Audio letter No. 16
Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net
"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording. Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This recording is a product of AUDIO BOOKS INC. (1981 current
address: 1629 K St. NW, Washington, DC 20006)
Hello my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is September 25,
1976, and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 16.
Last month I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15 much earlier
than normal, on August 2, because of its extreme urgency. In
that tape I revealed the locations of multiple warhead missiles
and hydrogen bombs which had been planted by the Soviet Union in
the coastal waters of 25 countries around the world--especially
the United States, Canada, the British Isles, and Western Europe.
We were on the threshold of a world-wide Pearl Harbor-type
surprise nuclear attack, and yet no one in the federal government
had taken any official action whatsoever to respond to my
warnings about this terrible war threat. It was obvious that
nothing would be done in time unless public opinion forced it to
be done, and so I appealed to YOU.
I told you the truth about our desperate situation, and I
asked you to bring about the rescue of our beloved country by
applying the kind of pressure on the Government that only
aroused, informed citizens can bring to bear. Your overwhelming
response was a major shock to the United States Government; and
as a direct result of your efforts, action has been and is being
taken. Thanks to you, the missiles and bombs in American waters
which I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15 have been removed
by the United States Navy. Likewise, those around the British
Isles and a number of other locations world-wide have also been
removed; but the grim fact is, my friends, that we are still in
very grave danger because the Soviet Union is not giving up.
That means you and I must not give up either.
The Soviet Navy is now struggling and maneuvering around the
clock trying to re-establish a commanding, strategic position for
attack, because an imminent nuclear attack on our country is
still planned by the Soviets. If this attack is to be prevented,
two things must be done:
First, they must be prevented from achieving the decisive edge in
battlefield position which they are now trying very hard to
accomplish at sea by means of submarines; and
Second, the fact that the Soviet Union is preparing to plunge the
world into thermonuclear war must be completely exposed, not only
here in America but world-wide. As I pointed out last month, in
monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15, the audacious world-wide naval
surprise attack which is almost ready to be triggered makes the
Soviet Union the all-out enemy of every other nation on earth.
Once this becomes known, Russia's military posture will be very
awkward indeed.
In order to bring you up to date on the events of recent
weeks, my three topics today are:
Topic #1--THE AUGUST MISSILE CRISIS OF 1976
Topic #2--THE UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE GAP AND A NEW ROUND OF
SOVIET UNDERWATER MISSILES
Topic #3--THE UNDECLARED SUBMARINE WAR NOW UNDERWAY
Topic #1--An increasing number of public figures in our country
know about the Soviet underwater missiles ringing our country,
but so far only one has come close to warning you about it.
At the Republican National Convention on August 19, 1976,
Ronald Reagan was invited to the speakers platform to say a few
words following the nomination acceptance speech by President
Ford. After some opening words of a personal nature and brief
comments about the Party Platform he had helped to forge, he
turned to what was really on his mind. He began, and I quote:
"If I could just take a moment, I had an assignment the other
day. Someone asked me to write a letter for a time capsule that
is going to be opened in Los Angeles a hundred years from now on
our Tricentennial. It sounded like an easy assignment. They
suggested I write something about the problems and issues of the
day, and I set out to do so riding down the coast in an
automobile looking at the blue Pacific on one side and the
mountains on the other; and I couldn't help but wonder if it was
going to be as beautiful a hundred years from now as it was on
that summer day."
With a few words about various challenges we face, he then
continued, quote:
"We live in a world in which the great powers have poised and
aimed at each other horrible missiles of destruction--nuclear
weapons that can in a matter of minutes arrive in each other's
country and destroy virtually the civilized world we live in.
And suddenly it dawned on me: Those who would read this letter a
hundred years from now will know whether those missiles were
fired. They will know whether we met our challenge. Whether
they have the freedom that we have known up to now will depend
upon what we do here. Will they look back with appreciation and
say, 'Thank God for those people in 1976 who headed off that loss
of freedom, who kept us, now a hundred years later, free; who
kept our world from nuclear destruction'? And if we failed, they
probably won't get to read the letter at all because it spoke of
individual freedom, and they won't be allowed to talk of that or
read of it. This is our challenge."
