Tag Archives: Conspiracies

Conspiracy Theorists by Jolly Roger

Have you been called a “Conspiracy theorist”? It’s just a tool to ridicule people who think with their own brains instead of just believing every rubbish story, that mainstream media tries to stuff down with their throats. Here’s a nice little article about this situation:

 Conspiracy Theorists

by Jolly Roger  slicingthroats@yahoo.com
1/08/2005

Everyone has heard, and has probably used the term “conspiracy theorist,” and the fact of the term being in common use, also indicates that we generally agree on what it means. I saw a movie by that name, and the title character was a raving lunatic who kept his food in thermoses with combination locks to reduce his chances of being poisoned by imaginary enemies.

Regardless of how the stupid movie turned out, what’s important here is the common perception people have of someone to whom that label is applied, and just as important, is who it is that applies the label. The common perception is that someone who is labeled a “conspiracy theorist” is suffering from some type of psychological disorder, and that label is usually applied to people by our government, and our news media. The next thing to consider, is that the label is applied to anyone who questions our government’s version of events in any matter. Doesn’t it logically follow that the media are teaching us to assume that anyone who questions the government is insane? When that label is applied to a person, doesn’t it become easy to dismiss everything they say without even hearing it? How convenient for them.

I think the label first became widely used to slander people who questioned the details surrounding the JFK assassination, and forty years later, there aren’t too many thinking people who still believe the Warren Commission’s “lone gunman” explanation. That explanation is doubted by everyone who has taken the time to look into the details, and believed only by people who refuse to.

Which is “theory” and which is fact? In the absence of a full confession, this can only be decided by a preponderance of evidence, and it would be silly to come to a conclusion on any matter without looking at all the evidence available. This is only common sense, just as it is safe to assume some degree of guilt or complicity on the part of anyone who lies about an event, or tries to hide, plant, or destroy any type of evidence.

Conspiracy theories arise from evidence. After the government releases an explanation of a particular event, a conspiracy theory is only born because evidence exists to disprove their explanation, or at least call it into question. There’s nothing insane about it, unless you define sanity as believing whatever the government tells you. In light of the fact that our government lies to us regularly, I would define believing everything they tell you as utter stupidity.

In July of 1996, flight 800 exploded over Long Island. Shortly after their terrorist explanation failed scrutiny, our government then explained the event by claiming that a faulty electrical system caused a spark that ignited a fuel tank, and the people who doubted this explanation were quickly labeled “conspiracy theorists.” More than a hundred witnesses saw a missile travel from the ground up to the plane just prior to its explosion, but rather than being treated as eyewitnesses to an event, they were labeled “conspiracy theorists,” which label allowed all subsequent investigation to ignore the strongest evidence in the matter.

Our “investigative” news agencies decided to accept and disseminate the official story, and they helped us forget the U.S. naval station nearby, the fact that missiles were regularly test fired there, and naturally, they paid no heed to more than a hundred “conspiracy theorists” who saw the plane get blown out of the sky by a missile. I believe that the U.S. Navy accidentally shot down flight 800, and that’s my belief because it’s the most sensible explanation that can be drawn from the available evidence. I’m not theorizing about conspiracies, but there are conflicting explanations of the event, and if the Navy did accidentally blow a passenger plane out of the sky, who would have a motive to lie about it? The U.S. government, or a hundred witnesses?

Then of course, there were the “crazy conspiracy theories” arising from the bombing of the Alfred Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City. In that matter, audio tapes and witnesses agree that there were two explosions, the first of which occurred inside the building between eight and ten seconds before the truck bomb exploded. Explosive experts agree that Timothy McVeigh’s fertilizer bomb could not have destroyed the building, and the FBI’s counter terrorism chief, and members of BATF lied about their whereabouts during and prior to the catastrophe. The evening news decided not to tell you any of this, and they will label anyone who tries to a “paranoid conspiracy theorist.” In light of the evidence, we would be complete fools if a conspiracy theory didn’t exist.

There were no conspiracy theories arising from the explosion of flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, and there were no conspiracy theories arising from the work of the uni-bomber, so the newly invented psycho-babble that tries to explain the malady of conspiracy theorists, also needs to explain why millions of conspiracy theorists all decided not to theorize about those events. There is no psychological malady. There was simply no evidence to indicate a conspiracy.

The real question is not why people theorize about conspiracies, but why people choose to believe the government’s version of events when it’s obvious that they’re lying. One reason is that most people never see the evidence because our “news” industry hides it, and another reason is that the same news industry will quickly associate anyone who questions the government with the people who see Elvis, Bigfoot, and UFO’s.

But sadly, I think the main reason people choose to believe the government’s version of events despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, is because it’s easier, and safer. If you ignore most of the evidence, and accept as plausible whatever ridiculous explanation the T.V. provides, your life remains simple, and you get to sit on your ass and watch more T.V. If on the other hand, you pluck your head from that same ass and realize you’ve been lied to, as a citizen in a democratic society, you’re instantly burdened with being responsible for doing something about it. Every citizen of the United States has a civic duty to participate in their government, and keep themselves informed of its actions, or government “of the people, by the people, and for the people” isn’t possible. You were warned that “eternal vigilance is the price of freedom, ” but you chose to ignore your government, and believe whatever they told you, and because of this, Americans have lost their freedom. Although presidents and senators are public servants, unlike the dog catcher and mailman, they wield a lot of power over people’s lives, and that’s why they have to be watched, and scrutinized.

Statistical analysts from UCLA and Rutgers University believe that John Kerry won the 2004 presidential election by an estimated 1.3 million votes, and despite the fact that these learned scholars are probably the most qualified people alive to forward such an opinion, our news madia dismisses this as “conspiracy theory.” George W. Bush lost the 2000 election, and he lost the 2004 election, but he’s occupying the White House, shredding our constitution, and stealing our wealth and freedom in a “war on terror” that’s as fraudulent as his presidency because many Americans are too stupid to see it, too lazy to do anything about it, or both.

I’m sorry if I sound angry, but the fact of the matter is that I am angry. While you were staring into the television like an idiot, our freedom, wealth, and constitutional protections have been stolen from us, and because you’re stupid enough to believe the manure being shoveled by our government, you’ve allowed them to commit bigger and more heinous crimes. Because you were too lazy to research their nonsensical economic policies, and see them for the scams that they are, we’ll all soon be living in poverty. And because you’re so lazy, apathetic, and easily lied to, millions have died for the profits of a few. I have every right to be angry, and only a fool wouldn’t be.

Only a small portion of my anger is reserved for the government of the United States, because they only did what can be expected of any government. They grabbed money, power and control where it was easy to do so. Most of my anger is directed toward my fellow American citizens, because they allowed it to happen by believing whatever they’re told, and not doing what’s expected of them. Patriotism in America does not mean waving the flag in blind loyalty to the government. As an American citizen, you have a civic duty to question your government, and hold them accountable for their actions, not use the flag as a blindfold. The American people have been duped once again, and it doesn’t seem like it’s a difficult thing to accomplish.

America’s latest “conspiracy nuts” are better known as the 9-11 truth movement. The news media are doing their usual job of slandering them with their usual childish name calling, but for more than three years, they have refused to show you the documented fact, scientific data, expert testimony, photographic evidence, or the credible eyewitness accounts that prove U.S. government complicity in the events of September, 11, 2001. If this were just a “crazy conspiracy theory,” I don’t think people in our government would have worked so hard to destroy, hide, and lie about the evidence. The White House tried to derail every investigation into the matter. If we had an honest government, we wouldn’t have conspiracy theories. We would have honest investigations, and fair trials, but these things are disappearing from America.

There are disturbing facts regarding the events of September 11 that every American needs to be aware of , but naturally, none of it will be on T.V. I’ve met a lot of people in the 9-11 truth movement, and I can assure you that none of them are crazy, paranoid, or even “conspiracy theorists.” One generalization I can make about them is that they all seem to be very intelligent. Maybe the smartest thing you could do would be to start listening to them. The Arabs don’t “hate your freedom.” The White House hates your freedom, because it’s the only thing that stands between them, and unlimited power. – Jolly Roger

“Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Freedom” – Thomas Jefferson

911truth.org 911review.org 911review.com physics911.org wtc7.net

Anything written by “Jolly Roger” is the property of the American Resistance Movement, and the author hereby grants permission to anyone who so desires to post, print, copy, or distribute this letter as they see fit, and in fact, the author encourages you to do so.

Source

Read more from Auricmedia:

[carousel-horizontal-posts-content-slider]

The Titanic Sinking – Rothschild and Rockefeller Conspiracy

Some interesting info about Titanic and how it all could have been staged like 911:

In October 1910, a group of seven men, all senior players in the Rothschild and Rockefeller financial dynasties, met in strict secrecy on a private island off the coast of Georgia, USA. Their brief was to create an organisation to usurp the power to create and print money, until then solely a function of the US government. This organisation was to be named ‘The Federal Reserve Bank’. This plan however, had several extremely powerful, high-profile opponents who stood in the way of these banker’s goals.

In the meantime, John Pierpoint (JP) Morgan, another American high-financier, involved in the Federal Reserve scheme, who also happened to own the British-based White Star shipping line, had commissioned a series of ‘super-liners’, the Olympic class, in an attempt to gain the lion’s share of the highly lucrative Atlantic-crossing market. The speculative investment involved in this project was immense.

However, in September 1911, before the second one of the planned three ‘sisters’, RMS Titanic had been completed, Morgan’s plans were dealt a massive financial blow when RMS Olympic, the first of the ‘sister’ ships off the production line was involved in a disastrous collision with a Royal Navy cruiser, HMS Hawke.

And so, the scene was set for one of the greatest deceptions ever perpetrated… in the 100th anniversary year, John presents information and evidence that seriously questions the official account in the history books.

DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #24

Audio letter No. 24

mp3 part 01

mp3 part 02

Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net
"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording.  Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This recording is a product of AUDIO BOOKS INC., Box 16428, Ft.
Worth, Texas 76133.
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter.  Today is May 28, 1977
and this is my monthly Audioletter No. 24.  This issue concludes
the second year of the Audio-letter.  But only if we are blessed
by a true miracle, will the third year ever be completed, because
as I speak to you today a tragedy has already been set in motion
that is beyond human comprehension.  Not since last July and
August, 1976 when the Soviet Union began planting underwater
bombs and missiles in our own territorial waters has the
situation been so grave and urgent as it is now.  For that reason
I will dispense with any further introduction today in order to
discuss these three topics: Topic #1--The Fall of Babylon
Revisited; Topic #2--The Handwriting On The Wall For America; and
Topic #3--WATER, THE ULTIMATE WEAPON.
Topic #1--We live today in a world that grows more complex and
more confusing with each passing day, but in spite of that we
Americans are fond of praising ourselves for the great man-made
wonders of our age.  And whenever the obvious dangers to our
continued existence as a nation prey on our minds, we are always
reminded that we, the great United States, have already survived
fully two centuries since our Republic was founded.  And scarcely
a day goes by that we are not reassured by our rulers, elected
and otherwise, that we are the mightiest nation on earth.  Our
technology, we are told day in and day out, is so wonderful that
it is impossible that any other nation on earth, especially the
poor, backward Soviet Union, might surpass us in any important
way.  In other words, we are technologically impregnable.  And
lest we become prematurely concerned over the impact of the
recent radical changes in our weather, certain news reports
recently have told incredible lies to the effect that the United
States has a two-year surplus of grains in our storage bins.  In
all of this, the behavior of the United States today is like that
of countless civilizations before us--just before they perished. 
And in some respects the greatest similarity of all is with that
of ancient Babylon just before its abrupt fall from power.  The
origins of the United States, unlike Babylon, were strongly moral
and spiritual in content, and the system of government set forth
in the United States Constitution, which freed men in a way
unparalleled in human history, was conceived by men who
understood man's place within God's creation.  This heritage
still lives today in the hearts of many Americans, but it's
rapidly being snuffed out under the bondage of rulers who are
superimposing the pattern of ancient Babylon on our beloved land. 
The Babylonian pattern is totally evil, and those who choose to
bow down to such Satanic rule thereby make themselves part of it. 
The origins of ancient Babylon are lost in the midst of time,
perhaps 5,000 years ago, but it reached its peak around 600 B.C.,
at which time it was undisputed as the most powerful empire the
world had ever seen.  The City of Babylon was the Rome of its
day, the most important trading center, the most powerful
military force, the greatest cultural influence, and even a
center of tourism because of its remarkable hanging gardens and
other man-made wonders.  The huge city of Babylon was surrounded
by city walls so high and so thick that they were impregnable by
any military technology of that day; and inside the city there
was a two-year supply of food, making any attempted siege against
Babylon unattractive.  And there was no lack of water either,
because no less than the mighty river Euphrates ran through the
city.  Yes, Babylon was powerful, wealthy, and so secure in
material terms that potential adversaries were hardly even taken
seriously.  Even when it became clear that the increasingly
powerful joint empire of the Medes and the Persians had designs
on Babylon, there was no real concern.  With all their means of
protection against invasion and their unrivaled prosperity, the
Babylonian attitude was simply "It couldn't happen here."  And so
when the Medo-Persian army of Cyrus and Darius laid siege to
Babylon, the only response of the ruler of Babylon was
debauchery, feasting, drunkenness, and mocking any real power
greater than himself.  At this point, we're told, the Babylonian
feast was interrupted by the appearance of a hand in midair
writing words on the wall that said Babylon's rule was at an end,
that its ruler had been weighed in the balances and found
wanting, and that the kingdom would be divided and given to the
Medes and Persians.  The handwriting on the wall said the
impossible was about to happen--Babylon, the impregnable city,
was about to fall--How could this be?  No one in Babylon had ever
had experience with invasion and so could not imagine such a
thing; and yet, within a few short hours, before the drunken
feast even ended, the impossible happened.  First, the water
level in the mighty Euphrates river, flowing through the middle
of Babylon, started dropping rapidly.  It dwindled to a trickle,
and soon stopped altogether.  Cyrus, the Persian, had worked out
of sight of Babylon and had diverted the Euphrates out of its
normal channel.  Now the great impregnable walls of Babylon were
left with huge openings--namely, the river bed no longer filled
with water, and in marched the Medo-Persian army, conquering
Babylon without resistance.  And today, the United States is
under siege by the Soviet Union with the cooperation from within
of quislings.  We are threatened by the joint Rockefeller/ Soviet
empire just as Babylon was besieged by the joint Medo-Persian
empire.  And now, as then, we are told there is nothing to worry
about, "It just couldn't happen here."  But, my friends, just as
happened in ancient Babylon, the handwriting is now on the wall
for America.  The America we know today is a perversion of the
pattern originally laid down for our beloved land, and America as
we know it is about to come to an end.  And as with ancient
Babylon, WATER is our Achilles heel and the means by which we are
to be reduced to surrender without a fight.
Topic #2--Not long ago the Carter administration's Ambassador to
the United Nations, Andy Young, made the remarkable statement
that: "Communism has never been a threat to me."  He also has a
habit of patting Cuba on the back for the so-called 'stabilizing
influence' of Cuban troops in Africa, and otherwise has
repeatedly shown a very amiable attitude toward World Communism. 
Many Americans have wondered why Andy Young is allowed to go on
saying such things without being restrained in any way by Jimmy
Carter.  But Carter has now answered that, in a major foreign
policy speech given at the University of Notre Dame on May 22,
1977.  This speech is as important as the famous Iron Curtain
Speech of Sir Winston Churchill a generation ago at Fulton,
Missouri.  White House aides stated that the Carter speech at
Notre Dame was specifically intended to "send some messages to
foreign governments"--and it did.  The foreign press is filled
with headlines about the major turn that has just been taken in
American foreign policy.  Yet, here at home, many Americans have
not grasped what has happened.  The most basic theme of that
Carter speech is an elaborate echo of Andy Young's statement,
that is: "We are no longer afraid of Communism."  Is this because
Communism is withering and dying?  One need only look at a map to
see how fast Communism is eating up the world.  What Jimmy Carter
is telling us and the world, is 'We can get along with
Communism'; and just to prove it, one of America's most
important, efficient intelligence operations to keep an eye on
Soviet naval movements and other important matters is being
closed down.  This intelligence unit, known as Task Force 157 and
run by the United States Navy, has a budget of well under 1/10 of
1% of that of the CIA, and yet it is being shut down--supposedly
for budgetary reason.  Meanwhile the signs of war to come are all
around us.  So great are the dangers facing us that military men
are speaking up in increasing numbers in an effort to warn
America before disaster arrives.  Since they are subject to
military law and subordinate to civilians who do not want them to
speak up, it's no small thing to speak out in this way.  So,
consider what Major General John K. Singlaub said in an interview
on May 19, 1977.  General Singlaub, the third-ranking U.S. Army
General in Korea said: "If we withdraw our ground forces on the
schedule suggested, it will lead to war."  And why did General
Singlaub speak up?  His answer was: "The question asked after
United States setbacks in Korea and Vietnam was: 'Did the
military people in the know express themselves loudly and clearly
enough that the decision-makers understood?'  We want to make
sure."  In speaking this way, General Singlaub was doing no more
than expressing the consensus of practically every knowledgeable
military man about the Korean situation.  For example, the same
Washington Post article that quoted General Singlaub also quoted
another headquarters Army officer in Korea as saying about the
Carter plan to withdraw our troops: "I don't know anybody who is
not staggered by it.  There's no military or strategic logic for
withdrawal."  The plan to withdraw from South Korea, in other
words, is strictly political--in line with the newly-announced
American foreign policy that it is no longer afraid of Communism. 
The reason General Singlaub's words had such an impact in this
country is that his name was attached to his warnings.  The words
I just quoted from the other anonymous Army Officer are just as
startling as what General Singlaub said.  But people will just
read those words once, frown, and then forget about it.  But
everyone knows about General Singlaub's warnings because,
deliberately or otherwise, he allowed himself to be identified as
the source of the warnings; and, for daring to warn us, he was
promptly relieved of his Korean command by Jimmy Carter.  The
situation in Korea illustrates the direction in which events are
now moving, but other events are due to occur long before the
pullout of our troops from South Korea.  The real threat to our
security is no longer in Korea or in Europe but right here in our
own backyard.
Another military man who is actively trying to warn America is
Major General George Keegan, who retired at the beginning of this
year as Chief of Air Force Intelligence.  General Keegan is one
of the West's greatest intelligence analysts, and the story he
has to tell should be continuous headline news throughout our
nation.  General Keegan has been speaking on radio and television
talk shows, giving speeches, accepting interviews--in short,
using every channel open to him in an effort to wake up America
before it is too late.  One of his most comprehensive and
important speeches was the one delivered on March 11, 1977, at a
press conference sponsored by the American Security Council here
in Washington, D.C.  To find out in more detail what General
Keegan had to say, I would urge every American to obtain a copy
of that speech.  Write to the American Security Council, Boston,
Va., 22713 for information.  It was published as the April 1977
Washington Report of the American Security Council.
We're frequently told by syndicated columnists that the CIA is
our first line of defense, but General Keegan said in his speech:
"The ultimate function of a nation's intelligence is to render
carefully assessed judgments and forecasts regarding the threat. 
When I look back upon my experience with this nation's highest
estimating body, I have the impression of having taken part in a
Charles Dickens novel.  The sense of make-believe and unreality
has to be experienced to be believed."  Further on he says: "The
intelligence estimators, heavily dominated by the CIA and the
State Department, have been wrong about Soviet purposes in
pursuing detente.  They have been shockingly deficient in their
estimates of the risks and the advantages to the United States
and the free world of the so-called technology exchange with the
Soviet Union."  And he adds: "If there has been a Watergate in
this country, and there has been, but ignored, it has been in the
monumentally incompetent judgmental processes of this government
regarding the nature, character, and growth of the Soviet threat
as it has evolved from year to year."  General Keegan goes on to
make crystal clear that the deficiencies in our intelligence
estimates are not due to any lack of our ability to collect
information or to analyze it technically.  The problem, instead,
has to do with what is done with that information.  To begin
with, the intelligence estimation process at the highest levels
in America today is not objective, but is manipulated to fit
political purposes.  In General Keegan's words, and I quote: "The
United States intelligence estimative process cannot be
understood unless it is first appreciated that national
intelligence estimates must perform three functions.  First, they
must support the decisions of the President, both for the record
of history and for the avoidance of impeachment.  Second, they
must substantiate or help to justify the decisions of the White
House 'Office of Management and Budget.'  Finally, the
intelligence estimates must, whatever other purpose they may
serve, rationalize the foreign security policy initiatives of the
Secretary of State."  Continuing, General Keegan says: "I
appreciate that those are extremely important allegations to
make, but I submit to you today that it is not possible to
understand the workings of the United States intelligence
community unless one is willing to open his mind to the influence
of those three factors."  This situation is illustrated vividly
by General Keegan's discussion of the controversy over the Soviet
Back-Fire Bomber.  As I've told you for many months, the
Supersonic Back-Fire is an inter-continental strategic bomber,
capable of striking the United States with nuclear weapons. 
General Keegan says: "The central issue all along has been
whether this bomber posed a threat to the United States.  The
Soviets argued that it did not, and the CIA and State Department
rather consistently accepted the Soviet point of view."  General
