This documentary wraps all things nicely, so check it out! This little documentary explains almost everything right or what I think is very close to the Truth:
“My uniform experience has convinced me that there is no other God than Truth.”
Tag Archives: World politics
DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #8
Audio letter No. 08
Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net
"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording. Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is January 21,
1976, and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 8.
As we begin to celebrate the Bicentennial of our Independence,
let us reflect for a moment on our past. Out of a vast
wilderness our people created a nation with astonishing speed.
Our Forefathers brought forth a nation with the highest and most
stable form of self-government ever conceived by man. It was
unique in the entire world, a prescription for freedom simple
enough for everyone to understand, yet truly a work of genius.
It's no wonder that from our earliest days as an independent
nation the eyes of the entire world have been riveted on the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
What was initially called our noble experiment was spectacular
in its success, and America's banner of freedom became a symbol
of hope for oppressed peoples everywhere.
Would any of this have happened without the clear patriotic
vision of our Founding Fathers? Could it have come to pass
without the courage of George Washington who in 1776 led the
famous surprise attack on the far stronger British forces in
Trenton? Would we have had our inspired and inspirational
CONSTITUTION if Benjamin Franklin's call for prayer had not
broken the impasse over representation at the Constitutional
Convention in Philadelphia in 1787? Could we ever have had a
government sensitive to the wishes of the people if the humility
of our early leaders had been replaced with the arrogant boasting
practiced by our corrupt rulers of today? And, would we have had
a nation such as ours if our Founding Fathers had believed in the
internationalism promoted today by the Rockefeller Brothers?
What would our Founding Fathers say today if they could see us
meddling in the affairs of other countries? How would they feel
about the tremendous sacrifices they endured if they could see
our rulers of today building up another nation to become our
slave master at our own expense?
We would all do well to look back once again at the patriotic
words of George Washington in his Farewell Address as President.
He advised his countrymen to extend commercial relations to
foreign nations with as little political connection as possible.
He did not advise against such commercial relations in
themselves, nor did he object to temporary alliances with foreign
nations when needed in an emergency; but he did give us a clear,
strong warning that has an urgent relevance to us today, and I
quote:
"to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the
foreign world."
Is this rule being followed today by our Rockefeller Rulers and
their client followers?
Since 1917 the Rockefeller empire has been allied with the
Soviet Union, with which we are to be merged against our will and
with the Soviets ultimately in the driver's seat!! As I
explained last month, and have often discussed on other
occasions, we, the people are the victims of an alliance between
State Socialism in Russia and Corporate Socialism here under the
Rockefeller Brothers. And, my friends, this is not an informal
arrangement. Since at least the early days of the Eisenhower
Administration, which was actually run behind the scenes by
Nelson Rockefeller, there has been a White House Directive which
I am about to reveal to you for the very first time. It is
short, but not sweet. It establishes as a prime goal of federal
policy, and I quote here:
"to so alter life in the United States that it can be
comfortably merged with life in the Soviet Union."
My friends, I do not merely challenge, I dare President Ford
or anyone else in the White House to deny the existence of this
Directive under oath. They won't do so unless they have become
so desperate that they are willing to gamble on any bluff,
because I have access to documentary evidence on this matter that
could immediately convict them for perjury and lead to
impeachment and/or prison.
Yes, this short White House Directive, my friends, quote: "to
so alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably
merged with life in the Soviet Union"--that's the key to all of
our domestic and foreign policy today. It explains why we have
become the factory for the Soviet Union. It explains why so many
multinational corporations are being used to build up the Soviet
economy while depressing our own. It explains why the many huge
Rockefeller-controlled, tax-exempt Foundations, which are all
working in this direction, are immune to prosecution for their
flagrant violation of their charters. It explains why the
Rockefeller-controlled banks and financial institutions are so
single-mindedly financing the Soviet Juggernaut at American
taxpayer expense.
It is little wonder that Nobel Prize-winning biologist George
Wald in an article a year ago about the runaway power of the
multinational corporations said, and I quote: "hence no nation so
closely resembles the United States as the Soviet Union."
My fellow citizens, it is essential that we halt this horrible
slippage backward into tyranny. If we are to survive as a free
people beyond this our Bicentennial Year, we, the people, must
rise up and make the Government that belongs to us turn its face
forward once again to the still new, still fresh ideals and
principles that launched our great nation. I am absolutely
convinced that we can still do it IF WE WILL.
Last month I recorded AUDIO BOOK No. 6 entitled "WHAT WE CAN
DO TO SAVE AMERICA" to explain the strategy which I believe can
and will do the job. And already alert citizens all over America
are listening to this message, getting to work, and making
suggestions. If YOU will join in the task, we can do it.
Meanwhile I intend to keep informing you about what we are up
against, how events are progressing, and what plans are being
formed behind the scenes. To this end, I want to talk to you
today about three topics that all reflect the drive to merge life
in America with that in the Soviet Union.
Topic #1--OUR CHARGES FOR A CITIZENS' INDICTMENT ON THE FORT KNOX
TWIN SCANDAL COVER-UP
Topic #2--ROCKEFELLER PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS IN THEIR DRIVE TO
DRAG OUR ECONOMY DOWN TO THE SOVIET LEVEL
Topic #3--SO-CALLED "DETENTE" AND THE IGNORED PROPHETIC WARNINGS
OF GEORGE WASHINGTON
Topic #1--It is essential that I give special attention to the
first topic today, but I will deal with the remaining two topics
as fully as I can in the time that remains for them.
Almost two years ago in April 1974 during Congressional
testimony before a subcommittee of the "House Banking and
Currency Committee" I first revealed that the Bullion Depository
at Fort Knox had been looted of its gold. I stood ready to
present evidence to substantiate my charges, but nothing whatever
was done! Having been failed by Congress, I then took my story
to the public through lectures, radio Talk Shows, and publication
of my charges in a national weekly newspaper. Faced by this
public pressure, the Government responded by setting in motion a
well orchestrated cover-up, a cover-up far more massive and more
serious than that of the Watergate scandal which removed our last
elected President from office.
The actual cover-up began on September 23, 1974, with the
carefully staged visit of Congressmen and newsmen to Fort Knox.
I have detailed the ensuing cover-up, among other things, in my
AUDIO BOOK No. 2 on the "FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL AND WHAT IT MEANS
TO YOU." I have also given you continuing updates since June
1975 by means of my monthly AUDIO LETTER. In October 1975 I
revealed what I had just learned at that time that makes a "twin"
super scandal of the Fort Knox situation--namely, the presence of
about 60 pounds of radioactive liquid super poison processed from
deadly plutonium-239 in the Central Core Vault of the Bullion
Depository at Fort Knox. The canisters of poison put there in
1968 by the CIA are corroding and leaking faster and faster,
endangering the health and even the lives of millions of
Americans in the southeastern United States.
The Government's response to this second, far more serious
half of the Fort Knox Scandal, has been the same as to the
first--COVER UP. I've explained in recent months how first
Senator Frank Church and then Congressman Otis Pike, Chairmen
respectively of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees,
have become parties to the Fort Knox plutonium scandal cover-up;
and how bureaucratic gobbledygook is being used by Government
officials to avoid giving straight, honest answers about the
situation.
But now, the Fort Knox Scandal cover-up is getting even worse.
It has recently entered a new phase of outright lying and of
masking the evidence concerning my charges. They are going for
broke, and they have long since passed the point of no return.
The same tactics of lying and cheating by the Government that are
standard practice in the Soviet Union, into which we are to be
merged, are now being used here in the United States, and these
tactics are far more effective here than in Russia because
Americans, unlike Soviet citizens, have not yet learned to expect
their government to lie to them continuously. Up 'till now the
main cover-up approach has been one of evasion, but now an
atmosphere of desperation on the part of the wrongdoers is
becoming increasingly apparent. For the very first time Treasury
Secretary William Simon has made the fatal mistake of actually
lying, in writing no less, about a crucial matter--the existence
of the Central Core Vault of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox.
We have challenged the Government to either confirm or deny its
existence in the past; and we have identified it not only by this
name, "Central Core Vault", but also by describing it to avoid
any possibility of misunderstanding due to terminology.
In a letter to a friend of mine dated December 10, 1975, Simon
said the following, and I quote:
"The allegation that plutonium 239 is, or ever has been stored
at Fort Knox in a central core vault is false, and the Army has
just conducted an extensive test of the Bullion Depository and
has found no evidence of radioactivity. I should add that there
is no such thing as the Central Core Vault."
Notice that Simon's denial of the presence of plutonium-239 at
the Depository is tied right in with his denial of the existence
of the Central Core Vault. Obviously if there is no Central Core
Vault then it cannot contain plutonium-239! But on the other
hand, to have any faith that his denial about the plutonium is
truthful, you must also believe his assertion that there exists
no Central Core Vault at the Depository. If he would lie about
one, he would lie about the other.
With that in mind, please listen now to an excerpt from
another letter--this one written to one of my associates by a
retired Lieutenant General, John L. Ryan, Jr., a former
Commanding General of Fort Knox. General Ryan probably knows
more about the Depository than anyone else who ever commanded
Fort Knox. He spent two tours of duty there before he returned a
third time as the Commanding General; and when the gold was moved
to Fort Knox to be stored there for the very first time in 1937,
it was he who was placed in charge of the actual physical
movement of the incoming gold into the Depository. With regard
to the disputed Central Core Vault, he says, quote:
"When I use the word 'vault' I am referring to the central core
of the Depository where the bullion was stored. This vault was
below ground level and could be entered only through a specially
constructed bank-type door that opened onto a screw lift. This
door was in the Receiving-Shipping area of the Depository. The
Receiving-Shipping room was above ground level. The vault was
below ground level. Around the vault proper, or central core,
below ground level was a passageway. On this passageway were a
number of cell-like compartments. There was no means of entering
the vault from this passageway."
My friends, the passageway with its compartments are all that
the visitors saw in September 1974. The existence of the Central
Core Vault, which is where the gold, if any, should have been, is
absolutely confirmed by General Ryan; and as his letter makes
clear, the 1974 visitors had no chance of finding out about it
while wandering around in the passageway and looking at the small
compartments you heard and read about in the news.
Such bald-faced lying is bad enough, but the mounting
desperation of the Rockefeller Brothers and their lackeys over
Fort Knox now goes even beyond mere lying. It is standard
practice whenever an extremely damaging secret is in danger of
exposure, to distract attention from it and confuse the issue by
deliberately exposing something else--something far less serious
and dangerous than the secret being hidden yet shocking enough to
satisfy the public's appetite for the truth.
With our totally manipulated government of today, a good rule
of thumb is whenever something that looks really damaging is
revealed, ask yourself: "Why are they letting this out of the
bag? What is it that is worse that they are trying to distract
my attention from?" Thus, for example, Sen. Church's sensational
revelations last summer about deadly shellfish toxins and the
like fooled many into believing they had been given the whole
ugly truth about CIA misdeeds, but actually he was covering up
what he knew about the insane nuclear super poison at Fort
Knox--something a thousand times worse than anything he revealed.
Now in the same way a cover-up campaign has been launched in
regard to the leakage of the plutonium-239 super poison from Fort
Knox, and it's horrible. A few days ago on January 12, 1976, a
truck carrying radioactive waste just "happened" to have an
accident in eastern Kentucky, smack in the heart of the area now
most heavily affected by radioactive poison leakage from Fort
Knox. Fourteen of the 32 drums of waste on the truck fell off,
and 8 of them broke open and leaked. The newspaper stories
around there about it contained the usual assurances that there
was no danger, that it had been cleaned up, etc., but leakage had
occurred.
Just six days later on January 18 newspapers contained big
articles about still another alleged radioactive waste leakage
problem in Kentucky.
The truck I mentioned a moment ago had been on its way to a
nuclear waste dumping ground at Maxey Flats, Kentucky, which had
been in use since 1963, and now we are suddenly told that the
leakage is occurring there too. Federal investigators, those
wonderful watchdogs we are supposed to trust and admire, claimed
that radioactive waste in steel, wooden, and even cardboard drums
has been just dropped into trenches and covered up with dirt; and
after 12 years they have just now abruptly discovered that some
of it has gotten loose and is spreading through the ground,
through the water, and through the air. And a study by the
General Accounting Office, while it gives the standard assurance
that there is no immediate danger, recommends a crash program to
correct the situation and develop systematic standards for safe
disposal of radioactive waste.
Now, why all of this sudden concern about leakage of
radioactive contamination? And why does the spotlight on actual
leakage cases just happen to be on Kentucky? After all, there
are vastly more serious problems of this sort elsewhere in the
United States, for example, in New York State--but so why
Kentucky? Two reasons, my friends. For one thing, they are
using the opportunity to continue the nuclear "con game" that has
been pulled on you for years by assuring you even when there are
nuclear waste leakages that you don't really have to worry about
it. But, more importantly, in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 7 last
month I posed a direct challenge to the federal government to
either prove or disprove my charges; and I spelled out a fair,
objective way to do it. What is going on now is their answer to
my challenge by spreading stories about other kinds of
radioactive waste leakage in the general vicinity of Fort Knox,
and possibly by deliberately causing such releases--such as
occurred in the truck accident--they are feverishly tampering
with the evidence.
The program I suggested to use offsite measurements to detect
leakage from the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox would, as they
can now argue, no longer prove anything conclusively about my
charges because of these other radioactive leakages which
allegedly have also suddenly been discovered in the same region.
I, for one, would like to see the whole business about Fort Knox
laid to rest once and for all, and I know you would too. I know
that my charges about the gold and about the plutonium poison are
true; but for the sake of argument IF I were wrong, I would
rather be honestly proven wrong about any or all of them and be
made a laughingstock than to have the American people's worry
over this matter dragged out endlessly like this.
Whatever the truth is, I want you to know; but the Rockefeller
lackeys in the Government know only too well that the truth is
exactly what I have told you, and they don't want you to know.
They will do anything and everything to try to save themselves
regardless of how many other human beings they may doom in the
process. And so, my friends, this is the vicious reality behind
the smooth mask that our Rockefeller-controlled federal
government wears. We, the people, must bring the pressure to
bear that will cause these things to be honestly investigated and
corrected.
The United States is under the thumb of modern outlaws; and if
we do not bring them to justice, they will bring us and our
children to total ruin. So far the United States Congress has
not seen fit even to consider my charges about the gold, about
the plutonium, about anything! The problem is not that I don't
have the evidence, but that I have too much of it. The same
applies to the Justice Department, the General Accounting Office,
the White House, and so on, so on.
But recently a Congressman who heard my testimony in Congress
about the missing Fort Knox gold in April 1974 and who went to
Fort Knox in September 1974, gave us a tiny opening, whether
wittingly or unwittingly. His constituents have been pressing
him continuously for some answers about Fort Knox; and in recent
replies which were forwarded to me, he in effect challenged us to
do exactly what we have wanted to do for nearly two years--to
present our charges and evidence in a proper legal forum. Our
response is a six-page "Open Letter" by my able co-patriot, Mr.
Edward Durell of Berryville, Virginia. The letter is addressed
to Congressman John B. Conlan of Arizona--but it is open, because
based on past performance we have little reason for optimism that
he will take any constructive action unless he is forced to do so
by public pressure.
The letter presents charges which parallel completely, even in
legal form, the impeachment charges leveled at President Nixon by
the House of Representatives. It is a legal document, and YOU
are the nation-wide Grand Jury. Under our CONSTITUTION, it is
ultimately we, the people, who constitute the highest human
authority in our land, and it is UP TO YOU to decide. Do our
charges deserve an open, complete, honest investigation in a
proper legal forum or not? If so, it is UP TO YOU to return a
"Citizens Indictment" by demanding that your elected
representatives provide a legal forum through Congressional
investigation or formal Grand Jury proceedings.
Here now is Mr. Durell's letter to Congressman Conlan of
Arizona. I will be quoting from the letter from here on all the
way to Mr. Durell's signature. Mr. Durell's letter is dated
January 7, 1976:
"Dear Mr. Conlan,
Your letters of December 5, 1975, to Mrs. Mary Barrow and Mr.
Art Bentley both of Lake Havasu City, Arizona, have been sent to
me for comment. To that end I write direct to you, with copies
to them and other interested parties.
In your letter to Mrs. Barrow you state among other things
that, quote: 'Grand Juries are empaneled to investigate criminal
wrongdoing', and that if, quote: 'you personally have evidence of
crimes committed in connection with our nation's gold holdings,
please let me know so that I can put you directly in touch with
appropriate officials of the United States Justice Department who
would have jurisdiction in this matter.'