It is no coincidence that nuclear missiles came to Ronald
Reagan's mind as he looked at the waters off the California
coast. We had been in telephone contact with one another since
August 11, and he knew all about the Soviet underwater missiles
when he said those words of warning I just quoted. But most of
his audience never realized what he was driving at, thanks to the
total absence of any other clues about the Soviet threat from the
Government or the major media. So the fate of our beloved
nation, and therefore of the whole world, rested during the month
of August 1976 in the hands of those who heard my charges and
acted on them.
Here is what happened: During August the United States
Government came under steadily mounting pressure from people like
yourself all over the world who sent copies of my tapes, relayed
my charges, and demanded action. The first sign that this was
beginning to take effect came on August 14, 1976. On that date I
learned that a secret code name had been assigned to the Soviet
Underwater Missile program. However, action to remove the
missiles still had not been approved, and was not going to be
approved unless such action was forced by public opinion.
Meanwhile the first concrete action in the August Missile Crisis
of 1976 was taken--not by the United States, but by Canada.
On August 17, 1976 the Canadian Navy had found the Crescent
Beach missile near Vancouver, B.C., but lacked the capability to
retrieve it. Prime Minister Trudeau, receiving no cooperation
from the United States Government at that time, called Soviet
Charge d' Affaires Nikolai Makarov in Ottawa and demanded that
the Soviet Union itself come and remove the missile. And remove
it they did. On August 25 the Vancouver area was visited by
three Soviet ships--two destroyers, the Sposobny and the Gnevny;
and a tanker called the Ilim. Rear Admiral Vladimir Varganov
arrived aboard one of the ships, using this 'good will' visit as
a cover. By the following afternoon, Canadian divers confirmed
that the missile was gone.
Meanwhile Great Britain had also begun taking serious action
in order to rid herself of the 12 underwater missiles and bombs
ringing the British Isles. On August 18, 1976, Prime Minister
Callaghan called a special Cabinet meeting at 11:00 A.M. London
time. Present were the First Lord of the Admiralty, the First
Sea Lord of the Admiralty, and several Fleet Commanders. The
purpose of the meeting was to listen to my monthly AUDIO LETTERS
Nos. 14 and 15 which had gone to England by diplomatic pouch.
They already knew that my information was accurate because of the
Soviet missile discovered the previous day in the waters near
Vancouver, so the Royal Navy wasted no time in taking action. By
August 27, 1976, all but one of the missiles had been removed;
and that one, too, was retrieved shortly thereafter.
By late August the United States was at last taking action too,
prodded into it by still-building public pressure. For once
President Gerald Ford acted on his own, over-ruled Rockefeller
agent Henry Kissinger and gave the go-ahead for the Soviet bombs
and missiles surrounding the United States to be removed.
Having been unleashed at last, the United States Navy worked
fast, acting on the information in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No.
15. By the evening of August 26, 1976, seven of the Soviet
weapons in our waters--six missiles and one hydrogen bomb--had
been removed; and by August 31, 1976, the waters along the
American coastline had all been cleared. At this point the
threat to the United States that I had spelled out last month had
been eliminated at last, using the very information I had made
public. But the Government in general, and the Military in
particular, were still under heavy public pressure; and under the
assumption that the Soviet threat was now over and done with,
they chose a technique which has become standard practice in
Washington today. It's called "plausible denial"--a particular
type of bureaucratic double talk. The Joint Chiefs of Staff and
the United States Navy had just completed an operation to remove
the missiles around our country, a job potentially so hazardous
as to defy imagination. In short, they had done their duty; and
the Navy especially deserves our thanks for accomplishing their
task without anyone being hurt.
They should be acclaimed as heroes, and our whole nation
should be rallying behind them with justified pride. But, my
friends, in the nightmare world of step-by-step surrender to the
Soviets called "Detente", it doesn't work that way. Even our
Military leaders are so thoroughly hemmed in by the "One-World"
web that the only way that they can do their duty in the face of
such a Soviet threat is to hide the fact that they are doing it.
And so, as soon as the missile removal operation had been
completed around our shores, "plausible denials" of my charges
began being issued by the United States Military. This began on
August 31, 1976, when Vice Admiral B. R. Inman, Acting Director
of the Defense Intelligence Agency, answered an inquiry sent to
the Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld weeks before by Senator Harry
F. Byrd, Jr. of Virginia. Admiral Inman's letter gives a number
of arguments as to why any prudent government, including the
U.S.S.R., would presumably refrain from planting such missiles
and bombs in our waters. But the real crux of his plausible
denial letter is the following sentence, quote:
"There is currently no evidence indicating the Soviets have
placed underwater nuclear devices, including missiles with
multiple warheads, within the territorial waters of the United
States."
