Wern says that in the 13th or 14th century, the inhabitants of the town of Corwrion watched fairies dancing in a ring around a glow worm every Sunday after church at a place called Pen y Bonc. They even joined the sprites in their revels. The legend survives in a rhyme: “With the fairies nimbly dancing round / The glow-worm on the Rising Ground.”[66] A Welsh tale recorded by Rhys in 1901 tells of a man who supposedly lived on the side of the Berwyn, above Cwm Pennant, in the early 19th century. The man destroyed a nest of rooks in a tree surrounded by a fairy ring. In gratitude, the fairies gave him a half crown every day but stopped when he told his friends, “for he had broken the rule of the fair folks by making their liberality known”.[67] Nevertheless, fairy boons are not without their curses, and tales often tell of the sprites exacting their revenge.[23]

Literature

The mushroom Gomphus clavatus growing in a fairy ring formation

Come unto These Yellow Sands (1842) by Richard Dadd. Images of nude and semi-nude fairies dancing in rings became popular during the Victorian era.

Fairy rings have featured in the works of European authors, playwrights, and artists since the 13th century. In his Arthurian romanceMeraugis de Portlesguez, Raoul de Houdenc describes a scene clearly derived from Celtic fairy-ring lore: The title character visits the Château des Caroles and sees a circle of women and a knight dancing around a pine in the castle courtyard. Meraugis is unable to fight the intense desire to join in, thus freeing the previous knight from the spell. Meraugis is helpless to leave the dance until, ten weeks later, another knight joins it and frees him.[68] Fairy circles feature in works by several Elizabethan poets and playwrights. William Shakespeare alludes to them in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Act II, Scene I[49][69] (“And I serve the fairy queen, / To dew her orbs upon the green” and “To dance our ringlets to the whistling wind”),[70] and The Tempest, Act V, Scene I:[29]

… you demi-puppets that
By moonshine do the green sour ringlets make,
Whereof the ewe not bites, and you whose pastime
Is to make midnight mushrooms, that rejoice
To hear the solemn curfew …[71]

Shakespeare’s contemporary Thomas Randolph speaks of fairy rings in his Amyntas, or the Impossible Dowry (1638), and Michael Drayton describes one in Nymphidia: The Court of Fairy:[69]

And in their courses make that round
In meadows and in marshes found,
Of them so called the Fairy Ground,

Of which they have the keeping.[72]

Fairy imagery became especially popular in the Victorian era. Thomas Hardy uses a fairy ring as a symbol of lost love in The Mayor of Casterbridge (1886); the character Michael Henchard passes a fairy ring and remembers that he last saw his wife Susan there when he sold her to a sailor in a drunken rage.[73] Victorian poets who have referred to fairy rings in their works include Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Eliza Cook, Robert Stephen Hawker, Felicia Hemans, Gerald Massey, and Alfred, Lord Tennyson.[74]W. H. Cummings composed the cantata The Fairy Ring, and William Butler Yeats wrote of them in The Land of Heart’s Desire (1894).[75]

Art

Fairy circles have appeared in European artwork since at least the 18th century. For example, William Blake painted Oberon, Titania and Puck with Fairies Dancing, depicting a scene from Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, around 1785,[76] and Daniel Maclise painted Faun and the Fairies around 1834. Images of fairies dancing in circles became a favourite trope of painters in the Victorian period. On the one hand, artists were genuinely interested in the culture such imagery represented, and on the other, fairies could be depicted as titillating nudes and semi-nudes without offending Victorian mores, which made them a popular subject of art collectors. Examples of Victorian fairy-ring paintings include Come unto these Yellow Sands (1842) by Richard Dadd and Reconciliaion of Titania and Oberon (1847) by Joseph Noel Paton.[77]