Keegan proceeded to acquire analysis of the Back-Fire's
capability from "the most competent analysts in the free world." 
The available intelligence information was provided to three
American aircraft companies with experience building strategic
bombers--plus, for good measure, the Royal Air Force and the
Royal Aircraft establishment in England--and the results: "every
single one of these organizations independently agreed that the
Back-Fire had an intercontinental capability.  Yet my word was
not good enough, nor was that of the American and British
heavy-bomber designers and builders.  CIA and State chose to
believe the Soviets."  General Keegan is not in a position to
express it this way, my friends, but his description of the
Back-Fire controversy illustrates what I've been trying to tell
you over the months--that the Rockefeller cartel has more faith
in the Soviet Union than in our own United States.  Finally,
General Keegan explains, the sheer weight of analysis made it
more and more apparent that the Back-Fire was truly
intercontinental: "however, CIA and State now judged that the
Soviet Union had no intention of using the Back-Fire as an
intercontinental bomber"--this in spite of the fact that the
second model of the Back-Fire has been given even greater range. 
The history of the Back-Fire controversy up to this point is very
disgraceful, and still generally unknown to the American people. 
But listen now to the final chapter in General Keegan's words,
and I quote: "Seemingly undaunted by the most extensive analysis
of a foreign bomber ever performed in the United States, the CIA,
in one final, super-secret, uncoordinated effort, proceeded over
a period of 18 months to undertake an analysis designed to prove
that the Back-Fire Bomber could not reach the United States. 
This effort, in which small bits and pieces of controlled
information were provided to McDonnell-Douglas Aircraft, designer
and builder of fighters, represents one of the most artful
contrivances I have ever observed.  It is one which I suspect may
have been designed to salvage a SALT accord.  Finally, when the
CIA surprised everyone by surfacing its new analysis, months of
painful and extensive analysis were required to show that the
books had been rigged.  Artificially high G-loadings had been
assigned to the design of the Back-Fire along with excessive
engine-drag and other factors which were designed to reduce
range."  And this, my friends, is how our so-called first line of
defense, the CIA, looks after America's national security to the
tune of over twenty billion dollars a year.
Elsewhere in his talk General Keegan also spells out the
dangerous manner in which our military intelligence capabilities
have been progressively over-centralized, compartmentalized, and
taken over by civilians "who understand little about the horrors
of war--and these are people who understand even less about
military doctrine, strategy, and weapons."  The product of all
these trends described by General Keegan is the very intelligence
gap that I discussed with General George S. Brown, Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, when I met with him last September
(1976).  For years General Keegan has tried in vain to obtain a
series of post-mortem audits on the predictive and estimative
record of the United States intelligence community.  The audit
would be performed by qualified but disinterested outsiders with
no links to the intelligence community so that their work would
be unbiased.  Quoting General Keegan again: "Such audits would
record scrupulously where we had been wrong, where we had been
right, where we had fallen short of the mark or where we had
exaggerated.  Yet, every such suggestion had been met with
disdain and has been resisted in the most resounding vocal and
emotional way."  He might as well have asked for an honest audit
of Fort Knox.
General Keegan's speech contains many more things than there
is time to discuss in this tape, and they're all important.  He
reveals many things about the military capabilities of both the
Soviet Union and the United States that you will never hear
through the usual news channels, but they all boil down to just
two major conclusions, backed up by many, many facts.  One
conclusion is that Soviet military capabilities vastly exceed
what we are being led to believe, both in terms of quantity and
quality.  The other conclusion is that the Soviet Union is firmly
convinced that a nation can fight a nuclear war and continue
afterward as a functioning society; and based on that conclusion
from a Soviet study undertaken after World War II, the Soviet
Union has for more than 20 years been preparing militarily to
fight and win a nuclear war.  The American approach, on the other
hand, is only to deter such a war, even though General Keegan
says: "I am unaware of a single definitive effort ever conducted
by the United States to determine precisely and in great detail
what it would take to deter."
General Keegan also explains another very important
principle--it has to do with official judgments of the strategic
balance and carries over into public pronouncements by the
Pentagon.  This is the tacit rule requiring the use of so-called
'agreed national intelligence.'  Says General Keegan: "Agreed
national intelligence is derived by committee, contains little
that is controversial except in some footnote or dissent; and it
rarely contains meaningful reference to the dynamics of strategic
competition in terms of the new weapons, new forces, and new
capabilities being evolved by the Soviet Union."  Thus, whatever
new threats are involved, whether it be the awesome particle beam
weapon warned about by General Keegan or the Soviet underwater
missiles I've been warning about for nearly a year, Pentagon
disclaimers dare not be accepted at face value today without
challenge.  Those who accept these denials are playing straight
into the hands of our nation's deadliest enemies.
Meanwhile the build-up toward the start of Nuclear War One is
gaining momentum.  Two months ago Nelson Rockefeller visited
Israel to help speed up the preparations for a Middle East war. 
By mid April, Israeli troops had begun massive maneuvers in the
Sinai with live ammunition, Reserves had been called up, and
Egyptian maneuvers were soon underway as well in the western
Sinai.  These maneuvers, headline news in Europe and Britain,
have gone unmentioned in the United States except for the crash
in the Sinai of a huge helicopter killing 56 Israeli soldiers. 
Then just a few days ago the extremists came to power by way of
the recent Israeli elections.  The Middle East is now a powder
keg as a result, and the Carter administration is rapidly
disengaging and disassociating itself from Israel.  So, when the
nuclear strike from the Sinai against Arab oil wells takes place,
it will not be recognized by the world or by most Americans for
what it really is.  Perhaps General Keegan was also right about
one other thing he said in his speech: "We have reached a point
in America where I believe we are almost incapable, culturally,
of being warned."  If so, my friends, it is we, the United States
of America, who will have been weighed in the balances and found
wanting, like ancient Babylon.
Topic #3--When the sun came up on southeastern Idaho one day
almost a year ago, it looked like the start of just another
beautiful late spring day.  It was Saturday, and two fishermen
were looking forward to a relaxing day in the shadow of the new
Teton Dam.  The Dam, over 300 feet high, had been completed the
previous fall except for a few finishing touches that remained,
and had been gradually filling up with water during the winter. 
Now, due to the run-off of melting snow in the mountains, it was
almost full.  Further down stream from the dam, tens of thousands
of people were going about their business.  Some puttered around
their houses doing weekend chores, while others were at work at
businesses or on farms; but for the construction crew who arrived
for work on the Teton Dam site that morning of June 5, 1976, it
was a different story.  At about 7:30 A.M. it was discovered that
a sizeable leak had sprung, not through the dam itself but
through the section of mountain on one side where the dam was
anchored.  This was reported immediately to the proper
authorities, who directed that steps be taken immediately to
start lowering the water level behind the Dam.  Why the leak had
appeared so suddenly was a puzzle, since inspection of the Dam by
personnel around nine o'clock the previous evening had turned up
nothing wrong.  But there was no time to solve this puzzle,
because soon a second leak developed.  Like the first, this
second leak also appeared to break through the anchoring mountain
side rather than the Dam itself.  Now the situation began to
deteriorate at an alarming rate.  Soon a leak found its way
through the earthen dam itself, and a growing torrent of water
gushed from it.  Two bulldozers raced to that location to try to
stop the flow by moving more earth into position, but the leak
grew so fast that the bulldozers were lost, the operators leaping
and scrambling to safety barely in time to save themselves.  Like
a nightmare come true, the Teton Dam crumbled, collapsed, and
released tons of water into the valley below.  The day ended
abruptly in tragedy for the two fishermen, and others who lost
their lives as well.  For two days, flood waters from that ruined
dam continued to spread, ultimately covering an area of 300
square miles including several towns and 50,000 acres of farm
land.  One of the major purposes of the Teton Dam, like many
others around our country, had been flood control.  Now the
man-made flood unleashed by the collapsed dam had caused damage
estimated to be in the range of $350- to $500,000,000 in addition
to the loss of life.  The bursting of the Teton Dam provided
America with a preview, on a very small scale, of what the Soviet
Union plans to do to our entire country.
Last month in Audioletter No. 23 I reported hard intelligence
I had received to the effect that 21 major lakes and dams in 10
western states have hydrogen Soviet bombs planted in them.  But
the information I gave you then, my friends, was only the
beginning.  Since recording Audioletter No. 23, I have been under
an avalanche of ongoing intelligence reports concerning the
ongoing Soviet program of planting nuclear weapons in our inland
lakes and reservoirs.  I can now reveal that this Soviet program
began at a relatively slow, careful pace as much as 18 months
ago.  For example, a Soviet nuclear device was planted over a
year ago at a dam known as the Dalles on the Columbia River east
of Portland, Oregon, and it is still there now.  The Teton Dam
disaster appeared to be just a great big accident, but it brought
to everyone's attention the fact that dams can be made to
collapse under certain conditions and that the consequences are
devastating.  Meanwhile the border of Idaho with Canada has
become an important entry point for Soviet agents who are
bringing nuclear bombs into this country.  On Monday May 16, I
received an alert from my intelligence sources that Soviet agents
were at that time in the process of transporting nuclear weapons
into the northern United States by truck through several entry
portals along the Canadian border.  The greatest focus of that
activity was at the Idaho entry points of Porthill and Eastport. 
For the next several days I was in frequent contact with my
intelligence contacts in Canada who were taking very definite
action to find and stop these Soviet intruders; but here in the
United States our attention is being focused on our border with
Mexico by the manufactured distraction of illegal immigrants.  At
the same time, we are undergoing a wholesale invasion along our
border with Canada by the Soviet Union and not one thing is being
done about it by the United States.  By late that first day, May
16, at least 16 Soviet vehicles carrying nuclear weapons were
known to have crossed into the United States from Canada through
entry portals into Idaho and Montana; meanwhile 7 more were on
Canadian Highway 3 from Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,
heading toward Porthill and Eastport, Idaho, to enter the United
States.  By that time the origination point in the Vancouver area
had been narrowed down to a barge in Horseshoe Bay.  The
Canadians took care of the situation on their side of the border
by stopping and inspecting trucks in the appropriate area, and by
early May 18 all seven trucks driven by Soviet agents had been
stopped and rounded up just short of the border.  At that point,
however, their next step was to wait for further instructions
from Ottawa, and I have not yet been informed as to what further
action was taken.  Meanwhile the only public hint of what was
going on was contained in a short item printed in Vancouver
newspapers on May 19.  It stated that trucks were being stopped
and searched along Route 3, but did not give the reason.  For my
Canadian friends, now you know!  But it was a different and sad
story here in the United States.
The Federal government is taking no action whatsoever, proving
that there is a continuing collusion between the Rockefeller
empire and the Soviet empire.  At the State level, one would hope
that the chances of obtaining action would be a little better,
but so far that has not been the case.  Concerned citizens who
have tried to bring my warnings to the attention of their
Governors and other high State officials have encountered
basically two reactions--one is that "This is something for the
Federal government, so we'll refer it to them"; and of course
there it ends.  The other main response is to the effect:
"Naturally even if we did find a bomb in the lake next to the
dam, we would not make it public--after all, we don't want to
excite the people."  But, my friends, that is like an air raid
warden refusing to turn on the siren during an attack because it
might frighten people.  At the local level though, one would hope
that some action could still be expected, but No; during the
period of May 16 I tried in every possible way to get local and
state police in northern Idaho to simply check out some very
specific reports I had been given, but to no avail.  Several
Soviet trucks were known to be heading southward in northern
Idaho toward the town of Sandpoint, and I was informed of the
approximate positions where it should have been possible to
intercept them on the highway; but when I relayed these reports
to State and local police in the area, both directly and through