Technically, Admiral Inman was telling the truth, because as of
August 31, 1976, when he wrote this letter, all of the
evidence--the missiles and bombs--had been removed from our
waters; but the impact of his letter, if read casually, would
seem to be that my charges never had been true!
By the same token, General George S. Brown, Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote me the following day on September 1,
1976. His letter has been photocopied and sent all over the
world by the Pentagon. I will now read it in its entirety:
"Dear Dr. Beter:
Your recent tape report alleging that Soviet nuclear warheads
and hydrogen bombs have been planted in the coastal waters of the
United States has been brought to my attention. I have
investigated these assertions and find not a shred of truth to
any of your statements in this regard. Let me assure you of this
country's capability to detect any such aggressive actions by the
Soviet Union or any other world power.
We stand ready to evaluate and comment in advance on any such
information you may acquire in the future which impinges upon the
vital issue of our national security.
Sincerely,
George S. Brown
General, U.S.A.F."
The seeming impact of General Brown's letter, read casually, is
that my whole story about the missiles was a fake. But the real
key, once again, is the word "find" (present tense).
Furthermore, in the last sentence, General Brown actually
signaled me that the door would be open if I acquired more such
information; and by the time his letter reached me, I had more
such information because as I said before, the Soviet Union is
not giving up.
Topic #2--On the afternoon of September 7, 1976, I received
General Brown's letter of September 1, which I just read you.
Ironically, I also learned on the same day, September 7, that
"round two" of the Soviet Underwater Missile Crisis was just
beginning. Three underwater missiles were now threatening Los
Angeles, and San Diego was once again targeted by an underwater
missile close by. Accordingly I answered General Brown's letter
as follows:
"Dear General Brown:
Today I received your letter of September 1. I fully
understand the position you are taking at this time; however
other governments have not taken your position. They know the
truth, I know the truth, and so does President Ford; and the
truth is that during the month of August 1976 a surprise Soviet
nuclear attack of world-wide proportions has been partially
averted.
Make no mistake, the huge build-up of Soviet nuclear missiles
on land and in the sea world-wide, continues to be a clear and
present signal for an imminent surprise attack of immense
proportions. In 1962 we had a Soviet Missile Crisis in Cuba; in
1971 we had the Soviet Missile Crisis in Canadian and United
States territorial waters which was kept from the American
people; and now once again, in 1976, the world is experiencing
yet another Soviet missile crisis. The world must know of the
courage of President Ford as Commander in Chief in moving aside
unbelievable obstacles in order to begin to meet the Soviet
challenge last month.
In your letter you state that, quote:
'We stand ready to evaluate and comment in advance on any such
information you may acquire in the future which impinges upon the
vital issue of our national security.'
In view of this and the urgency of the situation, I
respectfully request to meet with you privately in your offices
within the next ten (10) days. At that time I will present
evidence of the validity of all my charges, and under specific
conditions I will advise you of other strategic locations of
Soviet nuclear missiles planted in our coastal waters and
elsewhere of which you may not be aware and which constitute a
clear and present danger to our national security.
Sincerely yours,
Peter Beter"
Shortly after my registered letter reached the Pentagon, Navy
Captain Sidney V. Wright, Jr. called on behalf of General Brown
to arrange a meeting with the General. We agreed on meeting in
General Brown's offices at 3:00 P.M., Thursday September 16. An
associate accompanied me to the meeting as a witness; and
promptly at 3:00 P.M. the meeting began with General Brown and
Captain Wright, who tape-recorded the meeting with my consent.
In spite of the public posture which he has so far had to
maintain, General Brown told me that he had overruled his staff
in order to meet with me; and although he couched many of his
comments with considerable care, our discussion lasted for well
over an hour without interruptions, without telephone calls, and
without any cutoff because of time.
I gave General Brown a special tape for his ears only,
revealing the locations of 48 new missiles threatening the United
States, and within two days the United States Navy was already at
work removing them. In addition, General Brown made three
commitments to me, and I made one to him.