Modern

Modern depictions continue in a similar vein. The online gameRuneScape features a magical fairy-ring network used for transportation, Ultima Online includes circles of mushrooms in several locations, and in “Quest for Glory: So You Want to Be a Hero” the Hero must dance in a fairy ring to acquire spell components. The popularity of the garden gnome in England may be the most visible manifestation of the imprint of fairy-ring imagery on popular culture, as it links the fairy-like gnome with imagery of toadstools and mushrooms.[78]

Further reference is included in Guillermo Del Toro’s Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark. The main character, Sally, is venturing through the grounds of her father’s new estate when she comes across a fairy ring. She steps carefully into and out of it before continuing on. Mr. Harris, however, a restoration worker, knows of the house’s negative history with ancient fae and warns the girl. There is special attention paid to the fact that, as he is forcibly removing her from the area, he crushes many of the mushrooms forming the fairy ring. He is later attacked and hospitalized through the fae’s failed attempts to murder him.

Source

And some videos about the penomenon:

 

 

The Archon Network wreaks havoc on Earth

Some more information about Archons and their doings:

THE TRUTH DENIED TALK SHOW w/host Roxy Lopez

Guest: James Gilliland of ECETI RANCH
Visit www.eceti.org
Topic: THE ARCHONS! The war is in the sky, and now it has come to Earth.
What are the signs?
What can we as human beings do to heal our past, including past lives?
Who do we turn to that understands?
What is the fate of humanity as a whole?

 

 

And here’s David Icke’s take on the Archons:

 

Archons and Chemtrails

What are Chemtrails and why there is no “Official” information about them. I have no answers, but here is another theory what they could be:

“The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.”

by Chautauqua

March 26, 2013

from Augureye Website

It was 1996 when I saw chemtrails being sprayed across the sky for the first time.

I was visiting relatives in Kenai, Alaska and we were out camping for the weekend. At first I didn’t pay any attention as I’ve seen jet contrails overhead ever since I was a youngster. Some 20 minutes later I was considerably more interested as the thin streamers had gradually spread out across the sky in a kind of grid work or tic-tac-toe pattern.

We watched in disbelief as a bright clear summer day was turned into a grey overcast soup right before our very eyes.

The following afternoon the same thing happened, in pretty much the same way, except this time we got huge X patterns all over the sky. This time the people I was with were just as perplexed as I was, and we began “brainstorming” to come up with a logical explanation.

The very first thing we ruled out was commercial airliner traffic because actual jet contrails are made of water condensation vapor and always dissipate away into nothing before you loose sight of the jet.

The other reason commercial jets were ruled out is because if any commercial airline pilot flew the patterns we saw they’d be fired instantly; no ifs, ands, or buts about it!

A week later I was back home in the Seattle area when I looked up to see three big streamers being sprayed across the sky.

My neighbor was out in his driveway, so I called to him – and pointed out the chemtrails. We stood there watching these three jets when suddenly we saw three more coming in on a perpendicular approach. This new flight was on a course to intersect the trails from the first flight… and within a few minutes the entire sky was filled with triple X’s.

I asked my neighbor if he’d seen this before and he shrugged, saying,

“Those are just jet contrails, been seeing them since the 50′s.”

We spoke for a few minutes as we watched the chemical streamers thicken, and spread out just as I’d witnessed in Alaska the week previous.

Suddenly the neighbor turned to me with an ashen face, his expression one of rude discovery, he said,

“Those are military tankers… our government is spraying us!”

In the seventeen years since those first observations the spraying program has not only continued unabated, it has grown to truly staggering levels, and remains much like the villain in Harry Potter, as the subject is never spoken of at all-ever.

This is another thing that worries me about all this… If the spraying of chemtrails is something good, and beneficial to mankind don’t you think the government would be taking credit for it at every opportunity?

But they deny every word, photograph and video, of which there are many thousands by now.

Ponder this for a minute; since the government denies they are spraying the clearly visible chemtrails on a daily basis, around the world, then someone else must be doing it. Since no jet fighters have ever been sent after a chemtrail plane we must assume it’s being done with approval.