In your letter to Mr. Bentley you state among other things
that while you have, quote: 'some misgivings' about the gold
situation, quote: 'I can assure you that exposure to any
radioactive poison would have caused me serious illness. Neither
I nor anyone else who went to Fort Knox has suffered any such
illness.'
Please allow us firstly to answer your letter to Mr. Bentley.
It is common knowledge in nuclear medicine that if one is exposed
to alpha particle radiation of plutonium, death due to cancer can
come in a matter of months or years. It all depends upon dosage
level and duration of exposure. In this respect we would suggest
that you contact Dr. John Gofman, former professor of Medical
Physics emeritus, University of California at Berkeley; or listen
to him by way of a one-hour tape cassette obtainable from AUDIO
BOOKS, INC., P. O. Box 16428, Fort Worth, Texas, 76133; special
tape No. 2 for $6.00 postpaid.
(Editor's note--1981 address is:
The Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER
Suite 5092, 1629 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006.
Current price is: $7.50 postpaid.)
In this tape Dr. Gofman speaks on the effects of radioactive
poison, among other things.
In addition, over 18% increase in cancer deaths in the first
seven (7) months this year over last year has taken place in the
central-eastern states, which has left medical authorities in the
dark as to the cause. They felt they had made such tremendous
cancer advancements in the last few years, and then to have such
a high upsurge in the first seven months this year over last year
in that area alone, is baffling.
One more thing about this radioactive poison in the United
States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox--hereinafter called 'Fort
Knox.' We know from sources in the Intelligence industry that
this plutonium poison was part of the plutonium-239 stolen by
members of the Intelligence community in 1966 and that this most
deadly substance was processed in four plants--two in Kentucky,
one in North Dakota, and one in California--into radioactive
liquid poison. It was then taken--60 pounds each--to Peru,
Panama, Bolivia, and Argentina under cover of a multinational
cement corporation by a CIA officer, Harold Leroy White, for the
sole purpose of threatening to contaminate the United
States-planned and built water aqueduct systems in those
countries for political and economic pressure. Sixty pounds,
however, intended for use in Argentina, was brought back by Mr.
White and placed in the Central Core Vault at Fort Knox where it
has been stored ever since late 1968. The casks are now
corroding, causing leakage and contamination over the entire
areas east and southeast of Kentucky, and as far away as Cuba.
This contamination is endangering the lives of over 40-million
people in this country. Can we afford to allow these people to
be expendable?
The federal government has now publicly admitted our charges
that opium and morphine--150,000 pounds and 24,000 pounds
respectively-are stored at Fort Knox. Why will it not admit the
existence of the plutonium?
It is suggested that to do so might subject the Government to
thousands of legal actions involving hundreds of millions of
dollars under the Federal Tort Claims Act and/or the Price
Anderson Act, the 1954 Atomic Energy Act as amended, Title 42
Section 2011 and following for, quote: 'extraordinary nuclear
occurrence'--that is, quote: 'any event causing a discharge or
dispersal of source, special nuclear or by-product material from
its intended place of confinement in amounts off site or causing
radiation levels off site and which has resulted or will probably
result in substantial damages to persons off site or property off
site.'
And why will it not admit the loss of our gold reserves? For
the same reasons--legal actions including those criminal in
nature. And in the latter connection, we would like here to
pursue your suggestion to Mrs. Barrow and list the charges of the
high crimes committed relative to disappearance of the people's
gold reserves.
On behalf of the American people it is herein charged that the
United States Treasury Department--hereinafter called
'Treasury'--in violation of its Constitutional duty to protect
the people's gold and in violation of its Constitutional duty to
take care that the laws relative to the safeguarding and custody
of said gold be faithfully executed, has failed so to do in that
between January 1, 1961, and January 1, 1974, prior and
subsequent thereto, Treasury engaged itself through its
officers/agents and in concert with others in America's corridors
of financial power in a course of conduct or plan designed to
convert unto themselves the people's gold entrusted to it for
safekeeping for the avowed purpose of profiting unjust
enrichment; and in a course of conduct or plan designed to cover
up, conceal and protect those responsible and to conceal the
existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities.
The means used to implement this conduct or plan have included
one or more of the following:
1. Treasury has failed to render a true account of the amount of
gold shipped out from the United States Bullion Depositories from
1961 to 1968 under color of the 'London Gold Pool Agreement';
2. Treasury has failed to reveal the true prices, if any,
received for the sale of said gold or reveal the names of the
ultimate purchasers of said gold;
3. Treasury has failed to give a true account of the amount of
gold shipped out of the United States Bullion Depositories from
1968 to 1974 under color of an ad hoc committee composed of the
Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, the Chairman of the
Council of Economic Advisers, the Chairman of the White House
Council on International Economic Policy, the Secretary of State,
and the Secretary of Treasury, among others;
4. Treasury has issued a statement dated August 31, 1974,
purporting to list 24-million ounces of good delivery gold at
Fort Knox when in actual fact the Secretary of the Treasury
admitted December 3, 1974, that such listing is false or
misleading;
5. Treasury has taken, December 9, 1974, without lawful
authority, two-million ounces of gold from the Exchange
Stabilization Fund by a simple bookkeeping device and four days
later announced by way of the General Services Administration
that there would be an auction of two-million ounces of gold on
an 'as is' basis January 6, 1975. In addition, a Dutch auction
was held June 30, 1975, with the remainder of said gold based on
a price not considered best for the taxpayers of America;
6. Treasury has caused a statement to be issued April 11, 1975,
which is false or misleading in that it purports to list all of
the gold shipments out of Fort Knox when in actual fact such list
omitted among other things a shipment of gold consisting of four
(4) tractor-trailer loads on January 20, 1965, which shipment
consisted of 1.762-million ounces valued over sixty-one million
dollars ($61,000,000) at $35.00 per troy ounce--the par value for
official gold at that time;
7. Treasury has in its immediate possession and control the
necessary keys, combination numbers, and time-control data for
the vaults, depositories, and their mechanisms. It thus has the
highest duty to take care that its trust be faithfully executed,
but it has acted in a manner contrary to its trust and subversive
of responsible government to the great prejudice and to the
manifest injury of the people of the United States by acting in
concert with others to aid and abet, to surreptitiously remove
the gold under the cover of legal right;
8. Treasury has made false or misleading statements for the
purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into
believing that a thorough and complete inspection and audit have
been conducted with respect to allegations that Fort Knox
contains no significant amounts of gold and not accounted for, in
that an inspection trip to Fort Knox September 23, 1974, revealed
one (1) cell-like compartment, No. 33, to contain only
copper-hued bars. Mrs. Mary Brooks, the Director of the Mint,
Treasury, said, quote: 'It's all here.' Her statement is
analogous to the so-called Audit of October 1974 of only three
(3) of the cell-like compartments at Fort Knox, which Audit calls
the Report to be submitted to Congress February 10, 1975--also
based on a belief that, quote: 'It's all here.'
Further, the inference given by the inspection trip and the
Audit was that the gold at Fort Knox was of good delivery form
and the remaining ten (10) cell-like compartments were full of
good delivery gold;
9. Treasury is withholding relevant and material evidence or
information from the American people in total disregard or
violation of the Constitutional right of the people to know what
has happened to its gold reserves and to its right of freedom of
information for purposes unrelated to national security, the
enforcement of laws, or any other lawful functions of Treasury in
that the Central Core Vault at Fort Knox was concealed from the
inspection group of over 100 news media people, six (6)
Representatives, and one (1) Senator of the United States
Congress;
10. Treasury has unlawfully utilized its authority to cause the
General Accounting Office to fail to take care that the laws be
faithfully executed in that the General Accounting Office, a
legislative entity, was forced to have only two (2) of its own
people on a settlement committee to audit the alleged gold at
Fort Knox, whereas Treasury had thirteen (13) of its own people
on said committee;
11. Treasury has not caused to be made an annual physical
inventory of the people's gold since 1953. Thus Treasury has
failed to take care that Title 31 USC be faithfully executed by
failing to make the required annual physical inventories.
In all of this and more, Treasury has acted in a manner
contrary to its trust and subversive of Constitutional government
to the great prejudice of law and justice and to the manifest
injury of the people of the United States; wherefore, Treasury
through its officers, agents and others in concert with it, by
such conduct or plan, warrant such parties be brought before
appropriate legal authorities to answer these charges; and,
further, for the restitution of the people's gold except that
portion which is contaminated by radioactive poison in which case
said parties shall be ordered to pay the current market gold
price and for such other appropriate action as may be deemed just
and proper in the premises.
In support of the charges, please be informed that former
Congressman Frank Chelf's AFFIDAVIT dated April 7, 1975, in which
he deposes and says among other things, and I quote: 'that the
United States government was moving quietly as a church mouse out
of Fort Knox' and that the gold was, quote: 'constantly and
surreptitiously on the move.'
Fort Knox is located in former Congressman Chelf's
Congressional District. He further deposes and says that, quote:
'In response to my previous requests for gold removal
information, Treasury officials had been courteous and most
friendly but always non-committal or evasive.' Mr. Chelf had
earlier made the same charges on the floor of the House of
Representatives, but to no avail. (See Congressional Record page
15522 - August 21, 1963.)
Further, Lt. General John L. Ryan, Jr., US Army (Ret.), in his
statement of September 26, 1975 before Congressman Otis G. Pike
in his office, has proved the existence of the Central Core Vault
and in fact has drawn sketches of it. In view of this, there is
no valid reason for the Secretary of Treasury to continue to deny
the existence of the Central Core Vault at Fort Knox unless there
is something deeply secret stored therein. There admittedly may
have been the necessity for some secrecy in the 1960's when all
of the gold at Fort Knox was stored in the Central Core Vault.
Why the secrecy now, since the Comptroller General has stated on
February 10, 1975, quote: 'As of June 30, 1974 about 55% of the
gold claimed by the Treasury was stored in thirteen (13) sealed
compartments at the United States Bullion Depository at Fort
Knox, Kentucky'?
As further evidence, we call your attention to the balance
sheets of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks, which carry Gold
Certificate accounts as an asset to reflect a stated amount of
gold which, in turn, is reflected as a liability on Treasury
balance sheets; however it is submitted these Gold Certificate
accounts reflect assets--gold--which do not in fact exist in
Treasury vaults. This same situation prevailed in 1943 relative
to silver when, quote: '14,000 tons of silver from the Treasury
reserve backing American paper money was secretly taken from
Treasury vaults although carried publicly on the Treasury balance
sheets', cited in "Tragedy and Hope" by Professor Carroll
Quigley, page 855, 1966/1974.
We could go on, but suffice it to say that Treasury during our
18 months investigations has not moved to refute by evidence the
basic charges outlined above. Meanwhile our economy is suffering
by those twin disasters, inflation and deflation--high prices
with high unemployment--initially caused by the disposing of our
gold reserves in secret and its attendant game plan.
Mr. C. Gordon Tether in his December 11, 1975, article, quote:
'A NEW TWIST OF FORT KNOX SAGA' in the Financial Times of London
stated, quote:
'But whatever the cost in terms of loss of face, might not the
United States authorities be well advised to do whatever is
necessary to demonstrate that there is no Fort Knox cover-up? In
the light of what has happened in the United States during the
past few years, deeds inevitably now speak louder than words; and
the refusal to prove that they have nothing to hide, is
inevitably destined to go on fostering precisely the opposite
impression.'
Considering all of the above, would you please be so kind as
to put the undersigned and Dr. Peter Beter, as you offered to do
for Mrs. Barrow, quote: 'directly in touch with appropriate
officials of the United States Justice Department who would have
jurisdiction in this matter'? I am authorized to state that Dr.
Beter concurs with the contents of this letter and is fully
prepared to give further evidence before a United States Grand
Jury and any Congressional investigating committee in
confirmation of the charges herein cited, among others.
Further, I would suggest you personally bring this letter to
the attention of the Chairman of the House Banking Committee of
which you are a member, for appropriate action. Failure on your
part to do so will lend credence to the fact you, yourself, have
become part and parcel of the cover-up on this vital matter; and
failure on the part of the Chairman of said Committee to take
such action will further lend credence to the fact that he
himself is in league with those underlying forces at work in
America's corridors of financial power.
Most respectfully,
EDWARD DURELL."
Topic #2--In my AUDIO BOOK No. 2 on "THE FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL
AND WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU", I warned you to watch for the Stock
Market crash signal, meaning general unemployment in the range of
20 to 25%. This was originally targeted by the Rockefeller
Brothers for the fall of 1975, but their schedules have been
increasingly upset by their preoccupation with the Fort Knox
Scandal "cover-up" and by the anti-CIA actions of Indira Gandhi
last summer. Even so, they are working frantically to get the
pieces of their plan together again.
Here in America, the Government officially says that
unemployment in November 1975 was 8.3%; but my own confidential
information, direct from sources within the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, is that the true figure for November was over
15%--and still increasing! Therefore the real unemployment
levels are now moving closer and closer to the Stock Market crash
signal levels I revealed nearly a year ago.
Meanwhile the Dow Jones averages lately are streaking upward
artificially in a dream world of their own, totally divorced from
reality. The stage is being set for a dramatic visible plunge
downward if the Rockefeller Brothers cut the cable on the Stock
Market elevator.
And New York City, supposedly safe from outright bankruptcy by
federal loans, is already far behind in its schedule for raising
funds to stay afloat under that loan program. At the same time,
the Nation's banks are again the subject of widespread concern,
and no wonder. Recently front page stories have deliberately
been planted in major Rockefeller-controlled newspapers about the
alleged shakiness of the mammoth Chase Manhattan Bank and in even
larger First National City Bank of New York, both of them
Rockefeller controlled. This is partly an attempt to lower the
Rockefeller profile by saying: "See, we have problems too." But
more importantly, it is a deliberate effort to undermine
confidence in our whole banking system. Banks and their
customers should therefore watch for trouble. A publication
which is doing an outstanding job of keeping on top of the
banking situation as well as many other matters is the Daily News
Digest, Box 27496, Phoenix, Ariz. 85061
This month's meeting of the International Monetary Fund in
Jamaica produced no communique, no general agreement, only
reflecting continued confusion there.
Pressed by the smoldering Fort Knox Scandal on one hand and
the imminent war in the Middle East on the other, the primary
goal of the Rockefeller Brothers has now shifted to just one
thing--to abolish the official price of gold in America so that
the non-existent American gold hoard can be quietly dropped from
Treasury and Federal Reserve balance sheets. Most of the IMF
gold is beyond their grasp for the time being.
SO-CALLED "DETENTE" AND THE IGNORED PROPHETIC WARNINGS OF GEORGE
WASHINGTON
Topic #3
Last summer Indira Gandhi cracked down on the CIA to stop the
Rockefeller take-over of her country, India. Existing war
preparations were immediately diverted to a new direction, and
since that time a major new Asian war has been brewing. In my
monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 two months ago, I spelled out the
basic strategy for this war, including the role to be played by
the Middle East conflict in paving the way for the Asian War.
Plans are proceeding rapidly.
A few days ago Japanese Prime Minister Miki fell into a Soviet
trap. Reacting to brusk and uncooperative Soviet treatment, he
announced that Japan will sign a treaty with Red China that
includes the anti-Soviet hegemony clause desired by China. At
the same time, as you may have noticed in news reports, American
business men are rapidly packing up and leaving Japan, supposedly
because their Japanese understudies are now ready to manage
things themselves--but actually because the Rockefeller Brother
interests are bailing out in advance of war, just as happened a
few months ago in Lebanon.
To set the stage for the big Asian War, hostilities are first
to break out in the Middle East to provide an excuse for a
limited American nuclear strike to cap off Arab OPEC oil wells.
This will result in cementing the Sino-Japanese alliance for war,
neutralizing Europe and producing real suffering there, and
causing gas rationing in a major body blow to our wobbly economy
here in the United States.
The terrorist attack on OPEC oil ministers in Vienna last
month, engineered by our own CIA, was supposed to get the ball
rolling in all of this. Two key oil ministers were supposed to
be killed, leading to escalating reprisals and war--but the job
was botched. For bungling this top priority operation, the man
in charge, Richard Welch, the CIA station chief in Athens, was
judged unreliable and executed by the CIA itself.
And now Lebanon, which was primarily a distraction earlier,
has now become the new springboard by which the broader Middle
East conflict is to be enlarged. All of this, my friends, is
part and parcel of so-called "detente" with Soviet Russia on the
way to a world collectivist dictatorship. Rockefeller Brothers
internationalism, which is always portrayed by them as the path
to peace, is actually a prescription for war, destruction, and
enslavement. To them it is "progress."