To fulfill my own commitment, I sent the following registered
letter to him on September 17, 1976:
"Dear General Brown:
Thank you for affording me the opportunity to meet with you in
your offices yesterday for over an hour. During our conversation
I mentioned that the Soviet nuclear device which was removed from
Seal Harbor, Maine, had been taken to a location near Otis Air
Force Base on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and that it was still
there as of the time of my meeting with you yesterday afternoon.
You requested that I provide you with details about its location.
The facts are that the Seal Harbor nuclear device was in the
process of being retrieved by the United States Navy late
Saturday, 28 August 1976, and was on the beach at Seal Harbor
waiting transportation by the afternoon of 29 August. That
evening it left Seal Harbor by truck, which took it to an airport
at Augusta, Maine. On the afternoon of 30 August the nuclear
device was flown from Augusta, Maine, to Otis Air Force Base,
Cape Cod, where the airplane touched down at 17:13 EDT, 30 August
1976. From Otis Air Force Base this nuclear device was
transported to a remote location on the west side of Buzzards
Bay. For over two weeks the device stayed in that location,
which is between one and two miles east of the small town of
Marion, Massachusetts, on a small peninsula, the tip of which is
known as Butler's Point. The coordinates are: 41 42' 0" North,
70 43' 30" West.
The Seal Harbor weapon remained there until about 2200 EDT
last night, 16 September 1976; but then less than six (6) hours
after my meeting with you yesterday afternoon, it left this
location. As of today, this weapon is in a new location about 24
miles west of New London, Connecticut, with the approximate
coordinates: 41 19' 0" North, 72 31' 0" West.
If I had not known about this latest move, the result would
have been an echo of your letter to me of 1 September 1976, in
which you state that you, quote 'find' no evidence to support my
charges. Your letter of 1 September 1976, of course, was written
43 days after I first made my charges and only hours after the
Soviet missiles had all been removed by the United States Navy.
Sincerely,
Peter Beter"
My friends, General Brown is laboring under the handicap of an
Intelligence gap created by none other than Secretary of State
Henry Kissinger. Allied Intelligence sources inform me that they
have become gun-shy in sharing some of the information they give
me with the official Intelligence community of the United States
because invariably Kissinger betrays it immediately into the
hands of the Soviet Union. Large segments of the United States
Intelligence establishment are so independent that they do not
consider themselves accountable even to the President. Instead
they work under the direction of Henry Kissinger, who owes his
power to the four Rockefeller Brothers and who also works in the
interest of the Soviet Union.
Of course many of our Intelligence people are still patriotic
and loyal to our country and they are doing everything they
possibly can to protect our nation. Through their efforts the
Joint Chiefs of Staff first learned about 90 days ago that
missiles and bombs had been planted in American waters by the
Soviet Union; but due to the Intelligence gap, they were unable
to obtain complete information about them. Only when I publicly
revealed this information last month, did they obtain it; and
even then had I related to them privately instead of making it a
public issue, Kissinger would still have been able to block any
action to remove them.
The signs of our growing Intelligence gap are all around us.
A few years ago the United States was believed to be far, far
ahead in multiple warhead technology for missiles; yet as far
back as 1971, as I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 14,
short-range Soviet missiles with multiple nuclear warheads were
found in our own waters.
A few years ago no real threat in naval aviation was
anticipated from Russia, but two months ago, July 1976, the first
Soviet Aircraft Carrier Kiev entered the Mediterranean through
the Bosporus Straits boldly violating the 1936 Montreux
Convention as it did so; and instead of the stubby little
aircraft the Pentagon had expected, the Kiev carries sleek
advanced aircraft comparable to the American F-4 Phantom with the
additional capability of vertical take-off! And the Soviets are
building at least four more carriers like the Kiev. It is now in
the North Sea to bolster Soviet air power, which is a weak spot
in that area for them.
The military philosophy of detente as expressed to me by a
very high military official is, and I quote: "We watch what
they're doing, and they watch what we're doing, and that's good.
It prevents miscalculations." But, my friends, this means we are
in a perpetual war game with all of our lives at stake; and
because of the Intelligence gap that now exists, a miscalculation
cannot be prevented. Instead, it becomes inevitable; and with it
THERMONUCLEAR WAR.