They cannot have it both ways; either they are doing it, they are allowing someone else to do it, or somebody else has a massive fleet of jet tankers which the government is powerless to stop… or even see!

Really folks, Everybody sees these chemtrails every day, and our government denies their very existence! What’s wrong with that picture, plenty!

For starters, why are these liars and thieves even still in power? What must they do to us before we stand up for ourselves? Secondly, what does it say about a population who dutifully ignores the chemtrails (and so many other issues) because it’s easier than taking on the government? Not much!

We are being sprayed as if we are harmful insects, and most of us just ignore it. Astounding!

With each passing year we learn more about the health hazards connected to chemtrails, with perhaps the worst effect being Morgellons disease… which the government of course also denies the existence of. (see video far below)

The fact remains that people are getting sick, and dying from exposure to the Aluminum, Barium, and Strontium contained in the chemtrails; not to mention the Lab created synthetic life forms and other biological material like red blood cells, fungus, and self-replicating nano fibers!

Indeed many people the world over are dying from exposure to such toxins; but then, that is exactly the intention.

It’s called Geoengineering and it’s going on right now – and has been going on for many, many years.

Of course the chemtrails are just one of many different pacification technologies being employed by our overseers to marginalize us, taking us right out of the equation.

Whether it is,

…we are under constant assault.

Of course the steady backbeat of this population control agenda is the media:

television, movies, cell phones, Facebook,

…all streaming undiluted propaganda into our tortured minds 24/7 – lest we find a quiet moment and begin thinking for ourselves.

Within a couple years of my first chemtrail sighting the media was hard at work trying to brainwash us by frequently having chemtrails show up in the background of TV shows, movies, and especially commercials, those tightly engineered little propaganda pills.

They even went to the trouble of adding them in as a CG effect to older movies in an attempt to delude us into believing they have always been there. Bullshit!

I’m more than old enough to remember clear blue skies, and contrails which dissipated quickly. Evidently these pacification technologies are working just fine. Tried to explain chemtrails to anyone lately? How about Fukushima, or the Gulf of Corexit… tried to get those conversations going with friends or family? If you did, likely as not you got brushed off, ignored or ridiculed.

It’s the old ostrich syndrome in full bloom and ironically enough, that is the exact position the powers that be want us to assume!

The internet is all a-buzz over FEMA camps and railroad trains with cattle cars equipped with leg irons welded to the floor… and stories of DHS procuring millions of rounds of ammunition, and dozens of urban tactical assault vehicles; not to mention a whole new squadron of chemtrail tanker planes.

Your tax dollars hard at work suppressing and oppressing you into lethargic, apathetic submission.

A few years ago it is said that congressman Dennis Kucinich sponsored HR-2977 known as the space preservation act, in an attempt to ensure friendly skies for any potential alien visitors.

It is contended that this bill listed several rather nasty weapons systems currently employed by our government, including chemtrails, seeking to get them de-funded. As the story goes “they” handed Kucinich the bill back with the demand he remove the reference to chemtrails.

During the ensuing years a controversy has risen over whether Kucinich actually included chemtrails in HR-2977, some saying it was started by UFO enthusiasts, in other words, a hoax.

As is usually the case the waters around this story have become clouded with speculation, dis-information and outright lies over the years to where it is now difficult to know the truth of it.

Some would say by design.

The government denies chemtrails at every level. Weathermen on TV are all mum on the topic, even as chemtrails can often be seen in the satellite images they show.

Commercial airline pilots have always been especially silent on the subject of chemtrails; perhaps even more so in light of evidence confirming that some chemtrail cocktails (there are several different formulas and variants being used) are actually mixed in with their fuel.

Airline pilots would be the most credible of witnesses to confirm and even document the chemtrail spraying program, yet they are so deathly silent you’d think their jobs depended on it… or perhaps even their families.