a brave local citizen in that area, it turned out to be
impossible to persuade them to take action.  As one police
sergeant told me, "We're wondering why the Federal government
hasn't stepped in on this."  And since they had not, even after
being notified, the assumption was that there must not be
anything to it, therefore it was not even going to be
investigated.  And so there, my friends, is a part of the
handwriting on the wall for America.
Most all Americans have been tricked into accepting the idea
that only the Federal government counts or is able to do
anything, even though this idea is totally alien to our Republic
as originally founded.  All the Federal government has to do is
not act or to remain silent about a matter, such as Soviet
missiles in our waters, and people conveniently leap to the
conclusion that there must not be any missiles.  As General
Keegan says, we're becoming incapable of being warned; and, my
friends, if we don't snap out of it, we will suffer horribly. 
The fact that something was afoot in the area of our nation's
water supplies should have been realized four years ago when
Nelson Rockefeller started his "National Commission on Water
Quality."  This he started at the same time as his much better
known "Commission on Critical Choices for Americans."  And just
as the Commission on Critical Choices was absorbed into the
Federal government in everything but name, the same was done with
Rockefeller's Commission on Water Quality.  But even if it was
clear that water was to become a political tool in some way, I
doubt that anyone in his worst nightmares imagined what was
actually afoot.  Over the past several years, Federal and State
water quality control boards have built up a comprehensive and
up-to-date picture of our nation's water resources and
requirements--and all this data has been turned over to the
Soviet Union!  So now, the Soviets know exactly where and how to
strike at us through our Achilles' heel of water, just as the
Medes and Persians were able to calculate how to attack ancient
Babylon through its water source.
In the alliance between the Rockefeller and the Soviet Union
empires, the Rockefeller brothers still want to rule the American
continent under complete dictatorship; and the Soviets still want
America to become their complete satellite--a nation of slaves. 
But the Rockefellers realized long ago that this country could
not be brought under the total control they desire without the
benefit of crushing disasters to force us into that mold.  And
the Soviets for their part realize that to extract the benefit
from America that they seek, it is not enough simply to conquer
us in war.  Afterward there must be a core of turncoat managers,
quislings, to run America for them.  Soon, the Rockefellers
expect to obtain the "Declaration of National Emergency" that
they want in response to events which can be triggered by the
Soviets.  The Declaration of National Emergency, they believe,
will make their dictatorship all but complete.  At the present
time the Soviet Union has at least 158 underwater missiles in our
territorial waters along our coastlines.  In addition, the Great
Lakes now bristle with smaller, single warhead Soviet underwater
missiles--a total of 53 as of my latest information.  The fact
that the Soviet Union has been able to invade the Great Lakes and
place missiles there is shocking; and it is even more shocking to
know that Soviet agents are fanning out all over the United
States, unhampered, to sow seeds of nuclear disaster throughout
our land.  It's hard for most people to imagine how such things
are possible; but as I know from my own sources, they are being
facilitated from within our country.  For example, one of the key
steps which has been taken by the Carter administration to permit
these things recently was publicly confirmed by former
Congressman John Rarick of Louisiana.  Congressman Rarick
publishes a very informative monthly newsletter entitled "You've
a Right to Know", about which you might write to him at: Drawer
E, Saint Francisville, La.  70775.  Quoting from his March 1977
issue, "The Soviets are hauling United States cargo in
intra-coastal shipping illegally against the provisions of the
Jones Act.  Russian vessels can be seen in the river loading from
barges, and also unloading on two barges, as if they constitute
an integral arm of the United States Maritime Service.  Barges
loaded by Soviets have been followed up the river through inland
waterways and small canals to where their cargoes have even
reached the Chicago market."  Congressman Rarick further reports
that the Soviets are able to get away with this because Secretary
of the Treasury Blumenthal waived the provisions of the Jones Act
as applied to Soviet vessels.  Thanks to such generous help from
within the United States has been thrown wide open to offensive
Soviet actions.  As a result the planting of nuclear devices in
our inland waters--rivers as well as lakes and reservoirs--is
mushrooming at a tremendous pace.  To begin with, additional
bombs have been planted in some of the huge dammed-up lakes that
I named last month.  For example, Hoover Dam had one bomb when I
recorded Audioletter No. 23, but now it has 3--one next to each
end of the Dam itself, the third upstream some distance from the
Dam.  Another example is Oroville Reservoir in California.  Last
month it had one bomb, now it has 4.  But more serious than this
overkill of a few dams is the vast number of targets throughout
America where Soviet bombs have been and are being planted.  City
water reservoirs of any significance throughout America are
targeted.  Many already contain bombs, while others are scheduled
to receive bombs from the many trucks fanning out across America
with Soviet agents at the wheel.  Flood control, irrigation, and
hydroelectric dams of all kinds are targets as well; and major
rivers are also being seeded with bombs at strategic points.
To indicate the magnitude of the Soviet attack plan, I will
report the current status of just one state--Texas, which is a
major target.  As of my latest intelligence, over 100 bombs have
already been planted in Texas; and I have been provided so far
with a partial list that specifies 33 of the lakes involved. 
These are: Toledo Bend Reservoir, Sam Rayburn Reservoir,
Steinhillyers Reservoir, Lake Vernon, two lakes northeast of
Houston which provide water for the city, Conroe Lake, Somerville
Reservoir, Lake Waco, Lake Whitney, Malakoff Lake, Frankston
Lake, Lake Livingston, Millwood Reservoir, Lake Texarkana, Lake
O' the Pines, Cedar Lake, Lake Tawakoni, four water reservoirs
for Dallas and Fort Worth, Lake Texoma, Arbuckle Reservoir, Lake
Bridgeport, Hubbard Creek Reservoir, Lake Kemp, Lake Arrowhead,
O'Folla Reservoir, San Angelo Reservoir, Twin Buttes Reservoir,
Lake Thomas, and White River Reservoir.
A number of rivers around the country are also known to be
involved already.  These include the Mississippi, the Missouri,
the Illinois, the Ohio, the Columbia, the Potomac, and the
Susquehanna.  In the Mississippi alone there are already 31 bombs
located near dams, and locks, and other strategic points.  The
farthest to the north is a bomb about 5 miles downstream of
Little Falls, Minnesota.  From there, they have all been planted
all the way down to New Orleans of Louisiana, where 2 bombs are
in the river.  There are also two other bombs near New Orleans at
the east end of Lake Pontchartrain.
My friends, the Soviet Union is striving to be in a position
to suddenly, decisively rob America of our water resources. 
While we are distracted with arguments over weapons delivery
systems, such as bombers and missiles, the Soviet Union is
striving for the reliability of weapons that are already on site
at the target.  When war comes, the Soviet Union plans to be able
to just push a button, detonate nuclear weapons all over America,
devastate our country with floods and the pestilence that they
bring, and still have all their missiles and bombers still in
reserve.  But before war comes, the Rockefeller/ Soviet alliance
plan to lay the groundwork for a Declaration of National
Emergency in the United States.
One option still available to them is war in the Middle East
causing a cutoff of Arab OPEC oil supplies.  But a horrendous new
capability is now in place as an alternate means for creating our
national emergency; and, my friends, there are ominous signs that
this capability is going to be used, very soon.  Lurking deep in
the waters around the Philippine Islands there are now 7
fission-fusion-fission bombs planted there by the Soviet Union. 
Such a bomb is essentially a hydrogen bomb with a jacket of
uranium 238.  When it's set off, the nuclear reaction converts
much of the jacket material to plutonium 239, which in turn
explodes as well.  The Soviet Union is the only nation that has
ever set off such a bomb--16 years ago on October 30, 1961.  In
doing so, they set an ugly record that still stands--the biggest
nuclear weapon ever fired in the atmosphere.  Its yield was
something over 50 megatons--that is 50 million tons of TNT, 2500
times as large as the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. 
Theoretically, there's no limit to the yield of such a bomb, but
for 16 years it has been thought of in the West as unusable
because it produces such vast quantities of fall-out that it
would endanger the country that used it.  But the Soviet Union
has found a way to use it--deep under the ocean for geophysical
warfare in an environment where the radio-active products are
relatively confined, producing little fall-out.  The Philippines
sit like a keystone among a long arch of sub-sea trenches and
faults that comprise the most earthquake-prone areas on earth. 
Starting just north of New Zealand, a band of geological
instability runs northwestward toward the Philippines, then
northeastward past Japan to the Kamchatka Peninsula, eastward
along the Aleutians to Alaska, and then southward along the west
coast of the United States, Mexico, Central America, and onward
all the way to Chile.  This long, irregular zone around the
Pacific rim is often called the "Ring of Fire."  The 7 Soviet
bombs planted in Philippine waters are there for the purpose of
triggering major earthquakes, which, thanks to the peculiar
convergence of faults and trenches in that area, are intended to
work their way by chain reaction all around the Pacific rim,
devastating Washington State, Oregon, and California in the
process.  The 7 bombs in the Philippines are in the so-called
gigaton range--that is, each one is equivalent to a billion tons
of TNT--50,000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb and
therefore big enough to trigger massive earthquakes.  And the
Soviets believe they can safely use such warfare, treaties or no
treaties, because most of the Soviet Union has no history of
earthquakes.  The Soviet gigaton bombs in the Philippines are
located at navigational coordinates which I will now reveal.  No.
1 is at 17-23-23 north, 117-7-23 east; No. 2 is at 14-48-48
north, 119-2-18 east; No. 3 is at 14-0-40 north, 118-23-53 east;
No. 4 is at 13-0-0 north, 117-42-8 east; No. 5 is at 12-0-54
north, 126-4-55 east; No. 6 is at 13-50-36 north, 125-21-45 east;
No. 7 is at 19-48-3 north, 123-51-57 east.  But to make sure that
our west coast is devastated by the effects of a seeming natural
disaster erupting in the Philippines, a series of 7 conventional
but large hydrogen bombs have been planted off our west coast by
the Soviet Union.  These can be set off in conjunction with those
in the Philippines, and at the right moment to produce tidal
waves which would sweep in from the Pacific with devastating
effect along our west coast.  Bomb No. 1 west of Seattle is at
48-0-0 north, 127-50-0 west; No. 2 west of Eugene, Oregon is at
43-29-18 north, 127-55-5 west; No. 3 west of San Francisco is at
37-8-45 north, 125-42-30 west; No. 4 west of Monterey is at
36-31-0 north, 125-26-30 west; No. 5, also west of Monterey, is
at 36-26-30 north, 124-56-0 west; No. 6 west of Los Angeles is at
33-25-15 north, 122-23-50 west; and No. 7 southwest of San Diego
is at 31-45-35 north, 120-36-0 west.  In my Audioletter No. 20
for January 1977, I referred to a warning document issued in
December 1975 by Mr. Tony Hodges of Hawaii.  In that document Mr.
Hodges presented evidence of the feasibility of underwater
missiles.  He also warned of the dangers of bombs on or in the
seabed designed to generate earthquakes or tidal waves. 
Unfortunately, it turns out that Mr. Hodges warnings were all
valid.
The dictatorship and war plans are being speeded up now; the
world will be stunned by what will look like a massive, natural
disaster in the Philippines that also spreads around the Ring of
Fire to decimate our west coast.  And when it happens, Jimmy
Carter will have the excuse David Rockefeller wants him to have
to declare a National Emergency and in effect suspend the United
States Constitution.  The President's dictatorial emergency
powers spelled out in Executive Orders 11490 and 11921 will be
activated, and the complete bureaucracy of dictatorship set in
motion under circumstances designed to stifle all dissent; and
the elaborate prescriptions for complete governmental control of
all of our water resources spelled out in Executive Order 11921
will be activated under conditions which enable this to be sold
to the people as necessary for our best interest.  Soon
thereafter, with the Rockefeller dictatorship in place, Nuclear
War One itself is planned to come.  Dams and reservoirs all over
America are to be destroyed at one blow by the Soviet Union; and
the quislings from the Trilateral Commission, who now control the
Federal government, will use their control over what little
remains of our water supplies to make their domination of us
total.  The saddest thing about all of this is that only when it
happens will people believe.  By total exposure there is a chance
to prevent the West Coast disaster; but without exposure, there
is no chance whatsoever.
My friends, it's only by the grace and power of our Lord Jesus
Christ that I've received the information I revealed over the
recent past; and it's my solemn duty to pass on this information
to you--it's not meant for me alone.  And in the same way, it's
not meant for you alone--it needs to be known by every one.  And
so, my friends, this completes two years of my monthly
Audioletters.  I want to thank you for all your words of
encouragement, your support, and especially your prayers.  Again,
thank you; and may God bless each and every one of you.
Source

DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #23

Audio letter No. 23

mp3 part 01

mp3 part 02

Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net
"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording.  Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(This recording is a product of Audio Books, Inc., Box 16428,
Fort Worth, Texas  76133)
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter.  Today is April 24,
1977, and this is my monthly Audioletter No. 23.
Two months ago in Audioletter No. 21 for February 1977, I
explained how America had been turned into a nation-wide energy
addict over the course of two generations and more, and how this
energy addiction is to be used against us by the four Rockefeller
brothers in turning off our national security; and just four days
ago, on April 20, 1977, this process got under way in earnest by
way of David Rockefeller's revolutionary energy program announced
to the world by his employee, Jimmy Carter.  To the casual
observer it must seem incredible--a new administration under a
new President, with no previous experience in Washington, has in
only three short months done what no previous administration has
ever succeeded in doing: developed a comprehensive, detailed
energy program for the most complex economy on earth. 
Furthermore, Mr. Carter tells us that we must do as he tells us
in order to avoid "a national catastrophe"; and he says we must
act now.  Why the rush?  Why this sudden urgency?  And why does
he go out of his way to call his energy program "the moral
equivalent of war"?  The answer lies in what I warned you about
at the end of monthly Audioletter No. 22 just last month.
The CIA is hard at work arranging what is to be the CIA's
crowning achievement--the staging of a horrendous act of
terrorism that is intended to cause war to erupt in the whole of
the Middle East.  This is to set in motion a modified, up-dated
version of the detailed war plan I revealed in monthly
Audioletter No. 6 for November 1975.  This plan includes a
limited nuclear strike from the Sinai to cap off Arab OPEC oil
wells except those in Libya, which is controlled by the CIA. 
This will lead immediately to very harsh energy rationing in the
United States, and the Federal government will at last get to
issue those precious gas rationing coupons that have been
awaiting use now for over three years.  So the Carter energy plan
with its underlying warlike atmosphere is actually the first step
in a gradual shift unto a war footing for the United States.  It
has the same purpose as the declaration of national emergency
which President Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaimed in May 1941, six
months before Pearl Harbor, to start getting America ready for
war he was helping to bring about.  The second major step in our
progressive shift onto war footing is intended to occur the time
of the cut-off of Middle East oil, by war.  This will provide a
perfect excuse for an actual Declaration of National Emergency,
and that in turn will activate all the dictatorial presidential
powers spelled out in Executive Order 11921 signed by President
Ford very quietly in June 1976, and described in my Audioletter
No. 14 for July 1976.
Audioletter No. 14, of course, is also the issue in which I
first revealed the presence of Soviet underwater missiles and
bombs in our own territorial waters.  The terrible Middle East
incident now brewing, which I fervently hope and pray will
somehow be sidetracked by its advanced exposure, is to cause a
limited nuclear war in the Middle East.  That in turn is supposed
to initiate a chain of events, culminating in Nuclear War One
between the Soviet Union and the United States of America. 
Originally this was to have been a carefully programmed war for
the mutual benefit of the Rockefeller cartel and their Soviet
allies, with the Rockefellers and their intimates riding out the
war safely in the nuclear-safe zone across the northern United
States; but ever since the Soviet Union began its double cross of
the Rockefellers last summer 1976, the plans for war have been
undergoing frantic revisions.  Even the insane Rockefeller
concessions to the Soviets, embodied in the Red Friday agreement
of October 1, 1976 (which I revealed that month in Audioletter
No. 17) have failed to fully reinstate the Rockefeller/Soviet
alliance--so now anything can happen.  The Rockefeller brothers,
who for so long have tried to play God with their immense power,
are now finding out that they too are fallible and human, even if
they still refuse to consciously admit it.  Today, my friends,
the power of the Rockefeller empire is in the process of
destroying itself; but just as Samson pulled down the temple
around him, the Rockefeller brothers threaten to pull down modern
civilization around their heads as their power runs out of
control and collapses into the inferno of nuclear war.
Earlier this month, on April 7, 1977, Prime Minister Rabin of
Israel resigned.  The press has played up his resignation as if
it were another Watergate, but actually it was only a
technicality having to do with a modest bank account held here in
Washington, D.C. by Rabin against government regulations. 
Overnight Rabin was out of office, and his public career has been
described as ruined; but the real reason for Rabin's lightning
exit from Israeli politics was that he learned of the CIA plot to
ignite war in the Middle East, and he wanted no part of it.  It's
almost a replay of Sir Harold Wilson's sudden unexplained
resignation as Prime Minister of Great Britain on March 16, 1976,
just over a year ago; and as I explained then in monthly
Audioletter No. 10, Wilson resigned because he had learned of the
coming war plan and wanted nothing to do with it.  And so the
build-up toward war continues, and our rulers know it.  But what
of the American public in general?  How many know what danger we
are in?  And especially, how many believe it enough to do
something about it?  My friends, most Americans today are on
vacation from reality, but reality will have to be faced one day
in the not too distant future.
My three special topics for today are: Topic #1--THE PRE-WAR
SABOTAGE OF AMERICA, Topic #2--THE COMING NAVAL BATTLE FOR THE
UNITED STATES AND THE WORLD, and Topic #3--THE UNTOLD PERSONAL
SACRIFICE OF GENERAL GEORGE S. BROWN.
Topic #1--In the early days of the 20th century the
Rockefeller/Standard Oil monopoly had already become supreme in
the United States, but abroad it faced two powerful competitors
in oil.  One was the British Empire, whose destruction by means
of two World Wars I've discussed in a number of my past talking
tapes.  The other foreign competitor was even bigger than the
British Empire in oil, and it was attacked and destroyed first. 
That competitor was Czarist Russia.  After the Bolshevik
Revolution took place in 1917, property owners and businessmen of
all kinds were dispossessed and liquidated in great numbers.  And
included in this, by design, was the utter destruction of the oil
fields, refineries, oil tankers, everything having to do with
oil.  The small band of revolutionaries under Lenin and Trotsky
who had been sent into Russia with the help of Rockefeller
financing had done their job well; and within a few years the new
Communist regime of the Soviet Union welcomed the
Rockefeller/Standard Oil interests with open arms to re-develop
the huge Russian oil reserves.  Ever since that day, right down
to the present, practically all of the oil leaving the Soviet
Union has been carried in oil tankers of the Rockefeller/Standard
Oil empire under various names, nominees, and national flags. 
For a thorough and most unusual expose of the oil competition
presented to the Rockefellers by Czarist Russia, I highly
recommend a new book by Robert V. Tolf, entitled THE RUSSIAN
ROCKEFELLERS--THE SAGA OF THE NOBEL FAMILY AND THE RUSSIAN OIL
INDUSTRY published by the Hoover Institution Press, Stanford
University, Stanford, Calif.  94305--the price is $15.95
postpaid.
For decades following the Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet
rulers were absolutely dependent upon an uninterrupted flow of
transfusions from the West of money, technical know-how, food,
and arms.  The Kremlin ruled a huge nation with an iron fist, and
the Rockefellers shared this rule with the Kremlin.  The Soviet
Union, therefore, appeared to be the perfect vehicle for bringing
the entire world under the control of the super-rich Rockefellers
and their intimates.  All that was necessary, or so they thought,
was to gradually build up the Soviet system while bleeding to
death the harder to control United States and the western world. 
This was the situation the four Rockefeller brothers inherited
long ago-they literally grew up with it, and could hardly imagine
things being any different.  But now things are different.  The
Soviet Union can now survive without continued outside help, and
now they have been double-crossing the Rockefellers and we the
people will have to suffer for it.  Now, both the Rockefellers
and the Soviets are maneuvering, playing a tricky game, and all
the while trying to emerge supreme from the conflict to come. 
But, just as it was planned before the Rockefeller/Soviet
alliance began coming apart, the main and prime battleground is
to be the United States of America.  The Soviet Union is busy at
work trying to weaken America here and abroad so that we can be
defeated in Nuclear War One; and the Rockefellers are trying to
turn our nation into a complete dictatorship under their
domination.  Both are trying to bend the weakening of America's
freedom to their own special advantage.
The centerpiece of the Rockefeller program to completely take
over America right now is the so-called CARTER ENERGY PROGRAM. 
Recently the CIA s-u-d-d-e-n-l-y upgraded its estimates of Soviet
spending for new military equipment and installations to four
times the previous figure so as to alarm us.  In a similar vein,
the CIA has also provided Jimmy Carter with grist for his energy
mill to grind us into submission by issuing a report saying world
oil reserves are much lower than previously thought.  Both CIA
reports are rubbish, issued purely for propaganda purposes; so
the CIA under Admiral Turner, who is a Rockefeller man, is
continuing with the preparations for the limited nuclear strike
from the Sinai in order to get the war started.  American F-15
fighter bombers are now available in the Sinai and would hit all
of the five or more Arab target areas with ease; and the special
low-yield nuclear weapons for the job are already on the scene,
currently stored underground at the so-called American Monitoring
Station in the Sinai.  The bombs themselves are atomic, not
hydrogen, very clean, with primary blast effects confined to a
radius of only 300 to 400 yards--just right for a so-called
surgical attack to wipe out the oil wells in the target areas.
As for America, even though the Alaskan oil is supposed to
start flowing through the pipeline this summer, it will not come
into the lower United States.  It happens to be high sulphur oil
of a type which west-coast refineries cannot handle even though
there have been ten years to get ready for Alaskan oil.  Instead,
the Rockefeller plan is to ship this oil to Japan at a handsome
profit, of course, and make up the difference with more imports
of, guess what--Arab oil.  When the Arab oil is cut off, there
will be some attempts to ship some of the otherwise useless
Alaskan oil to the Gulf Coast by small, inefficient tankers
through the Panama Canal, which is targeted both by underwater
missiles and by missiles in Guyana.  The sharp drop in our oil
supplies will also help to intensify the reduction in food
supplies, which is already resulting from drought here in
America.  Many factors are contributing to the drought situation,
including not only the Soviet weather modification activities
I've mentioned in the past, but also activities under Rockefeller
control.  For example, I mentioned in Audioletter No. 9 for
February 1976 that for years the Rockefeller oil companies have
been knowingly lowering the underground water table in many areas
of the Midwest and Great Plains by means of excessive pumping
from their oil wells; and now, in many of these very areas, the
problem of low ground water is adding to the drought crisis.
Meanwhile, the Rockefellers never lose sight of their
objectives, no matter how much they are forced to change their
tactics along the way.  Their objective for America is
DICTATORSHIP, according to the pattern spelled out in their
secret New Constitution, which I revealed in my Audio Book
Talking Tape No. 4 released in July 1975.  Under the guise of
"governmental reorganization", the provisions of their
dictatorial new constitution are being imposed on the United
States piecemeal, gradually, while our real Constitution is
increasingly "interpreted" out of existence.
But of all the things that determine whether a nation will
survive or succumb in time of crisis, the human spirit is still
the most important.  A strong spirit and deep resolve can
overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles, and it can make a
people impossible to conquer; but a weak spirit, without
convictions or values, leaves a people defenseless--defenseless
no matter how much armor they may wear or what weapons they may
command.  This is why the human spirit has been the most
consistent target of all, both of the Rockefeller "One World"
group and of the rulers of the Soviet Union.
Last month in Audioletter No. 22 I pointed out one of the
extremes in church philosophy that has been promoted wherever
possible for generations by the Rockefellers and their
collaborators.  This extreme is to divorce the moral and
spiritual lessons of religions from daily decisions and actions,
as if the two had no relationship to one another except for lip
service.  For whatever reasons, this extreme is personified today
by one Jimmy Carter.  The opposite extreme is equally deadly, if
not more so.  This is to dilute the spiritual teaching for which
churches originally existed and replace it with preaching about
economic, political, and social issues.  To do this is to play
with fire; but this is exactly what the National Council of
Churches and its sister organization the World Council of
Churches have been doing for decades.  Prior to November 28,
1950, the National Council was known as the Federal Council of
Churches.  For many years the Federal Council had been dominated
at the national level by the Rockefellers and their agent John
Foster Dulles, and was the recipient of several grants from the
Rockefeller Foundation.  But the Federal Council became so
totally identified with political activism in support of
socialist causes that it became an object of increasing distrust. 
Accordingly, the name was changed to the National Council of
Churches, and its tarnished halo was polished up with public
assurances that this was a new organization which would devote
itself to the real business of the church.  There were many
influential laymen in the churches under the umbrella of the
National Council who wanted to help insure that the supposedly
new organization would truly devote itself to proper areas of
church concern.  As a result, a National Lay Committee was
brought into being under the chairmanship of the late J. Howard
Pugh, a truly great American, who was the director and president
of the Sun Oil Co. when it was still free of the grasping
clutches of the Rockefellers.  The National Lay Committee existed
from March 28, 1951, until June 30, 1955.
The whole story of what happened to the National Lay
Committee of the National Council of Churches is told in the
"Chairman's Final Report" by J. Howard Pugh.  Unfortunately this
important report has long been suppressed and buried.  I have in
my possession one of the very few copies still known to be in
existence; therefore I will read a few brief passages from the
Chairman's Explanatory Letter, which serves as a Foreword to the
Report as a whole.  These quotations are taken in sequence; and
although they do not do justice to Mr. Pugh's complete
explanatory letter, much less the entire 316-page Report, I
believe you will find them revealing:
"In the failure of this most important effort to bring about
an enduring partnership between the clergy and laity, I feel a
very real responsibility to provide a comprehensive and factual
account of those steps which led to the Board's
action--discontinuing lay participation."
"We lay people found ourselves not only deeply in the minority
but often poles apart from the clergy who invariably out-voted us
10 to 1 in these sessions."
"The members of the Lay Committee were often misunderstood in
their urgency to keep the churches out of politics and their
insistence on the promisee evangelism.  Our premise was that
instead of appealing to government, the church should devote its
energies to the work of promoting the attributes of
Christianity--truth, honesty, fairness, generosity, justice, and
charity in the hearts and minds of men.  We attempted to
emphasize that Christ stressed not the expanded State, but the
dignity and responsibility of the individual."
"Their philosophy, it seemed to the Lay Committee, looked to
an ever-expanding government."
"With few exceptions, the members of the Lay Committee had
agreed to serve only because they had been assured that the new
National Council would avoid the political involvements and
controversies of the old Federal Council of Churches, which was
now superseded."
"Most of the members of the Lay Committee came finally to the
realization that a wide chasm existed between the thinking of the
laity and the clergy and executives of the denominational bodies
which comprise the National Council."
"Thus, on June 30, 1955, the Lay Committee ceased to exist as
a committee of the General Board."
"The members of the Lay Committee believed, and so stated,
that the political adventures of the National Council in the
fields of economic and political controversy would seriously
hinder and not further Christian leadership in the pressing
fields of evangelism, fellowship, and education."
"It appears from the record that the National Council could
find no room for opposition to the philosophies and practices
carried over from the old Federal Council.  Lacking the patience
to resolve the basic problem, it has sought to bury it."
Thus ended, my friends, more than 20 years ago the last major
effort to deflect the Rockefeller-dominated National Council of
Churches away from its political programs and toward concern for
spiritual matters.  After more than four years of frustrating
effort, the National Lay Committee was dissolved.  This signaled
the end of any influence of the general church population of
America on the policies of the National Council of Churches.  The
National Council proceeded on its way, proclaiming to the public
that it represented 34,000,000 Protestants, while using this
power base to help undermine our free Republic.  The National
Council has done much to help dull and weaken the spirit of
millions of Americans, softening our approach in opposition to
Communism.  Let us hope and pray that in these dangerous days
they will at last see the light and begin to work at last to
build up the American spirit, instead of destroying it.
Topic #2--In monthly Audioletter No. 15 for August 1976, I
explained that the planting of short-range underwater-launch
nuclear missiles in our territorial waters was part of the Soviet
naval strategy for the United States and world conquest.  The
same continues to be the case now.  Admiral Gorshkoff, who has
commanded the Soviet navy for more than 20 years, has built it
into a fighting force that is radically different from any other
navy the world has ever seen; and as we near the very threshold
of war, it is no accident that the Rockefeller insider who now
heads the CIA is also an Admiral--4-star Admiral Stansfield
Turner.  The CIA has become the most powerful military
organization in the United States, and Nuclear War One will
revolve around naval strategy.  Both the importance of the Soviet
Navy and its great difference from our own United States Navy can
be illustrated by just one fact: When the supersonic Backfire
long-range bomber entered operational service in the Soviet Union
late in 1974, it did so simultaneously with the Soviet Navy as
well as with the Soviet Air Force.  This is like giving our own
new supersonic bomber, the B-1, to our Navy to fly--or, since we
still do not have the B-1 to counter the Soviet Backfire, having
our navy fly B-52s.  Of course our own navy does not fly
strategic bombers.  The United States Navy, like the British Navy
and most of the other great navies of history, has as one of its
primary missions the protection of our sea lanes of commerce--a
war which is basically defensive in nature.  Since World War II
our navy has also acquired offensive missions which have
gradually assumed greater importance, including the ability to
attack an enemy from the sea with the submarine-launched
ballistic missiles.  But the traditional defensive mission of
protecting our sea lanes can never be neglected.  Admiral
Gorshkoff, however, has been able to concentrate on building a
navy which is almost totally offensive in character.  Soviet
fishing trawlers, some of them genuine, roam the world; but the
Soviet Union does not depend for its survival on the sea nearly
as much as the United States.  So the Soviet Navy is designed
first and foremost for offensive operations; and this not only
includes the ability to interdict enemy sea lanes and attack