Topic #3--Yesterday, September 24, 1976, Secretary of the Navy,
J. William Middendorf II, delivered a very important briefing at
the News Media luncheon of the American Security Council held at
the Army-Navy Club here in Washington. He spoke of things that
every American should be alerted about, but the major news media
treated it as a non-event. The Baltimore Sun and the Washington
Star carried stories which dealt with splinters from Secretary
Middendorf's speech but missed the basic thrust of his comments.
The Washington Post and the New York Times and the rest of our
major media said nothing at all. Here at home another attempt to
warn the American people has so far been muffled and silenced!
But half a world away, Radio Australia did give Secretary
Middendorf's speech the attention it deserves--and they did not
miss the point. Here is what Radio Australia had to say at 8:00
o'clock this morning EDT, quote:
"A warning that the growing strength of the Soviet Navy has
created an emergency situation for the United States has been
sounded in Washington by the Secretary of the Navy, Mr. William
Middendorf. He also said that the emphasis being placed by the
Soviet Union on Civil Defense has another ominous trend.
Mr. Middendorf said the Soviet Union now has 345 submarines,
many of them nuclear-powered and armed with missiles capable of
hitting every city in the United States. In contrast, the United
States has only 169 submarines. Mr. Middendorf said that it is
evidence by the Soviet Union that the 40,000-ton Kiev-class
Aircraft Carriers, with four more believed to be under
construction, was another ominous change for the near future.
Mr. Middendorf said that while the Soviet Union was producing
submarines and warships by leaps and bounds, the United States
Navy had been almost cut in half to 474 ships over the past six
years."
Is the Secretary of the Navy crying "Wolf"? I submit he is
not, knowing what we know. In International Law, mining the
harbors of another country is an act of war. The Soviet Union
has already invaded our territorial waters, not merely with mines
but with hydrogen bombs and multiple-warhead nuclear missiles.
By contrast, we have placed no such weapons around the Soviet
Union--so the actions already taken by the Soviets are acts of
war and pure aggression.
As I say these words, an undeclared submarine war is going on
between the Soviet Union and the United States in the waters
surrounding our country. So far it is still at the stage of
maneuvering for attack on the part of the Soviets, who now have
nearly half of their submarine force surrounding the United
States. The challenge before us now is to prevent this from
escalating into all-out war, as planned by the Soviet Union. To
do this, we must all understand what we are up against.
As I explained several months ago in monthly AUDIO LETTER No.
13, WAR DOES NOT JUST HAPPEN! It is planned and triggered
deliberately by those whose lust for power is more important to
them than the lives of their fellow men. Conspiracy and
double-cross are standard practice in such things. The threat of
nuclear attack by the Soviet Union that hangs over us right now
is tied directly to a three-way power struggle involving the
Rockefellers on one side, the Soviet Union on the other, and in
the middle Henry Kissinger who serves both sides!
The four Rockefeller Brothers, of course, have been
double-crossing and using the American people for
decades--economically, politically, and in wars for their own
enrichment and expansion of power. These things I've revealed in
my previous tapes, but in particular they have been working hand
in hand with the Soviet Union. Now, the Soviet Union is
double-crossing them, trying to use their immense military might,
which has been built up with Rockefeller aid, in order to seize
complete world domination in a flash.
For 20 years Henry Kissinger has been a key Rockefeller agent
in the Rockefeller-Soviet alliance, and in recent years has been
the exclusive--I repeat, the exclusive--negotiator with the
Soviets in many sensitive areas behind closed doors. But
Kissinger sees the handwriting on the wall. He knows Nelson
Rockefeller is trying to push President Gerald Ford aside to take
over. Now if that happens, Rockefeller will be within reach of
the Dictatorship he has craved for so long, and Kissinger will
have outlived his usefulness to the Rockefeller Brothers,
becoming instead a dangerous liability because of what he knows.