On December 31, 1975, President Ford said on the eve of our
Bicentennial Year, and I quote: "Liberty is the most precious
possession of our past." But, fellow citizens, it is up to us to
restore liberty to our future as well. Had we simply been
heeding George Washington's wise warning to avoid permanent
foreign alliances, the horrors I have been discussing would not
exist. In his Farewell Address, he also left us with many other
equally wise observations that have direct application today.
Washington's words and example helped launch the greatest nation
on earth, and they can help get it moving forward again IF WE
WILL ALLOW THEM TO. In this, our Bicentennial Year, I plan to
return frequently to the forward-looking sage advice left to us
by our great first President.
Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may God
bless each and every one of you.
Source
DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #7
Audio letter No. 07
Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net
"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording. Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is December 21,
1975, and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 7.
As I celebrate Christmas with my family a few days from now, I
will be thanking God for the precious gift He has given to all of
us this year--the gift of time; because, my friend, the year
1975, even as difficult and trying as it has been, was a year of
reprieve due to delays in the timetable of the Four Rockefeller
Brothers. At this very moment, some important parts of their
plan are as much as one year behind schedule; and in the
meantime, more and more Americans have been awakening to the
truth of what is going on. Yes, we have been granted a little
more time than we might have had to respond to the menace we all
face, but we dare not relax and waste whatever time we have left.
The Four Rockefeller Brothers are working feverishly to make up
for lost time.
Overseas, the way is being paved for war, including that
nightmare the world has feared for 30 years--NUCLEAR WAR. Here
at home, our economic woes are getting worse while a corrupt
government, controlled by the Rockefeller Brothers, tells us
'Prosperity is just around the corner.'
Preparations for the dictatorial new Rockefeller Constitution
keep marching on; and the man who has conspired for 20 years to
become our first Dictator, Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, stands
poised at the threshold ready to seize the presidency. That is
why it is so important that more and more alert Americans are now
asking just one question: "What can I do?"
I am convinced that now, at last, there are enough of us to
launch a successful rescue of our great, free Republic.
Therefore I have just unveiled a strategy for action which I
truly believe can and will save our country. It is a strategy
which you, as an individual, can undertake starting right where
you are. It uses the powers you are granted by the most basic
law of the land--our present United States CONSTITUTION; and if
you will faithfully do your part, you can rest assured others all
over America will be doing theirs too. The result, IF WE WILL
EACH DO OUR OWN PART, is a plan of action which, in my opinion,
cannot be stopped. This entire plan of action is presented in a
new AUDIO BOOK recorded December 15, 1975, and it's entitled:
"WHAT WE CAN DO TO SAVE AMERICA", and it is my answer to the
question, "What can I do?"
The challenge before us, my friend, is to regain control of
the government that belongs to us, and we must act quickly before
that control, which is already in the hands of the Rockefeller
Brothers, slips forever beyond our reach.
CONTROL--that is the word, more than any other, that sums up
the actions of the Four Rockefeller Brothers. Control is both
the end toward which they work and the means by which they extend
their reach still further--control of money and of government,
control of industry and of Big Labor, control of natural
resources and of human resources.
The incredible financial wealth of the Rockefellers is
actually nothing more than a result of this insatiable drive for
control; and it grows continuously due to their control over your
money, your resources, your labor, and your government. They
believe they have a right to do all these things because they are
convinced that they have been divinely ordained to rule the
world. So, for example, using the CIA for their own private
purposes is right and proper, according to their concept of
themselves as America's royal family. It matters not what you
and I think, only they know best. All of this and much more is
made clear in the book that was written for them as their Mein
Kampf in 1930, "THE AMERICAN RICH" by Hoffman Nickerson.
Today I want to discuss three topics that point out some of
the fruits of such control by the Rockefeller Brothers:
Topic #1--HOW POLITICAL CONTROL PRODUCES COVER-UPS AND PARALYSIS,
INSTEAD OF TRUTH AND ACTION.
Topic #2--HOW ECONOMIC CONTROL PRODUCES DEEPENING ARTIFICIAL
DEPRESSION AND MONETARY CHAOS, INSTEAD OF REAL PROSPERITY, and
Topic #3--HOW THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN ROCKEFELLER CORPORATE
SOCIALISM AND SOVIET STATE SOCIALISM IS TAKING US INTO NUCLEAR
WAR.
Topic #1--In their drive for control, the Rockefellers are trying
to snare us all in their giant trap, catch us so that we cannot
wrestle free or fight back; but they know that if they move too
quickly we may notice what they are up to, and react to protect
ourselves. So they have been moving with great patience and
determination over a period of several decades to get their trap
assembled and in place ready to spring it on all of us. To
understand what is really happening, therefore, you should do as
they do: look at long spans of time, compress them in your mind,
and see where things are really headed.
Gradualism is the tactic now being used--while TV, Sports, and
other distractions are being used to focus people's attention
away from what is really happening. Thus, even while many people
find the idea of a new Constitution for America preposterous,
many of its provisions are already being put in place, ready for
ratification by a National Referendum in the near future. The
federal government already regards the United States as divided
up into 10 REGIONS, the forerunners of the 10 so-called "New
States." The Federal Election Commission, along with some other
activities, is the forerunner of the Electoral branch, and so on.
So keep your eye on their objective--that is, the direction in
which they are moving events, so that you won't be fooled by
their shifts in timing to meet their various contingency plans.
The secret new Constitution, which was developed over a
10-year period to fit the outline laid down personally by Nelson
Rockefeller himself, just as he did our present 25th
Amendment--this secret new Constitution is coming sooner or
later, unless we stop it once and for all! As former Senator Sam
Ervin said so emphatically just a few days ago, and I quote:
"We don't need a new Constitution. Ours has weathered many
storms in the past 200 years. It was written to last for the
ages."
But, my friend, if we leave the Rockefeller machine in control
of our government, our communications media, and our economy, we
will have a dictatorial new Constitution!
Senator Ervin is quoted as saying something else too, and it
is supremely ironic. Concerning Richard Nixon he said, quote:
"He had the most pronounced, aggravated notion about the powers
of the presidency. He envisioned the President as being
something of an absolute monarch."
However well these words may have applied to Nixon, they apply
far better to the man who made, used, and then unmade Nixon--that
is, Nelson Rockefeller.
Perhaps Senator Ervin himself now realizes how cleverly he was
used in the Watergate coup d'etat, since he said last spring, and
I quote:
"If I had known then what I know now, I would never have voted
to confirm Nelson Rockefeller."
Whenever possible the Rockefeller Brothers maneuver people
into doing what they want done without their puppets even being
aware of it--not, at least, until later. But the Rockefeller
style also includes more solid avenues of control over all sides,
if possible, in every arena including that of politics. Thus,
for example, the Rockefellers have their hooks equally deep into
both the Democratic and Republican Parties as well as fringe
political fronts, both left and right. And while they have often
found it advantageous to maintain a so-called Liberal image with
their public relations they are not true Liberals, any more than
certain of their lackeys who wear the Conservative label are true
Conservatives. As Nelson Rockefeller himself said in Dallas on
September 12, 1975, and I quote:
"Conservative and Liberal to me are misleading as labels."
These and other similar labels have completely lost any
utility they may once have had, thanks to their control by the
Rockefeller Brothers. Their only true loyalty is to themselves,
and that transcends all of the conventional boundaries of
political affiliation.
A perfect example of Rockefeller control of all sides of a
political situation is before us right now in the alleged
Presidential campaign. I say "alleged" because there is no doubt
at all as to the outcome under the Rockefeller scenario.
Instead, the game is being played for other reasons. For the
moment the most prominent players on the stage are four:
Humphrey, Reagan, Ford, and his ventriloquist Rockefeller.
Hubert Humphrey wears a big label that reads "Liberal Democrat",
while the equally large label on Ronald Reagan reads
"Conservative Republican." President Ford's label is a large
question mark.
Nelson Rockefeller's label which, by the way, is made of solid
gold, is rather large. It reads: "Liberal New Deal Democrat
turned instant Conservative Republican."
It looks like quite a field, doesn't it? But it so happens that
Nelson Rockefeller has the other three in the palm of his hand
and his own label is only for show.
Hubert Humphrey is currently the beneficiary of the so-called
'Humphrey phenomenon'--an undeclared candidacy that is being made
to look impressive by the Rockefeller major media and by polls
which can easily be manipulated. Humphrey's well concealed
control of a huge major multinational oil company for over 20
years has been very helpful to his Rockefeller supporters behind
the scenes. Partly for this reason, a possible
multimillion-dollar tax case against him by the Internal Revenue
Service has been covered up under Presidential seal, and the
IRS-FBI agents who worked on the case are no longer around!
Ronald Reagan, of course, is the polished actor who has been
rehearsing so-called Conservative lines ever since 1950. That
was the year when, during Congressional hearings, he officially
admitted his previously ultra-Liberal activities but claimed that
he had seen the light and was turning over a new leaf. Yet his
actions, as sharply distinguished from his words, have never
really changed. He has maintained many active ties with
Rockefeller-dominated organizations, such as their complex of
governmental-controlled groups known collectively as "1313" in
Chicago. The Reagan administration in California was heavily
populated with people from the Rockefeller stables and the Reagan
record in California parallels that of Rockefeller in New York in
many ways, but Reagan has consistently spoken as if his views and
policies were totally opposite to those of Rockefeller. Reagan's
service on Rockefeller's CIA cover-up commission earlier this
year, therefore, helped to quiet the cover-up fears of some who
are not aware of Reagan's strong Rockefeller ties.
President Ford is where he is because then-President Nixon
double-crossed his boss Nelson Rockefeller. When Agnew was
forced to resign, Nixon was supposed to nominate Rockefeller; but
Nixon could see where that would lead, so instead he selected
Gerald Ford, whose political star had risen considerably after
his participation in the work and defense of the Warren
Commission. Good old 'Jerry' was well known and well liked by
his colleagues, yet his confirmation hearings bogged down
unexpectedly. Behind the scenes Nelson Rockefeller applied the
brakes until Ford agreed to nominate him (Rockefeller) upon
Nixon's departure from the presidency. Once the agreement was
reached, Ford's confirmation hearings rapidly concluded
favorably. And Nelson Rockefeller immediately resigned as
Governor of New York, surreptitiously moved into his Washington,
D.C. residence, and personally finished Watergating Nixon out of
the White House. Nelson was so proud of his success in this
project that he wrote to a banker friend in Mexico afterward to
tell him all about it. Can you imagine?
Thus Rockefeller control denies us any real choice in national
politics. Ultimately the Rockefellers choose all the
presidential candidates that count--and have ever since Woodrow
Wilson's time. We, the voters, are then given the useless
privilege of choosing which of their hand-picked puppets we want,
just like they do in Soviet Russia. Even in the election itself,
the deck is stacked in favor of their preferred choice. But,
just in case, they control the other side too. If this isn't
"TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION", I don't know what it is.
In Congress, too, most of our politicians end up in the
Rockefeller pocket one way or another. Some deliberately throw
in their lot with the Rockefellers and become active Rockefeller
agents. Others become compromised by skeletons in their closets,
and are pawns in the Rockefeller game of blackmail and
double-cross here in Washington. And still others just go along
to get along, not rocking the boat. And so when government
abuses become so flagrant that they are detected, we are still
left without recourse because the Rockefellers control the
investigations in almost every case.
As I speak to you, the ante has gone up due to the leakage of
radioactive plutonium-239 super poison from the Bullion
Depository at Fort Knox, and the government is doing nothing
whatsoever to stop it! My previous information was that the
region which has been primarily affected by the leakage over the
past several years consists of a swath through Kentucky, my home
state of West Virginia, and Virginia with a combined population
of over 9-million people. But on November 8, 1975, a secret
meeting was held in the White House to discuss alternative means
of disposing of the deadly poison. The discussion included some
ideas that would be as insane as the poison itself--such as
dumping all 60 pounds of it into the underground streams that lie
under Fort Knox. Not only might this allow the poison to spread
uncontrollably from there, but it could possibly also cause
contamination of any of the huge underground caverns under Fort
Knox which are used for natural gas storage. Now if this were to
happen, natural gas could carry traces of the radioactive
plutonium poison straight into the industrial plants and homes of
thousands of people in that area. The deadly plutonium radiation
would be unaffected by passing through gas flames, after which it
could be inhaled or set on to food.
I received no further information concerning the action, if
any, taken at the November 8 White House meeting; but I have
received updated information to the effect that the poison is now
spreading throughout the entire Southeast of the United States
and even beginning to enter the Gulf of Mexico. Thirty-six
million Americans are now at stake. And what is our government
doing about it? Nothing. The White House meeting had only one
purpose: to save face for the wrongdoers, not to save 36-million
lives!
And what about Congress? And all those investigations we keep
hearing about? Consider Senator Frank Church who is our newest
presidential candidate. On November 20, 1975, he explained the
release of his Committee's report about assassination plots on
foreign leaders with the words, and I quote: "The people were
entitled to know what went wrong, and why." But when it comes to
an immediate deadly danger to all of us caused by the same
elements of the Intelligence community, apparently Senator Church
believes we are not entitled to know, since he has been covering
up this vital information now for four months while the situation
grows steadily worse. And for over two months the same has been
true of his counterpart in the House--Congressman Otis Pike.
Meanwhile what else is happening in the Executive Branch,
specifically the Treasury Department? My friend, I believe it is
time to let you in on an example of the evasions, half truths,
and distortions which Rockefeller bureaucrats use to cover their
tracks. I call it a lesson in bureaucratic gobbledygook, the
slippery language that some people also call double talk.
For over three months now, all of our attempts even to
communicate directly with the government about the twin disasters
at Fort Knox have met with nothing but a very loud silence.
Having deepened and confirmed their own guilt time and again
through various slips in the past, they apparently no longer have
the courage or the courtesy even to answer us! Through an
indirect channel, however, we were able to extract a letter from
Mrs. Mary Brooks, the Director of the Mint, dated November 21,
1975. This indirect channel is Congressman Kenneth Robinson of
Virginia who, while he does not choose to pursue the Fort Knox
matter on his own, has at least cooperated with us in ways such
as this. In this regard, he is exceptional. No one else in the
entire United States Congress has done even this much.
As I read the letter try, if you can, to find any clear-cut
YES or NO type answer to anything. You will only find one to the
effect that a certain statement, and I quote: "is simply not
true." But the statement referred to is not our statement but a
carefully selected misstatement of our charges by someone else.
Now here's the letter:
"Dear Mr. Robinson:
Thank you for your letter of November 10, 1975, concerning
allegations that plutonium-239 was stored in the so-called
Central Core Vault at the United States Bullion Depository, Fort
Knox, Kentucky.
We do not store plutonium-239 or any other radioactive
substance at the Depository, and have no reason to believe that
it is stored there by other government agencies. We authorized
the Military at Fort Knox to make radiation tests in the
Depository last week. We were informed that the tests did not
disclose any evidence of radioactive material.
The allegations relating to the so-called Central Core Vault
are carried in a Swiss Newsletter entitled 'Myers Finance and
Energy' that is currently being circulated by those who have
persisted with all the wild allegations about the Bullion
Depository at Fort Knox. The Newsletter discusses Dr. Peter D.
Beter's allegations and states (and the letter quotes as
follows):
'In 1942-43 Major Stanley Tatom designed and oversaw the
construction of a Central Core Vault below the Main Vault. To
get to this ultrasafe vault, an elevator had to be installed and
it used up the space occupied by 12 of the former Vault
compartments. This explains why the numbering in the Vault
compartments upstairs had a 12-digit gap.'"
And Mrs. Brooks' letter continues, and I quote:
"This statement is simply not true. There were no major
alterations to the Vault after construction of the Depository was
completed in 1936. The elevator was installed at the time the
Depository was constructed. We have no record of Major Stanley
Tatom designing or overseeing the construction of a Central Core
Vault. In fact we do not, and find no record that we ever did,
refer to any part of the Depository by that name.
The Visitors Log at the Depository does show the name of Major
Daniel F. Tatum as calling on the officer in charge on July 29,
1942. We also have records which show that a steel door was
erected by the Champion Wire & Iron Works, Louisville, Kentucky,
at the entrance to the corridor that leads to Compartments
numbered 1 through 14 in the basement level of the Depository.
This work was completed on January 7, 1942, and the No. 15 was
assigned to the door. After this work was completed, gold was
stored in the corridor for a time during which the door was
locked and sealed."
Still quoting from her letter:
"The allegation that there is a 12-digit gap in the numbering
of compartments is also inaccurate. Our records show that the
Depository had 28 compartments, 14 on the lower level and 14 on
the upper level at the time of construction. The compartments on
the lower level were numbered 1 through 14, and the corridor door
was numbered 15 when it was added in 1942. The compartments on
the upper level were numbered 21 through 34. There is no record
of the numbers 16 through 20 ever being used on Vault
compartments of the Depository.