enemy naval forces at sea, it also includes an unprecedented
emphasis on projecting naval power ashore.  This in turn means
not only the ability to carry out amphibious assaults and
tactical bombardment, but strategic attack--a role we usually
tend to think of only in terms of the Soviet Air Force with its
ICBMs and bombers.
The new Soviet Navy of Admiral Gorshkoff also differs from
ours in another way.  Aside from missile submarines, the American
Navy is structured around the aircraft carrier; whereas the
Soviet Navy is built around the submarine.  American task forces
include all kinds of ships designed to coordinate with the needs
and capabilities of the aircraft carrier.  By the same token,
Soviet surface ships of all kinds are intended to support the
huge submarine force in various ways.  This applies even to the
new Soviet aircraft carriers which are now beginning to appear on
the scene since Soviet naval aviation is heavily oriented toward
anti-submarine warfare, although it has other capabilities as
well.  The relative naval capabilities of the Soviet Union and
the United States have never been considered in the Strategic
Arms Limitations Talks, the SALT talks, except with regard to
sea-launch ballistic missiles; and yet it is the coming naval
confrontation that could all by itself determine the outcome of
Nuclear War One.  It is often forgotten, for example, that the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is primarily a naval
alliance.  We hear frequently about NATO in the controlled major
media of the United States as though the only problems were Army
problems--such as rusty tanks and lack of spare parts; and when
the Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, who is presently General
Alexander Haig, is mentioned in the news, he is often called the
head of NATO, or some such, but actually he's only one of three
co-equal Commanders in NATO.  The other two are Naval
Commanders--they are the Commander-in-Chief, Channel Command; and
the Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantic, the latter based at
Norfolk, Va.  NATO depends for its very life on its naval
strength, including the ability to keep open the vital North
Atlantic sea lanes.  But now, Soviet naval Backfire bombers with
air-to-surface, anti-ship missiles threaten to cut those North
Atlantic sea lanes in time of war; and the Mediterranean, which
was once dominated by the United States Navy, is now heavily
populated by the Soviet Navy as well.  While the Soviet Navy has
undergone explosive growth over the past decade to the formidable
armed force that it is today, the United States Navy has been
allowed to shrink to half its former size with more and more
ships aging and obsolescent.  When the Arab oil is cut off by war
soon, Europe will have to fall back on its meager reserves, which
will run out within 60 to 90 days.  Interdiction of NATO sea
lanes at that point by the Soviet Union could cause all of Europe
to fall like a plum into Soviet hands.  This is especially true
in light of the short-range Soviet underwater missiles in
European territorial waters, which I mentioned in Audioletter No.
22 last month.  So far only Great Britain shows signs of being
able to withstand such a course of events.  As I mentioned last
month, the British government had requested the latest missile
coordinates from me, and I had supplied them.  Of the 29 Soviet
missiles around the British Isles at that time, all but one had
been removed by the Royal Navy as of April 18--6 days ago. 
However, I have been informed of 3 newly planted missiles there,
and I have relayed these to the British for action.  Great
Britain also may have the benefit of her new North Sea oil fields
which, barring sabotage or the like, should make Britain
independent of foreign oil producers in the near future.
Since I spoke to you last, action has been taken in another
area also.  Acting on information which I relayed, of the 8
missiles around southern Africa, seven have now been taken up. 
At last report, however, the missile lying off Mozambique
targeted on Rhodesia was still in place.  Such removals of
missiles are better than no action at all, but they are still no
more than holding actions.  What is needed, if war is to be
prevented, is for this deadly cat-and-mouse game to be stopped
altogether by revealing to the whole world what the Soviet Navy
is up to.  Late last September, as I revealed in monthly
Audioletter No. 16, the United States had a golden opportunity to
do just that, and to do so while the Soviet underwater missile
threat was only a small fraction of what it is now.  At that
time, a Soviet missile-laying mini-sub equipped with
sonar-defeating design features entered Chesapeake Bay and became
trapped there, due to a malfunction that ultimately killed the
crew.  It was a perfect opportunity for the United States to pick
up the sub, display it on television world-wide by satellite, and
tell the Soviet Union that the jig was up; but instead, as I
revealed in Audioletter No. 17 the following month, the Red
Friday agreement on October 1, 1976 reinstated a strained
alliance between the Rockefellers and the Soviets, and the Soviet
Navy was allowed to enter Chesapeake Bay under cover of darkness
and recover the mini-sub.  But now, a similar opportunity exists
once again--not in American waters but in those of Norway.  In
March 1977 a Soviet submarine entered the fjord of Folda on the
north coast of Norway.  The Norwegians detected its presence and
sealed off the exit to wait for the sub to surface.  On April 4,
1977, the story was broken in European press, although the
location was not mentioned.  To my knowledge, however, it has
received no mention anywhere in the United States.  I strongly
suggest to the Norwegian government that before the Soviet
submarine be allowed to escape, a search be made at the
navigational coordinates 64 35' 23" north, 10 23' 14" east.  This
location is not far from where the Soviet submarine is trapped
and is the site of one of the seven Soviet underwater missiles
that have been planted recently in Norwegian waters.  Should the
government of Norway so request, I will naturally provide the
other locations as well, through proper channels.
As for the United States, there continues to be no effort at
all to clear our waters of the Soviet nuclear weapons which
threaten our country.  As of my latest report a few days ago, not
one of the 158 Soviet missiles and hydrogen bombs lurking in our
territorial waters has been removed, and I have not been
approached in any way by the United States government with
requests for their locations.  Meanwhile the Soviet plutonium
cloud attacks on the United States are still continuing by means
of the new canisters which are being deployed close to shore
along the West Coast, which I mentioned last month.  Of the 16
canisters which were deployed at the time I recorded Audioletter
No. 22 last month, 11 had been discharged as of April 15, but by
then there were 17 new ones.  At last report, these canisters are
being deployed along the entire West Coast from San Diego to
Seattle.  These are extremely easy and simple to deploy--for
example, they are dropped from aircraft flying under our radar
like the Soviet Bear bombers that we were told about by news
reports the other day.  They are also planted by Soviet trawlers,
since they are allowed to enter our new 200-mile fishing zone to
catch certain fish there.  The fact that this is being done was
proven by the arrested Soviet trawler Taras Shevchenko which was
carrying plutonium canisters in a compartment near the stern of
the ship.
Thus the maneuvering in preparation for Nuclear War One
continues with a strong naval emphasis.  At one level,
Rockefeller agents in America appear to continue to cooperate in
the joint plan of conquest with the Soviets; but on the real
level the Soviets and the Rockefellers are both jockeying for a
decisive knock-out blow.  In this, time is on the side of the
Soviet Union, so they're trying to delay war slightly while the
Rockefeller brothers are trying to hurry it up; and to condition
us all for it, the Carter Administration is flexing its muscles
to show us how strong it is when it comes to the Soviets.  In
short order it has forcefully espoused Human Rights, handed the
Soviets an ultimatum on SALT talks, seized Soviet fishing
trawlers, chased Soviet Bear long-range turbo-prop bombers away
from the southeast coast of our country--and what's next?  A
photo of a Soviet submarine in our waters?  Already the
Rockefeller position has decayed further in the past several
months because of the further deterioration of their CIA undersea
super-missiles in the Atlantic and Pacific.  Of the fleet of 14
such missiles which I described in Audioletter No. 20, January
1977, all 5 in the Pacific have now sprung leaks and are no
longer usable.  Of the 9 in the Atlantic, 4 have now
failed--missiles #4, 6, 7, and 8.  That leaves only 5 of the
original fleet of 14 CIA missiles still available for Rockefeller
threats against their Soviet partners.  Meanwhile the Soviet
short-range missiles in our waters in the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico are now being used by the Soviets
to further weaken our position as a nation.
But, my friends, that's not all.  For the very first time
Soviet missiles have now been planted in the Great Lakes.  From
there they now threaten Chicago, Racine, Milwaukee, Cleveland,
Bay City, Erie, Buffalo, Rochester, and other cities of our
industrial heartland.  At present there are exactly 50 such
missiles in the Great Lakes.  These, however, are single warhead,
short-range missiles, and are even smaller in size than the
multiple warhead missiles that have been planted along our East,
West, and Gulf Coasts.  As if this were not enough, I have just
been alerted that Soviet agents are now fanning out across
America planting small hydrogen bombs in selected inland lakes. 
The primary targets here are major dams, but some other targets
are also involved.  Since the Federal government refuses to take
action, it's imperative that State governments--especially those
in the West--take action now to protect their citizens.  Security
patrols around major dams and lakes should be beefed up
immediately and placed on full alert.  In addition, search
operations must be performed to locate those bombs that have
already been planted so that they can be removed.  Already,
Soviet underwater nuclear devices have been planted in 21 places
within the United States, and more are being planted.  Nineteen
(19) of the targets are dams, the other 2 are cities.  CALIFORNIA
has 4--Oroville Dam north of Sacramento, Castaic Dam north of Los
Angeles, Shasta Dam in north California, and Otay Reservoir Dam
near San Diego.  ARIZONA also has 4 bombs--Glen Canyon Dam,
Coolidge Dam, Theodore Roosevelt Dam, and Lake Pleasant Dam near
Phoenix.  NEW MEXICO has 3--the Navajo Dam, Blue Mesa Dam, and
Alfa Butte Dam.  MONTANA has 3--Fort Peck Dam, Yellow Tail Dam,
and Hungry Horse Dam.  NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA,
NEVADA, and WASHINGTON STATE so far have 1 bomb each, threatening
dams which are among the world's largest--these are respectively
Garrison Dam, Oahe Dam, Fort Randall Dam, Hoover Dam, and Grand
Coulee Dam.  IDAHO has 2 bombs, both threatening towns--one is in
the north end of Cour d'Alene Lake, threatening the town of that
name; the other is in the north end of Lake Pend Oreille near the
town of Sandpoint.  My friends, this would not have been possible
had it not been for the destruction of the FBI beginning with the
murder of J. Edgar Hoover.  God help us all.
Topic #3--With our military situation so serious, one would
naturally expect someone to come forward to take action against
the Soviet underwater missiles.  For example, General George S.
Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, brought about the
removal of many of these ocean and gulf missiles during August
and September 1976.  But where is he now?!!  My friends, here is
what has happened to General Brown.  No matter how much the
tactics of public manipulation change and shift, some things
never change.  I mentioned several months ago in connection with
the disgraceful Sputnik One episode that nowadays accolades and
awards go to the spoilers and traitors in our midst, while the
true heroes who dare to raise their heads are beaten down,
suppressed, and forgotten.  Today there is no more grim testimony
to this fact than the current predicament of General George S.
Brown.
As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Brown is
the top military officer in the United States, and therefore in
some respects in the entire free world.  As I revealed in detail
in monthly Audioletter No. 16 for September 1976, it was he,
General Brown, who more than any other person in the United
States government, prevented a surprise Soviet nuclear attack on
America during August and September 1976.  Under extremely
adverse conditions, he obtained the go-ahead to remove Soviet
underwater missiles and hydrogen bombs then planted in our own
territorial waters and then ordered the United States Navy to do
the job, which it did quickly.  And on September 16, 1976, I met
for over an hour with General Brown in his office at the Pentagon
to discuss the continuing Soviet underwater missile crisis and to
relay new information to him which had been prevented from
reaching him through normal channels.  In meeting with me,
General Brown was accepting terrible personal risks, and he knew
it.  He had overruled his entire staff in order to meet with me,
and the meeting itself was completely free of interruptions of
any kind.  Nor was there any cut-off due to time; the meeting
simply continued without pressure until we finished the business
at hand.  Then I left, along with an associate who had
accompanied me to the meeting as a witness.  We drove away from
the Pentagon that day in a driving rainstorm; but the brave
patriot whose office we had just left now faced a far worse
personal storm--thanks to his efforts on our nation's behalf.  I
warned my listeners about this in monthly Audioletter No. 16 last
September, and asked that everyone strengthen his hand by
expressing their support for him.
General Brown, alone among the top echelons of the United
States government, had stood by us and had saved millions of our
lives in the process.  Now he was depending on us to stand by him
in his continuing efforts to carry out his Constitutional duties
to the letter.  Some of us did so, my friends, but far too many
of us did not.  During August and early September 1976, the Joint
Chiefs of Staff were flooded with demands for action against the
Soviet underwater missiles; but after that action was taken,
there was no such massive outpouring of thanks for General
Brown's crucial leadership or support for the continued positive
efforts needed to save our country.  Far too many of us forget
that it is not enough just to complain about what is wrong; we
must also actively support that which is right, or it will wither
and die.  After the crucial actions taken under General Brown's
leadership late last summer, far too many of us just relaxed and
went back to sleep, leaving General Brown to fend for himself.
Now I must tell you what has happened to General Brown as a
result.  For many months now I have been cut off from direct
contact with General Brown; and in recent months General Brown
has seemed like a completely different person than in the past
whenever he appears in public.  In place of the outgoing
personality which has been General Brown's trademark in the past,
there is nothing but resignation and acceptance of the dictates
of his civilian superiors.  The change has been so dramatic that
it has even been commented upon by syndicated columnists, who are
mystified.  What has happened to General Brown, my friends, is
known to very few.  I myself have been able to confirm it only
within the past few days.  General George S. Brown, the nation's
top military officer, is now virtually under house arrest.  This
is exactly the same kind of confinement that was meted out, for
example, to Army Lieutenant William Calley during his court
martial for the My Lai massacre in Vietnam.  But there are two
differences in General Brown's case.  First, there has been no
court martial.  Instead, he is living under the threat of a court
martial, for its twisted evidence and perjuring witnesses have
already been assembled.  Second, General Brown's isolation at the
Pentagon and confinement to his Fort Myer residence are not
absolute.  Instead, they are interspersed with very carefully
controlled appearances at official functions, since his absence
from these would quickly arouse suspicions that something was
terribly wrong.  Now, should General Brown attempt again to step
out of line and defy those in high places by giving orders to
remove the missiles, doing his Constitutional duty, the suspended
threat of court martial would instantly come crashing down upon
him.  By means of the elaborately doctored and falsified evidence
I've already mentioned, General Brown would be railroaded into
certain conviction for treason for doing his duty.  Already
alleged statements by General Brown have been published recently
to make him appear to be a dangerous man.  Were General Brown to
be courtmartialed with falsified evidence, it would destroy him
personally.  It would also prevent his efforts from producing any
benefits to America--such as a resumption of the removal of
Soviet nuclear missiles from our waters.  Any such orders of his
would be rescinded; and his courtmartial would be used to make
any attempts by him to warn America useless, by destroying his
credibility.
As long ago as October, 1976, just a month after my meeting
with him, General Brown was given a powerful demonstration of the
ability of his enemies to crucify him publicly.  As I discussed
that month in Audioletter No. 17, a six-month old interview of
General Brown was dredged up and used to subject him to intense
public embarrassment and criticism.  A few alleged statements of
his from the interview were made public and played up by the
controlled major media to such an extent that he was forced to
make a public apology on nationwide television.  Can you imagine? 
All of that for a few relatively insignificant comments which, if
he really made them at all, had attracted no attention six months
earlier.  This episode had just one purpose--to prove to General
Brown that if the falsified charges of treason should ever be
leveled at him, he would have no chance at all either to defend
himself or to do a service to America.  His only recourse now
would be to himself publicly demand a court-martial, but even
that would not be successful without a massive outpouring of
public support for him ahead of time--and that, my friends, has
so far been denied him to the everlasting shame of our entire
nation.  Should General Brown come to any physical harm, the
responsibility for it will rest squarely on the shoulders of
David, Nelson, Laurance, and John D. Rockefeller III; but
meanwhile, he's a secret captive, keeping millions of Americans
reassured that all is well merely by his presence on the scene. 
Whenever a public or official appearance or statement by General
Brown is called for, it's arranged and carried out under the
watchful eyes of a heavy escort, although this is not always
apparent.  Otherwise the openness, the accessibility, and warmth
that has always distinguished General Brown among newspaper
reporters is now gone.  He's a virtual prisoner at the Pentagon,
held practically incommunicado except for the carefully
controlled communications and appearances I have already
mentioned.  As soon as this Audioletter is released, you can
expect to see things happen that may seem to disprove what I am
telling you--for example, General Brown may become more visible
publicly for a while.  It is even conceivable, though highly
unlikely, that this might even be carried to the point of having
General Brown publicly deny that he has come under any new
restrictions in recent months as the result, say, of the
unfavorable publicity he received some months ago.  Should that
happen, keep in mind that General Brown is now a prisoner of war,
imprisoned by the enemies within our own midst; and we've already
seen many examples of the kinds of things American prisoners of
war are forced to say for propaganda purposes.
Yes, my friends, General Brown stood up for all of us only to
have too many of us let him down by failing to follow through
with our thanks and our overwhelming support; but there is one
way that we can still keep General Brown's great personal
sacrifice on our behalf from being in vain, and that is for us,
each and every one of us as individuals, to begin right now to do
whatever we can to save our beloved country.  My friends, there's
no vacation from reality.  It's up to you to do what you
can--there's no one else; and even though you may not be able to
do more than write a letter or two, do it.  You never know how
far your few words may spread.  They may pass from one person to
another, finally reaching the ear of someone you don't even know,
someone with far more resources than you have who may play a
vital role in saving our nation, yet who may never hear and never
act if you fail to do your part.  If all you have to offer is 5
loaves and 2 fishes, offer it; you just might be amazed at the
results.
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter.  Thank you,
and may God bless each and every one of you.
Source

DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #22

Audio letter No. 22

mp3 part 01

mp3 part 02

Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net
"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording.  Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This recording is a product of AUDIO BOOKS INC.  (1980 current
address: 1629 K St., NW, Washington, D.C.  20006.)
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter.  Today is March 27, 1977,
and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 22.
Few things are certain in life, but one thing we can depend
upon is that things are always changing.  Today a flower blooms
in all its glory; tomorrow it will be withered and forgotten,
leaving behind only a beautiful memory.  Today a child at play
scrapes a knee, and the whole world revolves around a mother's
tender care.  Tomorrow the knee will be healed, leaving behind
only a lesson of caution and comfort.  Today you and I pass
through this world for a little while; tomorrow we will not be
seen, leaving behind only the legacy of our choices for good or
evil.
Last month in AUDIO LETTER No. 21 I alerted you to the
possibility that we may have already failed in our efforts to
prevent NUCLEAR WAR ONE, which is drawing closer by the day.  My
question is not "Can the war be stopped?" but "Will it be
stopped?"  There is nothing in this whole world that would please
me so much as to be able to tell you: "Good news.  We have
prevented the war.  We have won."  And when I recorded monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 16 on September 25, 1976, it seemed as though I
might soon be able to give you such good news.  Public reaction
to my AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 14 and 15 for July and August 1976 had
thwarted an attempted Soviet double-cross of the Rockefellers by
means of underwater missiles along our coast lines, and it had
produced a direct meeting between General George S. Brown,
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and myself.  But then came
the terrible reversals for America that I revealed the following
month in AUDIO LETTER No. 17; and far too many of those who had
pressed the government for action during August 1976 failed to
follow through and support General Brown in his efforts to
continue to protect our beloved country.  Now, as a result, we
have lost General Brown as an effective force for good.
Now the job of stopping NUCLEAR WAR I is even harder.  It can
still be done, but WILL WE DO IT?  My deep hope is still that the
answer is YES, otherwise I would not be speaking these words.  I
am doing all in my power to bring the truth to you.  So long as I
continue to have access to vital information that bears on your
life and your well-being, I will feel a deep responsibility to
communicate it to you, but then it becomes your responsibility to
choose what you will do about it.
I have made many suggestions of things you might do to help
save our country.  ln December 1975 I even recorded an entire
tape devoted to nothing else, entitled "WHAT WE CAN DO TO SAVE
AMERICA"; but all I can hope to do is open your mind as to what
you, as an individual, can do.  In this great nation of some
215,000,000 individuals, every person is different.  No two of us
have the same set of abilities, the same opportunities, or the
same avenues for possible action.  There is no way that I, just
one person, even with the help of my associates and information
sources, can provide a simple, cut-and-dried prescription for
what to do; but I am convinced that scattered throughout America
is all of the knowledge, all of the ability to organize, and all
the resources necessary to save our beloved land IF WE WILL BUT
DO IT.
My three topics for today are:
Topic #1--HOW CIRCUMSTANCES ARE PROVING THE ROCKEFELLER-SOVIET
PLANS TO DESTROY AMERICA
Topic #2--PRESIDENT CARTER'S EFFORTS TO HURRY UP NUCLEAR WAR ONE
Topic #3--HOW THE CHURCH IS BEING USED.
Topic #1--For over four years now I have been trying by every
means at my disposal to alert the American people to the progress
of far-advanced plans to destroy our beloved country as we know
it.  We are seeing the final stages of a plan to create a
world-wide dictatorship acted out before our very eyes with
ourselves ensnared as the victims.  This commitment for a
ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT under the control of a super wealthy elite
was set in motion in the early years of the 20th Century, using a
small group of powerful tax-exempt Foundations to coordinate and
direct the program.  This program of conquest long ago became so
massive, so powerful, and so complex that the average citizen had
no hope of grasping what was really going on.  And the ONE WORLD
plans were and are so evil that the normal person simply cannot
believe they are real without overwhelming proof.
But how are things like this proven?  Such a long-range
commitment is a sophisticated form of conspiracy; so, how are
conspiracies exposed and proven?  Well known in legal circles,
and especially in the United States Department of Justice, are
the words of Special Judge Advocate John A. Bingham during the
trial of the conspirators involved in Abraham Lincoln's
assassination.  This trial took place in Washington, D.C. in
1865.  Listen to Judge Bingham's words, and I quote:
"A conspiracy is rarely if ever proven by positive testimony. 
When a crime of high magnitude is about to be perpetrated by a
combination of individuals, they do not act openly, but covertly
and secretly.  The purpose formed is known only to those who
enter into it.  Unless one of the conspirators betrays his
companions and gives evidence against them, their guilt can be
proved only by circumstantial evidence.  It is said by some
writers on evidence that circumstances are stronger than positive
proof.  A witness swearing positively, it is said, may
misapprehend the facts or swear falsely, but that circumstances
cannot lie."
Judge Bingham's words may come as a surprise to you if you're not
a lawyer.  Contrary to the impression you may have received from
fictional detective stories, circumstantial evidence can be very
powerful indeed and has decided the outcome of vast numbers of
court cases.
Furthermore, it is the incriminating power of circumstances
that makes any conspiracy most vulnerable to just one
thing--exposure.  If the plans of even the most powerful of
conspirators are made public and put on record before the plans
are executed, often the plans have to be abandoned; because even
if the conspirators succeed in carrying out their plans without
being caught in the act, the circumstances that result from their
criminal actions cannot be hidden, and the advance exposure of
their plan then causes the finger of guilt to point straight at
the conspirators.
This is the principle I invoke every time I publicly reveal
anything about the plans or actions of those who are conspiring
to destroy America.  As I have always tried to make clear, my
purpose in exposing these criminal plans is to prevent them from
being carried out.  In this way I share a common goal with my
associates and the many sources who provide me with vital
confidential information.  The best achievements of Intelligence
gathering, like diplomacy, often lie in what did not happen--the
crisis quietly deflected.  And our efforts up to now have been
partially successful in that regard.
But the commitment for world domination that was forged over
two generations ago has grown into an incredible monster with
countless tentacles and tremendous momentum.  As a result, the
four Rockefeller Brothers and their co-conspirators have found it
impossible to completely cover their tracks even though many
modifications in their detailed plans have been made.  So a brief
review of the circumstances that have been developing around us
over the past years is very, very revealing.
First: Consider Nelson Rockefeller's unsuccessful attempt so
far to become our unelected President and Dictator by way of his
25th Amendment to the United States Constitution.  On October 11,
1974, I recorded my first AUDIO BOOK talking tape entitled: "HOW
TO PROTECT YOURSELF DURING THE COMING DEPRESSION AND THIRD WORLD
WAR."  At that time Rockefeller still had two months to go being
confirmed as Vice-President; but I revealed that if confirmed,
Rockefeller intended to become President by June 1975.  In June
1975 during a trip to Europe, President Ford suddenly began
taking serious falls--once down an aircraft ramp, and persons
close to him said he also looked pale and unsteady.  The public
was quickly fed stories about the trouble being an old knee
injury from football, even though Ford's doctor stated flatly
that his falls had nothing to do with his knees.
The following month in AUDIO LETTER No. 2 I relayed
information that I had been given to the effect that Ford's
troubles had been caused by a powerful virus of unknown origin
which had been arrested successfully.
The next month I revealed in lectures and also in AUDIO BOOK
Special Tape No. 1 that by September or thereabouts we should
know whether Nelson Rockefeller was to be stopped in his drive to
seize the presidency.  And on September 5, 1975, an alleged
attempt on Ford's life was made by Lynette Fromme; but as I
warned in AUDIO LETTER No. 4 that month, this was only a dress
rehearsal intended to frighten Ford into resigning.  But Ford
refused to resign, and on September 22, 1975, a real attempt on
Ford's life took place.  During a visit to San Francisco, Ford
became the target of Sara Jane Moore, and it truly was only by
the grace of God that he escaped injury.  It had been planned for
Ford when he came out of the St. Francis Hotel to cross the
street and shake hands with people in the crowd.  And there
waited Sara Jane Moore, standing exactly where Ford was supposed
to enter the crowd, armed with a pistol she had bought with a
Treasury agent by her side the previous day, and with her mind
programmed for assassination by electronic programming
techniques!  But at the last moment the assassination plan fell
apart.  A Secret Service agent told the President not to cross
the street, so he headed straight for his limousine.  At that,
Sara Jane Moore raised her gun to fire across the street at Ford,
but her shot was deflected by another onlooker--a Vietnam veteran
in a wheel chair.
As it turned out, this was indeed the real turning point in
Nelson Rockefeller's hopes for succeeding Jerry Ford as
President.  He ran through a series of additional back-up plans,
all of which my sources enabled me to reveal in advance in my
monthly AUDIO LETTERS--and he failed for the time being.  But he
recently whispered to reporters as he left a White House Award
ceremony, "I'll be back."
And then there is Fort Knox.  I recorded my first AUDIO BOOK
tape in October 1974 less than three weeks after the so-called
Gold Inspection Visit to Fort Knox by 6 Congressmen, a Senator,
and about a hundred newsmen.  Here was a perfect example of a
case in which the true circumstances alone--namely, the absence
of the huge hoard of gold shown on Treasury and Federal Reserve
books--would have been sufficient all by themselves to prove the
existence of a tremendous financial conspiracy.  Therefore great
care was taken by the Treasury Department to prevent these
circumstances from being detected.  Instead of an objective,
honest inspection of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox by
independent gold experts, the Treasury substituted a public
relations peep show involving people who had no way of knowing
what they should look for.  And while the public was loudly
promised an independent audit by the General Accounting Office of
Congress, the actual so-called Audit Committee consisted almost
entirely of Treasury personnel; and the tiny Audit Report that
was finally issued several months late presented no findings of
fact, concluding only, quote: "We believe" the gold is there!
My associates and I have amassed mountains of evidence in
connection with the FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL.  This twin scandal
involves not only the theft of America's monetary gold supply but
also the storage of leaking canisters of CIA super poison
processed from radioactive Plutonium 239.  From time to time I
have made portions of this evidence public, such as in monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for July 1975.  In that tape I was able to
reveal the sworn statement of former Congressman Frank Chelf
attesting to the constant flow of gold out of Fort Knox during
the mid 60's and the unsatisfactory answers he received from the
Treasury and the White House about what was going on.  I also
revealed that the official listing of gold shipments from Fort
Knox omits major shipments.  One example of which we had
photographs took place on January 20, 1965; and in response to
such a specific challenge, the Mint admitted the shipment had
taken place.
But the most important item about Fort Knox that was revealed
in AUDIO LETTER No. 2 was the secret "Central Core Vault"--a huge
central gold storage vault whose existence was not revealed to
the September 1974 visitors and was later denied in writing by
then Treasury Secretary William Simon--another interesting
circumstance because the Central Core Vault was described and
confirmed for us and for Congressman Otis Pike by a former
Commanding Officer of Fort Knox, General John L. Ryan, Jr.  Both
Simon's lie and General Ryan's confirmation are quoted in monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 8, January 1976.  The Central Core Vault is the
key to the whole Fort Knox Scandal.
The joint Rockefeller-Soviet program to conquer the world is
so all-encompassing that many other aspects of it have been
discussed too in the monthly AUDIO LETTER.  But the most
overriding issue of all now is the rapid approach of NUCLEAR WAR
ONE on American soil.  In my very first tape recorded in October
1974 I explained the basic purposes for which the Rockefeller
Brothers were betraying America into nuclear war.  I also
revealed the target schedule for the war to begin--mid 1977 to
mid 1978.  Today some of the details of the war plan have
changed, and the economic and political scenarios being planned
by the Rockefellers at that time, while still on track, are
behind schedule.  But of all Rockefeller plans, the one for
nuclear war on America is most crucial and, as of now, the time
schedule for war is still practically unchanged.  For reasons I
will explain in Topic #2, the Rockefeller Brothers are straining
all their resources to prevent a slippage in the timing of the
war.
In July 1975, Indira Gandhi clamped down on her own India in a
manner that stunned the world.  She was condemned most bitterly
of all by the Government of the United States!!  The following
month in AUDIO LETTER No. 3 I told you what had actually happened
in India.  Despite all appearances, Indira Gandhi was trying to
save India's freedom--not destroy it.  What she had done was to
smash a CIA project that had been under way for five years to
take over India.  In the same tape I went on to reveal that the
joint Rockefeller plans for war were being revised on India's
account.  The plan for nuclear war on American soil was put back
on a back burner until India could be taken over by war in Asia. 
The target date for India to be attacked under the revised war
plan was March 1977, this month.
I also told you, quote:
"The new plans do not involve hostilities on American soil as
they stand right now.  Keep in mind though that further changes
can and probably will occur.  In particular, should Indira Gandhi
be toppled from power any time soon, it may well enable the CIA
to put the original takeover plans back on track, and that would
restore the original plan for war on the United States."
When I revealed these things 19 months ago, they probably
seemed remote and improbable to you; but by relaxing the
Emergency control she had imposed and holding election on March
21, six days ago, she lost--tragically for not only India but
America as well.  Once again things are not what they seem to be. 
The CIA succeeded in toppling Indira Gandhi by subverting the
free election she wanted for her people--and did so this very
month, March 1977.  This was the original target date for war on
India in the plans I revealed 19 months ago.
With India taken care of, neutralized for the moment, NUCLEAR
WAR ONE on American soil no longer faces any delay on India's
account.  In monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 for November 1975, I
revealed the grand strategy for the huge Asian war that was to
precede nuclear war on America.  It called for hostilities to
begin in the Middle East with a severe provocation arranged to
justify a limited nuclear strike from the Sinai Desert at
Arab-OPEC oil wells.  This cut-off of oil supplies would cripple
the heart of Europe and Africa, disable Japan, and force
dictatorial measures such as gas rationing and other measures on
the American people by Executive Orders with all of these being
brought about more completely under the domination of the
Rockefeller-Soviet alliance.
But now, India has been rendered easy prey for a complete
takeover and has therefore dropped in priority.  The war in the
Middle East has been delayed several times.  The most decisive
failure in this regard occurred late in December 1975 when OPEC
oil ministers were kidnapped in Vienna by terrorists in the pay
of the CIA.  Several were supposed to be killed, inflaming
passions and leading to war, but the job was botched and they all
escaped with their lives.  This caused a tremendous slippage in
the plans for war and conquest; and for bungling this top
priority assignment, the CIA station Chief in Athens, Richard
Welch, was executed by the CIA itself, as I revealed in monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 8 for January 1976.
In that same tape I publicly revealed the super secret White
House Merge Directive.  This Directive requires that life in the
United States be so altered that it can be comfortably merged
with life in the Soviet Union, and it has been in existence since
the days of Stalin!  Such a way of life is totally alien to
America; but today, under the puppetized administration of Jimmy
Carter, the federal government is now openly run by aliens with
alien philosophies.  Our life is being merged with that of the
Soviet Union.  Even so, the greed and lust for power that
motivates both the Rulers of the Soviet Union and the real Rulers
of America today knows no bounds.  And as early as November 1975
in AUDIO LETTER No. 6, I began warning of the threat of a Soviet
double-cross of the Rockefellers and their Corporate Socialist
intimates here in America.  By the spring of 1976 I reported that
certain Trustees of the Rockefeller-controlled major Foundations
were increasingly concerned that such a double-cross was brewing. 
But not so the Rockefeller Brothers and their closest
collaborators, because they have more faith in the Soviet Union
than they do in America.
Last summer, of course, the Soviet double-cross actually
began.  First, as I reported in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 13 for
June 1976, I received Intelligence information that a nuclear
weapon had been planted at Seal Harbor, Maine, between the summer
homes of David and Nelson Rockefeller.  Soon afterwards I was
notified that the Soviet Union was planting short-range nuclear
missiles within our own territorial waters ready for launch from
undersea resting places upon remote control.  We were in danger
of an immediate Soviet nuclear surprise attack, not only here but
world-wide, that would destroy all effective naval opposition to
the Soviet Union and thereby guarantee Soviet victory.  Thanks to
the Intelligence gap created by Henry Kissinger as Secretary of
State, the information reaching me about the missiles was not
reaching the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  Intelligence sources
informed me that the only way action could be brought about to
save the situation was by making it a public issue, so that is
what I did by means of AUDIO LETTERS 14 and 15 last summer--and
it worked as I recounted for you in AUDIO LETTER No. 16 for
September 1976.
But the four Rockefeller Brothers long ago passed the point of
No Return.  In spite of what has happened last summer, they are
continuing with the joint program of conquest with the Soviet
Union, trying to convince themselves that their long-time
alliance is back on track.  But at the same time they are trying
to hurry up NUCLEAR WAR ONE because in the Soviet-Rockefeller
rivalry, time is now on the side of the Soviets.
My friends, we are now surrounded by circumstances that prove
the existence of a grand conspiracy to rob us of our freedom and
even our very lives.  It is up to each one of us to open our eyes
and see these circumstances for what they really are before it is
too late.
Topic #2--Last month in AUDIO LETTER No. 21 I explained what the
words "NATIONAL SECURITY" really mean to those who control
America's government today.  To them National Security begins and
ends with the protection and the advancement of our unelected
Rulers themselves--not you and me.  Nowhere is this more vividly
proven than in the realm of war.  We are taxed to the breaking