Kissinger has now tilted towards the Soviet Union, whom he
thinks will be the winner in this struggle. Not only has he
created the Intelligence gap I told you about earlier, but he has
also used his unique position to withhold certain critical
information even from the four Rockefeller Brothers! Not only
did he negotiate the agreements between the Rockefellers and the
Soviets concerning the "NUCLEAR SAFE ZONE" for the benefit of the
Rockefeller Brothers in the planned war to come; but it is he,
Henry Kissinger, who also conspired with the Kremlin for the
Soviet double-cross that is now under way! The military threat
we now face is tied very closely to political maneuverings here
in the United States. Nelson Rockefeller at this late date still
wants to get Ford out of the way as quickly as possible in the
hope that he can turn even this dangerous situation we now face
to his own benefit.
The financial scandal against President Ford that Rockefeller
has had ready to spring for many months is now under way in the
form of the investigation of Ford by the Watergate Special
Prosecutor's office. But the Soviet threat is real, the time is
short; and, therefore, as Nelson Rockefeller himself keeps
saying, "Anything can happen."
Once he seizes the power of the presidency, Nelson Rockefeller
will have the option of declaring a "National Emergency" to help
meet this missile threat, thereby activating all of the
dictatorial controls that are provided for in Executive Order
11921, which I discussed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 14. This is
not affected by the bill signed by President Ford on September
14, 1976, which has been falsely represented in some quarters as
eliminating the emergency powers of the president.
Meanwhile Soviet military forces are now being deployed in
offensive positions. In Europe over 4000 Soviet tanks have now
been deployed along the borders next to West Germany and Austria.
Soviet naval and amphibious forces are ready for action in the
area of the Baltic and North Seas, but most ominous of all is the
deployment of Soviet submarines around the shores of the United
States. In recent days, Soviet submarines have been swarming
into position at battle stations along our East, West, and Gulf
Coasts. As of today, September 25, 1976, there are at least 142
Soviet submarines in position, lined up at precise intervals up
and down the East and West Coasts of the United States and
concentrated especially in the Gulf of Mexico. The number of
Soviet submarines now in position around us is almost equal to
the entire submarine force of the United States--which are
scattered world-wide.
One major advantage the Soviet Union has in this situation is
the ability of the Soviet Naval Command to maintain continuous
contact with any or all of its submarines. This is a capability
which the United States Navy has been trying to obtain for over a
decade by means of "PROJECT SEAFARER" which has been thwarted
time and time again. But the Soviet system of communication with
its submarines is far more advanced even than our Project
Seafarer would be, and enables the Soviet submarine force to
operate in close coordination, reacting quickly to any changes in
plans.
Most of the Soviet submarines now at battle stations around
the United States are in readiness for direct participation in
warfare. However, certain subs are also still at work planting
underwater missiles along our shores. For this purpose, the
Soviets have a special type of missile-laying sub that is small,
highly maneuverable, and able to operate in shallow waters and
relatively tight quarters. The missiles themselves are also
relatively small due to their short range and their use of
satellite guidance. And these special submarines are very
difficult for our Undersea Sonar Detection Nets to pick up
because the hull is treated in such a way that it absorbs sonar
signals instead of reflecting them. By moving slowly, these
submarines also avoid making sound that might be picked up by
passive sonar sensors. Thus they move in and out of our waters
at will, planting missiles and bombs wherever they choose.
Thanks to the detailed information handed over by Henry
Kissinger, the Soviet Union has been able to turn our undersea
sonar nets into another Maginot line.
Since I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15 last month,
additional missiles and bombs have been planted around the world
in certain locations besides the United States. In particular,
the British Isles were ringed by 23 new underwater missiles as of
September 21, 1976. On that date, I relayed complete information
to British Intelligence so that the Royal Navy can once again
take action to remove them.
Elsewhere around the world the situation has not changed
drastically except in the case of Latin America. As of last
month, the Soviet Union still had not planted underwater missiles
in positions to threaten Latin America; but now they, too, are
targeted. Mexico has six missiles in its coastal waters.
British Honduras, Honduras, and Guatemala have one each, while
three missiles now infest the waters off Costa Rica.
The underwater missile which originally threatened the Panama
Canal from the north end has been removed by the United States
Navy, but now the Soviet Union has planted three new missiles to
the south of the Canal in the Gulf of Panama.
One is at
Latitude 7 52' 20" North Longitude 79-35-22 West
The second Panama missile is at
18-19-24 North 78-58-12 West
and the third is at
7-57-17 North 78-37-54 West.
One missile lies off the coast of Surinam, two missiles lie
off Ecuador, and Peru is also targeted by two missiles. Chile
has three missiles in the waters nearby. Argentina and Brazil
are targeted by two missiles each.