If I could be of further assistance in this matter, please let
me know.
Sincerely,"
and there follows the signature of
"Mary Brooks,
Director of the Mint."
My friend, letters like this one are the product of a year and
a half of continuous effort on their part to refine their story
and put their very best foot forward. They are written with
great care, with careful choice of every word. The letter I have
just read to you, in fact, was not even written by Mary Brooks
alone. Much of it was written by an official in the General
Accounting Office who has ties to the Intelligence industry. The
GAO itself is implicated in the Fort Knox cover-up through the
falsified Gold Audit done in the fall of 1974, so this letter is
important, and it deserves closer examination.
First: Why does the Government deliberately go so far out of
its way, to Switzerland no less, to find someone else's
misstatement of the Bullion Depository modifications so that they
can attack that instead of refuting our own statements? If they
can refute our actual charges, why don't they do it? I invite
the Government to listen to my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for
July 1975 and respond to that, not someone else's secondhand
statements. As I clearly stated then, the Central Core Vault was
built into the Depository at the start. Major Tatom's job later
on was to build a rapid retrieval system into the Gold Vault, not
to build the Vault itself. I also explained that there is a gap
of six digits, not 12, on each floor of Vault compartments.
My friend, the Government is acutely aware of my real charges,
so why don't they answer them? What do you think?
Notice also, in trying to wave aside references to Major
Stanley Tatom, how cleverly it is done! We can prove that he was
there and did oversee the work on the rapid retrieval system, and
apparently the Government knows we can. Therefore the following
sentence is used to mislead without actually lying, and I quote:
"We have no record of Major Stanley Tatom designing or
overseeing the construction of a Central Core Vault."
Of course they don't, because that is just not what he did. He
built a rapid retrieval system to give access to the Central Core
Vault. The writers of the letter included one other item which
was intended to help throw everyone off the track, but actually
does just the opposite. According to our own sources, during the
work on the rapid retrieval system in 1942-43, the disruption was
so great that the gold was taken out of the Central Core Vault
and, quote: "piled around in the corridors." Now we are told in
this letter about the strange corridor door, which was installed
for unstated reasons. Listen again to these astonishing words
from Mrs. Brooks' letter, and I quote:
"This work was completed on January 7, 1942, and the No. 15 was
assigned to the door. After this work was completed, gold was
stored in the corridor for a time during which the door was
locked and sealed."
Mrs. Brooks does not tell us for how long a time, much less why!
But thanks to our own information, she doesn't have to tell us.
I suggest that you replay Mrs. Brooks' letter all the way
through and see for yourself what you will pick up. For example,
listen to all the assertions and denials that are all couched in
the words, quote: "Our records show ..." or "We have no
record..."--this coming from the same office whose records are so
suspect in other ways.
Records of the quality of gold stored in Fort Knox and
elsewhere, as I have revealed on other occasions, have disagreed
with one another in glaring ways. The official Mint records omit
shipments we can prove from Fort Knox. Even the case of the
missing experimental aluminum pennies that has erupted lately is
another example of the 'dependability' of United States Mint
records.
But notice also that the letter spends the least time on the
most important matter of all--the radioactive plutonium poison
stored in the Central Core Vault. It is stated that the
radiation tests by the Military, quote: "...did not disclose any
evidence of radioactive material." In much the same vein, and
with similar bureaucratic phrases like, quote: "We have no
evidence...", the Kentucky Department of Human Resources claims
that there is nothing to worry about. But, my friend, plutonium
radiation is very hard to detect, yet very deadly if it gets
inside your body. Experts sum it up with the phrase:
"If there is enough plutonium to detect, it is already too
much."
Therefore nothing less than a serious, comprehensive, honest
check by top experts with the best equipment available can be
considered satisfactory. The stakes for over 36-million
Americans in the Southeast United States are too high to settle
for less. The United States Government expects you to just take
their word for it regardless of what they may tell you. No
proof, no criteria, just believe what they say.
CHALLENGE TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Well, my friend, I do not ask you to do that. I am now going
to issue a challenge to the federal government either to confirm
or refute my charges about the plutonium poison leaking from the
Bullion Depository at Fort Knox--openly, fairly, and
conclusively. Furthermore, I am going to state clearly what my
criteria are for a test of my charges that I believe the American
people could accept and believe in.
Here specifically is what I propose:
First, formation of a truly blue-ribbon committee to test for
plutonium poison leakage from the Bullion Depository at Fort
Knox, this committee to consist of scientists, recognized
authorities fully qualified for such a task. If my challenge is
accepted, the committee must include certain individuals whose
names I will reveal at that time. The Government may nominate an
equal number of scientists to the committee. However, my
nominees will be men who are not my employees or associates; and
likewise any members of the committee nominated by the Government
must not be federal employees unless my own information indicates
that they can be trusted. In other words, the committee must be
independent and totally unbiased.
Second, this committee is to be given complete authority and
discretion over the conduct of the plutonium poison
investigation. They are to be provided at federal government
expense with any and all technical assistance they may request as
well as the most up-to-date and effective instrumentation. This
must include the 1026 multichannel analyzer and any other devices
they may specify. They must also have the right by majority vote
of the committee to add other experts to their investigating
committee if they deem it necessary. They are not to be
interfered with or limited in any way. Should federal or other
authorities choose to impose limitations, the investigating
committee shall be empowered to immediately state any objections
they may have to these limitations over live nation-wide
television and radio so that their message cannot be edited out
or reinterpreted by anyone else.
Third: Upon completion of their investigation, the investigating
committee shall be granted up to one hour of live broadcast time
on nation-wide radio and television to present their findings,
and also their recommendations if my charges are confirmed. I am
willing to accept their conclusion as final if it is unanimous,
and the federal government must agree to do the same.
- - - - - - -
There is no time to be lost. If you agree that my proposal is
reasonable, start passing the word and applying public opinion
pressure to make it happen. Otherwise the ever-expanding control
exercised by the Rockefeller Brothers will prevent it. It is UP
TO YOU, because the once free, once great major media in America
are being gobbled up ever more completely by the Rockefellers.
Their latest victim is the mighty Hearst publishing empire,
whose publications reach a total audience of nearly 86-million
adults. This take-over is the bottom line in the tragic Patty
Hearst case involving the CIA-financed SLA. A stock transfer to
a tax-free Foundation controlled by the Rockefellers was the
objective, and it has now been accomplished.
It's sad that we have to look overseas to see any meaningful
reporting about the Fort Knox plutonium disaster. In the
Financial Times of London for Thursday December 11, 1975, the
story was broken by C. Gordon Tether whose financial column is
read the world over. In his article titled "A NEW TWIST OF FORT
KNOX SAGA", he reviews the Fort Knox Gold Scandal cover-up and
then informs his readers of the latest charges concerning
plutonium. He ends the article with words that no columnist of
his stature in America has yet dared to write, and I quote:
"But whatever the cost in terms of loss of face, might not the
United States authorities be well advised to do whatever is
necessary to demonstrate that there is no Ft. Knox cover-up? In
the light of what is happening in the United States during the
past few years, deeds inevitably now speak louder than words; and
the refusal to prove that they have nothing to hide is inevitably
destined to go on fostering precisely the opposite impression."
Topic #2--On December 11, 1975, New York City went into default.
Hundreds of millions of dollars in City notes came due on that
day, and the City did not pay as promised. A DEFAULT is nothing
more or less than a failure to pay, and that's exactly what
happened. "But wait a minute", you may say. "President Ford
announced that he would ask Congress to give New York City
2.3-billion dollars in loans because New York bailed itself out.
What's going on here?"
What is going on, my friend, is just another Rockefeller shell
game. New York City has declared a three-year moratorium, so
called, on payment of 1.6-billion dollars of City notes. Anyone
holding one of those notes cannot cash it in for three years, and
will also receive a lowered rate of interest during that time.
New York noteholders do have another choice though. Until
December 29, a few days from now, these noteholders may, if they
wish, trade their notes for bonds issued by the "Municipal
Assistance Corporation", or otherwise known as "MAC", on behalf
of New York City. These bonds cannot be cashed in for 10 years
or more, but they carry a higher rate of interest. And, oh yes,
there's one other little uncertainty: MAC is a so-called "moral
obligation agency", an idea given birth by Nelson Rockefeller and
his own lawyer John Mitchell, and its bonds are "moral obligation
bonds." Its promise to pay the bonds when they come due is not
backed up by a legal obligation on the part of New York City, New
York State, or anyone else. Either way, the person who simply
wants to cash in his City note as it comes due is now out of
luck, he can't do it; so New York City is in default.
Don't be misled by the fact that the major media under
Rockefeller control are not using that word "default" for the
time being. As I pointed out last month in my monthly AUDIO
LETTER No. 6, the dress rehearsal for default in New York some
weeks ago was used to give that word "default" a very apocalyptic
meaning. The word is therefore being saved for the right moment.
Meanwhile, the effect of this New York failure to pay is
already spreading through our economy. Municipalities all over
America, and even abroad, are suddenly finding it hard to sell
the bonds. As the municipal bond market dries up, so will funds
for public employees, projects, etc. The domino effect has
already started, but our advance revelations have made it
dangerous for them to highlight this just yet. But you can be
sure that the word "default" has not been so carefully given its
present frightening connotations without a purpose--and it may be
that we will all see that purpose within a matter of a few days.
A court ruling is due soon concerning the Constitutionality of
the so-called moratorium imposed by New York. Should it be ruled
unConstitutional, financial chaos will be the result in New York,
and that chaos will quickly be labeled "default."
There are a whole string of other time bombs like that too,
all ticking away. When the time is just right, the Rockefeller
Brothers can set off whichever one is the handiest. When they
do, the results will be the same, regardless of the exact timing.
Armed with this knowledge, I hope you have taken the necessary
steps to protect yourself, such as I described in my AUDIO BOOK
No. 1, on "HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF DURING THE COMING DEPRESSION
AND THIRD WORLD WAR."
Meanwhile, gradualism continues to be the word for the step by
step actions of the Rockefeller Brothers; so if you watch the
Stock Market, for example, don't fall into the trap of reading
great significance into the daily up-and-down wiggles. What
counts is the month-to-month trend--and that is down. The Stock
Market crash actually began in July 1975, as I said it would, but
it does not yet suit the purposes of the Rockefeller Brothers for
this to be obvious to all. Instead, the overall market is
sinking downward in gradual, almost imperceptible phases. It is
crashing in slow motion like a bad dream.
Meanwhile most people--that is, those who do not specialize in
the Stock Market and financial matters--generally keep track of
little more than the Dow Jones industrial average. There are
nearly 2,000 stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange but the
Dow index is an average of just 30 of them. They were chosen to
be representative of the whole Market, assuming no manipulation,
but that assumption is no longer correct. Very special attention
is paid to the manipulation of prices of these 30 stocks. As a
result, the real behavior of the Market can be completely hidden
from the general public. Whenever man is involved, races will be
fixed.
Turning to the monetary picture, a development I first
revealed in April of this year has just happened. At the 1975
"International Gold and Monetary Conference" here in Washington,
D.C., I revealed confidential information to the effect that the
Soviet Union would soon be issuing an international gold ruble,
and just a few days ago it happened. The Soviet Union has
introduced their "chervonetz", or 10-ruble gold piece. It bears
the date 1975, and only 250,000 have been minted, 50,000 of which
are already here in the United States out of 125,000 to be
consigned to the United States. Under a 1923 Soviet law it is
legal tender, making it convertible. This new gold coin is an
attempt by the Russians for the first time in 52 years to
penetrate the world gold-coin market and to compete directly with
the "krugerrand" issued by South Africa. The chervonetz is about
one-quarter of the size and value of the krugerrand, which means
that South Africa will have to take measures to compete with it.
The other major event, supposedly in the monetary sphere, is
the Monetary Conference, so called, at Rambouillet Castle near
Paris late last month. It was a summit meeting of the Big
Six--the United States, France, Britain, West Germany, Italy, and
Japan, but please note that Canada was not there, and for very
good reasons.
First, here's what happened, then I will explain why it
happened, which is far more important.
Treasury Secretary Simon said on his way back from the meeting
which took place over the week-end of November 16, 1975, that a
compromise had been reached on exchange rates, among other
things. France wanted fixed rates, while the United States had
been campaigning for a "free" float to continue. The compromise
that was reached is just what I had told you it would be: stable
yet flexible rates of exchange, which they chose to call a
"managed float." Simon also said he hoped that, quote: "the
agreement will be approved at an international meeting in
January, and that Congress will readily approve necessary changes
in the Articles governing the operation of the International
Monetary Fund."
Now a "managed float" from a legal point of view does not
require any change in the Articles that govern the IMF unless it
changes the par value of gold. So what is brewing now is a
system of so-called "stable yet flexible rates of exchange"
indirectly tied to a par value of gold. I revealed in my monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 5 for October 1975 that the plan is to repeg
gold at or about $195.00 per ounce, and this is still on track.
This, in effect, will amount to still another devaluation of the
dollar, and the official price of gold ($42.22) will be abolished
beginning early next year. Keep in mind that the private gold
markets will not be closed; and after this action, private gold
prices will go past the $195 mark. A leapfrog condition will
have been set in motion that will jack the price of gold higher
and higher, and the process will be intensified by the coming war
and world-wide economic problems. David Rockefeller's gold
skyrocket will be launched at last; but the 50-million ounces of
gold to be sold by the IMF will never reach the private market,
going instead to the central bankers by way of sale, auction, or
restitution. Five-million ounces of this, returned to the United
States under the restitution provision, will be used in an
attempt to continue to cover up the Fort Knox Gold Scandal along
with gold now being smuggled into the United States by the CIA
for the private coffers of the Rockefeller Brothers.
The biggest question about Rambouillet is: Why did the United
States compromise? The answer is that a "free-floating" system
would be too uncontrollable during the upcoming limited nuclear
war against the Arab OPEC nations which is targeted to begin late
in February 1976, just two months from now. So the United States
had to compromise to complete its preparations for this war.
What I am telling you, my friend, is a military secret, or was
until I revealed it in detail in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6
last month. The code name for this military attack, by the way,
is "OPERATION COBRA", and preparations for it are moving rapidly.
Already the first detachment of crack United States Marines are
now in Germany ready for swift deployment into the Sinai, where
war will break out; and the build-up toward the staged
provocation to ignite the conflict--namely, an attack on the
so-called American advisers in the Sinai--is progressing
steadily. Only today, December 21, 1975, the latest step was
taken in this plan when a CIA-supported group made a provocative
attack on OPEC Oil Ministers at their headquarters in Vienna,
Austria. This is intended to lead, by stages, to reprisal
actions against the Americans stationed in the Sinai.
HOW THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN ROCKEFELLER CORPORATE SOCIALISM AND
SOVIET STATE SOCIALISM IS TAKING US INTO NUCLEAR WAR
Now I turn briefly to Topic #3.
Topic #3--As I explained last month, the limited nuclear war
which is scheduled to begin soon in the Middle East is only a
part of a much larger picture. The Rockefeller Brothers have
designs on India, while the Soviet Union has its eyes on China.
In resource-rich Africa, both the Rockefellers and their Soviet
allies have an interest. So the real theater in the war now
brewing is Asia. After the OPEC oil wells are capped by the
nuclear strike, Russia's western flank (Europe) will be crippled
and Africa will be more easily finished off by the guerrilla
warfare already going on there. Oil-hungry Japan will be thrown
into the arms of Red China which, by the way, has just announced
it can now export oil; and the stage will be set for the big
Asian war that is to be the next round in the bloody game of
global monopoly. The strategy of all this was spelled out in my
monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 last month. My purpose now, however,
is simply to point out the basic nature of all this.
It is, my friend, a DRIVE FOR CONTROL--control of people, of
resources, of the entire world. Furthermore, it is a product of
unholy alliance between the State Socialists in the Soviet Union
and the Corporate Socialists in the United States, the
Rockefeller Brothers and their client followers.
Many people mistake the Rockefeller Brothers for capitalists,
but that is not at all what they are. David Rockefeller, for
example, has been quoted as saying, "I believe in the enterprise
system", but he does not say "free", much less "competitive
enterprise." The entire Rockefeller empire is built on the exact
opposite of that--monopolies and trusts. Their major
multinational corporations are an ingenious device for casting
off loyalties to any country, and they are already more powerful,
collectively, than most nations. The Rockefellers, you see, are
Corporate Socialists. Corporate Socialism and State Socialism
are nothing more than two sides of the same coin. Both boil down
to the same thing--dictatorships or near-dictatorships--enabling
a very few people to control everyone else. Once you grasp this
fact, the alliance between the Rockefellers and the Soviets will
no longer surprise you, nor will the fact that the Russian
Revolution in 1917 was financed by the Rockefeller interests.