Talk about your elephant in the room, this whole charade is ludicrous to the point of being annoying. The damn things are a daily event all over the planet yet everyone denies and ignores them… except for the 4% or so who are awake, aware, and vocal.

Deny, delay, discredit, obfuscate, confuse, ridicule and ignore; these are the rules they play by, and they are playing for keeps!

Aside from the internet the only place you will find printed material on chemtrails is, in school books. That’s right- school books! They are teaching our children all about chemtrails, saying it’s a program for dispersing elements into the air to reflect sunlight back into space… you know… to fight global warming!

Am I the only one who finds this chillingly like George Orwell‘s dystopian nightmare “1984“? Or are we now so beaten down and intimidated we refuse to even fight for our own survival?

Of all the many questions raised by the spraying program there is one that really eluded me for quite some time.

Why are they spraying themselves and their children, as well as us? It just doesn’t make any sense at all, yet there exist numerous photos of chemtrails over the white house, indeed everywhere they congregate.

Now some might be quick to offer that this is evidence that chemtrails are harmless, because we all know what craven quisling cowards politicians are; or it might be evidence of a different nature altogether.

As I said, chemtrails are just one facet of a global scale geoengineering program; which is tech-talk for rearranging mother nature to suit your specific needs. Star Trek fans will recognize this as Terraforming or plowing under the existing biosphere in favor of a new one. Hmmm.

This scenario made for passable science fiction fare in the movie The Arrival where alien invaders were changing Earths environment to be optimum for their race, not ours.

Yeah, I hear you thinking,

“but that’s just the movies, it isn’t real”.

Are you certain of that, or is it just denial speaking? Are you so sure you’ll bet your life on it?

What is an Archon?

I first heard vague references to the Archons several years back, in a book I’ve since forgotten the name of. I took in the data and kept going… and sure enough every so often I’d find another reference to Archons with some additional information.

By that time my curiosity was aroused enough to pay better attention… there is substance here.

It all began with the Gnostics around 3600 BC. Gnosis is a Greek word meaning “inner knowing” and the practice of Gnosticism derived from the mystery school teachings of pre-Christian antiquity.

The Gnostics were somewhat shaman like in their use of psychoactive plants which bestowed them with a vast cosmological vision, centered around a female deity they called the Divine Sophia.

The Gnostic creation story is unique as it is the only one ever to have explained in great detail how an inorganic life form came to be present in our solar system, and on our planet.

Those inorganic aliens were the Archons, and they are still here because they never left.

It was the Archons who repeatedly destroyed the library at Alexandria which was built by the Gnostics. Following the destruction of the library, the Gnostics began writing about the invasion of the Archons. These writings, (13 codices with more than fifty texts), were discovered in 1947 at Nag Hammadi in Egypt.

The Nag Hammadi texts are so important because they remain totally intact; surviving a 1300 year long period of Archon inquisition against the truth. They describe the invasion being somewhat virus-like, yet very difficult to explain.

They said the Archons have the ability to duplicate reality, to trick us into buying into their false construct over our true reality. The texts explain that the Archons are envious of Humans on account of we have something they don’t have and greatly desire… a Soul.

They are said to hate the emotion of love, especially any expression of such.

They much prefer,

  • violence

  • aggression

  • hate

  • death

  • war,

…as they feed off the energy of the dead and dying while controlling the events leading up to those wars within the false reality they constructed… kind of like what is going on everywhere right now, especially with North Korea’s little Kim Jong Un threatening to nuke us for the fifth time in as many days.

What the hell did Dennis Rodman say to that guy anyway?

Ever see the Matrix trilogy? Perhaps we need to view it again, with new eyes.

The Nag Hammadi texts describe one Archon looking like a bi-pedal reptile, while another looks more semi-embryonic; like an unborn baby with grey skin and dark unmoving eyes. Archons can get into people and make them do weird, unexpected things.