point in order to support so-called National Security.  But when
in this Century has all of this prevented a war?  And for all our
vaunted Intelligence gathering and Early Warning Systems, when
have you and I ever benefitted by being warned in advance of an
imminent conflict by the Government?
It has been proven beyond question, not only by circumstantial
evidence but by documentary evidence as well, that every single
major conflict in the 20th Century involving America has been
known about, in advance, by our Rulers.  But this advance
knowledge has never been communicated to us, the nation at large,
except once.  In 1962 President John F. Kennedy did notify
America of the warnings he had obtained of the imminent Cuban
missile threat.  It was a frightening experience for us all, but
the result was that a successful Soviet surprise attack was
rendered impossible.  Barely a year later, Jack Kennedy died at
the hands of the CIA for ruining this Rockefeller-Soviet gamble
by acting in the interest of true national security--our
security.  But in the cases of two World Wars, Korea, and
Vietnam, a different pattern has consistently applied.
In 1916 Woodrow Wilson, the first American president to be a
total puppet of the Rockefeller empire, narrowly achieved
re-election with the peace-oriented slogan, "He kept us out of
war."  Meanwhile he was rapidly maneuvering America into war. 
Five months after his re-election on April 6, 1917, America
declared war on Germany, and soon American doughboys were off to
fight "The War to End All Wars."  There thousands died in
trenches while Trustees of the "Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace" encouraged Wilson to extend the war because
of the desirable changes it was producing in American lives!
In 1940 with Europe once again aflame with war, President
Franklin D. Roosevelt, like Wilson before him, appealed to peace
sentiment in order to be re-elected.  Even now, my friends, I can
still hear those campaign words of F.D.R. ringing in my ears, and
I quote:
"And while I am talking to you mothers and fathers, I give you
one more assurance.  I have said this before but I shall say it
again, and again, and again: 'Your boys are not going to be sent
into any foreign wars.'"
But even as he won an unprecedented third term in this way,
F.D.R. was moving the United States rapidly toward war.  On May
27, 1941, only six months after his re-election and with Pearl
Harbor still six months in the future, F.D.R. proclaimed an
"UNLIMITED NATIONAL EMERGENCY" to get ready for war!  In the
ensuing months everything possible was done to provoke a Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor; and when this attack was known to be
imminent, most of the United States Pacific fleet was
conveniently bottled up in Pearl Harbor as a tempting target. 
Only our Aircraft Carriers were kept far away from danger, since
they would be indispensable for retaliation against Japan.
Certain officials in the American government knew well in
advance that war with Japan was coming.  Proof of this can be
found in many places today, some of them quite unexpected.  One
example is the autobiography of the Rt. Reverend Edward Randolph
Welles II published by Learning, Inc., Manset, Maine  04656.  The
book entitled "THE HAPPY DISCIPLE" is not basically about
politics or economics at all but about the career and life of an
Episcopal minister.  But it so happens that in the fall of 1941,
Bishop Welles was the rector of Christ Church in Alexandria,
Virginia, the church of George Washington.  And on page 62 one
reads the following, and I quote:
"Another of my friends was Norman H. Davis, President of the
American Red Cross, who was elected to our parish vestry.  He was
very close to President Franklin D. Roosevelt and saw him
frequently.  On November 6, 1941, I had lunch with Mr. Davis in
Washington and learned of the approaching war with Japan which
would begin within five weeks.  I was shaken, and asked Mr. Davis
to urge the President to appoint a national day of prayer, and
handed Mr. Davis a letter I had written to President Roosevelt on
the subject.  Mr. Davis did hand my letter to the President, who
did appoint the following New Year's Day as a 'National Day of
Prayer.'
I was so moved by the luncheon revelations that later that
very day I sent our mimeographed postal cards to the congregation
stating:
'The rector is preaching a sermon at 11:00 A.M. service on
Sunday, November 9, which he feels is sufficiently important to
call to your attention.  The sermon will assess the desperate
situation that confronts America this Armistice Day, and suggests
basic Christian attitudes and actions.'
On Sunday in the course of that sermon I said:
'Few people realize how great is the possibility that we
shall actually be at war with Japan within thirty days.'
The congregation was deeply shocked; and in response to many
requests, my booklet of sermons was reprinted with this sermon
added.  Twenty-eight days after that sermon came, December 7, the
Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and the war was on."
(End of quotation from Bishop Welles' autobiography.)
Bishop Welles, of course, had no way of knowing that President
Roosevelt's advance knowledge of the impending Japanese attack
was due to conspiracy to bring about that attack, but he did know
that people should be warned about it--and he did just that.  The
federal government, of course, could have warned all of America
of the impending Japanese attack, but then the attack would never
have taken place.  And F.D.R., doing the bidding of the
Rockefellers and their allies, wanted the attack to take place so
that America would go to war!
In the two-volume AUDIO BOOK talking tape I recorded a year
ago with Colonel Curtis B. Dall, the detailed story of Pearl
Harbor is told by Colonel Dall--and Colonel Dall, who was the
son-in-law and close friend of F.D.R., knows what he is talking
about.
Next came Korea.  On June 21, 1950, Assistant Secretary of
State Dean Rusk testified before Congress to the effect that
there was no indication of any impending North Korean attack on
South Korea.  Several days later John Foster Dulles went to
Seoul, South Korea, to give reassurances that there was no danger
of invasion from the north.  Then he left quickly because the
North Korean invasion was already being launched!
As for us, the American people, another nasty surprise. 
Vietnam, too, followed the old pattern.  The last thing the
American people wanted was yet another bloody war.  And during
the election campaign of 1964, Lyndon Johnson knocked down straw
man Barry Goldwater by playing on the Peace theme.  Goldwater was
portrayed as the dangerous man who would get America into a big
war; Johnson, as the 'great compromiser' who would keep us away
from any such danger.  But Johnson had already obtained the
Tonkin Gulf Resolution as the tool he needed, and within 3 months
after his landslide election, Johnson started turning Vietnam
into another big disastrous war.  By June 1965, the commitment of
American combat troops to the nightmare of Vietnam had begun
under the orders of one more president who had promised America
Peace and Prosperity.
Today it is all happening again.  Jimmy Carter, the puppetized
president who works for David Rockefeller, is raising many
Americans' hope that this time it will be different.  This time
we have a president who wears sweaters and blue jeans and must
therefore be a man of the people.  He must be determined to have
peace since he is so aggressively seeking disarmament; and he has
promised us all that he will never lie.  Yet in a short space of
only two months, President Carter has succeeded in alienating and
angering governments the world over.  Under the guise of
folksiness, he is systematically insulting visiting ambassadors
with undignified receptions and by refusing to attend luncheons
given by the ambassadors.  He is preaching to the world about
"human rights", while doing nothing whatever about the violation
of our own human right to breathe clean air free of contamination
by Soviet plutonium attacks, among other things.
In the case of the Soviet Union with whom he says he wants to
negotiate arms reduction to prevent war, he is breaching an
agreement not to interfere in one another's internal affairs that
was signed by President Nixon back in 1972.  He says he wants
peace; but the circumstances he is bringing about with great
speed are exactly those that could well lead to war.
The fact is, my friends, that Jimmy Carter is sweeping us
along swiftly toward NUCLEAR WAR ONE--and the sooner the better,
according to his Rockefeller bosses.  Does he himself know where
he is taking America by following orders?  Bear in mind that he
is conspicuously trying to emulate F.D.R. in every respect right
down to launching his campaign last summer where F.D.R. did in
1932--Warm Springs, Georgia, and reviving the Fireside Chat as
president.  And listen to Carter's own words from a recent
Fireside Chat, and I quote:
"I remember another difficult time in our nation's history when
we felt a different spirit.  During World War II we faced a
terrible crisis, but the challenge of fighting against Fascism
drew us together.  I believe we are ready for that same spirit
again."
The Rockefeller Brothers want very badly to have NUCLEAR WAR
ONE begin as soon as possible, for several reasons.  The military
balance is shifting ever more rapidly in favor of the Soviet
Union and away from the Rockefellers even in the realm of secret
super weapons.  As of now, according to all the information I
have been able to obtain, the CIA undersea super missiles in the
Atlantic and Pacific, which I revealed two months ago in AUDIO
LETTER No. 20, are still the most awesome nuclear missiles in the
world.  But as I revealed then, these CIA missiles which are to
protect the Rockefellers--not you and me--have become inoperative
in several cases, and there is no way to predict how long those
that remain will last before they, too, fail and start leaking.
But there is another even more basic worry the Rockefellers
must think about.  As of now, the United States has no
anti-missile weapons at all, and the Soviet Union has only the
Galosh ABM, whose effectiveness against ICBMs is questionable;
but that situation is on the verge of changing drastically very
soon.  Major General George Keegan Jr.,  who retired on January
1, 1977 as head of Air Force Intelligence, is a man who has
repeatedly been first to detect major new developments bearing on
the military balance.  He has said recently, quote: "A global
conflict is in gestation."  And, my friends, he is right. 
Furthermore, he has been sounding the warning that the Soviet
Union is already testing a death ray type weapon called a
"Particle Beam."  Once this weapon is operationally deployed in
the very near future, it could destroy incoming missiles and
render the Soviet Union invulnerable to any ICBM attack,
including an attack by means of the Rockefeller CIA undersea
super missiles.
Meanwhile the Soviet Union is continuing right now in a
relentless program of planting underwater missiles along the
coastlines of the United States and other countries around the
world.  And in spite of the "Red Friday Agreement" of October 1,
1976, which I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 17, the Soviet
Union is not honoring the "Nuclear Safe Zone" in planting these
missiles.  The Rockefellers believe that the threat of their CIA
undersea missiles will prevent the Soviet missiles inside the
Nuclear Safe Zone from actually being launched in NUCLEAR WAR
ONE, but that is strictly a gamble on their part because the
threat is there.
During the latter part of this month, I have been receiving
reports from my own Intelligence sources about the current status
of the world-wide Soviet program of planting short-range
underwater nuclear missiles.  When I recorded monthly AUDIO
LETTER No. 15 last August, I gave the coordinates for 64 missiles
and bombs around the world, including 16 in American and Canadian
waters.  That was sufficient to give the Soviet Union the
capability of a surprise knockout punch against all the naval
power in the world opposing the Soviet Union; but now, thanks to
the insane Red Friday policy of the Rockefellers, the situation
has been allowed to become far worse.  Now redundant targeting
insures that any such Soviet attack has a very high probability
of success.  And in addition to naval and other military targets
close to the sea, Soviet underwater missiles are now being aimed
as well at increasing numbers of non-military strategic targets.
As of my latest tally, the Soviet Union has so far planted a
total of 372 nuclear weapons, mostly missiles but a few bombs, in
coastal waters of the world.  Of these nearly half, 158, are
planted in American waters.  This includes 130 around the
mainland 48 States, 9 more around Alaska, 15 in Hawaiian waters,
and 1 each at Midway Island, Guam, Christmas Island, and the
north approach to the Panama Canal.  The Soviet Union is also
preparing to be able to strike with additional plutonium cloud
attacks against America.  On March 1 America extended its
territorial limits to 200 miles, and Soviet submarines have moved
out beyond this new limit; but now remote control canisters are
being planted along our west coast within 3 to 5 miles of the
coastline.  So far 16 of these have been planted, and more are on
the way.
There are 29 missiles around the British Isles and 11 in
Canadian waters.  Europe and the Mediterranean are currently
surrounded by 46 Soviet underwater missiles.  Ten of these are in
the Mediterranean.  Along the Atlantic and North Sea coasts,
Spain is targeted by one, France by 3, the Netherlands by 5, and
West Germany by 6.  Three Soviet missiles have been planted in
Danish waters, 7 near Norway, 6 near Sweden, and 5 near Finland. 
In addition, 7 Soviet underwater missiles surround Iceland. 
These are ready to decimate NATO Air Bases there, enabling the
new Soviet supersonic long-range Backfire Bomber in its naval
version to interdict all our vital sea lanes across the North
Atlantic.
The rest of the pattern world-wide is: First on the Pacific
and Indian Oceans--Australia 7, New Zealand 6, New Guinea 4,
Philippines 6, Indonesia 6, Malay Peninsula 2, Thailand 1, Burma
1, India 1, Taiwan 3, Red China 7, border between Red China and
Vietnam 1, Japan heavily targeted 19, South Korea 8.
Around southwest Asia, Africa, and the Middle East--Caspian
Sea coast of Iran 3, Persian Gulf coast of Iran and Saudi Arabia
5, in the Oman Gulf 1 (target Iran), Red Sea coast of Saudi
Arabia 2, Black Sea coast of Turkey 1, southern Africa 8.
And along the coast of Latin America--Mexico 11, Guatemala 1,
British Honduras 1, Honduras 1, Nicaragua 1 even though Nicaragua
itself is being used for certain naval purposes by the Soviet
Union, Costa Rica 3, Venezuela 4 including one in the Orinoco
River, Chile 5, Argentina 1.  The British possession of West
Falkland near southern Argentina is also targeted by 1 Soviet
missile as is the Island of Bermuda.
The government of any country I have named may obtain the
navigational coordinates of the threatening Soviet underwater
missiles from me upon official request.  Up to now only one
government, that of Great Britain, has requested these latest
coordinates and I have gladly supplied them.  Great Britain is
quietly living up to her majestic name, because alone of all the
nations on earth, the British Government is fending off the
Soviet naval threat with grim determination.  I do not think it
would be in the best interest of the British people for me to
tell you all of the measures being taken in this regard beyond
the fact that the Soviet missiles are being removed from British
waters.  But I will tell you that the British are proving one
very important fact up to now.  Given the will to do so, the
Soviet war threat can be staved off.  For all their modern
weaponry, the Soviets are not supermen except in comparison to
the treasonous jellyfish who control America's government today. 
What is necessary is to recognize circumstances for what they
really are, and then to summon the spirit and determination to do
what must be done; and that, my friends, is exactly what the
British are doing right now.
Topic #3--A few days ago the Reverend Billy Graham was quoted in
newspapers as saying he likes, quote: "symbolic gestures made to
the American people" by President Carter.  He expressed
particular pleasure at the fact that Carter not only plans to go
to Sunday School but even to teach there.  But as for the
substance of the new administration, Dr. Graham said it is just
too early to assess that.
Millions of Americans are placing their trust in Jimmy Carter,
an untried newcomer to national politics, mainly because of his
Sunday School teacher image.  In the rush, rush world of today,
Jimmy Carter's highly visible piety almost seems like something
out of the past.  A hundred years ago the following words might
have been written about him, and I quote:
"He became a regular attendant at the Erie Street Baptist
Church, and vigorously did Jimmy give himself to his work.  Jimmy
was publicly baptized in the fall of 1854.  Not long after, Jimmy
was made Clerk of the church, an unusual responsibility for a
mere youth, and indicative of the impression of maturity and
responsibility that he gave to others.  Before many years passed,
he was teaching one of the largest classes in the Sunday School.
As a bright High School graduate, a faithful attendant, a most
staid and responsible young man, Jimmy soon took a prominent part
in all church activities.  He threw himself into them with
characteristic single-mindedness.  As we have said, the church
offered this unemotional youth an outlet; but it also offered his
mother, brothers and sisters the best part of what social life
they enjoyed."
My friends, I did not just make up these words to fit Jimmy
Carter.  I have simply substituted the name "Jimmy" for the name
"John" in excerpts from the biography of John D. Rockefeller, Sr.
by Allan Nevins.  The striking thing about John D. Rockefeller
was that his vigorous church activities never throughout his
entire career translated into fair, honest, or ethical dealings
in business!  And in a similar vein today, Jimmy Carter, whether
he realizes it or not, is preaching good but doing evil.  How far
might some dictators, past and present, have gotten if they had
eliminated church opposition by themselves going to church?  It
may be that Jimmy Carter is being misled and is not knowingly
doing that which is evil; but either way, my friends, that is no
excuse for the rest of us to blindly follow along like sheep to
the slaughter.  If we do so, history shows clearly what will
happen.
The end of the world came for the organized church in Russia
after the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.  Within a few short years
more than 20,000,000 Russians met death at the hands of the
Soviet government.  And while a struggling underground of
believers has persisted to the present day, the church as an
organization that can influence events directly no longer exists. 
And it will not exist so long as Communism remains the official
religion of the Soviet Union.
In mainland China, too, the same thing happened when Mao
Tse-tung took over.  The church in China was much smaller as a
percentage of the population than it had been in Russia, but its
fate was the same--the end of the world aside from a struggling
remnant of believers forced under ground.  After killing more
than 60,000,000 of his own people, Mao succeeded in turning
Communist China into perhaps the most rigidly regimented society
on earth.  And David Rockefeller, who made Jimmy Carter president
and calls the shots now, has expressed strong approval of this
state of affairs.  For example, several years ago he said, and I
quote:
"The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership
is one of the most important and successful in human history."
Now, my friends, if we allow it to happen, we are
next--America and the whole western world.  The elaborate plan
which I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 for November 1975,
is being revised and updated for application in the present
circumstances.  Certain of my sources have expressed great
concern to me recently that a provocation for war in the Middle
East is now being established that will be unlike anything we
have ever seen before.  I repeat, the Rockefellers are
increasingly desperate to get NUCLEAR WAR ONE under way before
they lose what control they still have over events.  To achieve
that purpose, plans are being seriously considered which, if
carried out, could instantly throw all three major religions of
the western world into turmoil in the course of igniting a Middle
East conflict.  My hope is that by warning you of the existence
of such plans, I am making them too dangerous for the
conspirators to carry out.  But in case they are carried out, I
hope that you will now be able to recognize it immediately when
it happens.  We must not allow ourselves to be tricked,
stampeded, or neutralized, my friends.  We have important work to
do.
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter.  Thank you,
and may God bless each and every one of you.
Source