The State Socialism of Nazi Germany also falls into place
since it, too, was just another version of the same pattern. In
all of these cases, as well as many others we see today, the
Corporate Socialist empire of the Rockefeller Brothers gains
handsomely--mineral riches, oil, and other rewards--in return for
cooperation with State Socialism.
Thus it is that Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a
Rockefeller agent for 20 years and more, defends the Soviet Union
against charges of cheating on the so-called SALT Arms Limitation
agreement, but allows his out-going Ambassador to Canada to
publicly accuse our closest neighbor of being "no longer reliable
or to be trusted." Kissinger speaks not for you or me, but for
the Rockefeller Brothers; and to them, Russia is the ally, the
friend, while our close friends in Canada are the 'enemy', the
people not to be trusted, because Canada's government now knows
what is in the wind and they are taking all the necessary steps
to weather the storm. The Canadian government wants no part of
the coming war, monetary chaos, and all the rest of it, and has
privately said so to Kissinger in no uncertain terms. So Canada
has become 'unreliable', which means outside the circle of firm
Rockefeller control. Bravo for Canada! Long may she continue on
her independent course.
Ultimately the greedy misdeeds of the Rockefeller Brothers and
their allies will be their eventual undoing. Even now both
Nelson Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger have doomed themselves by
handling some of the gold that was taken out of Fort Knox. That
gold was contaminated by the radioactive plutonium-239 super
poison, and now their bodies are contaminated with it. Even
though they and the rest of the Rockefeller organization may well
succeed in destroying our Republic IF WE DO NOT ACT, they will
not live long to enjoy it. What poetic justice! Their dose is
even stronger than that received by the Congressmen and newsmen
who visited the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox in September
1974. Yes, eventually, the huge empire of the Rockefeller
Brothers and their allies will tear itself apart, and perhaps
destroy the world in the process. But meanwhile, IF WE DO NOT
ACT NOW, there will be untold suffering for millions--ourselves,
our children, and probably our children's children. Can we
possibly sit by and let that happen? Or do we act NOW, while we
still can, and take back our rightful control over our own
destinies? For me, there can be only one choice, and I hope for
YOU as well.
Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. I wish all of you a
blessed Christmas and a healthy, happy, holy New Year. May God
bless each and every one of you.
Source
DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #6
Audio letter No. 06
Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net "AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books, Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape recording. Reproduced under open license granted by Audio Books, Inc. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hello everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 14, 1975, and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 6. As I speak to you today, the four Rockefeller Brothers--David, Nelson, John D. III, and Laurance--operating as a unit, are nearing the goal line in their merciless drive to enslave America. Even so, as I discussed in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for July 1975, they have been partially tripped up recently by unexpected obstacles, both here and abroad--obstacles caused by your increasing awareness of what is going on. Their grip on the ball has been loosened a trifle, and they are beginning to lose their balance. They can be stopped; but this will only happen if each of us keeps doing our part, spreading the word by all possible means about what is happening. Otherwise they still can, and will, reach their goal line of DICTATORSHIP. One thing we should always keep in mind is that you and I are not alone in this fight. There are many, many members of the United States Intelligence Service who do not agree with the horrendous perversion of their activities that is going on under the control of the Rockefeller Brothers, so they give me information and I pass it on to you. I'm fighting on their behalf, among other things, especially for over 500 ex-CIA and ex-FBI officers and agents who are now "dead" on file, agents who were part of "OPERATION DEEP FREEZE." Last month I mentioned the electronic techniques of psychological programming which are now in use. Similar techniques are used on agents themselves in Operation DEEP FREEZE, enabling them to assume false identities so completely that they can even pass lie detector tests. They are programmed this way for an assignment and are supposed to be deprogrammed afterward, releasing their minds from this artificial state. But some of these agents have been double-crossed by the CIA and FBI for certain reasons--pronounced "dead" on file and dumped out on the street without being de-programmed. They are left without access to jobs, welfare, or in most cases even their families. Many of those in this situation are the very men who most want what is right for America--not for the international conquests of the Rockefellers; and, therefore, I'm fighting their fight as best I can. The three topics I want to discuss today parallel the three AUDIO BOOKS that I have recorded so far for Audio Books, Inc. In those I have tried to give you essential background information. In my monthly AUDIO LETTERS, on the other hand, I am trying to keep you continually informed of the latest plans and developments on a current events basis. My first AUDIO BOOK released October 1974 warned of the coming depression and war, and today my Topic #1 is: THE FORD DEPRESSION, ASIAN WAR, AND THE IMPENDING DOOM OF THE OPEC NATIONS. My second AUDIO BOOK released March 1975 explained the "Fort Knox Gold Scandal" and its crucial role in destroying our economy and our Republic. And today my Topic #2 is: FORT KNOX PLUTONIUM AND OUR SELLOUT BY CONGRESS. My third AUDIO BOOK released July 1975 tells you all about the "NEW CONSTITUTION" which has already been written secretly for America's conversion into a dictatorship, and today my Topic #3 is: GERALD FORD'S LAST DAYS AS PRESIDENT. Topic #1--Last month in my AUDIO LETTER No. 5 I explained how the four Rockefeller Brothers are preparing to sacrifice New York City as one way of triggering what will be called "The Ford Depression", and on October 17, 1975, a dress rehearsal was held for the default of New York City. Sudden news bulletins the previous day said that New York City was on the brink of default; and for 24 hours the TV and radio news was filled with dire speculations about what might happen. The cliffhanger ended with a default being avoided only by a matter of minutes, and in the process the financial term "default" was transformed into a household word--and a frightening one at that. For weeks President Ford and his spokesmen have been opposing any federal aid to prevent default, and so had Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller--that is, until October 11, 1975, just a week before the near-default in New York. On that date, October 11, Rockefeller suddenly launched a public campaign of speaking in favor of aid to New York, even while still working behind the scenes in Congress and the banking community to prevent it. Thus began the carefully-orchestrated public split between Ford and Rockefeller that is to leave Ford holding the bag when our financial catastrophe arrives very shortly. Twelve days later, on October 29, Ford crawled out still further on the limb that Rockefeller is sawing off by announcing that he would absolutely veto any kind of legislation Congress might send him to bail out New York City; and only four days after that, Rockefeller put further distance between himself and his lackey Ford by removing himself from the Vice-Presidential ticket for next year. Many people are falling right into Nelson Rockefeller's trap as a result, discounting Rockefeller in their thinking and leaving Ford 100% in the spotlight. Because of considerations such as those I discussed last month, the effects of a default by New York City, or State, would not merely ripple through our economy--a tidal wave would be a better term. Even if the federal government or Federal Reserve does step in to apply financial band-aid, the Rockefeller Brothers, through their control of the Federal Reserve System as well as the Government, have it within their own power either to intensify this process or to soften it. But as of now, they are preparing to pull out all the stops. Meanwhile, Government economic spokesmen are lying when they say our economy is recovering. The United States dollar is sinking overseas, and our domestic economy is on the ropes ready for a knock out punch from a New York default, stock market crash, or other such blow. A lot of attention is being paid especially to the effect a New York default would have on the nation's banks. Well, there are quite a few banks around the country that would be in trouble, but the big New York City banks owned by the Rockefellers are not among them! They hold vast amounts of New York City bonds but that's in trust for other investors--the banks themselves do not own them. The Rockefellers, as I said before, bailed out months ago; and, after the crash, they will be thoroughly liquid ready to buy up everything in sight for a penny on the dollar. Of course they could force one of their own banks to fail for the sake of appearances; but if they do, it will be strictly voluntarily on their part. A more telling warning of the impact of default came from the Bank of America, the largest bank in the world and also controlled by the Rockefellers. They revealed that over two-thirds of New York City bonds are held by individuals, not banks. The life savings of many people are, therefore, directly at stake. The economic calamity now brewing in the United States is, as I have explained before, to beat us into such a submissive condition that we will accept a dictatorship under the new Rockefeller Constitution a year from now. Already the building attack on the Food Stamp Program is leading into something called the Federal Work Job Program. It will seem to offer food and benefits to those in need as the depression deepens--but at the expense of signing away your present CONSTITUTIONAL rights in the fine print. Its actual purpose is the conscription of people into slave labor--which may not be immediately apparent since no barbed wire compounds will be involved at first; but when the time comes, they are scheduled to be packed up and sent to the Middle East to help reconstruct that area after the coming war--never to be heard from again! To get Americans to accept such schemes, the food shortages I have been warning about for over a year now are being engineered. One factor in this has to do with shutting off the flow of natural gas used to make fertilizer in California, which supplies up to 40% of some of the food supplies used in the United States. Another factor is the continuing shipments of grain to Soviet Russia on so-called "sale terms" which are only 10% down, the rest guaranteed by YOU, the American taxpayer!! Official estimates of the Soviet grain crop keep being revised downward as an excuse and cover for additional shipments, but no evidence of Soviet crop failures has ever been given to the United States Agriculture Department--and it never will be, because the alleged Soviet "drought" is fictitious. Instead, the Soviet Union is stockpiling for the coming Asian war! As it now stands, my friends, the war in Asia could come as much as one year earlier than was indicated by my information just a few short months ago. As of now, the Rockefeller Brothers and their Soviet partners have set a target date of February 1976, just a few short months from now for initiation of hostilities, which are planned to begin in the Middle East. Such a shift in timing is unnerving, but so far the information I have been able to give you has been more accurate than that which Secretary of State Henry Kissinger sometimes provides in confidential briefings of top businessmen. For example, in the early fall of last year Kissinger briefed a group of about 100 American businessmen who do business in the Middle East, and told them that by late spring of 1975 there would be war in the Middle East. The war he was talking about is a war that is now set to begin in February 1976. What Kissinger was really talking about was his diplomatic objectives. My own information, however, indicated that conditions would not be ripe yet for a Middle East war at least through the summer of 1975, and that information turned out to be correct. But the war preparations are indeed moving quietly now, and very quickly. First, David Rockefeller must obtain an international monetary agreement on exchange rates at the January meeting of the International Monetary Fund, since a floating currency during wartime would be unmanageable. Meanwhile in the diplomatic ring, Kissinger's Sinai Accord is the key feature. You may have been left with the impression by our kept press that the Sinai Accord is between Egypt and Israel with 200 American technicians being sent there just as a sort of glue to make it stick. But, my friends, this is just not the case. It is in reality two (2) separate treaties--one between the United States and Israel, the other between the United States and Egypt. They are executive agreements in effect considered as being treaties. By ratifying these so-called treaties comprising the Sinai Accord, the United States Congress has sold the American people right down the road to war! They have now set the stage for America to be involved in something we have not had for 30 years--a declared official war. The 200 American advisors, or technicians so called, are already in the Sinai, as President Ford admitted in a slip of the tongue on "Meet the Press", November 9, 1975. And they have two (2) purposes. They are the vanguard of a secret American limited nuclear strike force, and they are also to be the deliberate targets for a provocation that will be used to ignite the war. Now that we are officially at peace with Egypt by way of the Sinai Accord treaty, we will have to officially breach that peace--that is, declare war, in order to retaliate against this rigged attack on the Americans. The Anti-Zionism Resolution which has just been passed in the United Nations is also part of this plan. The Arabs have fallen into a terrible trap by pushing through this Resolution which will be used to whip up fears that Israel is being surrounded and will be snuffed out if America does not respond militarily to the provocative actions mentioned a moment ago. The fighting between Moslems and Christians in Lebanon has been fomented by Libya, which is controlled by the Rockefellers, for two (2) reasons. For one thing the excitement there distracts attention away from the true, larger picture of war preparations in the Middle East; but even more importantly, the fighting in Lebanon has given the Rockefellers the excuse they wanted for pulling their own companies out of that area prior to the coming war. As of now, all of the big United States multinational corporations formerly based in Lebanon have pulled up stakes and headed for London, out of the war zone. The American foreign policy known as detente with Soviet Russia has, in reality, hardened into an alliance, in spite of recent remarks by Secretary of State Kissinger for domestic consumption. While the United States bargains away its defense capabilities at the so-called SALT talks and receives nothing in return, Russia goes right on doubling and redoubling their military build-up with Kissinger and the President Ford and Rockefeller consent. Meanwhile the United States is being turned into a factory to supply the Soviet Union. The Rockefeller Brothers think that they and the U.S.S.R. will thus end up as partners ruling the world; but the horrible risk, my friends, that they are taking is that after the coming Asian war is out of the way, Russia will double-cross the Rockefeller Brothers and take over the whole world for itself. Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger was fired by Nelson Rockefeller through his puppet President, Gerald Ford because he was getting in the way of this alliance. Schlesinger insisted, very properly, that true detente must be balanced with a strong defense, and he refused to knuckle under. So he had to go, but as he went he said some words that should be burned indelibly into the mind of every American, and I want to quote here: "Some years from now someone will raise the question, 'Why weren't we warned?' and I wanted to be able to say, 'Indeed you were.'" The Red Chinese can see what is developing, that is why they accorded Secretary of State Henry Kissinger such a frosty treatment during his recent visit. Red China is being encircled by the Soviet Union with the help of the Rockefellers through their manipulation of the wealth of the United States. Indo-China has been delivered into Soviet hands in return for turning over the rich offshore oil leases of North Vietnam to the Rockefellers. The coming war is intended to suck up India, Red China, and all of Africa into complete domination by the Rockefeller-Soviet alliance. In the process, it is also to slap down Europe and Japan, which are trying to squirm free of the Rockefeller bonds that already grip them. Here now is the grand strategy for the war which I can reveal to you for the very first time; and, as always, I reveal it in the hope that doing so will throw a monkey wrench into these plans and cause them to fail. World War II was used by the Rockefellers to bring Britain down to her knees, as explained in my first AUDIO BOOK last year, and also to make great inroads into Western Europe. Since World War II, Britain has been generally subservient to the Rockefellers, but lately both Europe, and Japan, which has been the special domain of John D. III since the War, are showing signs of struggling to break free. However, 99% of Japan's oil needs are supplied by the Middle Eastern Arab members of OPEC, and 67% of the oil needs of the European Economic Community come from there also. On top of that, India, one of the prime targets of conquest in the planned war, is also heavily dependent upon OPEC oil. And Africa, another target, leans heavily upon Europe for all kinds of support and will be easy picking if Europe is neutralized. The OPEC nations of the Middle East, therefore, hold many of the keys for accomplishment of the Rockefeller-Soviet joint objectives in the Asian war. Plans now exist for the Americans in the Sinai to be attacked and for over 100 of them to be killed, enraging Congress and public opinion in the United States. On top of that, the drum beat which has begun with the United Nations "Anti-Zionism Resolution" will by then make it appear that Israel is in danger of extinction. War will thus be declared by then-President Rockefeller's rubber-stamp Congress. Cobra helicopter gunships have already been delivered secretly to the Sinai, and these will be equipped with air-to-ground tactical atomic missiles which have been in the Sinai secretly for two (2) years under strict American control. After hostilities break out, this limited nuclear strike force is to put the OPEC oil wells out of action with atomic blasts. No nation in the Middle East, including Israel and Lebanon, will escape radioactive fallout from this limited nuclear strike. And the oil wells themselves, due to radiation, will remain unusable and capped off for a period of approximately 10 years. The United States, which currently gets about 19% of its oil from the Middle East, will experience manipulated shortages far worse than those during the Arab oil embargo two years ago, and this will help further rip our domestic economy to shreds. But the effect on Europe and Japan will be far more drastic. At one stroke the heart of Europe will be crippled and completely at the mercy of the merciless Rockefeller Brothers; and Japan, which is being rudely rebuffed by the Soviet Union and wooed by China these days, will be thrown fully into the arms of China. China has begun developing its own vast oil deposits and could provide some to Japan in return for an alliance against China's mortal enemy, the Soviet Union. Thus will the Sino-Japanese alliance be cemented. The already bitter clashes between China and Russia on the one hand, plus lesser skirmishes between China and Russia's client state, India, on the other hand, will set the stage for the larger Asian war, which is planned to follow very quickly. Africa, cut off from its ties to Europe, will be like a ripe plum, ready for the plucking by the Rockefellers, and this includes Rhodesia and South Africa. I turn now to Topic #2. Topic #2--The French have a saying that "The more things change, the more they remain the same." How true that is, and how tragic. It's been over a year and a half now since I first exposed the FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL during Congressional testimony. Long ago I offered publicly to go to jail as a rabble rouser if I could not prove my charges in an appropriate legal forum. And has Congress acted? NO! And now the gold manipulations have entered a new phase. Gold, my friends, is now coming back into the United States along with huge amounts of illegal drugs--in return for