Last month I mentioned that the nuclear missiles in Guyana
which were formerly located around the huge Atkinson Airfield
near Georgetown had been moved south to a new location. As of
now, they have been moved again, slightly north and west to the
new position:
5-29-33 North 58-55-53 West.
In addition, there is now a Missile Resupply Base for Soviet subs
northwest of Georgetown, Guyana, at
6-56-24 North 58-25-27 West.
At present the Soviet submarines are also being resupplied
with nuclear missiles at stations in Cuba and Nicaragua where
Castro has been working very quietly. In Cuba there is a Nuclear
Depot near the north coast northwest of Camaguey at:
Latitude 22-7-37 North Longitude 78-21-32 West.
Until recently, offensive missiles were also installed in
undersea concrete silos along the north and south coasts of Cuba,
ready to fire at the southern United States and the Panama Canal,
but these have now been taken up.
In Nicaragua the Nuclear Depot is on the east coast at:
Latitude 12-49-42 North Longitude 83-50-45 West.
These resupply depots are making it possible for the Soviet
submarine fleet to give the United States Navy a very difficult
time.
On September 16 I gave General Brown a list of 48 new sites
around the United States where missiles and bombs have been
planted during the first two weeks of September. Two days later
the United States Navy was fast at work picking them up, and by
now has removed practically all of them; but we pick up one and
the Soviets lay down another.
Using their missile-laying submarines, the Soviets have
planted seven more missiles in new locations around the United
States since my meeting with General Brown. As of yesterday
afternoon, the United States Navy had already found and removed
two of these new ones--one northeast of Vero Beach, Florida; the
other southeast of Jacksonville, Florida.
As of today, four of the other five are still in place in the
following locations:
Near Miami, Florida at:
25-19-0 North 80-12-50 West
In the southwest end of Pamlico Sound, North Carolina, at:
35-4-20 North 76-30-20 West.
In the northeast end of Pamlico Sound about 20 miles south of
Kitty Hawk, North Carolina at:
35-40-0 North 75-38-50 West.
And near Valdez, Alaska, at:
60-51-50 North 147-5-0 West.
The other new missile was planted Sunday night, September 20,
1976, near Bloodsworth Island in Chesapeake Bay at: 38-12-25
North 76-11-55 West but is now being removed.
The Bloodsworth Island missile is a special case, and I will
have more to say about it in a moment. Before I do that though,
it is important to mention a diabolical new trick the Soviet
Union is now trying in an effort to confuse the United States
Navy long enough to replant enough missiles in our waters for an
attack. Some sites which have been cleared by the United States
Navy are now being used to replant new underwater missiles very
close to the exact location used before. The Soviets anticipate
that when these locations are given to the United States Navy
they will be entered on the Master Plot in use by our Navy, and
at that point it will of course be noticed that the new report
corresponds to a location where a missile has been removed. The
natural assumption would be, therefore, that such a new report
was simply a repetition of an earlier report and was now
out-of-date. If this happens, the new missile will be overlooked
and will not be removed. Just to make sure, however, the Soviet
Union is placing the new missiles just far enough from the
previous location to prevent our Navy from discovering them by
anything less than a complete new search of the area.
As of approximately noon yesterday, I can confirm two new
missiles which have been newly planted at old locations this way.
One is near Gulfport, Mississippi, at
Latitude 30-17-20 North Longitude 89-18-25 West.
The other is near Mobile, Alabama, at
Latitude 30-38-40 North Longitude 87-59-0 West.
Both of these sites are almost identical to the ones which I gave
to General Brown on September 16 and which had been cleared by
September 21.
A moment ago I mentioned a new underwater missile that was
planted last Sunday night, September 20, in Chesapeake Bay near
Bloodsworth Island, which is about midway between Baltimore,
Maryland, and Norfolk, Virginia. The small missile-laying
submarine installed the Bloodsworth Island missile at 10:30 PM
EDT, and then headed back south toward Norfolk, Virginia. As of
10:00 AM the following morning, Monday September 21, this small
submarine with at least one more thermonuclear weapon on board,
was close to the mouth of Chesapeake Bay, but had stopped and was
playing possum on the bottom. Its location was about 10 miles
northeast of Norfolk, Virginia, at:
Latitude 37-6-20 North Longitude 76-7-10 West.