They imitate life with a false facade of culture, chaos and depravity. The texts talk about a time when the Archons were defeated, and imprisoned by the Gnostics. They also speak of the Archons eventually being released somehow.

In an interview with Jeff Rense some while back, the noted writer and film maker Jay Weidner said that this release from prison may be what the Book of Enoch was about; where the demons were locked away in a box but they’d return at the end of time.

Weidner says he wonders if maybe the Archons are actually the Anunnaki, who came here, altered our DNA in order to enslave us, and that we might derive more understanding of the Archons thruZecharia Sitchin‘s books.

Quoting Jay Weidner from the interview:

“The Archons were somehow successfully quelled and then began their re-emergence and they are as close to immortal as we could understand, and that’s why their plan is so precise.

They needed time to gain power because the people of Earth are essentially Gnostics who were resistant to and didn’t believe in, the “religion” that was being foisted on them.

The forces of Jehovah [Archons] conquered the last of them [Gnostics] and now they are pretty much in control of the system.”

These Archons primarily hang out in the outer solar system, they seem to like it around Saturn and Jupiter.

They have controlled our culture and politics, and re-written our history. A growing cadre of people all over the world are becoming aware of the Archons among us. When you know what to look for they’re not that difficult to spot.

Perhaps the most often cited example of this is Lady Barbara Judge, who oddly enough now has the job of convincing the Japanese to make up with nuclear energy and re-start their decrepit reactors.

Another public figure often thought to be an Archon is Arizona senator John McCain, and between the two of them they sure make a pair to draw to.

And we don’t want to forget our very own Archon in politics Diane Feinstein:

No list of the usual ‘suspects’ would be complete
without the Obamanator in Chief

At its peak, Gnosticism had nearly the numbers of followers/practitioners as Hinduism, and was devoted to the acquisition and sharing of knowledge and truth.

Other tribes and races also knew of the Archons as well, except whatever records they kept were ages ago destroyed by the Archons brushing away their footprints. The Archons will tell us anything just so long as it dis-empowers critical thought and results in us not accepting responsibility or accountability, (perhaps the strongest of Human abilities).

In my own life I have seen our values degrade from those abilities to where we find it today, where nobody is accountable for anything and nothing exists if you just deny it long enough.

Where it almost seems as though psychopathic behavior is encouraged by our overseers as a preferred “new normal” for Humans. When you stop and mull it over for a while, this whole scenario seems to explain an awful lot.

The Invasion happened centuries ago, we have been a captive and genetically altered society ever since, and it’s harvest time!

Rod Serling tried to warn us way back in the sixties with stories like “To Serve Man” and “Will the real Martian please stand up” but we refused to listen, we’re not listening still.

The roots of the programming go so deep that we refuse to believe in chemtrails even though we see them every day. We do not wish to believe any more than Neo did in the Matrix.

It’s unflattering to realize what the ugly truth is; that we are genetically bred slaves, that our lives and destiny have been intercepted, hijacked by a parasitic alien race which is Terraforming the planet to sustain themselves, not us.

We don’t like the sound of that, so we disengage critical thought and logic as we buy in to the fake culture the Archons built and Terence McKenna tried to warn us about.

Admittedly all this does sound rather depressing and distressing; it just seems too insurmountable.

We don’t like that either, but before you reach to disconnect from this reality stop and think for a minute… The Archons were defeated before. Although our overseers have done a pretty complete cleansing of history, and especially so with anything remotely Gnostic in nature; they did not get their bloody claws on the Nag Hammadi codices.

The information in those texts might just be sufficient to assist in defeating the Archons again.

If we truly are the descendants of the last Gnostics, and if we can somehow manage to shrug off this induced narcolepsy long enough to find that spark of spirit residing within us still, we might just have a chance to unify here at the dawning of the fifth sun, and take back what rightfully belongs to us, planet Earth.

Source

 

Golden Wings Of Destiny