American-made guns and weapons which are being sent abroad for use in wars, revolutions, and terrorism! The gold now coming in is not reflected in Treasury records. Instead, it is being hidden around the country by the CIA for the Rockefellers. The Rockefeller interests want to have it handy for sale to the Government for war purposes or for other purposes at the elevated prices that will soon prevail. Meanwhile, as I revealed last month, the Fort Knox Gold story has taken a deadly new turn; and, as before, Congress is doing absolutely nothing about it. The Central Core Vault of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox contains canisters of liquid radioactive superpoison processed from Plutonium 239, the deadliest substance imaginable. These canisters are leaking due to corrosion, and the radioactive leakage is escaping through the porous concrete walls of the Vault and through the dehumidifying system and getting out into the countryside to be carried away on the winds, contrary to what officials tell you. The prevailing winds in that area for the past several years have been very unusual--from essentially due west rather than from the northwest, as is more common. As a result, the thin invisible fog of radioactive poison from Fort Knox is being carried from the Depository (which is located south of Louisville) eastward in the general direction of Lexington and West Virginia, and onward approximately toward Washington, D.C.; and this leakage has already been going on for several years in sufficient quantity to be having an initial impact on health statistics now. My own investigators have reported to me that many doctors in the region east of Fort Knox are baffled lately by a large increase in the incidence of cancers of all types; and on November 7, 1975, just a week ago, the Government itself released statistics that show the same thing. The National Cancer Institute announced that so far this year the cancer death rate nation-wide is up by 5.2%. This is five times the rate of increase that has prevailed over a period of many years, and they frankly admit that they are at a loss to explain it. But buried in those same official Government statistics is a regional breakdown, and that east-central states containing Fort Knox and the area east of it shows an astronomical 17 to 18% increase! Now, before I go on, there is something I feel I must make clear; and I am not just sitting back and saying, "Well here's something sensational to talk about." Any such callous attitude on my part would be impossible. It so happens that my beloved father and other members of my family are in my childhood home of Huntington, West Virginia, smack in the path of the Fort Knox radioactive killer fog. They are among the millions of people who have already been exposed to the first whiffs of plutonium poison, and I fear for their lives if nothing is done to stop this leakage, which is steadily accelerating; and the feeling I have for them carries over to millions of others--men, women, and innocent little children who are in the same boat all because of the insane efforts of the Rockefeller Brothers to seize power at any cost and by any means. Some will also say, no doubt, that I shouldn't tell you things like this because it will cause alarm; but, my friends, this is something to be alarmed about. It's no joke. If I did not tell you, I would be just like a Civil Defense official who, warned of an imminent attack by enemy bombing aircraft, would say: "I'm not going to turn on the air raid sirens because that might frighten people." But, you may say, wouldn't the Government warn us and take the necessary measures to correct such a situation at Fort Knox? My answer is: NO. The Government is stonewalling it; and up 'till now major newspapers, news magazines, and the TV and radio networks are also sitting on this life-and-death story with one exception. Two days ago, on November 12, 1975, the Louisville Courier-Journal broke the Fort Knox plutonium story on its front page, in the best traditions of newspaper reporting. Their courageous exercise of free speech guaranteed by the First Amendment to our CONSTITUTION may make it impossible even for the Rockefeller-controlled major media to ignore the situation indefinitely. In any case, top business and financial people here and abroad are being kept aware of the Fort Knox fiasco, thanks to specialized newsletters of all kinds. While the major media try to brainwash you with slanted news and distract you with all kinds of entertainment, these newsletters tell what is really going on. One of the best of these, which began informing its readers about the strange goings-on at Fort Knox over a year ago, is: Myers Finance and Energy, edited at P.O. Box 5531, Station A, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. In his Oct. 31, 1975 issue Mr. Myers caps off a story on Fort Knox by quoting the following letter of my able associate, Mr. Ed Durell, to the Acting Director of the Mint, quote: "I now ask you for the record, please, to confirm or deny the existence of the Central Core Vault at the U.S. Bullion Depository at Fort Knox, Ky. I refer to the single, large, centrally located underground chamber serviced by elevator." As Mr. Myers asks in his Newsletter, quote: "Why can't the Acting Director of the Mint answer simply YES or NO? The whole nation is asking a question. Why won't they answer?" For two months now we have received a dead silence from the Government. Every one of their past evasions has confirmed and deepened their guilt--and they know it, so they are stonewalling it. What then is Congress doing? Is it, too, just writing off 9,000,000 people rather than sound the alarm and get the deadly situation at Fort Knox corrected? YES. Listen. As just pointed out, the United States Government has to this day never admitted the existence of the Central Core Vault, which was not mentioned to the 100-odd visitors of Fort Knox last year on September 23, 1974. To admit its existence would all by itself prove that the so-called "Gold Inspection Visit" by Congressmen and newsmen was a total fraud, and also the so-called "Audit" done by the GAO and the Treasury together. And since the Central Core Vault is where the leaking plutonium poison is, they want desperately to keep you from knowing that the Vault exists. I am now going to reveal previously confidential discussions which have been held between Congressman Otis Pike, Chairman of the House Intelligence Investigating Committee, and myself and associates. I'm making it public now because Congressman Pike himself has breached this confidentiality in the worst possible way by turning over our information, without our consent, to the Church Committee in the Senate. As I explained last month, Senator Church is already sitting on the plutonium poison story while he plays games with you and me; and now, for whatever reasons, Congressman Otis Pike, too, has let America down. In mid September I held private discussions with Congressman Pike about the situation at Fort Knox. At that time I did not yet know about the plutonium poison stored there, but I did know that the CIA and FBI were tied in with the theft of America's gold from Fort Knox on behalf of the Rockefeller Brothers. He appeared to be generally interested and courageous as well--a quality which has virtually disappeared from the United States Congress today; but his major sticking point which he came back to time and time again was the Central Core Vault at Fort Knox. Its existence had never been admitted by the Government, so Congressman Pike could not believe that it did exist. The No. 1 requirement that he placed on us was, therefore, that we prove that the Central Core Vault does exist. So on September 26, 1975, we met again with Congressman Pike and two of his top staffers in his office, and this time we had with us no less than a former Commanding General of Fort Knox, Lieut. General John L. Ryan, Jr., U.S. Army (retired). General Ryan commanded Fort Knox from 1956 to 1959. He had also served two earlier tours at Fort Knox, the first being in the late 1930's when he was placed in charge of the Army contingent that was assigned to help store the nation's gold in the Bullion Depository for the very first time. All of the gold was put in the Central Core Vault at that time, having been constructed specifically for that purpose. The many small jail-cell-like storage compartments seen by the Fort Knox visitors last year were also in existence at that time but were not intended for the storage of gold but for other valuables. General Ryan stated that for the entire duration of his long experience with Fort Knox, the gold was always kept in the Central Core Vault. He also said he was mystified as to why the gold would ever have been removed from the Central Core Vault and placed in the small jail-cell compartments on the levels above, which offer a much lower degree of security. Congressman Pike then asked us for certain further information, including specific connections between the Fort Knox affair and the Intelligence community which is within the jurisdiction of Congressman Pike's Committee. We agreed to provide what he asked, and it was in following up the connection between Fort Knox and the Intelligence industry that my sources informed me of the hideous plutonium poison in the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox. But when we returned to Congressman Pike ready to provide witnesses and other evidence about the plutonium and other things, Mr. Pike's response had changed. It is now the classical position that is always used to say 'good-bye' on Capitol Hill, quote: "We're too busy to work on this." Our information given to him in confidence has been unceremoniously dumped on that dead-letter office, the Church Committee; and Congressman Pike's opportunity to stand head, shoulders, and waist above everyone else in Washington by simply doing his duty, has been forfeited. Only an informed, aroused public can now move Congress in the right direction. One of the unanswered questions when I recorded AUDIO LETTER No. 5 last month was why this insane radioactive plutonium poison was ever made at all. Now I can tell you. During the early and mid 1960's over 200 pounds of this superpoison was made for the CIA and FBI Intelligence communities. It was processed in four plants--two in Louisville, Kentucky, one in North Dakota, and one in southern California. One thing it is handy for, in very small doses, is putting troublesome individuals out of the way. But why so much plutonium poison? For political blackmail, my friends! In 1966 the CIA divided up this poison and sent about 60 pounds to each of four Latin American countries--Peru, Panama, Bolivia, and Argentina. There threats were made that it would be used to contaminate United States planned and built water aqueduct systems--can you imagine?--unless certain political and economic actions were taken. In Argentina this successfully laid the foundation for the return to power of the Peron group; and then the poison was no longer needed there, and so it was returned to the United States in 1968. But a problem arose: where to store this illegal nuclear poison. CIA agents within the Treasury, however, knew that the Central Core Vault at the Fort Knox Bullion Depository was being emptied of gold and suggested that it be stored there. This was done with all but 12 grams (less than half an ounce), which the CIA extracted from one canister to experiment with. This 12-gram sample of the plutonium poison, whose full effects still were not fully understood at that time, was taken to the White Sands Proving Grounds in New Mexico for evaluation purposes. During the experiment there, about 3 grams 'accidentally' leaked into an underground water supply which was being used by 12 families in that sparsely settled area. All of them died quickly from the poison; and the CIA mounted an elaborate cover-up, burying those innocent victims secretly. Perhaps you will recall, in fact, some strange news items several years ago about the sudden disappearance of some ranch folk out West, a disappearance that never was explained. Well, now you know what happened. At about the same point in time, by the way, IT&T was involved in the so-called "Mole Hole Project" to drill deep into the earth's crust, for reasons which were never made clear publicly. Its purpose, I can reveal, was to reach a hypothetical underground 'world river', so-called, and contaminate it with the plutonium poison to deny its use to everyone. After spending vast amounts of taxpayers' money, it was abandoned as an impractical project. Insane? YES. Fiction? NO. The CIA agent who was put in charge of getting the poison to the Latin American countries under cover of his multinational company, was named Harold Leroy White. Once he became fully aware of the details of the project, however, he became disgusted and sick at heart and decided to go to--guess who?--Senator Barry Goldwater with the story. He arranged to see Goldwater but died on the way, apparently because his intentions became known to the wrong people. Whether Goldwater knew what White wanted to see him about is not clear from my information so far, but it does seem strange that we keep running into Senator Goldwater in all of this. First there was the crucial Chapter 12 of the unpublished Tatom manuscript on Fort Knox, which Goldwater obtained from Tatom's widow after Tatom's death under suspicious circumstances. Goldwater has never released the manuscript, even though I challenged him to do so in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 1 for June 1975. Now, there's the Harold Leroy White case. Did Goldwater know what was afoot or not? And now he has come out in strong public opposition to any further investigation of the CIA and other United States Intelligence agencies. What's going on here, Senator Goldwater?? Since I first revealed the presence and leakage of the radioactive Plutonium 239 superpoison in the Central Core Vault at Fort Knox, I have been astonished by the failure of some people to stop and realize what it means. My associates and I were hoping to obtain a court injunction to open the Vault and prove that the gold is gone--but now, God forbid. The whole Depository should be abandoned immediately and covered up with a pyramid of lead, cement, and stone--whatever it takes to shut off its deadly contents from the environment before its effects become a runaway disaster. It would be a pyramid with a poison core for thousands of years, but that is apparently the best that can be done now. Topic #3--If the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox is indeed abandoned and entombed under a giant pyramid to shut it off from the world, it would be an ironic symbol of the miscarriage of Rockefeller power and ultimately a symbol of the self-destruction which the four Rockefeller Brothers are bringing upon themselves. If you will take out a $1.00 bill and look at the back as I talk, you will see what I mean by this irony. On the left side you will see the pyramid and eye symbol that today signifies the power of the Rockefellers. They did not invent this symbol, but in 1933 they appropriated it as their own property. In that year their puppet President, Franklin D. Roosevelt came to power, and this symbol appeared on our money for the very first time, and it's been there ever since. Many people attach patriotic and religious meanings to the various parts of this symbol, but that is not what it means to the Rockefellers who put it there. The 1776 (MDCCLXXVI) inscribed at the base of the pyramid refers not to the founding of our Republic but to "May Day" 1776, the day celebrated today by the Communists and radical Socialists the world over. The pyramid itself symbolizes the pyramid of power. At the bottom are you and I, the general public; and its successively smaller layers above us are fewer and fewer people with more and more power. Floating above the pyramid, seemingly unattached to it, is the very hub of power, the essence of which is secrecy--no visible connection with the rest of the pyramid--and spying, symbolized by the mysterious eye with a view in all directions. The words "NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM" on the banner underneath mean "New Order of the Ages"--or freely translated, "New Deal." Little understood symbols like this are one way our secret Rulers have of signaling to one another the progress of their grab for power. They are all around us today, even on postage stamps, and you should watch for them. The same pyramid symbol often appears over Walter Cronkite's shoulder these days when he discusses the economy on CBS TV news. It is also embodied as a triangle at the top of the headboard and footboard of Nelson Rockefeller's celebrated $35,000 bed, which was designed by an artist of Satanic symbols, Max Ernst. Another symbol to watch for on Walter Cronkite's TV News is the Rockefeller Road to the Bicentennial emblem, showing a road heading into the center of a circle of stars. Count the stars--there are not 13, but 10 stars in the circle standing for the 10 'new states' which are to replace the 50 we now have, under the new Rockefeller Constitution. The shake-up of the Ford Cabinet over the weekend of November 2 coinciding with Rockefeller's announcement that he will not run with Ford, or as Vice-President, in 1976, is a clear signal that Ford's remaining days in office are distinctly numbered. CIA Director Colby and Defense Secretary Schlesinger were fired at Nelson Rockefeller's behest, but these unpopular moves were hung like an albatross around President Ford's neck by having him say, "I wanted my guys." At the same time Henry Kissinger was ostensibly taken down a peg. I have always warned that Kissinger would have to go as soon as Nelson, his long-time boss, made his takeover move, because their egos will not permit them to actually work together without terrible friction. Kissinger knows this too, and is a Little Hitler waiting in the wings under the illusion that he may be able to displace Nelson Rockefeller and become our Dictator himself under the provisions of the new Rockefeller Constitution. But he has already begun to find out otherwise, and in all likelihood will be successfully removed from the scene regardless of what moves he may make against Nelson. What is already being called the "Sunday Night Massacre" by some of the barking dogs of the Rockefeller media, is only a prelude to bigger shake-ups ahead. Once the onus of the coming crash is firmly stuck to President Ford, the stage will have been set for him to retire from the scene, voluntarily or otherwise, to be replaced by Nelson Rockefeller riding out on his "white horse" to save the nation--just like F.D.R. did in 1933. As it stands now--and please remember that they often change their plans when they are spotlighted--the timetable is as follows: On or about November 20, 1975, New York enters another crisis on the way to default, which will probably come while Ford is off drinking tea in China. Also on November 20, Ronald Reagan, the consummate actor who is Nelson Rockefeller's good friend and America's most two-faced Trojan horse, will make an announcement about his own candidacy. On or about December 20, 1975, Nelson Rockefeller now plans to publicly take the reins of the presidency from the floundering President Ford, the new Herbert Hoover. Ford's image is already in the process of being torn to shreds in a systematic campaign now under way. On January 20, 1976, President Nelson Rockefeller expects to deliver his first "State of the Union" message, which is now being written secretly, and electrify Congress and the nation as he proposes the writing of a New Constitution for America. He will speak of the moment as a solemn one in the nation's experience, a time when the past is being conditioned to the future, and when a law fundamental to all other laws must again be created as it was by our Founders in another time of national trial. For the remainder of the Rockefeller scenario, ending with our acceptance of the New Constitution by National Referendum on rigged voting machines, I refer you to my AUDIO BOOK No. 2 entitled: "THE FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL AND WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU." Finally, around February 1976, war is supposed to break out in the Middle East, to be followed by the greater Asian War. Yes, my friends, this is what is going on. Meanwhile our United States Congress is doing nothing whatever except playing games with you and me. Both the House and the Senate are packed with members who are totally ignorant of the big picture, intimidated by Rockefeller power, and weakened by skeletons in their own closets. Interspersed among them are the Hugh Scotts, the William Proxmires, the Henry Reusses, and the Hubert Humphreys--on both sides of the aisle and in both houses of Congress--who provide the active leadership to lead Congress and the nation down the primrose path being laid out for us by the Rockefeller Brothers. My friends, only public opinion--massive, powerful, focused public opinion--will move Congress in the right direction. It is therefore up to us--you and me, our neighbors, our friends--to save our CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC for ourselves and our children by becoming aware of the truth, spreading awareness of the facts to others, and focusing that awareness into such pressure on Congress that they will realize they must stop catering to the special interests dominated by the Rockefeller Brothers. I hope to have more to say in this vein soon, but for now, use your own imagination, your own resources, and DO WHAT YOU CAN. The hour is late!! Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may God bless each and every one of you. Source