Upon receiving this information, I immediately called General
Brown's office and relayed this information to Captain Sidney V.
Wright, Jr.
Here was a chance for the United States Navy to catch one of
the Soviet missile-laying submarines red-handed. By the time you
hear this, the Bloodsworth Island missile planted last Sunday
night by this submarine will be gone, thanks to the action now in
progress by the United States Navy; but as of now, the submarine
is still there. This Soviet missile-laying submarine will stay
there complete with its cargo of mass destruction until our Navy
pulls it up and takes it away because, my friends, the small
Soviet submarine now resting on the bottom of the Chesapeake Bay
has become a tomb for its crew. Something went wrong with its
power plant, and now the Soviet crew is dead. The sub itself,
still loaded with nuclear weapons, has now become a gigantic mine
in the waters near the biggest naval concentration in the United
States, and so it will remain unless and until it is removed by
the United States Navy.
My friends, the threat of war from the Soviet Union has never
before been as great nor as imminent as it is now. But I remain
firmly convinced that, even now, a shooting war can still be
prevented. Our fate remains in YOUR hands; but now I believe
more than ever that the American people, when told the truth, are
equal to the task. Congressmen and Senators write letters to
President Ford or Henry Kissinger and get no satisfactory
response; but YOU, you opened the door for communication between
General George S. Brown, who heads our country's military
establishment, and myself, and I thank you from the very bottom
of my heart.
Now I ask you to get behind General Brown in the same way.
This is more important than I can express because General Brown,
handicapped by the Intelligence gap created by Henry Kissinger,
is confronted by many opposing forces within the federal
government who, unlike General Brown, are not loyal to the United
States.
As soon as you finish listening to this tape, I ask you,
PLEASE, to send a letter, telegram, or Mailgram to General Brown
expressing your support. It took great courage from the
standpoint of his own career for General Brown to see me at all,
yet he overruled his staff in insisting upon doing so. And under
General Brown's command, with the approval of President Ford as
Commander in Chief, the United States Navy has acted and has so
far been able to fend off the intended surprise nuclear attack by
the Soviet Navy.
Send your letters and telegrams to:
General George S. Brown
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Washington, D.C. 20301.
Thank him for seeing me, thank him for taking action, and tell
him you are behind him. By doing this, my friends, YOU can help
strengthen Gen. Brown's hand against those who would rather see
inaction or outright surrender to the Soviet Union. Remember:
YOUR VOICE COUNTS.
If God will grant us the time and the wisdom to do so, I
believe the war which is now so close can still be averted; but I
would not be honest if I did not urge you to take such
precautions as you can for your own protection in the event war
does come. The Soviet Union has a massive Civil Defense program
to enable it to survive nuclear war. No such preparations have
been made in the United States except for the so-called "Federal
Relocation Arc", a network of 96 virtually bomb-proof underground
cities in which many of the Government officials, who have
betrayed us into war, will be able to ride it out in safety and
comfort. So the rest of us, who are considered expendable, are
left to fend for ourselves.
Almost two years ago, looking ahead to this situation, I
recorded my first tape for AUDIO BOOKS. INC. entitled: "HOW TO
PROTECT YOURSELF DURING THE COMING DEPRESSION AND THE THIRD WORLD
WAR." The exact timetable and some other details have changed
since then due to unexpected obstacles and failures which the
four Rockefeller Brothers have encountered, including now their
double-cross by the Soviet Union; but the measures I suggested
then are still the ones I would suggest now in order to protect
yourself and your family. Highly informed individuals who know
from their own sources that my present warnings are correct, are
actively preparing their own bomb shelters right now just in case
the worst should happen. But as I said in conclusion to that
first tape two years ago, what we could accomplish to protect
ourselves individually was one thing, and what we can accomplish
working together was quite another. Now, as then, that is where
my real hopes lie; and now, my friends, we are working together
to save our beloved country. If we will continue without losing
heart, and if we will all show our overwhelming support for
General Brown, then I have the feeling that we're going to do it.
It may sound too good to be true--but then, so did the concept of
FREEDOM that became the United States of America 200 years ago!
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you,
and may God bless each and every one of you.
Source