DR. PETER DAVID BETER – AUDIO LETTERS SERIE #5
Audio letter No. 05
Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net "AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books, Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape recording. Reproduced under open license granted by Audio Books, Inc. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This recording is a product of AUDIO BOOKS INC. (Current 1981 address: 1629 K St. NW, Washington, DC 20006) Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is October 15, 1975, and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 5. One year ago this month I made my first cassette tape recording for AUDIO BOOKS INC. It was entitled: "HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF DURING THE COMING DEPRESSION AND THIRD WORLD WAR", and was released as AUDIO BOOK No. 1. Stop and think what has happened since then. It may startle you. In October 1974 our government was still assuring us there was no recession; but the very next month the government announced that there was a recession under way; and today, a year later, we have already endured what is officially the worst recession since the late 1930's. But we haven't seen anything yet! As I say these words, we are again being fed optimistic lies by Rockefeller agents in our government from President Ford on down when we are actually poised on the brink of a far worse economic cliff than the one we fell over a year ago. In this regard I want to talk to you today about the following three topics: #1--THE CIA, FORT KNOX, AND THE POISONING OF AMERICA #2--HOW THE ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS ARE PREPARING TO SACRIFICE NEW YORK CITY TO TRIGGER GENERAL ECONOMIC COLLAPSE #3--THE CONTINUING BUILD-UP TO A NEW U.S. CONSTITUTION AND WAR IN ASIA. Topic #1--On September 19, just a few weeks ago, a mini scandal involving the United States Bureau of the Mint broke nation-wide--"THE GREAT PENNY CAPER" in the words of the Wall Street Journal. Two years ago the Treasury had 1-1/2 million experimental aluminum pennies minted supposedly at the suggestion of Mrs. Mary Brooks, the Director of the United States Mint. Samples went to Senate and House Banking Committee members, and a few went to Mrs. Brooks' own office. In the end, the aluminum penny idea was scrapped, and all those million-plus experimental coins were melted down--all, that is, except a dozen or so that seemed to have disappeared in the Senate, the House, and the Bureau of the Mint offices. Since they are potentially worth thousands of dollars as collectors' items, the Government professes great concern about the situation, and may even be forced to mint the low quality aluminum pennies after all, if they can't be recovered. An Assistant United States Attorney said, quote: "This may just turn out to be the world's worst blunder by the Bureau of the Mint, an egregious case of negligence." Well, my friends, here is a perfect example of the look-over-there distraction tactics that the Rockefellers always use. They make a big to-do about a few pennies while they cover up the FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL. They're playing games with you and me. We have also heard a lot lately about the United States Intelligence Community--the CIA, the FBI, and so on--and a lot of pro and cons about it. First there was the CIA whitewash by CIA boss Nelson Rockefeller with the able assistance of his good friend and Trojan horse, Ronald Reagan--who, by the way, is presently in line to be Nelson's Vice-President once Gerald Ford is out of the way. More recently there have been the lurid revelations by the Senate Intelligence Committee chaired by one Senator Frank Church: assassination plots against Castro, poison dart guns to stun guarddogs at enemy installations, all manner of James Bond-style murder weapons, and even deadly shellfish toxins kept by the CIA despite presidential orders to destroy them. "Strong stuff", you say. Wrong. The Church committee, like the Treasury with its pennies, is playing games with you and me again. The United States Senate hearings on shellfish toxins last month did not reveal anything except the tip of the iceberg. The same applies to what they have not told you about assassinations, psychological programming, and other things. As usual, the Government is telling you just enough to make you think you have been told the truth, while keeping you in the dark about what really matters. So I'm going to tell you a thing or two about what really goes on in the Rockefeller Brothers espionage network. I believe what I am about to reveal, my friends, is actually mind boggling. It's tragic, it's frightening, and frankly, it borders on the unbelievable. But my information, which I have carefully double-checked, comes from sources which have been proven absolutely reliable in the past, therefore the absolute truth to the very best of my knowledge; and I believe you have a right to know the truth about the things that affect your life, your health, and your destiny. Senator Church's committee made a big publicity splash over the 11 grams, less than half an ounce, of the shellfish toxin kept by the CIA in defiance of presidential orders. But they have known for over a month now about something far worse than those shellfish toxins--something that is a direct, immediate threat to unsuspecting citizens right now--and they are not telling you about it. CIA operatives have stolen from 40 to 60 pounds--pounds, not ounces or grams--of deadly radioactive Plutonium-239 from various stations in the United ed States. Plutonium-239 is the deadliest substance imaginable, and is the material used for nuclear weapons; and these 40 to 60 pounds of stolen plutonium have been processed into an incredibly dangerous radioactive superpoison so lethal that one (1) gram--1/28th of an ounce--is enough to kill over 60,000 people; and this insane illegal poison is now stored in the "Central Core Vault" at Fort Knox! The Central Core Vault, which was originally designed to house the nation's gold, has been emptied of that gold and turned by the Rockefellers' spy establishment into a chamber of death, containing enough radioactive superpoison to kill over one-third of the world's population! Shellfish toxins, my eye! But, my friends, you still haven't heard the worst of it. The clandestine operation involving the plutonium poison was not only insane but it has been botched as well. This radioactive liquid poison in the Central Core Vault is stored in a number of lead-lined casks to somewhat resemble large milk cans in outer appearance. Most of these were put there as long ago as 1968, even before the last of the gold left Fort Knox. They have not been subject to the safety precautions spelled out for radioactive materials by the former Atomic Energy Commission, and the containers began corroding long ago. Leakage began occurring several years ago as a result, and it's steadily accelerating now. The entire United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox and its environs are already contaminated with radioactivity, and it is increasing daily! "But", you may ask, "how can these things have happened? How could the gold have been taken out from under the Army's nose? And how could the CIA, or anyone else, have sneaked this plutonium poison into Fort Knox? Everyone knows Fort Knox is impregnable." My friends, the answer is so simple it may amaze you. First, I must correct one erroneous item contained in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for July 1975. It is true that it takes two keys and two people to open the vaults in the Bullion Depository, but the Commanding General of Fort Knox is not one of them! The two people with the keys are the Treasury agent in charge and his deputy, both Treasury officials. Furthermore, control and authority over the depository building and the immediate grounds within the fence surrounding it, lies exclusively with the Treasury Department. The United States Army has no authority whatsoever over the Bullion Depository. The Army never becomes involved in any way with the activities at the Depository except when the Treasury requests Army Guard duty for major shipments of gold. What you probably think of as Fort Knox, the famous Bullion Depository with small grounds and a fence around it, is properly called the "United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox, Kentucky." It is a little Treasury island located geographically within a huge Army Reservation that is called Fort Knox. Access to the Bullion Depository is possible without passing through any Army Guard stations, and without the Army even having to pay any attention. There is a controlled access divided public highway, US 31-W, that runs from Louisville north of Fort Knox south to Elizabethtown, and it runs smack through the middle of the huge Fort Knox Military Reservation. If you stay on that highway, you can drive all the way through Fort Knox without stopping or being interfered with in any way. But if you take any of the exits onto a crossroad within the Fort Knox Reservation, then you will come to a Guardhouse within a few hundred feet. Driving north or south along Highway 31-W through Fort Knox, you come to a point at which you get a good view of the imposing Bullion Depository, which sits on a hill perhaps a quarter mile east of the Highway. If you take the nearest exit from Highway 31-W, you find yourself on a crossroad that goes right past the Depository, right up to an Army Guardhouse where you will, of course, be stopped. But about 50 feet before you reach the Army guard, there's a wide driveway that leads into the Bullion Depository itself. If you turn into that driveway, the Army guard 50 feet down the road will certainly see you, but he need not take any action. Instead, it's up to the Treasury guards to either admit you or keep you out of the Depository grounds itself. Thus the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox is virtually impregnable for any potential thieves from the outside. The Treasury people at the Depository need only squawk once for help, and the Army will be swarming all over the area in moments. But for an "inside job" through the Treasury itself, the Bullion Depository is a sitting duck. Access to the Depository is exactly the same as it would be if the Depository were located clear outside the Fort Knox Military Reservation, since no Army checkpoints have to be passed; and inside the fence that surrounds the Depository building, everything is strictly up to the Treasury--unless they call upon the Army for assistance. So the Treasury Department had to come to terms at some level with the Intelligence people responsible for the radioactive plutonium poison. The United States Treasury is now acting as a nuclear banker for the United States Intelligence Community, which works for the Rockefeller Brothers. They wanted to put their deadly valuables in a great big safety deposit box--the Central Core Vault--and the Treasury allowed them to do so. The people who went to Fort Knox last year on September 23, 1974--six Congressmen, one Senator, and over 100 news media people--were all exposed to this radiation without their knowledge. Far from being warned of this hazard, the very existence of the Central Core Vault was deliberately hidden from the unsuspecting visitors. As a result, every one of those visitors has grounds for a lawsuit against the federal government and against the Treasury officials personally responsible for this terrible trick, under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Had I known about the radioactive plutonium poison at that time, I would have publicly warned everyone to stay away. As it is now, all I can do is to suggest that those who visited Fort Knox last year be checked up medically. It is even more urgent that those who work at the Depository be checked. I am informed that those who have worked there for a sufficient period of time may already have the beginnings of cancer. Most doctors are unfamiliar with the effects of radiation poisoning, and it can easily be misdiagnosed. Elevated blood sugar, irritability, dizziness, itching, elevated temperature, and a number of other symptoms can result from radiation poisoning. For further information I refer you to that wonderful book, "ARE YOU RADIOACTIVE?" by Linda Clark. Knowing what we know now, it is obvious why the man who invited the visitors to Fort Knox last year, United States Treasury Secretary William Simon, knew better than to go there himself. It also explains why the Government has so steadfastly refused to admit the existence of the Central Core Vault. They dare not open it now, even for a peep show. And on October 9 just last week if you will recall, President Ford abruptly canceled--yes, canceled--a scheduled trip to Louisville, Kentucky, near Fort Knox; and just 16 hours earlier I had publicly broken the plutonium poison story in Los Angeles. Before that, our puppet President probably knew nothing about it. But why has the Church committee of the Senate, which has had information about all of this for over a month, kept it so carefully covered up? Has Senator Frank Church, whose presidential ambitions are well known, found what he considers a better use for this life-and-death information than to tell the American people about it? Up to now, the main effects of the radioactive contamination seeping out of the Central Core Vault have been confined mostly to the immediate vicinity of the Bullion Depository itself. But the Central Core Vault was never intended to house radioactive substances. Its walls, ceiling, and floors are made of reinforced concrete several feet thick, but any such concrete structures form thousands of cracks all through it over a period of time--some visible, some microscopic. That makes no difference for gold storage; but for radioactive materials, the concrete structure of the Central Core Vault is like a giant sieve with tiny holes on all sides. Once the radioactive poison gets out of those lead-lined storage-tank cans, as it already is doing, a good fraction of it will eventually find its way outside. A major catastrophe--radioactive poisoning of the entire southeast portion of the United States--is now a real possibility unless steps are taken to prevent it. But I am informed that there is no way to neutralize this radioactive poison. All that can be done is to seal it off from the environment. Even if there were some other safe place to take the leaking cans of poison for storage, which there is not, it would not be safe to open the Central Core Vault now, much less enter it. This means that the United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox must be abandoned forthwith, and a massive tomb of lead and rock built around it to contain the radiation. The contents of the Depository--any left-over dregs of gold still there, the stores of curare poison and other drugs and poisons for the Intelligence Community, Bureau of Engraving plates, important documents, everything--has already been subjected to radioactive contamination, and are unsafe so that they might just as well be entombed with the Depository itself. Needless to say, a project like this--the abandonment of the Bullion Depository and the construction of a radiation shielding mound over it--could scarcely be done and kept secret. Thousands of people drive by the Depository every day on the public highway, US 31-W; and even if that highway were closed, the fate of the Bullion Depository would necessarily become known if these corrective steps were taken. But that would lead back to the source of the trouble--the Rockefeller Brothers themselves through their intrigues with the CIA, FBI, and the rest of the United States Intelligence establishment! The only way the Rockefellers can protect themselves in this hideous thing they have caused, is not to do anything so that no questions will be asked. By the time the spreading effects of the radioactive leakage from Fort Knox can no longer be hidden, they expect to have their dictatorship in place. Then they can do whatever is necessary without worrying about you or I or anybody else. Think about it. Therefore nothing will be done about the hideous, invisible killer fog slowly creeping outward from Fort Knox unless the public knows about it and demands action. Yet Senator Frank Church contents himself with the public posture of shock at a mere half ounce of shellfish toxin; and even those are not being destroyed! If you will notice, the Church committee merely voted to suggest to the CIA that its stockpile of shellfish toxin be turned over to scientific agencies for research. That's like saying: "If you'd like to, why don't you take the poison flask out of your left hand and put it in your right hand instead?!" Senator Church has his publicity. The CIA, FBI, and the rest of the Rockefeller spy network still have easy access to their beloved poisons. The public has been given an exciting show, and made to think everything is being straightened out; and the real secrets of the Rockefeller Brothers end up more secure than ever. If our Republic is to survive, this kind of thing has got to stop. In other ways, too, the CIA and its brothers in the United States Intelligence industry, are knee-deep in things about which you are not being given the slightest hint. The Rockefeller spy and espionage establishment specializes in poisoning minds, as well as bodies. I refer especially to the many techniques of psychological programming which they have at their disposal. Even President Nixon, after all, was Watergated out of office through an elaborate CIA plot on Nelson Rockefeller's behalf that pivoted around psychological profiling of Nixon and many of those who surrounded him in the White House. An artificial environment was created at the White House during the Watergate siege with predictable results based on the psychological profiles of Nixon and his aides. After it was all over, you may recall, some of the Nixon people expressed confusion and amazement at what had happened. They could not understand how they had lost their way and become totally divorced from reality. But this is only one aspect of the psychological control exercised on selected individuals by the Rockefellers through their Intelligence web. They also have a variety of brainwashing techniques including highly advanced secret electronic devices. All that is necessary to use certain of these techniques is to get a victim into a hospital. Once he or she is there, it's all over. In this controlled environment, a millivolt system with small electrodes is used to alter the brain wave pattern and inject thoughts and tendencies. As a result, a person can actually be programmed to do things they normally would not--say, to leak information from a Congressional committee doing special investigative work; or a world leader can be programmed to change his policies; or the wife of a diplomat can be turned into a spy; or a world leader can be assassinated by a close relative programmed to do so; or a true patriot can be programmed to assassinate a political leader or a potential presidential candidate. In all of these cases, the brainwashing techniques permanently damage a person's mind. It is terrible, alien to our way of life, but it is going on right now on behalf of those self-proclaimed philanthropists, the Four Rockefeller Brothers. I know of specific instances of every one of the programming situations I just gave you, but suffice it to mention only one: Sara Jane Moore who took a shot at President Ford in San Francisco on September 22, 1975. Unlike the incident 17 days earlier with "Squeaky" Fromme, the attempt by Mrs. Moore was real. Had President Ford gone across the street as planned to mingle with the crowd, he would have gone exactly where she stood patiently waiting with her gun, which she had picked out for purchase the previous day with a United States Treasury agent by her side. You may have been baffled by all the accounts of her attempts to get arrested ahead of time and her unsuccessful efforts to stop herself. But she truly could not help herself, because she was electronically brainwashed and programmed as an assassin by Rockefeller Intelligence agents. Only last night, October 14, 1975, still another odd occurrence happened to President Ford. He was involved in a traffic accident, so-called, as his motorcade drove through downtown Hartford, Connecticut. And for the third time in a row, an apparent brush with possible death by the President was caught beautifully by the TV news cameras which just happened to be riding in the motorcade this time, three cars behind the President. The limousine President Ford was riding in was supposedly the same one J.F.K. rode in when he was killed, but 90% rebuilt. Due to the accident last night, it will, of course, have to go into the Ford Motor Company shops for repair in Detroit. Will it return to service, outfitted once again as a murder car as it was that day of November 22, 1963, in Dallas? After all, the Rockefeller Brothers have a habit of using any trick that proves successful over and over again. Now I turn to Topic #2: On October 2, 1975, while cheery promises of economic recovery were emanating from Washington, the largest financial collapse in retailing history occurred. The huge W. T. Grant Department Stores chain with over 1000 stores in 40 states filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Act. Tempted by the booming years of the late 1960's and early 1970's, the chain had expanded at breakneck speed and was caught high and dry when our economy began to crumble two years ago. Suddenly, in the changed economic environment, Grant simply could not find enough buyers for its goods to cover its liabilities. Bankruptcy came with the chain owing over one-billion dollars, more than all of its assets put together. But companies are not the only things that can go bankrupt. On October 2, 1975, a major firm that rates government bonds suddenly and completely suspended all ratings on New York City bonds. It had become apparent that the City's finances were in bad, bad trouble. New York City, like W. T. Grant, was in over its head. Frantic maneuverings ensued in order to try to keep New York City afloat, including creation of the Municipal Assistance Corporation, or "Big Mac" as it is often called. With that, New York State was drawn into the City's tangle of financial woes, and now the State's bond ratings are on the way down too. Experts confirm what is all too obvious to everyone. It is now only a matter of time until New York State and City default on their crushing debts as they come due. The result will be legal and financial panic and confusion as creditors, city employees, welfare recipients, bondholders, and others are thrown into a battle to try to get their money. City services will be cut back, unemployment in New York will skyrocket due to layoffs, people who have put their life savings into so-called safe New York City bonds will be in danger of seeing it all go up in smoke. This is the exact situation that I warned disbelieving Wall Street bond traders about in a seminar in January of this year 1975. All of this is likely to happen within just a few weeks, just in time for Christmas, unless federal or quasi-federal authorities step into the picture with some sort of temporary bail-out scheme. But will this happen? One of the main contingent plans of the Rockefeller Brothers is to let New York go down the drain. They themselves bailed out months ago, so that they will not personally suffer if New York goes bankrupt. Therefore they are in a perfect position to use the State and City's financial collapse for three purposes: First--to trigger the general economic collapse for which they have worked so long; Second--to be able to label our coming crash "The Ford Depression", so that Nelson Rockefeller can then ride out on his white horse like F.D.R. did 42 years ago, proclaiming himself our savior; and Third--to convince the American people that the United States Congress has become a totally worthless institution so that the Congress can be abolished in the course of setting up their new Constitution and dictatorship. The plight of New York City and State after all is not unique, as you may think. The deteriorating financial condition of all of the government bodies, with local governments least able to fight back, is a deliberate and predictable product of the economic forces unleashed by the Rockefeller Brothers four years ago. The era of STAGFLATION and monetary instability entered its current phase in the spring of 1971 through Rockefeller manipulation of their multinational corporations. In my book "THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DOLLAR" published in 1973, I called it "Campaign May." I now quote, starting on page 32: "It happened on signal. It was May 1971. The affiliates of the multinationals, armed with dollars, opened their Spring offensive. They dropped bombs of dollars on Europe. The Europeans, as they had attempted in 1967/1968, tried again to rescue the American dollar. The multinationals sent waves and waves of dollars against the central bankers until these bankers were compelled to stop supporting the dollar by giving out high fixed-price currencies. The time had come to think of their own currencies and what they were doing to their own economies. The dollar began to 'float'. It had become free from a fixed-rate in relation to other European currencies. It had, in effect become devalued, 'softer'." Then came August 15, 1971--mark it well, my friends--the date when our current inflation really began. August 15, 1971, the Rockefellers, through their government lackeys, persuaded President Nixon to repudiate the 1944 Bretton Woods Monetary Agreement by suspending settlement of international transactions in GOLD, since the Rockefeller Brothers had already stolen almost all of America's gold by then. This action, severing the dollar from gold, set in motion an inflationary force greater than America had ever experienced in the 20th Century. Continuing on page 81 of my book, the predictable effect on governmental bodies such as New York City was pointed out as follows, and I quote: "The waves of Campaign May had reached the shores of America. The war against the dollar in Europe was coming home to Americans in the form of high prices and social unrest. The impact of the econostrategic and econopolitic measures of the New Imperialism of the Rockefeller Brothers will be felt for many years in the United States. The legislative bodies of the local, state, and federal government will be incapable of coping with the situation we call stagflation; that is, the problem previously referred to of high inflation combined with a lack of real growth in the economy." Still quoting: "After two official devaluations followed by 'unofficial' devaluations as a result of the floating dollar, the value of the dollar, in terms of goods and services bought is going down and down, buying less and less. Devaluation of the dollar is a presage of increased inflation. The burden of devaluation ultimately falls on the average working man, the pensioner, and those on fixed incomes. It erodes savings accounts, bonds, and other fixed income instruments. It also takes more dollars for local, state, and federal programs." Thus, thanks to the stagflation era, launched deliberately by the Rockefeller Brothers several years ago, mounting deficits by New York City were inevitable as they simply tried to maintain programs and services which had begun under a non-stagflation era economy. The same applies to the federal government itself, which is now running a record deficit half again as large as that experienced at the height of World War II. If the point is reached when New York cannot pay its massive obligations to creditors, then at least some of those creditors will in turn have trouble paying off their obligations and loans. This process can, therefore, ripple through our general economy; but in normal non-stagflation times, it would die out and be absorbed after some point. But the American economy is now dangerously top-heavy with debt, and much of it is owed, by the way, to the huge major banks, insurance companies and the Federal Reserve System--all controlled by the Rockefellers who, therefore, stand to pick up an awful lot of property through foreclosures. Recent figures indicate that corporations, taken all together, have twice as much debt as liquid assets. Worse yet, two years ago we passed the point at which the total debt of the United States--governmental, business, and personal--exceeded our total assets. In other words, our whole country is now like a great big W. T. Grant operating with a negative net worth. Should our nation's debt structure collapse badly in one spot, say New York City, the whole thing can start falling down progressively like a house of cards. There is no solid debt-free financial underpinning left to absorb this process and make it fizzle out. One way or another, therefore, it is only now a question of time whether the Government and/or the Federal Reserve will leap into our collapsing economic situation, and their so-called 'solution' for our problems will come down ultimately to printing more dollars. Inflation will then skyrocket even faster than now. Any remaining confidence in the dollar will be shattered, and all of this will come along just in time to send gold prices streaking upward under the conditions which David Rockefeller has labored so hard to finally achieve. I discussed this last month in connection with the IMF gold sale decision, and everything is still very much on track there. On the weekend of October 5, 1975, just 10 days ago, a secret meeting was held in New York City by delegates of the United States, Britain, Japan, France, and West Germany to lay the groundwork for a Western economic summit to be held later this year. David Rockefeller is trying to make sure that the January 1976 meeting of the IMF in Jamaica will reach a compromise agreement acceptable to France on the matter of exchange rates so that the conditional Gold Agreement reached last month will then take effect. My current information is, that to satisfy France, stable yet flexible exchange rates between currencies will be defined in terms of gold. Gold will be officially fixed at or about $195.00 an ounce for this purpose, this being the first of several successive stages within a period of 2-1/2 years from today, with gold ultimately targeted to reach $2,000.00 per ounce. So bankruptcy of New York City, if it comes, will serve the Rockefeller Brothers well in their scheme to bring America to submission economically. And after spending months telling President Ford, both directly and through advisors, not to help New York City, Nelson Rockefeller has suddenly hopped on the other side of the fence and now says, for public consumption, that federal authorities should help New York. But this is only lip service, my friends, for behind the scenes he is still making sure that ultimately nothing is done. Now when the ultimate collapse comes, it will be President Ford--not Nelson Rockefeller, the real culprit--who is blamed for not effecting a rescue. Along with Ford, Congress will also be the loser in all of this. On October 11, 1975, when Rockefeller went public with his statements in support of New York, he said in a speech which, please note, he did not bother to clear with his puppet Ford, and I quote: "After the Control Board in New York City have acted to restore fiscal integrity, it will be a true test of the responsiveness of our Congressional system as to whether the Congress can act in time to avoid catastrophe." This is the very same Nelson Rockefeller who, as Governor of New York State, increased New York State taxes by over 500% and its debt by over 300%, and drove numerous industries, including some of his own, out of the state by confiscatory taxation. But you can rest assured that Congress will now be watched very closely by the Rockefeller mass media to see what they do about all of this. Thus the Rockefellers are trying to make us think of New York City's fate as a criterion for the continued usefulness, or lack thereof, of Congress. And regardless of what Congress does, they intend to make sure that Congress does not pass the public opinion test. So, my friends, don't be too mystified by the strange things going on around us. Keep your eyes focused on causes, not effects, because what man makes, he can unmake. In the 1920's, the Rockefellers brought a very sophisticated German economist to America from Berlin to work out a plan to massage the Stock Market in order, so they said, to try to deflate inflation. But once they had his plan, they promptly twisted it and used it to bring about the Stock Market Crash of 1929. He resigned in disgust and went into a religious retreat, but later became a university professor. It was my privilege to have studied under this man, and we became good and close friends. It was he, my wise German professor, who taught me finance, banking, and economics and who confidentially taught me to forget all about the effects that economists had written about in their books, even including his; and to focus instead on causes and the way these effects can be brought about. He died with shame in his heart because of the cruel way in which the Rockefellers had warped and misused what he had taught them in good faith. His identity must remain a secret, but he left with me a heavy responsibility to use what he had taught me for good, and that is what I am trying to do now--for you and for him. THE CONTINUING BUILD-UP TO A NEW UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND WAR IN ASIA Topic #3--Perhaps you are wondering why I have chosen to talk today about preparations for our new American Constitution and maneuverings for a new Asian war all as one topic. The reason is that both are parts of the larger Rockefeller plan for world conquest and one Rockefeller-world-government, as outlined in Hoffman Nickerson's Rockefeller-authorized book "THE AMERICAN RICH" published in 1930. On previous occasions I have alluded to the fact that Japan, since World War II, has been substantially under the thumb of the four Rockefeller Brothers, and in particular of John D. Rockefeller III. It was John, as I explained in AUDIO LETTER No. 3, who helped pave the way for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor through his spy ring activities under the cloak of the "Institute of Pacific Relations." If you had any doubts about what I have told you of the Rockefeller control over Japan, I hope you paid close attention to the recent visit by Emperor Hirohito to our country. From start to finish with scarcely a break, he was in Rockefeller company on Rockefeller turf, from the Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia tourist attraction owned by the Rockefellers, to Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller's Japanese-style house at Pocantico Hills. Our figurehead President Ford and other officials hardly even counted! Nelson's brother John, who is heading the publicity campaign for their own new Constitution under the banner of a Second American Revolution, is still up to his old tricks in the Pacific too. On September 15, 1975, a significant article appeared in the Vancouver Province newspaper describing a hush-hush meeting that was not even reported in the United States. The article was entitled, quote: "ROCKEFELLER'S BRAINTRUST MEETING ENDS" and reads in part as follows, and I quote: "An informal conference of some of the Pacific Rim's most influential political and economic thinkers convened by financier John D. Rockefeller III ended here Saturday; and only then was the list of participants released. The 43 guests invited to the 'Williamsburg Five Conference' from southeast Asia, Australia, and North America met for four days in off-the-record sessions representing only themselves, not their organizations." Still quoting: "Participants included George Ball, former United States Undersecretary of State; Derek Davies, editor of the authoritative Far Eastern Economic Review; Newsweek editor Osborn Elliott; Exxon chairman C. C. Garvin; United States Senate Minority Leader Hugh Scott; Mitsubishi Research Director Morihisa Emori; and Khoman Thanat, former Thai Foreign Minister. Other guests included top-level experts from Asian and United States companies, publications, banks, universities, various ministries, and presidential circles." In a news conference after the meeting, Robert Barnett, director of the Washington center of the Asian Society, was asked what effect the discussions would have on the foreign policy of various countries, and he answered, quote: "I would say the probability of direct influences, very small; and the probability of indirect influence is very considerable." It is mentioned that the conferences began in Williamsburg, Virginia five years ago to discuss, quote, "the then-new breakthrough in United States-Chinese relations." The Rockefeller Brothers are maneuvering rapidly to bring on the Asian war, which they plan to ignite in March 1977 as their target date. Their goal is to take over India, the former crown jewel of the British Empire, which is rich in iron ore, precious metals, and various other natural resources as well as cheap labor. Already 1000 or so inhabitants of a small island in the Indian Ocean, Diego Garcia, are being involuntarily relocated elsewhere to make room for the rapid build-up of a U.S. Naval Base in preparation for the coming war in that area. Henry Kissinger's new controversial Sinai Accord, involving 200 so-called civilian technicians to be placed in no-man's land between Israel and Egypt, is also a part of the global preparations for Asian war by the Rockefellers. The primary focus right now is not the Middle East itself, but Asia. Israel is, in effect, to become our advanced base for American military operations when we are drawn into the Asian conflict on the side of Russia and India and against the Sino-Japanese Axis which, through Japan, will also be under Rockefeller influence. Huge amounts of arms are being pumped into Israel, with much smaller token amounts promised to Egypt. Israel is being used, while the Arabs are being placated for now to keep the region's oil supplies secure for the planned war. Those so-called civilian technicians will be civilian in name only. They are actually the advance command nuclei of the American military build-up in the Sinai that is already going on in secret. The whole purpose of this is not fundamentally to protect the Israelis and Egyptians from one another, but to keep open the American supply line to the East for war in India. Should India fall through subversion before 1977, the war now brewing will no longer be necessary. In that event, the Rockefeller plans will revert to those described in my AUDIO BOOK No. 1 released a year ago: WORLD WAR III, with America the primary nuclear battlefield, beginning just a little later than the war now planned. For that purpose, the Rockefeller Brothers have as their ace in the hole the Panama Canal. It is already targeted by atomic missiles in the Republic of Guyana in Latin America; and while negotiations proceed to return partial sovereignty over the Canal Zone to Panama, the United States is negotiating to retain the right to defend the Canal indefinitely in case of attack. The Panama Canal will thus be the new Pearl Harbor, and we are to be dragged into nuclear war in its defense under that contingent war plan of the Rockefeller Brothers. Meanwhile here at home the Rockefellers are already making war--propaganda war, economic war, and political war--on us, the peasants as they call us. As I explained in my AUDIO BOOK, "THE SECRET NEW CONSTITUTION FOR AMERICA", the Rockefellers have several contingency plans through which their new Constitution may potentially be put into effect, and they are keeping all of them alive. The primary plan is still for us to accept it by the national referendum in the midst of economic chaos a year from now; but earlier this year, for example, House Concurrent Resolution No. 28 was introduced calling for a Constitutional Convention to be called and complete its work before July 4, 1976! Under this resolution, one of the co-chairmen would be the Senate president pro tem--that is, Nelson Rockefeller. Meanwhile the piecemeal dismantling of our Constitutional Rights is continuing. One of the more notorious examples lately has been Senate Bill No. 1 sponsored by a whole flock of Senate stars when it was introduced, ranging from Senator John McClellan, who ought to have known better, all the way down to Nelson Rockefeller's waterboy, Birch Bayh. Senate Bill No. 1 is a two-inch-thick complete revision of the Federal Criminal Code with some hair-raising provisions carefully buried all through it. One of these would amount to an official secrets act, imposing criminal penalties on anyone who might dare to publicly expose errors or misdeeds by government officials. Another provision which ties in with the increasingly shrill cries for gun control to disarm us prior to our enslavement, would effectively remove your right to defend yourself in your own home! But these are only proposals so far. Other things are taking effect now. For example: another portent of Rockefeller's proposed Electoral Branch of government is present in the Justice Department which is usurping local authority over the conduct of elections all over America through tools provided by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. For a sobering account about this, I refer you to the front page of the September 29, 1975 issue of the Daily News Digest, P.O. Box 27496, Phoenix, Arizona 85061. And speaking of the Justice Department, Attorney General Edward Levi recently took the unprecedented step of placing the FBI under his direct, immediate control. There exists no more dangerous Rockefeller agent in our entire government than Levi! All of these things are very clearly spelled out in the secret new Rockefeller Constitution; but they are only the beginning, my friends. The 10-year multimillion-dollar study that produced their horrendous new document was funded by the Rockefeller Brothers through their controlled Foundations, and no clearer statement of the evil philosophy that motivates the new Constitution is possible than the one given by McGeorge Bundy, the Rockefeller insider who is president of their controlled Ford Foundation. He has been quoted as saying: "It is better for man to build his own heaven on earth than to seek heaven in Heaven through blood on a cross." This, my friends, is the true philosophy of the Four Rockefeller Brothers. They strive for their brand of a heaven on earth for themselves, even if that means hell on earth for all the rest of us. Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may God bless each and every one of you. Source